Connect with us

Cannabis News

50% of All Cannabis Users Have ADHD?

Published

on


half of marijuana users have ADHD

Do Half of All Marijuana Users Have ADHD? Unpacking the Claims and Community Response

 

The prevalence of Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) stands as a focal point of contemporary discussions. These conditions, characterized by symptoms such as inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity, continue to garner significant interest from both medical professionals and the general public. To set the stage for our exploration, let’s start by considering the current statistics of ADD/ADHD diagnoses. How widespread are these conditions, and what percentage of the population is navigating the challenges they present?

 

Parallel to this, the world of cannabis consumption is undergoing its own evolution. The question of how many people regularly use marijuana in the United States is not just a matter of cultural interest but also of public health and policy. Recent data sheds light on the shifting landscape of cannabis use, revealing trends that intersect with various aspects of society, including mental health.

 

Into this intersection of mental health and cannabis use enters a provocative claim from AdditudeMag.com, a platform dedicated to ADD/ADHD awareness and support. The website posits that half of all cannabis users have ADD or ADHD, a statement that, if true, would have profound implications for understanding the relationship between these disorders and marijuana use. In this article, we delve into this claim, examining its factual basis and the responses it has elicited from the cannabis community, particularly through a vibrant Reddit discussion. Our journey will navigate the intricacies of this assertion, seeking clarity amidst a sea of anecdotes and data.

 

 

In the intricate web of health, psychology, and substance use, certain claims stand out for their boldness and potential implications. One such claim, coming from the digital corridors of AdditudeMag, asserts that a staggering 50% of cannabis users are grappling with ADD or ADHD. This assertion, if proven true, could significantly alter our understanding of the relationship between cannabis consumption and these prevalent neurological disorders.

 

To unravel this claim, let’s dissect the underpinnings of AdditudeMag’s argument. The website, known for its focus on ADD and ADHD, brings forth a set of supporting clauses that merit closer inspection. However, a critical eye must be cast on the nature of these clauses – are they based on comprehensive research, or do they stem from a place of internal bias, skewed towards a particular narrative?

 

Delving into the content, it becomes apparent that AdditudeMag has a tendency to cherry-pick topics that reinforce a certain viewpoint. The studies they reference, and the manner in which they interpret these studies, raise questions about the scientific robustness of their claims. For instance, one might argue that the website leans heavily on anecdotal evidence or selects research findings that specifically align with their perspective, potentially overlooking a broader scientific consensus or contradictory data.

 

To validate or debunk their assertions, we must turn to the quoted material directly from their website. However, in the absence of a clear, scientific consensus and given the complexity of the relationship between cannabis use and ADHD, it’s challenging to unequivocally affirm or refute their stance. This ambiguity leaves room for further research and a more nuanced understanding of the interplay between cannabis and neurological conditions like ADHD.

 

Furthermore, the tone and subject matter of AdditudeMag’s content may inadvertently reflect an internal bias. While their focus on ADHD-related topics is understandable given their specialization, it’s crucial to question whether this focus leads to a myopic view of the broader health implications of cannabis use. Are they adequately considering the multifaceted nature of cannabis consumption, including its varied effects on different individuals and the diverse reasons people turn to it?

 

While the claim that half of cannabis users have ADD or ADHD is provocative, the current evidence and methodologies employed in supporting this claim require a more critical examination. The scientific community’s ongoing efforts to understand the complexities of cannabis and its impact on neurological conditions will undoubtedly shed more light on this intriguing intersection in the future. So for now, let’s simply say that it’s “not proven to be true”.

 

 

 

The vibrant community of cannabis enthusiasts on Reddit offers a wealth of perspectives on the relationship between marijuana use and ADHD. These candid insights provide a more nuanced view of the varied experiences of individuals who use cannabis, some with ADHD and others without. Let’s delve into a selection of these comments to understand this dynamic better.

 

Seattlehepcat comments, “With weed, I can focus, but in a more mellow way than the Ritalin.” This sentiment resonates with many users who find cannabis a gentler alternative to traditional ADHD medications. The concept of achieving focus in a less intense manner seems to appeal to those who might otherwise struggle with the side effects of stimulant drugs.

 

Thisisntmyaccount24 shares a reflection on stereotypes, stating, “It’s funny that the ‘stoner’ stereotype back in the day was a person with essentially a slowed-down brain. As someone with ADHD and anxiety, that is what I am going for a lot of the time.” This observation underlines the irony in how cannabis, often associated with cognitive slowing, can paradoxically aid individuals in managing their hyperactive minds.

