Connect with us

Cannabis News

Reefer Madness 2.0 – Exposing Fake News about Cannabis in the Age of AI, Trump, CNN, and Conservatives

Published

on


reefer madness today on cnn

Reginald vs the Examiner – Exposing Lies in Modern Reefer Madness

 

My editor shared this article with me and said, “right up your alley!” and he wasn’t wrong. Published in the Examiner, as the Examiner, meaning, that this is the opinion of the entire organization, some modern Reefer Madness was being spewed and of course – it’s my duty to shine the light on the lies and deception generated through the machinations of prohibition and its associated rhetoric.

reefer madness 2.0

While the article isn’t too long, it does provide us with insight to the mind of the prohibitionist and it makes one question, “Who sponsored this article?”

 

Typically, they have some author attached, but this time it’s simply “The Examiner”.

 

Nonetheless, let’s analyze the drivel and provide some fresh perspective on the content.

 

 

The article published in The Examiner attempts to discredit the Drug Policy Alliance’s role in legalizing marijuana and argues that the promised benefits of legalization have not materialized.

 

The author dismisses the idea that marijuana has medicinal properties and claims it is addictive, especially for young users, and linked to schizophrenia and brain damage. They assert that marijuana legalization has led to increased addiction, crime, and ruined families.

 

The article also challenges the supposed benefits of legalization, stating that crime has not decreased, tax revenues have fallen short, and marijuana serves as a gateway to more harmful drugs.

 

The author blames the Drug Policy Alliance – and more importantly George Sorros – for these negative outcomes and warns other states to resist their advocacy for legalization.

 

However, the article is riddled with biased claims and misinformation.

 

By starting with an attack on the Drug Policy Alliance’s funding source and dismissing their achievements, the author sets a negative tone from the beginning.

 

The assertions made about “marijuana’s addictive nature, its direct links to schizophrenia and brain damage, and the notion that it is a gateway drug” are cherry-picked and fail to consider broader scientific research on the subject.

 

There is no definitive link between any of these things, and in essence, in places where cannabis has been legalized we have seen a decrease in many of these metrics, including a reduction in youth consumption.

 

The claim that crime has increased with legalization fails to acknowledge the complexities of the relationship between cannabis and crime, and ignores the potential positive effects of regulation and taxation.

 

For example, it speaks of the “black market” as if it’s a side effect of marijuana legalization.

 

Marijuana legalization has clearly increased crime. Strict regulations and taxes placed on legal marijuana sellers have created a vast illicit market that easily undercuts the legal market on price. – The Examiner

 

Except, it didn’t! The vast illicit market has existed for decades and is directly related to prohibition. From Colombia to Mexico, the cartels, street gangs, and your indie growers have all made up the “illicit market” they claim legalization created. However, we know that black market activities existed well before any state legalized cannabis meaning that it is actually the fruits of prohibition itself.

 

What’s more, it forced the illicit market into the hands of criminals. People willing to break the law and scale their efforts, tend to expand their illicit endeavors and as we’ve seen with Mexican Cartels – they do everything nowadays!

 

But here comes the kicker from the article;

And because possession is legal, it is virtually impossible to crack down on the illegal market.

 

The author argues that the illegal cannabis market, run by drug cartels and street gangs (and the indie growers), can’t be stopped because “possession is legal”.

 

Then what was the excuse when possession was illegal? Not only did prohibition have nearly 50-years of uninterrupted, blank-check, “I’m going to shoot your dog” authority and under this social configuration, cartels grew in size and wealth exponentially.

 

The Examiner article’s alarmist language and lack of nuanced analysis undermine its credibility and present a biased perspective.

 

To truly understand the impact of marijuana legalization, a comprehensive examination of scientific research, social and economic data, and the experiences of different states is necessary.

 

Yet I doubt that the purpose of the article was to actually get to “truth” but rather it’s to shape opinion.

 

Allow me to get conspiratorial.

 

 

If you haven’t heard about Project Mockingbird let me introduce you to the concept.

 

Project Mockingbird, as revealed through declassified documents, was an operation in which the CIA sought to shape public opinion by infiltrating and influencing various media organizations. The goal was to ensure that the narrative aligned with the government’s interests. Although the program was officially discontinued in the 1970s, it raises concerns about the potential continuation or evolution of similar efforts in the present day.

