Connect with us

business

Mastercard: No Debit for Cannabis – Cannabis | Weed | Marijuana

Published

on


Mastercard is telling U.S. cannabis shops: no debit for cannabis purchases. U.S. consumers use cash for a vast majority of legal cannabis sales. Debit and credit purchases are rare but not out of the ordinary.

But because cannabis remains illegal at the federal level, Mastercard has started cracking down.

“As we were made aware of this matter, we quickly investigated it. In accordance with our policies, we instructed the financial institutions that offer payment services to cannabis merchants and connects them to Mastercard to terminate the activity,” Mastercard said in a statement on Wednesday.

“The federal government considers cannabis sales illegal, so these purchases are not allowed on our systems,” the statement continued.

The ban does not extend to Canadian consumers, where cannabis is legal at the federal level. Canadian customers can continue to use Mastercard debit and credit for cannabis purchases.

Mastercard: No Debit for Cannabis

Mastercard: No Debit for Cannabis

Mastercard doesn’t want customers using their debit cards for cannabis because of the federal ban. But, more likely, this has more to do with the federal prohibition regarding banking and providing financial services to the cannabis industry.

The U.S. SAFE Banking Act seeks to correct this financial prohibition.

Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code says legal cannabis businesses cannot deduct operating expenses from their gross income. SAFE Banking would reverse that.

SAFE Banking has failed three times in U.S. Congress.

The Democrat-controlled US Senate is opening to pass another version of the bill this year. Republican Senator John Cornyn said this was “wishful thinking.”

In the meantime, don’t expect Mastercard to reverse its “no debt for cannabis” decision until U.S. politicians pass SAFE Banking.

Mastercard: No Debit for Cannabis? That’s Okay. Cash is King

Mastercard: No Debit for Cannabis

Mastercard sent cease-and-desist letters to cannabis companies informing them of their “no debt for cannabis” policy.

While this leaves many consumers out to dry, as mentioned, most U.S. legal cannabis sales are made with cash. If anything, the rest of the economy should mimic the U.S. cannabis industry.

While access to banking services is essential for any advanced market economy – consider the benefits of using cash. And then the downsides of a cashless society where governments and banks can track you and your purchases with a digital currency.

Mastercard’s no debit for cannabis policy may end up being a good thing.

Cash Pros

  • When you pay with cash, you use the money you already have. That means no debt or overdraft fees.
  • Cash transactions are more tangible and can help you budget. When you use cash, you can physically see how much money you’re spending and how much you have left.
  • Cash transactions are private and don’t leave a digital trail. This also reduces the risk of identity theft and online fraud.
  • No transaction fees with cash
  • Cash is universally accepted. Especially the American dollar. Even in remote parts of the world, a gold coin will get you access to food and shelter.
  • Cash transactions are instant. No need to worry about approvals, declined transactions, or the “blockchain.”
  • Cash doesn’t require technology or electricity. Cash saves the day if your electronic payment system is on the fritz.
  • It’s impossible to overspend cash since you’re limited to what’s physically in your wallet.
  • Cash is convenient.
  • Cash is private. Already mentioned, but worth repeating.

Cons of a Cashless Society 

It’s no secret that Joe Biden is pushing the U.S. government to develop a “digital dollar” or a central bank digital currency.

While cash-flooded dispensaries may welcome SAFE banking and an end to Mastercard’s ‘no debit for cannabis’ policy – be aware of sheep in wolf’s clothing.

Consider the negatives of a cashless society.

  • Electronic payments leave a digital trail for online grifters and government busybodies. Banks and governments could monitor, record, and profile your spending habits.
  • Increased vulnerability to cybercrime. The government can’t even deal with crime in real life, let alone cyber-criminals stealing digital wallets.
  • Relying on technology requires dependable infrastructure and a stable internet connection. In the case of power outages or natural disasters, a cashless society could leave people without any means of payment.
  • Transaction fees and hidden costs would become more normal than they are now.
  • Loss of financial anonymity. People can also steal financial data or use it to blackmail or coerce.
  • Imposes costs that large corporations can cover while negatively affecting small businesses
  • Gives governments new tools and weapons to use. For a real-life example, during the Canadian Freedom Convoy protest, the government ordered banks to freeze the accounts of peaceful protesters. These restrictions would have prevented the protestors from feeding themselves if not for cash.
  • Cashless transactions benefit large financial institutions at the expense of everyone else. A cashless society gives banks and governments more economic control and influence. Ultimately limiting consumer choice and creating a two-class system of “haves” and “have-nots.”

While Mastercard’s ‘no debit for cannabis’ policy is annoying, looking for the silver lining is always beneficial. 

And while it would be nice if the U.S. government treated the cannabis industry like any other. Simultaneously, it would be nice if more companies borrowed from cannabis and trusted cash.





