Cannabis News

Woody Harrelson vs. the Church of Covid

Published

2 years ago

March 7, 2023

admin

Woody Harrelson Chuch of COVID

Woody Harrelson, famed actor and seasoned stoner unleashed living hell on Saturday Night Live with his opening Monologue which by now you may have heard about due to the “media machine” pumping out counter opinion to what he said.

But, if you have been living under a rock and want me to tell you what it’s all about – let me give you the skinny as they say.

Firstly, before the part that has everyone’s panties in a knot, he went on a long monologue talking about his cannabis use, his political affiliations and to be honest – he looked very stoned throughout the process.

As the monologue came to a close however, he talks about this “fictional script” that he received in 2019. The preamble to the punch line however, sets up the scene where he’s high, reading the script in central park when all of a sudden he says;

“So the movie goes like this… The biggest drug cartels in the world get together and buy up all the media and all the politicians and force all the people in the world to stay locked in their homes,” he said. “And people can only come out if they take the cartel’s drugs and keep taking them over and over.”

He ends off by saying, “I threw the script away, who was ever going to believe that stuff anyway!”

And just like that, he “Red Pilled” a bunch of folks on the “left” and the rage machine began churning hit pieces against the actor. Of course, by me simply using the term “red pill”, I’m not automatically associated with the “right” of which anyone who has read my work would know is not true.

In fact, in the world of “right and left” – I’m definitely up!

Headlines like, “Harreslon echoes “conspiracy theories” and other titles rang similar tones of disapproval. Here’s a screenshot of the “pharma bought” propaganda machine in response to the actor’s joke.

As you can see here, every single article on the Google top search results for the term “Woody Harrelson SNL monologue 2023” comes up with this. And that is to be expected.

You see, it’s a fascinating subject matter to analyze the whole “Church of Covid” narrative because what happened to dear old Woody is simply a reaction from an entity that lives within the mass consciousness of millions of people around the world.

Let’s take a moment and re-examine who we were pre-covid and the world as we knew it. Perhaps, by examining the sociopolitical climate of 2019 can we understand how we ended up in such a bizarre timeline where Bond-like villains meet in secret castles deciding the fates of millions.

Who we were in 2019?

I don’t know if you remember, but I do. Right before the world got “locked down” for a few years and held hostage at the idea of “mass death” while being forced to accept a singular truth or be shunned from the whole of humanity.

The world was a divided place. There were riots in China that seemed to scare the government. Trump’s presence in the world of politics wobbled the norm enough to send people into a tribal frenzy. Lines were being drawn, sides were getting picked.

Ideas were being challenged.

The MAGA cult was getting behind their man “The Donald”, who for some obscure reason became the champion of a totally forgotten part of the US fabric. Easily dismissed, but in fact – a very diverse crowd of people.

Perhaps “The Donald’s” antihero shittalking memed lifestyle was all the people needed to say “fuck it…I’m IN!”

I was like, “Wait a minute…THAT guy?”

But by that time the hats consumed them, they became a part of the whole.

On the other side, it seemed like the Democrats peaked on Obama. Who objectively was an amazing smooth talker – but also did horrific shit and advanced terrible plans. And those politicians that followed were simply the scummiest, most abysmal options available.

You’d think, “There’s no way the intellectual left would pick these idiotic…”

Only to hear them complain about people not calling them the names they prefer to be called. As if that’s an “actual problem”.

Identity is certainly a personal thing. However, anyone who needs the affirmation of others to assume their identity is an imposter within their own mind. You either are, or you are not. There is no maybe.

Nonetheless, the fractal nature of “identity” means that there are endless “smart-sounding bullshit” to consume that seem important enough to waste your life away, feeling like you’re “actually doing something” when in reality you’re doing nothing of major significance.

And this was the stage of the world prior to the pandemic. And then, a few months after 2020 kicked off…the world’s largest drug cartels shut down the world, locked people up and forced them to take a drug or ELSE…

What happened then was a deepening of personal narratives. Those on the “left” and those on the “right” dug deeper trenches, demonized the other even harder and decided that their opinions are the only ones that are valid.