 

We know that as of the pandemic, the “misinformation board” and the “fact checkers” were routinely “fact-checking” truth to suit a government narrative. This isn’t conspiratorial at all.

 

However, in the world of Chat GPT and similar technology, we need to consider that these programs are more easily conducted than ever before.

 

Considering this historical context, one might speculate that the article from The Examiner, with its biased and alarmist tone, could be an indirect product of such programs aimed at controlling public perception. While we cannot definitively attribute this article to Project Mockingbird, it is essential to remain vigilant about the potential influence of government agencies or other powerful entities on media outlets.

 

Maintaining an informed and critical perspective is crucial in today’s media landscape, where disinformation and propaganda can easily permeate public discourse. The lack of author attribution in the article from The Examiner may be a deliberate strategy to obfuscate the true origins of the message and shield it from scrutiny.

 

To counteract potential manipulation, individuals should actively seek diverse sources of information, fact-check claims, and engage in critical thinking. By being aware of historical instances of media manipulation and staying vigilant, we can better evaluate the validity and credibility of the information presented to us.

 

While we cannot definitively prove the connection between the article and Project Mockingbird, it is important to question the motives and potential biases behind media content.

 

An open and informed society depends on the ability of individuals to discern fact from fiction and to challenge narratives that may serve ulterior agendas.

 

These days, that has become surprisingly difficult even within known spaces such as science and math – that could or could not be racist, according to some.

 

Conspiracy Theory has become a weapon to dismiss ideas and has been utilized in recent years for too often.

 

For example, at the beginning of the Pandemic, to think that the virus originated or leaked from a lab in Wu Han was pure conspiratorial. However, nowadays, the vast majority of the evidence suggests that its exactly where it came from.

 

There’s a bunch of other conspiracies that turned out to be true in the past as well. Here’s a few of them;

 

  • Operation Northwoods: In the early 1960s, the U.S. Department of Defense proposed a plan to carry out false flag terrorist attacks on American soil to justify military intervention against Cuba. Declassified documents later confirmed the existence of this plan.

 

  • MK-Ultra: In the 1950s and ’60s, the CIA conducted secret mind control experiments under the MK-Ultra program. The agency’s involvement was exposed in the 1970s through congressional investigations and declassified documents.

 

  • Tuskegee Syphilis Study: From 1932 to 1972, the U.S. Public Health Service conducted an unethical study on African American men, withholding treatment for syphilis without their informed consent. The details of this study were revealed in the 1970s, leading to significant reforms in research ethics.

 

  • Iran-Contra Affair: In the 1980s, it was revealed that the U.S. government had secretly facilitated the sale of weapons to Iran to fund Nicaraguan Contra rebels, despite an explicit congressional ban.

 

 

Now this isn’t to say that my claim that the Examiner’s Reefer Madness article is evident that it’s from Project Mockingbird or similar programs, I simply provide the above historical events as evidence that they do exist.

 

In fact, they are far more prominent than you are and mostly not done by governments, but private entities.

 

Just check out this quote from Transparency.org about the state of the world in relation to their “Corruption Index” and it’s effect on the world;

 

The global average remains unchanged for over a decade at just 43 out of 100. More than two-thirds of countries score below 50, while 26 countries have fallen to their lowest scores yet. Despite concerted efforts and hard-won gains by some, 155 countries have made no significant progress against corruption or have declined since 2012.

 

Conflict, security and trouble at the top

Global peace has been deteriorating for 15 years. Corruption has been both a key cause and result of this.

 

Corruption undermines governments’ ability to protect people and erodes public trust, provoking more and harder to control security threats. On the other hand, conflict creates opportunities for corruption and subverts governments’ efforts to stop it.

 

Even countries with high CPI scores play a role in the threats that corruption poses to global security. For decades, they have welcomed dirty money from abroad, allowing kleptocrats to increase their wealth, power and destructive geopolitical ambitions.Transparency.org

 

Only the naive would believe everything that they hear on the news in this day and age.

 

I always intend to provide my readers with a nuanced perspective. I know that I am biased towards freedom of consumption. It’s not so much about the drugs itself, as about having the freedom to decide.