 

Another user, PussyWax, humorously compares using cannabis to “putting blinders on a horse before a two-hour history lecture,” highlighting its ability to narrow focus. This analogy aptly captures how some individuals with ADHD use cannabis to filter out distractions and hone their concentration.

 

Amid these personal accounts, it’s crucial to address the factual accuracy of AdditudeMag’s claim that half of all cannabis users have ADD or ADHD. While anecdotal evidence suggests that individuals with ADHD may self-medicate at a higher rate, there is no solid user data to support the notion that 50% of all cannabis users have ADD. Such a sweeping generalization does not hold up under scientific scrutiny. It’s more likely that this figure emerged from a subjective analysis rather than a peer-reviewed study, underscoring the need for more comprehensive research in this area.

 

These Reddit comments paint a vivid picture of the diversity within the cannabis community. They remind us that while some individuals find cannabis helpful for managing ADHD symptoms, others enjoy it for entirely different reasons, challenging the oversimplified narratives often presented in discussions about cannabis use.

 

 

In the intricate dance of data interpretation and narrative construction, there’s a thin line between enlightenment and deception. This line becomes especially significant when discussing complex topics like cannabis use and its association with conditions like ADHD. The art of “lying with statistics” is not just a cunning play of numbers; it’s about framing questions and interpreting data in ways that craft a specific narrative, often serving hidden agendas.

 

Historically, the government has been accused of “weaponizing science” in its approach to cannabis research. A striking example of this is the infamous monkey experiment that purported to show cannabis causing brain damage. In this study, monkeys were subjected to such high levels of cannabis smoke that they essentially suffocated. This methodological flaw led to misleading conclusions about cannabis destroying brain cells, which were later debunked as a hoax. Yet, for a time, this “research” was wielded as a scientific weapon against cannabis legalization.

 

This historical context makes one cautious about accepting claims without rigorous scrutiny. The assertion that half of all cannabis users have ADD or ADHD, while not inherently implausible, demands a critical evaluation. It’s essential to differentiate between genuinely insightful studies and those that might be tailored to propagate a particular viewpoint. In the absence of peer-reviewed data substantiating this claim, its credibility remains questionable.

 

The cannabis community, diverse in its composition and motivations, cannot be accurately represented through a singular lens. The vast array of reasons for cannabis use – from therapeutic to recreational – defies reduction to a single statistic. It’s imperative, therefore, to approach such claims with a healthy dose of skepticism, demanding robust, peer-reviewed research that acknowledges the complexity of cannabis use and its multifaceted impact on individuals’ lives.

 

 

In the hazy intersection of cannabis use and ADHD, certain truths emerge with clarity from the smoke. A significant number of individuals with ADD or ADHD express a preference for cannabis over conventional prescription medications. This inclination towards self-medication with marijuana underscores a broader narrative – one where individuals with ADHD find solace in the plant’s natural properties, often more attuned to their needs than the effects of traditional pharmaceuticals.

 

This trend doesn’t just highlight a personal choice; it signals a pressing need for deeper, more nuanced research into cannabis and its potential as a therapeutic agent, especially for ADHD. Imagine a future where cannabis-based medications are specifically tailored for ADHD, harnessing the plant’s benefits while minimizing any drawbacks. Such a prospect isn’t just wishful thinking; it’s a call to action for the scientific community to explore and develop cannabis-based treatments that could revolutionize how we approach ADD/ADHD management.

 

As we stand at the crossroads of understanding and innovation, the path forward is clear: more research, more empathy, and a willingness to embrace the potential of cannabis in transforming the lives of those with ADHD.

 

MORE ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA FOR ADHD, READ ON…

MEDICAL MARIJUANA HELPS WITH ADHD

DOES MEDICAL MARIJUANA HELP WITH ADHD? THE LATEST STUDY SAYS..



Source link

Cannabis News

Latest Trump Weed Rumor – Trump Will Federally Deschedule and Decriminalize Cannabis, but Not Legalize It

Published

on

By


trump on marijuana reform

In a recent interview, former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie made headlines by asserting that President-elect Donald Trump will pursue significant reforms in federal policies regarding marijuana and cryptocurrency. As the nation grapples with evolving attitudes toward cannabis and the burgeoning digital currency market, Christie’s predictions have ignited discussions about the potential implications of such changes on both industries. This article delves into Christie’s insights, the current state of marijuana and cryptocurrency regulations, and the broader implications of these anticipated reforms.