The first casualty was that of truth, as opposing views were being censored for the “greater good”, while actual data was being obscured by the people that were “allegedly” our saviors (aka Big Pharma).

And this is the chord that Harrelson struck…and as a reaction, the Church of Covid rose up.

Why do you call it “Church of Covid?”

While those who are avid defendants of the vaccine mandates and believe that the government nor pfizer had any wrongdoing throughout the entire pandemic claim to be “based in science” – they acted very “unscientific” by silencing any voice that didn’t fit the mainstream narrative.

For example, the whole notion of “Natural Immunity” meant that you were “anti-vax” when you simply were hesitant about a drug that was rushed to market without proper longevity testing or even control groups.

You were shunned, called a plague rat, deplatformed, ridiculed, by the mainstream and their supporters. Your person was attacked, you were called vile…you were out to kill Grandma!

All of these narratives are very extreme in nature. And to question anything of the narrative meant heresy.

And this is why I believe it’s a “Church of Covid” and not a rational, scientific debate around a pandemic.

“Dogma” is defined as “Any belief held unquestioningly and with undefended certainty.” It’s a set of “principles” that are laid out and that if you were to challenge them, you’d be met with virtually the same intensity as if you were to question the birth of Jesus.

Don’t believe me? Check out the responses to Harrelson’s monologue on one of the most “left leaning” billionaire owned publications “The Washington times”.

Here’s a comment from “Knitgirl”

Yeah- I will take medical advice from pot head Woody Harrelson. Just like I took it from Trump and the My Pillow guy. And just in case anyone thinks I am serious- guess again

And one from “B-H Carter”

They aren’t “conventional thoughts”, they are facts. And, no, harmful nonsense should not be given a platform. The vaccines are safe. Period.

Another comment from MacBeadWeaver

My mother died of COVID. An old friend’s 44 year old daughter also died of COVID. A few weeks ago SNL allowed antisemitic tropes from Dave Chapelle and now this from Woody H. I’m really done with SNL helping fascism take over America.

And let’s be fair…many people did lose loved ones to the Covid Pandemic, however, even within these statements of sentiment, we can see how the scientific bias is present.

For example, in the first comment from KnitGirl, we can see that she immediately equated Harrelson with a “Trump” supporter, this despite the fact that he claims to be neither left nor right but purple. I’m sure Harrelson did NOT vote for Trump and probably doesn’t follow his political ideas at all – yet due to the fact that he spoke against the “Holy Covid Doctrine”, he now must be “othered” by the Church and protested.

Just like the Christian Church did when Marilyn Manson plays a rock concert near their place of residence.

And yes, you shouldn’t take medical advice from an actor…it’s the dumbest thing to do…which is why his comments should not be taken seriously. Because if you “don’t take medical advice” yet find offense posture on things – then it simply means that you DO take his words seriously, perhaps not for the same reasons as you might claim – yet serious enough to warrant a comment on an article.

Or let’s take the comment from B-H Carter,

“The vaccines are safe. Period”

The most scientific statement of the century. A statement that closes off all scientific inquiry. It’s almost like “God Exists – Period!”

Except, VAERS have reported more than 50,000 vaccine related injuries in 2021, and to find any accurate data on any of these things is nearly impossible. For every report, there are 10 “Counter reports” floating about – and most of these counter reports are funded by…you guessed it – your pals at Pfizer.

Furthermore, no vaccine is “safe”. There’s always inherent risks and this is why vaccines are supposed to be taken on a “case by case” basis.

However, if you said this in 2020 and 2021, you would have been violently attacked for these ideas. However, in 2023, Natural Immunity is science once more, the Lab Leak is definitely plausible, and people do have strange reactions to the vaccine…such as women’s menstrual cycles being affected.

Yet once again, “CONSPIRACY” if you would have said that a few years ago. Hell, it’s still true today.

The final comment is probably the one that is most difficult. People lost loved ones. They believe that “the vax saved them”, and there might be some truth in this, but we won’t know for sure. This is because any idea of a control group was shunned….everybody gets it or else!

However, the final comment is what makes the strongest case – “If you believe like X, you’re a racist, fascist…but hey, ignore the literal Nazis in the Ukrainian army…they fight for freedom!”