This is something that is fundamentally missing from modern society. We’re asked to be more inclusive and tolerant, yet we aren’t allowed to exercise a simple act of consuming a plant without some form of scrutiny.

 

The potential “psyop” article from the Examiner is nothing but propaganda. Interestingly, it used those very words in the beginning of its article.

 

However, it’s my hope that with this article, no matter how crazy it became – it made you stop and question your government, your parties, your allegiances.

 

At the end of the day, all of this corruption, all of these psyops only exist with your participation.

 

THE LATEST ON REEFER MADNESS, READ ON…

REEFER MADNESS ON THE INTERNET TODAY SOROS

HOW DOES THIS EVEN GET PUBLISHED TODAY? READ THIS!



Source link

Cannabis News

Federal Cannabis Roundup: Nixon, DEA, Tobacco-Hemp . . . and the DOOBIE Act (*sigh*)

Published

on

By


Last week, I wrote a round-up post on Oregon cannabis. This week, I thought I’d drop a line on the federal happenings. Which are quite a few.

The Nixon tapes

This was a fun piece of news, unearthed by Minnesota cannabis lobbyist Kurtis Hanna. Ernesto Londoño then broke the story on September 14th for the New York Times, which you can read here. In short, Nixon conceded that marijuana “is not particularly dangerous,” despite calling the plant “public enemy No. 1” only two years prior. And he opined that punishments ought not be so serious for possession of the plant.

I say this news is “fun” because it’s more interesting than surprising and I doubt it will have much impact. Nixon was a mean old liar, and one with an animus toward certain groups of people. I also don’t think this revelation will persuade the vocal, diminishing minority of prohibitionists to change their minds. I like it anyway, especially as cannabis history nerd. We were right!

DEA embraces two-step review for marijuana rescheduling

This one is important, in my opinion. It relates to the method of analysis DEA must undertake when determining whether a drug, including marijuana (and psilocybin, and any other verboten substance), has a “currently accepted medical use.” In April, the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) put DEA in a box on this one, explaining that the old, five-part test was “impermissibly narrow.” OLC thus endorsed the two-part test. On September 17th, DEA assented to the test for Schedule I review.

The two-part test bodes well for DEA’s rulemaking, now underway, to move marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III of the federal Controlled Substances Act. How do we know? Well, the Schedule I stans don’t like it, for starters. This is because, under two-part review, a drug can have currently accepted medical use: a) even if that drug hasn’t been approved by FDA, and b) even if the drug wouldn’t pass DEA’s scrapped five-part test. So, more runway.

DOOBIE Act on the way?

I’m embarrassed even having to type that. But yes, some Congressperson named a federal cannabis bill the “DOOBIE Act,” unfortunately. With a press release and everything.

This proposal would prohibit federal agencies from denying security clearance and employment to people simply because they have used marijuana. In my reading of the actual bill, these agencies could still ding an applicant for past marijuana use, but they couldn’t “base a suitability determination . . . solely on the past use of marijuana by the individual.” The word “solely” needs to go.

Because this bill applies only to “Executive agencies” under 5 U.S. Code § 105, it also wouldn’t have prohibited, say, Joe Biden from doing his “doobie” staffers dirty, which he definitely did.

FDA gets the nod on tobacco-hemp

I like the Congressional Research Service (CRS) and often send people thataway. On September 16th, CRS published a new report titled “Legal Effect of Marijuana Rescheduling on FDA’s Regulation of Cannabis.” Here are my extremely condensed takeaways:

  1. FDA can authorize tobacco products containing hemp-derived cannabinoids (although it hasn’t yet). This is because hemp is not a controlled substance.
  2. Marijuana, even at Schedule III, would still be banned as a tobacco additive (and probably always will be). This is because FDA would need to approve specific cannabis medicines first, and it never does that for botanical drugs.

Here we have one of those cognitively dissonant outcomes often seen with the cannabis plant. As a reading of law it makes sense, but as to policy it’s nonsense. You can thank Richard Nixon and other cannabis heels for that.



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Does Hemp Have Cancer-Fighting Properties?

Published

on

By


hemp for fighting cancer

Does Hemp Have Cancer-Fighting Properties?