 

The Current Landscape of Marijuana Legislation

 

Federal vs. State Laws

Marijuana remains classified as a Schedule I substance under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), which places it in the same category as heroin and LSD. This classification has created a complex legal landscape where states have moved to legalize cannabis for medical and recreational use, while federal law continues to impose strict prohibitions. As of now, over 30 states have legalized marijuana in some form, leading to a burgeoning industry that generates billions in revenue.

 

Challenges Faced by the Cannabis Industry

 

Despite its legality in many states, the cannabis industry faces significant hurdles due to federal restrictions. These challenges include:

  • Banking Access: Many banks are hesitant to work with cannabis businesses due to fear of federal repercussions, forcing these businesses to operate largely in cash.

  • Taxation Issues: The IRS enforces Section 280E of the tax code, which prohibits businesses engaged in illegal activities from deducting normal business expenses, leading to disproportionately high tax burdens for cannabis companies.

  • Interstate Commerce: The lack of federal legalization prevents cannabis businesses from operating across state lines, limiting their growth potential.

 

Chris Christie’s Perspective on Marijuana Reform

 

Christie, a former presidential candidate known for his tough stance on drugs during his tenure as governor, has evolved his views on marijuana over the years. In his recent statements, he emphasized that Trump is likely to pursue descheduling cannabis, which would remove it from the Schedule I classification. This move would not only provide clarity for businesses operating in legal markets but also open avenues for banking and investment.

 

Christie highlighted that descheduling would allow for a more regulated market where safety standards could be established, thus protecting consumers. He believes that this approach aligns with a growing consensus among Americans who support legalization and recognize the potential benefits of cannabis use for both medical and recreational purposes.

 

The Future of Cryptocurrency Regulation = The Rise of Cryptocurrencies

 

Cryptocurrencies have surged in popularity over the past decade, with Bitcoin leading the charge as the first decentralized digital currency. The market has expanded to include thousands of alternative coins (altcoins), each with unique features and use cases. As cryptocurrencies gain traction among investors and consumers alike, regulatory scrutiny has intensified.

 

Current Regulatory Challenges

 

The cryptocurrency market faces several regulatory challenges that hinder its growth and adoption:

 

  • Lack of Clarity: Regulatory frameworks vary significantly across states and countries, creating confusion for investors and businesses.

  • Fraud and Scams: The rapid growth of cryptocurrencies has led to an increase in fraudulent schemes targeting unsuspecting investors.

  • Consumer Protection: Without clear regulations, consumers are often left vulnerable to risks associated with volatile markets.

 

Christie’s Vision for Crypto Regulation

 

Christie believes that under Trump’s leadership, there will be an effort to find a “sweet spot” for cryptocurrency regulation balancing innovation with consumer protection. He argues that overly stringent regulations could stifle growth in this emerging sector while too little oversight could expose consumers to significant risks.

 

In his view, a balanced regulatory framework would include:

 

1. Clear Definitions: Establishing clear definitions for different types of cryptocurrencies and tokens to differentiate between securities and utility tokens.

2. Consumer Protections: Implementing measures to protect investors from fraud while promoting transparency within the market.

3. Encouraging Innovation: Creating an environment conducive to innovation by allowing startups to thrive without excessive regulatory burdens.

 

Christie’s insights reflect a growing recognition among policymakers that cryptocurrencies are here to stay and that appropriate regulations are necessary to foster growth while safeguarding consumers.

 

Implications of Proposed Reforms

 

Economic Impact

 

The potential reforms proposed by Christie could have far-reaching economic implications:

 

  • Job Creation: Legalizing marijuana at the federal level could lead to significant job creation within the cannabis industry—from cultivation and production to retail sales.

  • Investment Opportunities: Descheduling cannabis would open up investment opportunities for institutional investors who have been hesitant due to federal restrictions.

  • Boosting Local Economies: Legal cannabis markets have proven beneficial for local economies through increased tax revenues and job creation.

 

Similarly, clear regulations around cryptocurrencies could stimulate investment in blockchain technology and related industries, fostering innovation and economic growth.

 

Social Justice Considerations

 

Both marijuana legalization and sensible cryptocurrency regulations have social justice implications:

 

  • Addressing Past Injustices: Legalizing marijuana could help rectify past injustices related to drug enforcement policies that disproportionately affected marginalized communities.

  • Financial Inclusion: Cryptocurrencies offer opportunities for financial inclusion for those underserved by traditional banking systems, particularly in low-income communities.