Yes, I also went there.

And this is why this is a religion and not reason. It’s scientism and not science. And the mere fact that Harrelson received a onslaught of negative articles only strengthens the point.

What Harrelson said isn’t “wrong”.

Let’s look at the facts…

Pfizer is literally a drug cartel as “Cartel” is defined as “A combination of business firms to control world markets and fix prices.”

Pfizer has a long history of human rights violation and criminal business practices. You can read their transgressions here.

Just to put into context the type of business Pfizer is, here’s a quote from one of their transgressions:

Pfizer apparently engaged in questionable practices abroad as well. In 2000 the Washington Post published a major exposé accusing Pfizer of testing a dangerous new antibiotic called Trovan on children in Nigeria without receiving proper consent from their parents. The experiment occurred during a 1996 meningitis epidemic in the country. In 2001 Pfizer was sued in U.S. federal court by thirty Nigerian families, who accused the company of using their children as human guinea pigs.

In 2006 a panel of Nigerian medical experts concluded that Pfizer had violated international law. In 2009 the company agreed to pay $75 million to settle some of the lawsuits that had been brought in Nigerian courts.The U.S. case was settled in 2011 for an undisclosed amount.

Classified U.S. State Department cables made public in 2010 by Wikileaks indicated that Pfizer had hired investigators to dig up dirt on Nigeria’s former attorney general as a way to get leverage in one of the remaining cases. Pfizer had to apologize over the revelation in the cables that it had falsely claimed that the group Doctors Without Borders was also dispensing Trovan during the Nigerian meningitis epidemic. – SOURCE

They also settled one of the largest fraudulent advertisement cases in 2009 totalling $2.3 billion. “In 2009 the company had to pay a record $2.3 billion to settle federal charges that one of its subsidiaries had illegally marketed a painkiller called Bextra.”

Pharma funds roughly half of the FDA budget, but also portion of the CDC.

Pharma pays significant money to media agencies

Pharma pays significant in political lobbying. In fact, they spent $11, 000,000 in lobbying expenses in 2019, and even more the following years.

They wanted to seal the data on the Covid Vaccines for 75-years

So, a major drug cartel, who pays politicians, the media and funds organizations meant to regulate them – have no conflict of interest?

You cannot question their business practices? You cannot question the efficacy of their medicine? They are protected from public scrutiny and if anyone questions it…they are immediately ostracized.

If this doesn’t sound like a religious movement to the degree of catholics defending priests who molest little children – then I don’t know what is.

Stay Purple…

The reason I decided to write this article is because like Harrelson…I’m neither left nor right. I don’t subscribe to political ideology and have very little trust in the institutions that are meant to regulate us – especially how they behaved during the pandemic.

As a stoner…I’ve been writing on Pharma’s wicked ways for a long time. I know how they influenced politics to keep drugs like cannabis and psychedelics off the market – since it would destroy their profit margins.

I, for one, applaud Harrelson for his ballsy move…I think the world is ready to start asking the tough questions, and those that defend the Pharma camp might come under scrutiny one of these days.

People are rightfully angry…from where I’m sitting, Pharma had a major role to play in the proliferation of the fear of covid and it is my hope that one of these days…we take on that beast. Because, like the parasite it is – it must keep us sick in order for it to survive.

So perhaps it took one stoner to say some crazy stuff on TV to shift the conversation back to a place where disagreeing with the official consensus doesn’t end up with you locked in a tower until the day you die…

MORE ON WOODY AND WEED, READ ON…

WOODY HARRELSON WENT FOR A DISPENSARY IN HAWAII EARLY ON!

Source link

Cannabis News

The Grinch Stole SAFE Banking from the Cannabis Industry This Christmas, Yet Again!

Published

8 hours ago

December 22, 2024

admin

no safe banking in 2024

The landscape of cannabis legislation in the United States has been a complex and evolving issue, particularly concerning banking regulations. As of December 2024, it has become official: the current Congress will not provide any protections for banks that serve state-legal marijuana businesses. This decision has significant implications for the cannabis industry, which continues to grow rapidly despite the lack of federal support. In this article, we will explore the reasons behind this decision, the implications for cannabis businesses, and the broader context of cannabis legalization in America.