Hemp, Weed’s Cousin, May Have More Therapeutic Value Than We Thought

 

While both hemp and cannabis come from the same plant, they possess significant differences.

 

Hemp, in particular, has become the less popular cousin of weed because more people were interested in the psychoactive properties of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). And since hemp only contains less 0.3% or less of THC, recreational consumers weren’t keen on it.

 

Historically speaking, hemp has been famous for thousands of years across ancient civilizations around the world. It was cultivated for its reliable fibers, used in textiles, rope, clothing, and paper. Even back then, hemp’s nutritious properties were known. People ate its seeds and extracted oil, while it was used for treating many conditions in ancient China and ancient India.

 

However, hemp plants do contain a much higher amount of cannabidiol (CBD), and due to the sheer demand for CBD products lately for their medicinal benefits, hemp became better-known. Now, the global CBD market is estimated to be worth a cool US $7.71 billion, and it’s only expected to grow more. After all, the CBD in hemp has been found to be tremendously powerful especially for treating a wide range of diseases and afflictions, from anxiety to insomnia, and much more.

 

However, CBD isn’t the only therapeutic value found in hemp.

 

Can Hemp Help Fight Cancer?

A recent study by the Rowett Institute took a look into the potential value of specific fibers added to the diet of patients with prostate cancer, and its effect, if any, on tumors. The NHS Grampian Charity has invested £90,000 into this research, which has been led by Professor Anne Kiltie, who is a member of Friends of ANCHOR Clinical Chair in Oncology, at the University of Aberdeen.

The new study, which was conducted by Dr. Aliu Moomin, Dr. Sylvia Duncan, and Dr. Madi Neascu, focused on hemp fibers such as hemp hull, inulin, and pectin. They analyzed how these fibers affect gut bacteria in animal models, and its overall impact on tumor cells.

 

According to Professor Kiltie: “This funding will allow us to build on our previous work demonstrating a benefit to dietary fibre supplementation in terms of improved tumor control and protection of the bowel from radiotherapy damage, by looking at other types of fiber and how these interact with the gut microbiota,” she said. The idea is that if they notice improvements when cancer patients supplement with fiber, and it actually helps delay the progression of cancer, this would be instrumental improving patient outcomes.


We have long known that diet plays a critical role in cancer development and prevention, so it only makes sense to take advantage of the healing power of gut microbiome for cancer patients. There are several studies that show a strong link between gut microbiome and one’s cancer risk. One study in particular found that patients with melanoma, who possessed healthy gut bacteria, had much better responses to immunotherapy treatments compared to patients who had poorer gut bacteria.

 

“We hope that this work would lead to a large randomized clinical trial in the UK in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. If the fiber supplementation is found to delay progression of the disease and prevent the need for active treatments, this would significantly improve outcomes for these patients and their quality of life,” she added, shared by a release published by the University of Aberdeen.

According to Dr. Simon Dunmore, the NHS Grampian Charity research officer: “The importance of intestinal microbiome in a wide range of health areas, including the development of cancer, is becoming increasingly highlighted by numerous scientific studies,” he said. “This study will provide important evidence of the role of a beneficial gut microbiome composition in reducing the aggressiveness and development of prostate cancer and the positive effect of dietary fibre on the microbiome,” he added.

 

Studies On Hemp Oil For Cancer


There are other studies supporting the viability and potential of hemp compounds for treating cancer. In another recent study out of Shanghai in China, researchers found that hemp oil extracts which contain the terpenes humulene and caryophyllene were found to be effective in treating pain and fighting cancer.

 

For the study, Chinese researchers analyzed the tumor-fighting and painkilling properties of hemp oil on mice. They found that after administering the hemp oil extracts, it was found to significantly reduce tumor growth. “Thes results reveal that HEO [hemp essential oil] plays a role not only in tumor chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy treatment, but also in anti-tumor treatment which offers key information for new strategies in cancer treatment and provides reference for the medicinal development of hemp,” they said.


Additionally, since hemp contains abundant levels of cannabidiol (CBD), it can be used for alleviating the symptoms of cancer treatment. Studies have shown that CBD is effective for helping relieve pain, stimulate the appetite, and minimize nausea and vomiting – all of which are tremendously valuable for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. CBD can also be integrated into one’s lifestyle to reduce chronic inflammation and stress, which, when left untreated, can contribute to cancer progression.

