I’m pretty sure that more ink has been spilled on the Secure and Fair Enforcement Act (“SAFE Banking”), than any other proposed cannabis law. It just won’t pass and it just won’t die. Specifically, SAFE Banking was introduced in 2017 and it passed the House seven times (seven times!) with bipartisan support since 2019. The public likes it too: here’s a November 2022 Data for Progress poll revealing that “By a +65-point margin, voters support ensuring that banks do not discriminate against legitimate marijuana-related businesses.” This bill should pass, right?

It’s getting closer. SAFE Banking will finally go to mark-up this week in the Senate Banking Committee. That Committee is preparing to vote before October 1, although what they’ll be voting on at this point isn’t entirely clear. (For some chatter on that, check out this Marijuana Moment piece from last Friday.) But let’s assume that SAFE Banking, after mark-up, holds onto its key tenets. It would prevent federal banking regulators from:

prohibiting, penalizing or discouraging a bank from providing financial services to a legitimate state-sanctioned and regulated cannabis business, or an associated business (such as a lawyer or landlord providing services to a legal cannabis business); terminating or

Read full article on HarrisBricken

New York State budget talks are hung up on how to curb an onslaught of unlicensed cannabis retailers. It is self-evident that these illicit weed joints are hurting the ability for the cannabis industry to begin and grow. However, until there are more legal shops that compete with the illegal stores, it seems the State cannot shut them down or drive business into the regulated market. Lawsuits such as the one we recently covered by New York City against unlicensed operators and their landlords don’t seem to have not deterred most operators.

Huge fines proposed for unlicensed cannabis retailers

While the State issues additional condition adult use retail dispensary licenses, Gov. Kathy Hochul proposed legislation weeks ago to empower state agencies to increase fines on illegal sites from a paltry $250 to as much as $10,000 per day. State agencies would also be allowed to shutter the illegal cannabis stores for good. Mayor Adams previously complained that $250 was paltry and a mere slap on the wrist.

State senators showed they are devoting more legislative energy to the topic by commemorating the so-called “4/20” pot holiday April 20 with the establishment of a new subcommittee focused on cannabis issues.

Law enforcement

Read full article on HarrisBricken

On April 13th, I moderated a webinar about cannabis taxes called “IRS Enforcement of Cannabis Operators is Here – What Do We Do Now?“. Cannabis taxes should scare anyone in the industry, but federal incomes taxes under I.R.C. 280E probably take the cake when it comes to general anxiety. Our webinar featured Ani Gaylan and Jonathan Kalinski who are both tax attorneys from Los Angeles, representing clients in the cannabis industry facing 280E audits and controversy cases. Jonathan even handles the criminal aspect when the IRS comes calling. If you didn’t attend the webinar, below are the key takeaways about cannabis taxes and the IRS.

It’s not a matter of “if” but “when” for audits on cannabis taxes

Ani and Jonathan both agree that the IRS is ramping up its pursuit of audits against cannabis businesses. In case you forgot, I.R.C. 280E dictates that, if you traffic in a schedule I or II controlled substance (and cannabis is in schedule I), you cannot take normal business deductions or credits. You only get Costs of Goods Sold (“COGS”). The effective corporate income tax rate then for cannabis businesses is sky high, unless those businesses can capture more COGS.

The IRS has

Read full article on HarrisBricken