The State of Cannabis Legalization

A Growing Industry

The cannabis industry has seen remarkable growth over the past decade. As of late 2024, 23 states and Washington D.C. have legalized recreational marijuana use, while 38 states allow medical marijuana. According to recent estimates, the legal cannabis market in the U.S. is projected to reach over $40 billion by 2025. This growth has been fueled by changing public perceptions of marijuana, increased advocacy for legalization, and significant tax revenues generated by state-legal cannabis sales.

The Banking Dilemma

Despite this rapid expansion, cannabis businesses face unique challenges, primarily due to their inability to access traditional banking services. Federal law classifies marijuana as a Schedule I controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act. This classification creates a significant barrier for banks and financial institutions that wish to work with cannabis businesses, as they risk federal penalties for facilitating transactions related to an illegal substance.

As a result, many cannabis companies operate on a cash-only basis. This situation not only poses safety risks—such as increased theft and violence—but also limits these businesses’ ability to manage finances effectively, pay taxes electronically, and build credit histories.

Legislative Attempts at Reform

One of the most prominent legislative efforts aimed at addressing these banking issues is the Secure and Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act. First introduced in 2019, the SAFE Banking Act sought to provide protections for banks that serve legal cannabis businesses by preventing federal regulators from penalizing them for doing so.

The act garnered significant bipartisan support in both the House and Senate. In previous sessions of Congress, it passed multiple times in the House but faced hurdles in the Senate due to opposition from certain lawmakers who were concerned about broader implications of marijuana legalization.

In light of ongoing discussions about federal spending and budgetary priorities, advocates had hoped that some version of the SAFE Banking Act would be included in recent spending bills. However, during negotiations leading up to December 2024, a House committee led by Republicans removed any provisions related to marijuana banking protections from key spending legislation.

This decision reflects a broader trend within Congress where discussions around cannabis reform have become increasingly contentious. While there is still bipartisan support for certain aspects of cannabis legislation—particularly when it comes to medical use—more comprehensive reforms like banking protections have struggled to gain traction.

Implications for Cannabis Businesses

Continued Cash-Only Operations

The removal of banking protections means that many cannabis businesses will continue to operate primarily on a cash basis. This situation presents several challenges:

Safety Risks: Cash-only operations make cannabis dispensaries and cultivation facilities prime targets for theft and robber Employees often have to handle large amounts of cash daily, increasing their risk of violence.

Operational Inefficiencies: Without access to banking services, businesses cannot easily manage payroll or pay bills electronically. This inefficiency can lead to operational delays and increased costs.

Impact on Public Safety

Advocates argue that providing banking access would enhance public safety by reducing the amount of cash circulating within the community. By allowing cannabis businesses to deposit their earnings into banks, it would minimize the risks associated with cash transactions, making both employees and customers safer.

Moreover, having a transparent financial system would help law enforcement track illicit activities more effectively. Currently, without proper banking oversight, there are concerns that some cash-only operations may be involved in money laundering or other illegal activities.

Politics and Public Opinion

Changing Attitudes Toward Cannabis

Public opinion on marijuana legalization has shifted dramatically over recent years. According to various polls, a significant majority of Americans now support legalizing marijuana for both medical and recreational use. This shift has put pressure on lawmakers to address outdated federal policies regarding cannabis.

Despite this growing acceptance among the public, political divisions remain strong within Congress regarding how best to approach cannabis reform. Some lawmakers advocate for full legalization at the federal level, while others prefer a more cautious approach that prioritizes regulation over outright legalization.

The Role of Advocacy Groups

Advocacy groups play a crucial role in pushing for legislative change regarding cannabis banking protections. Organizations such as the National Cannabis Industry Association (NCIA) and Americans for Safe Access (ASA) have been vocal proponents of reforming banking laws to support state-legal cannabis businesses.

These groups have mobilized public support through campaigns highlighting the safety risks associated with cash-only operations and advocating for policies that promote financial inclusion for cannabis entrepreneurs.