Source link

business

Marijuana rescheduling leaves regulators and sellers cautiously optimistic

Published

on

By



A move by the Biden Administration to change how marijuana is treated by federal authorities was met with cautious approval by Massachusetts state regulators, cannabis sellers, and national marijuana advocates alike.

The Drug Enforcement Agency will drop marijuana from the list of banned substances found under Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, where it currently sits alongside heroin and LSD. It will instead move it to Schedule III, among the likes of Tylenol with codeine and anabolic steroids. This follows the recommendation of the Department of Health and Human Services

“Rescheduling cannabis is a monumental step forward for the federal government, one that can open new avenues to research, medical use, and banking for the regulated industries states like Massachusetts have built across the country,” said Ava Callender Concepcion, the acting chair of the Bay State’s Cannabis Control Commission.

Read the rest of this story on BostonHerald.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

business

Thailand Considers Relisting Cannabis as a Narcotic

Published

on

By


The Thai government is contemplating the relisting of cannabis as a narcotic due to concerns over its recreational use and potential societal harms. This reconsideration comes after cannabis was decriminalized in June 2022, which led to a surge in its availability and use.

Cannabis Conundrum: Thailand Reconsiders Legal Status Amidst Rising Concerns

The recent decriminalization of cannabis in Thailand has ignited a complex debate over its legal status and societal impact. While the policy aimed to boost the medical marijuana industry and provide economic opportunities, the unintended rise in recreational use has sparked discussions about a potential reclassification.

Public Health Minister Anutin Charnvirakul, a key advocate for the decriminalization, emphasized that the policy was intended to promote medical use, not recreational. However, the current legal framework lacks clear regulations governing recreational use, leading to widespread availability and potential misuse.

The Bhumjaithai Party, led by Anutin, initially pushed for the delisting of cannabis to benefit the medical industry and provide economic opportunities for Thai citizens. However, the subsequent surge in recreational use, particularly among youths, has raised concerns about potential health and social consequences.

Opposition parties have criticized the government for inadequate regulations and are advocating for cannabis to be relisted as a narcotic under the Narcotics Act. They argue that the current situation exposes young people to potential harm and lacks sufficient safeguards.

A recent poll revealed that a majority of Thais support stricter regulations on cannabis use. Concerns have been raised about the potential impact on public health, particularly regarding mental health issues and addiction, especially among youths. Additionally, there are worries about the potential for increased crime and social disorder.

The government now faces the challenge of balancing the economic benefits of a burgeoning cannabis industry with the need to protect public health and safety. Finding a solution that addresses the concerns of both advocates and critics will be crucial in determining the future of cannabis in Thailand

Why It Matters

Thailand’s shift in cannabis policy has garnered international attention, serving as a case study for the complexities of drug policy reform. The potential reclassification of cannabis underscores the challenges of balancing economic opportunities with public health and safety considerations. The outcome of this debate will have significant implications for Thailand’s legal landscape, public health policies, and the future of its cannabis industry.

Potential Implications of Relisting Cannabis as a Narcotic

If cannabis is relisted as a narcotic, it could lead to stricter regulations on its cultivation, distribution, and use. This may impact the growth of the medical marijuana industry and limit access for patients who rely on cannabis for therapeutic purposes. Additionally, it could result in increased criminal penalties for possession and use, potentially leading to a rise in incarceration rates.

Alternatively, if the government opts to maintain the decriminalized status, it will need to implement robust regulations and public health campaigns to mitigate the risks associated with recreational use. This includes age restrictions, educational initiatives, and support systems for individuals struggling with cannabis dependence.

The Bigger Picture

The debate surrounding cannabis legalization and regulation is a global phenomenon, with countries around the world grappling with similar challenges. The Thai government’s decision regarding cannabis will likely be influenced by international trends and best practices in drug policy reform. It is crucial to consider the experiences of other nations that have legalized or decriminalized cannabis, examining both the successes and challenges they have encountered.

Source: Thai PBS World



Source link

Continue Reading

banking

“A big deal”: What the feds’ move to reclassify marijuana means for Colorado cannabis

Published

on

By



Cannabis advocates in Colorado cheered the Biden Administration’s reported move to reclassify marijuana and said the decision likely would reduce businesses’ tax burden significantly.

Industry leaders cautioned that such a move — if finalized — would not resolve some major challenges facing the industry, such as limited access to banking. But they pointed to the symbolic importance of preparations by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration to downgrade the substance’s drug classification.

A man pours cannabis into rolling papers as he prepares to roll a joint the Mile High 420 Festival in Civic Center Park in Denver, April 20, 2024. (Photo by Kevin Mohatt/Special to The Denver Post)

Read the rest of this story on DenverPost.com.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media