 

Conclusion


These studies are promising: hemp is clearly not just important for its industrial benefits, but it can also help save lives. The compounds found in hemp plants may help fight and treat cancer, shrink tumors, and even enhance the effectiveness of traditional cancer therapies. If you or a loved one want to explore using hemp for wellness and cancer prevention, you may consult with healthcare professionals for tailored medical advice.

 

HEMP FOR FIGHTING CANCER, READ ON…

CBD FOR OVARIAN CANCER

CBD FROM HEMP HELPS FIGHT OVARIAN CANCER IN NEW STUDY?



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Why is Everyone But the Youth Smoking Weed?

Published

on

By


youth marijuana use drops

In recent years, the landscape of cannabis use has undergone a surprising transformation, defying long-held predictions and challenging conventional wisdom. For decades, opponents of marijuana legalization have wielded a powerful argument: legalizing cannabis would send the wrong message to youth, inevitably leading to increased consumption among teenagers and young adults. This fear has been a cornerstone of anti-legalization campaigns, painting a grim picture of a future where young minds are clouded by widespread drug use.

However, as more states and countries have embraced cannabis legalization, an unexpected trend has emerged. Contrary to dire predictions, youth cannabis use has not skyrocketed. In fact, in many places, it has remained stable or even declined. Meanwhile, it’s the older generations who are increasingly turning to cannabis, with one of the fastest-growing demographics of users being adults over 50.

This shift isn’t limited to cannabis alone. Across the board, today’s youth are showing less interest in various substances, including alcohol and tobacco. It’s a trend that has left researchers and social commentators puzzled. Are we witnessing the rise of a more health-conscious, drug-averse generation? Or, as some might cheekily suggest, are young people today simply less inclined towards experimentation and risk-taking than their predecessors?

The implications of this trend are far-reaching, challenging not only our assumptions about drug policy but also our understanding of generational behaviors and values. On one hand, we could interpret this as a positive development – a sign that education and awareness campaigns are working, producing a generation more informed about the risks of substance use. On the other hand, it raises questions about changing social dynamics and what drives young people’s choices in today’s world.

In this article, we’ll explore the factors behind this intriguing phenomenon. Why are fewer young people turning to cannabis and other substances, even as legal barriers fall? And what’s driving older adults, particularly those over 50, to embrace cannabis in growing numbers?

By examining these trends, we hope to gain insight into the complex interplay of social, legal, and cultural factors shaping attitudes towards substance use in our society.

 

As we delve into the statistics, a clear trend emerges: fewer young people are indulging in substances across the board. Whether it’s alcohol, tobacco, or cannabis, today’s youth are increasingly abstaining. This shift has left many scratching their heads, wondering what’s behind this sudden display of temperance among the younger generation.

At first glance, one might be tempted to chalk it up to the success of drug education programs. After all, today’s youth are bombarded with information about the risks and consequences of substance use from an early age. Gone are the days of simplistic “Just Say No” campaigns and exaggerated scare tactics. Modern drug education tends to be more nuanced, focusing on harm reduction and evidence-based information.

However, as someone who went through the gauntlet of ’90s drug education myself, I can attest that knowledge doesn’t always translate to abstinence. My generation was subjected to a barrage of anti-drug messaging, yet many of us still experimented with various substances in our youth. So while improved education may play a role, it’s unlikely to be the sole factor driving this trend.

Perhaps we need to look at what today’s youth are doing instead. Enter the elephant in the room: social media. In many ways, social platforms have become the drug of choice for the younger generation. The constant dopamine hits from likes, shares, and notifications create a neurological response eerily similar to that of traditional stimulants. As kids spend more time glued to their screens, they may be less inclined to seek out other forms of stimulation.

Moreover, the ubiquity of social media has changed the nature of rebellion. When I was young, smoking a joint or sneaking a beer felt like acts of defiance against adult authority. But in a world where parents and grandparents are posting selfies and sharing memes, how does one rebel? For some youth, abstaining from substances their parents use might be the ultimate act of generational differentiation.