Future Prospects for Cannabis Banking Reform

While current congressional efforts have stalled regarding marijuana banking protections, there are still potential avenues for reform:

Incremental Reforms: Rather than pursuing comprehensive federal legislation like the SAFE Banking Act all at once, lawmakers may consider incremental reforms that address specific issues related to banking access without fully legalizing marijuana at the federal level.

The Role of Public Awareness

As public awareness about the challenges faced by cannabis businesses grows, there may be increased pressure on lawmakers to act decisively on this issue. Continued advocacy efforts can help ensure that banking reform remains a priority on Congress’s agenda.

Conclusion

The decision by Congress not to include marijuana banking protections in its current spending bill underscores ongoing tensions surrounding cannabis legislation in America. While public opinion increasingly favors legalization and reform, political divisions continue to hinder progress on critical issues such as banking access for state-legal marijuana businesses.

As the industry continues to grow despite these challenges, stakeholders must remain vigilant in advocating for change while exploring alternative solutions at both state and federal levels. The future of cannabis banking reform remains uncertain; however, with continued advocacy and public support, there is hope that meaningful progress can be made in addressing these pressing issues facing one of America’s fastest-growing industries.

SAFE BANKING SINCE 2018, WHAT A FAILURE, READ ON…

SAFER BANKING ACT FAILS AGAINS, SAME OF BANANA IN THE TAILPIPE!

Source link

Cannabis News

HHC vs. Delta 9: Differences & Similarities

Published

2 days ago

December 20, 2024

admin

Cannabis has so many compounds, and two that have been making the rounds lately are HHC and Delta 9 THC. They’re not the same thing, even though they’re both cannabinoids that interact with the body’s endocannabinoid system. Some people want a mild, steady experience, while others might be looking for something more intense. Understanding these two can help you figure out what’s right for you.

What Is HHC?

HHC, short for hexahydrocannabinol, is a hydrogenated version of THC. It’s not something you’d find naturally in large amounts in cannabis plants. Instead, it’s made through a process that adds hydrogen molecules to THC. The result? A more stable compound that’s less prone to breaking down when exposed to heat or UV light.

How HHC Is Made

Think of it like a science experiment. HHC is usually created in a lab by taking Delta 9 or Delta 8 THC and using hydrogenation—basically, combining it with hydrogen under pressure and in the presence of a catalyst. This process changes its structure while keeping its effects somewhat similar to THC.

Common Uses and Effects of HHC

People who use HHC say it’s somewhere between Delta 8 and Delta 9 in terms of effects. It’s often described as relaxing but without being overly sedative. You might feel a light buzz, reduced stress, or mild euphoria. Some even claim it helps with discomfort or improving sleep, but solid research is still catching up. Since it’s less potent than Delta 9, it’s often favored by those who want a manageable experience without the strong psychoactive punch.

If you’re interested in trying HHC and Delta 9 for yourself, check out their wide range of products at trycandycloud.com. They’ve got everything from gummies to disposable vapes, all crafted for a smooth experience.

What Is Delta 9 THC?

Delta 9 THC is the main psychoactive compound in cannabis. It’s the reason you feel “high” when you use weed. Chemically speaking, Delta 9 has a double bond in its ninth carbon chain, which plays a big role in how it interacts with your brain.

Natural Occurrence in Cannabis

This one is straightforward: Delta 9 is found in high concentrations in marijuana plants. It’s what most people think of when they hear “THC.” Unlike HHC, there’s no need for a lab process—it’s already there. Hemp plants, however, contain much lower levels of Delta 9 THC, which is why it’s primarily extracted from marijuana.

Common Uses and Effects of Delta 9 THC

The effects of Delta 9 are well-documented. Depending on the dose, you might feel euphoria, increased appetite, or deep relaxation. For medical users, it’s often used to manage chronic pain, nausea, and other conditions. It’s also been studied for its potential benefits in anxiety relief, though higher doses might have the opposite effect, causing paranoia. Delta 9 THC is versatile, but it’s not without its risks, particularly for new users or those sensitive to its psychoactive effects.