 

Political Landscape

 

The political landscape surrounding these issues is complex. While there is bipartisan support for marijuana reform among certain lawmakers, challenges remain in overcoming entrenched opposition. Similarly, cryptocurrency regulation has garnered attention from both sides of the aisle but requires collaboration to establish effective frameworks.

 

Conclusion

 

Chris Christie’s predictions about President-elect Donald Trump’s approach to federal marijuana descheduling and cryptocurrency regulation suggest a potential shift in U.S. policy that could significantly reshape both industries. As public opinion evolves on these issues, lawmakers have an opportunity to enact meaningful reforms that promote economic growth while ensuring consumer protection. The anticipated changes could foster a more robust cannabis industry that contributes positively to the economy and addresses social justice concerns, while clear regulatory frameworks for cryptocurrencies could encourage innovation and protect consumers in the digital economy. Stakeholders in both sectors are closely watching these developments, eager to see how potential reforms might impact their futures. While the realization of Christie’s predictions remains uncertain, it’s clear that the conversation around marijuana and cryptocurrency regulation is ongoing and far from settled.

 

TRUMP 2.0 ON CANNABIS REFORM, READ ON…

TRUMP ON MARIJUANA REFORM

TRUMP 2.0 ON FEDERAL CANNABIS REFORM – WHAT DO WE KNOW?

 



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Webinar Replay: Post-Election Cannabis Wrap – Smoke ’em if You’ve Got ’em

Published

on

By


On Thursday, November 7th, Vince Sliwoski, Aaron Pelley and Fred Rocafort held a post election discussion “Post-Election Cannabis Wrap – Smoke ’em if You’ve Got ’em”. Watch the replay!

Key Takeaways from the “Smoke ’em if You’ve Got ’em – 2024 Post Election Cannabis Wrap” Webinar:

  1. Panelists:
    • Vince Sliwoski: Oregon Business lawyer specializing in cannabis and commercial real estate.
    • Aaron Pelley: Experienced in cannabis law since Washington’s legalization in 2012.
    • Fred Rocafort: Trademark attorney working closely with the cannabis team.
  2. Election Results Overview:
    • Most 2024 cannabis ballot measures did not pass.
    • Florida, South Dakota, and North Dakota saw failures.
    • Nebraska became the 39th state to legalize cannabis for medical use when it passed two cannabis initiatives, Initiatives 437 and 438.
  3. Federal and State-Level Developments:
    • Medical use is currently legal in 38 states, and 24 states allow recreational use.
    • Republican support for marijuana legalization is growing.
  4. Federal Policy Implications:
    • Schedule III Rescheduling: The process to move cannabis to Schedule III is ongoing, which could significantly impact the industry.
    • Importance of Federal Appointments: The future of cannabis policy depends heavily on who is appointed to key positions in the administration.
  5. International and Domestic Trade:
    • Schedule III status could ease import/export restrictions on cannabis.
    • Unified control of House, Senate, and presidency might expedite legislative progress.
  6. Economic and Industry Impact:
    • Cannabis stocks experienced volatility post-election, reflecting investor uncertainty.
    • Federal legalization and banking reforms are crucial for industry stability and growth.
  7. Future Outlook:
    • The potential for federal rescheduling remains strong, with hearings scheduled for early 2025.
    • State-level initiatives and regulatory developments will continue to shape the industry.

Watch the replay!



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

I Had Just One Puff

Published

on

By


one puff of a joint a drug test

“How Long Does One Puff of Weed Stay in Your System?”… This topic can be difficult to answer since it is dependent on elements such as the size of the hit and what constitutes a “one hit.” If you take a large bong pull then cough, it might linger in your system for 5-7 days. A moderate dose from a joint can last 3-5 days, whereas a few hits from a vaporizer may last 1-3 days.

 

The length of time that marijuana stays in the body varies based on a number of factors, including metabolism, THC levels, frequency of use, and hydration.

 

Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, is the primary psychoactive component of cannabis. THC and its metabolites, which remain in your body long after the effects have subsided, are detected by drug tests.

 

Since these metabolites are fat-soluble, they cling to bodily fat molecules. They could thus take a while to fully pass through your system, particularly if your body fat percentage is higher.

 

THC is absorbed by tissues and organs (including the brain, heart, and fat) and converted by the liver into chemicals such as 11-hydroxy-THC and carboxy-THC. Cannabis is eliminated in feces at a rate of around 65%, while urine accounts for 20%. The leftover amount might be kept within the body.

 

THC deposited in bodily tissues ultimately re-enters the circulation and is processed by the liver. For frequent users, THC accumulates in fatty tissues quicker than it can be removed, thus it may be detectable in drug tests for days or weeks following consumption.