The normalization and legalization of cannabis in many areas have also played a role. As weed becomes more mainstream and socially accepted, it loses its countercultural edge. The image of cannabis has shifted from a symbol of rebellion to something your cool aunt does to relax after work. This transformation may have inadvertently made it less appealing to youth seeking to establish their own identity.

Lastly, we can’t ignore the practical aspects. As more adults turn to legal dispensaries for their cannabis, the street market that traditionally supplied curious teens has faced stiff competition. Legal establishments with strict ID checks have made it harder for underage users to access cannabis, potentially contributing to the decline in youth use.

In essence, today’s youth aren’t necessarily more virtuous or health-conscious than previous generations. They’re simply products of their environment – an environment that offers myriad digital distractions, blurs the lines of generational rebellion, and increasingly restricts access to substances. As we continue to navigate this shifting landscape, it’s crucial to remember that while reduced substance use among youth is generally positive, it doesn’t tell the whole story of their well-being. The challenges and pressures faced by today’s young people are unique, and our understanding and support should evolve accordingly.

 

As we turn our attention to the other end of the age spectrum, an intriguing trend emerges. While youth cannabis use is on the decline, adults over 50 are blazing up in record numbers. This demographic has become one of the fastest-growing segments of cannabis consumers, leaving many to wonder: why are the “olds” suddenly embracing their inner stoner?

To understand this phenomenon, we need to dive into the fascinating world of the endocannabinoid system. This complex network of receptors in our bodies doesn’t fully mature until around age 25. As we age, our natural endocannabinoid production tends to decline, leading to what some researchers call “endocannabinoid deficiency.” This can manifest in various ways, from mood disturbances to physical discomfort.

Enter cannabis. When older adults consume marijuana, they’re essentially giving their endocannabinoid system a much-needed boost. It’s like adding oil to a squeaky machine – suddenly, things start running more smoothly. Many report improvements in sleep, mood, and general well-being. It’s not just about getting high; for many, it’s about feeling balanced and functional.

Moreover, as we age, our bodies become less resilient to the effects of alcohol. A night of heavy drinking in your 20s might result in a manageable hangover, but the same indulgence in your 50s or 60s can knock you out for days. Cannabis, on the other hand, offers a gentler experience. You can enjoy an evening toke and still be ready to face the day come morning. For many older adults juggling work, family, and other responsibilities, this is a significant advantage.

Accessibility is another crucial factor. As more states legalize cannabis, it’s becoming increasingly easy for adults to walk into a dispensary and purchase high-quality, regulated products. Gone are the days of relying on sketchy dealers or questionable sources. This ease of access, combined with the normalization of cannabis use, has made it a more appealing option for older adults who might have been hesitant in the past.

Let’s not forget the economic aspect. In many cases, cannabis can be a more cost-effective option than alcohol, especially when consumed in moderation. A single joint can provide an evening’s worth of relaxation, often at a lower cost than a night out drinking. For retirees or those on fixed incomes, this economic advantage can be particularly appealing.

The health benefits of cannabis, especially when compared to alcohol, can’t be overstated. While excessive use of any substance can be harmful, moderate cannabis consumption doesn’t carry the same risks of liver damage, addiction, or long-term health consequences associated with alcohol abuse. For older adults looking to unwind without compromising their health, cannabis presents an attractive alternative.

In essence, the rising popularity of cannabis among older adults is a perfect storm of biological, practical, and social factors. It offers a way to potentially improve health and well-being, provides a gentler recreational experience, and aligns with changing social norms. As more research emerges on the potential benefits of cannabis for age-related issues, we may see this trend continue to grow.

Of course, it’s important to note that cannabis use, like any substance, should be approached responsibly and with an understanding of potential risks and interactions with medications. But for many in the over-50 crowd, it seems that cannabis is proving to be a welcome addition to their golden years.

Who would have thought that the “reefer madness” generation would end up being the ones to fully embrace the green revolution?

 

CANNABIS USE DROPS AMONG YOUTH, READ MORE..

WHY TEEN MARIJUANA USE DROPS AFTER LEGALIZATION

WHY CANNABIS USE DROPS 9% IN TEENS AFTER LEGALIZATION!

 

 



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media