Key Differences Between HHC and Delta 9 THC

Chemical Structure and Composition

The main difference is in their structure. Delta 9 THC has that iconic double bond, while HHC’s hydrogenation makes it more stable. This difference might not mean much to the average person, but it’s why HHC is less likely to degrade over time.

Potency Levels

Delta 9 THC is generally more potent. HHC might require a higher dose to get a comparable effect, but some people prefer its lighter touch. Potency differences can also depend on the method of consumption, with edibles typically providing a stronger, longer-lasting effect compared to vaping or smoking.

Duration of Effects

Both last a few hours, but some users report that HHC’s effects fade more gradually. Delta 9, on the other hand, can have a sharper comedown. HHC’s gradual fade makes it appealing for those who want a smooth end to their experience.

Benefits and Drawbacks of HHC and Delta 9 THC

HHC: Pros and Cons

Pros:

More stable, so it lasts longer on the shelf.
Effects are milder, making it less overwhelming for beginners.
Can be a functional option for daytime use.

Cons:

Limited research, so we don’t know its full impact yet.
Availability can be hit or miss depending on where you live.
Legal gray area in many regions.

Delta 9 THC: Pros and Cons

Pros:

Well-studied with established medical uses.
Widely available in areas where cannabis is legal.
Stronger effects make it ideal for experienced users or those with high tolerance.

Cons:

Higher chance of side effects like anxiety.
More likely to show up on drug tests.
Shorter shelf life compared to HHC.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q. Is HHC safer than Delta 9 THC?

Not enough research exists to say definitively, but HHC’s milder effects might make it feel safer to some users.

Q. Will HHC or Delta 9 THC show up on a drug test?

Yes, both can potentially show up on a drug test, so use with caution if that’s a concern.

Q. Which one is better for recreational use?

That depends on your preferences. HHC is great for a mellow time, while Delta 9 is better if you’re looking for something more intense.

HHC vs. Delta 9: Choosing the Right One for You

The choice comes down to what you’re after. If you want a milder, more laid-back experience, HHC might be a good option. On the other hand, if you’re looking for something stronger or need it for medical reasons, Delta 9 is the way to go. It also depends on what’s legal and available where you are. And always consider your tolerance levels and experience before diving in. If you’re unsure, consult with a knowledgeable dispensary staff.

Resources:

Source link

Cannabis News

What Federally Illegal Drug Has Created Almost $10 Billion in Sales Tax Revenue for States in the Last 40 Months?

Published

2 days ago

December 20, 2024

admin

sales tax revenue with marijuana

In a significant development for the burgeoning cannabis industry, the U.S. Census Bureau has reported that states across the nation have collectively amassed over **$9.7 billion** in tax revenue from marijuana sales since mid-2021. This figure underscores the economic impact of legalized cannabis and highlights the growing acceptance of marijuana as both a recreational and medicinal substance in various states. As more states move toward legalization, the financial implications both positive and negative are becoming increasingly evident.

The Landscape of Cannabis Legalization

The journey toward cannabis legalization in the United States has been long and complex. Initially criminalized in the early 20th century, cannabis began to regain acceptance in the late 20th century, particularly for medical use. The first state to legalize medical marijuana was California in 1996, setting a precedent that many states would follow.

By 2012, Colorado and Washington became the first states to legalize recreational cannabis, paving the way for a wave of legalization efforts across the country. As of now, more than 20 states have legalized recreational marijuana, while over 30 states allow medical use. This shift reflects changing public attitudes toward cannabis and recognition of its potential benefits.

Economic Implications of Legalization

The legalization of cannabis has not only transformed social norms but has also created a substantial economic impact. States that have embraced legalization have seen significant increases in tax revenue, job creation, and investment opportunities.

According to the latest Census Bureau report, states like California, Colorado, Illinois, and Michigan have emerged as leaders in cannabis tax revenue generation. These states have implemented various tax structures on marijuana sales, including excise taxes, sales taxes, and local taxes. The revenue generated is often earmarked for essential public services such as education, healthcare, infrastructure improvements, and drug rehabilitation programs.