 

The detection time varies according to the amount and frequency of cannabis usage. Higher dosages and regular usage result in longer detection times.

 

The type of drug test also affects detection windows. Blood and saliva tests typically detect cannabis metabolites for shorter periods, while urine and hair samples can reveal use for weeks or even months. In some cases, hair tests have detected cannabis use over 90 days after consumption.

 

Detection Windows for Various Cannabis Drug Tests

 

Urine Tests

Among all drug tests, urine testing is the most commonly used method for screening for drug use in an individual.

 

Detection times vary, but a 2017 review suggests the following windows for cannabis in urine after last use:

 

– Single-use (e.g., one joint): up to 3 days

– Moderate use (around 4 times a week): 5–7 days

– Chronic use (daily): 10–15 days

– Chronic heavy use (multiple times daily): over 30 days

 

Blood Tests

Blood tests generally detect recent cannabis use, typically within 2–12 hours after consumption. However, in cases of heavy use, cannabis has been detected up to 30 days later. Chronic heavy use can extend the detection period in the bloodstream.

 

Saliva Tests

THC can enter saliva through secondhand cannabis smoke, but THC metabolites are only present if you’ve personally smoked or ingested cannabis.

 

Saliva testing has a short detection window and can sometimes identify cannabis use on the same day. A 2020 review found that THC was detectable in the saliva of frequent users for up to 72 hours after use, and it may remain in saliva longer than in blood following recent use.

 

In areas where cannabis is illegal, saliva testing is often used for roadside screenings.

 

Hair Tests

Hair follicle tests can detect cannabis use for up to 90 days. After use, cannabinoids reach the hair follicles through small blood vessels and from sebum and sweat surrounding the hair.

 

Hair grows at approximately 0.5 inches per month, so a 1.5-inch segment of hair close to the scalp can reveal cannabis use over the past three months.

 

Factors Affecting THC and Metabolite Retention

 

The length of time THC and its metabolites stay in your system depends on various factors. Some, like body mass index (BMI) and metabolic rate, relate to individual body processing, not the drug itself.

 

Other factors are specific to cannabis use, including:

 

– Dosage: How much you consume

– Frequency: How often you use cannabis

– Method of consumption: Smoking, dabbing, edibles, or sublingual

– THC potency: Higher potency can extend detection time

 

Higher doses and more frequent use generally extend THC retention. Cannabis consumed orally may remain in the system slightly longer than smoked cannabis, and stronger cannabis strains, higher in THC, may also stay detectable for a longer period.

 

How Quickly Do the Effects of Cannabis Set In?

 

When smoking cannabis, effects appear almost immediately, while ingested cannabis may take 1–3 hours to peak.

 

The psychoactive component THC produces a “high” with common effects such as:

 

– Altered senses, including perception of time

– Mood changes

– Difficulty with thinking and problem-solving

– Impaired memory

 

Other short-term effects can include:

– Anxiety and confusion

– Decreased coordination

– Dry mouth and eyes

– Nausea or lightheadedness

– Trouble focusing

– Increased appetite

– Rapid heart rate

– Restlessness and sleepiness

 

In rare cases, high doses may lead to hallucinations, delusions, or acute psychosis.

 

Regular cannabis use may have additional mental and physical effects. While research is ongoing, cannabis use may increase the risk of:

 

– Cognitive issues like memory loss

– Cardiovascular problems including heart disease and stroke

– Respiratory illnesses such as bronchitis or lung infections

– Mood disorders like depression and anxiety

 

Cannabis use during pregnancy can negatively impact fetal growth and development.

 

Duration of Effects

Short-term effects generally taper off within 1–3 hours, but for chronic users, some long-term effects may last days, weeks, or even months. Certain effects may even be permanent.

 

Bottom Line

The amount of time that cannabis remains in your system following a single use varies greatly depending on individual characteristics such as body fat, metabolism, frequency of use, and mode of intake. Frequent users may maintain traces of THC for weeks, whereas infrequent users may test positive for as little as a few days. Hair tests can disclose usage for up to 90 days, while blood and saliva tests identify more recent use. Urine tests are the most popular and have varying detection durations. The duration that THC and its metabolites are detectable will ultimately depend on a number of factors, including dose, strength, and individual body chemistry.

 

PEE IN A CUP COMING UP, READ ON..

how long does weed stay in your urine

HOW LONG DOES WEED STAY IN YOUR URINE FOR A DRUG TEST?



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media