Breakdown of Tax Revenue by State

As the largest legal cannabis market in the United States, California has been at the forefront of marijuana tax revenue generation. Since mid-2021, California has contributed approximately $2.5 billion to state coffers from cannabis taxes. This revenue is derived from both recreational and medical marijuana sales.

California’s tax structure includes a 15% excise tax on retail sales, along with local taxes that can vary significantly by city and county. The state has allocated a portion of these funds to various programs aimed at addressing issues related to drug abuse and public health.

Colorado was one of the pioneers in cannabis legalization and continues to serve as a model for other states. Since mid-2021, Colorado has generated around $1.8 billion in tax revenue from marijuana sales. The state imposes a 15% excise tax on wholesale marijuana transactions and a 2.9% sales tax on retail sales.

The revenue generated from cannabis taxes has been instrumental in funding education initiatives through the Public School Fund, as well as supporting mental health programs and substance abuse treatment services.

Illinois has seen remarkable growth in its cannabis market since legalizing recreational use in January 2020. In just two years, Illinois has collected approximately $1 billion in tax revenue from marijuana sales. The state imposes a tiered excise tax based on the potency of the product, ranging from 10% to 25%.

The funds collected are allocated to various initiatives, including community reinvestment programs aimed at addressing social equity issues related to past drug enforcement practices.

Michigan’s cannabis market has also flourished since legalization. Since mid-2021, Michigan has generated about $700 million in tax revenue from marijuana sales. The state’s tax structure includes a 10% excise tax on recreational marijuana and a 6% sales tax.

The revenue is utilized for various purposes, including education funding and support for local governments impacted by legalization.

Broader Economic Impact

The legalization of cannabis has led to significant job creation across various sectors. According to industry reports, the legal cannabis market supports hundreds of thousands of jobs nationwide—from cultivation and processing to retail and distribution. As more states legalize marijuana, this trend is expected to continue.

With the growth of the legal cannabis industry comes increased investment opportunities. Entrepreneurs are entering the market at an unprecedented rate, leading to innovations in product development, marketing strategies, and distribution channels. This influx of investment not only benefits individual businesses but also stimulates local economies.

Social Equity Considerations

While the financial benefits of cannabis legalization are clear, it is essential to address social equity issues that arise alongside this new industry. Many states have recognized that communities disproportionately affected by past drug enforcement policies should benefit from legalization efforts.

States like Illinois have implemented community reinvestment programs that allocate a portion of cannabis tax revenues to support communities impacted by previous drug laws. These funds can be used for education initiatives, job training programs, and mental health services—aiming to rectify historical injustices associated with cannabis prohibition.

In addition to financial support for communities affected by past policies, some states are also working to create equitable licensing opportunities for individuals from those communities. By prioritizing applications from minority-owned businesses or those directly impacted by previous drug laws, states can foster a more inclusive cannabis industry.

Challenges Ahead

Despite the significant progress made through legalization efforts, challenges remain on both state and federal levels.

Federal Legalization Uncertainty

One major hurdle is the ongoing conflict between state and federal laws regarding cannabis. While many states have legalized marijuana for recreational or medical use, it remains classified as a Schedule I substance under federal law. This discrepancy creates complications for businesses operating legally at the state level but facing potential federal prosecution.

Efforts toward federal legalization or decriminalization have gained traction recently; however, progress remains slow due to political divisions and differing opinions on drug policy reform.

Regulatory Hurdles

As more states enter the legal cannabis market, regulatory frameworks must evolve to ensure consumer safety while promoting fair competition among businesses. States face challenges related to product testing standards, labeling requirements, advertising restrictions, and taxation policies that can impact market dynamics.

Conclusion

The U.S. Census Bureau reports that states have collected over $9.7 billion in marijuana tax revenue since mid-2021, highlighting the significant economic impact of cannabis legalization. As public acceptance grows, more states are likely to pursue legalization. Despite ongoing challenges, including federal regulations and social equity issues, legalized cannabis is poised to remain a vital part of state economies. Collaboration among government officials, business leaders, and community advocates will be essential for fostering an equitable and sustainable cannabis industry. This evolving landscape not only presents economic growth opportunities but also addresses historical injustices tied to drug policy enforcement, shaping the future of cannabis legislation in the U.S.