Connect with us

Legalization

Teen Cannabis Use Dropped by More than 60% in Minnesota After Legalization

Published

on

Teen Cannabis Use Dropped by More than 60% in Minnesota After Legalization

Cannabis use among Minnesota high school students fell by more than half between 2013 and 2025 despite the state adopting increasingly permissive cannabis policies over that period. according to a study published in Social Sciences and Medicine.

The researchers analyzed five waves of the Minnesota Student Survey that included ninth- and 11th-graders. Between 45,180 and 75,551 students participated in each survey year.

The prevalence of past month cannabis use fell from 12.7% in 2013 to 5% in 2025, with decreases observed in every demographic group examined, including groups based on sex assigned at birth, sexual orientation, gender identity, race and ethnicity, and financial stability.

The study period coincided with major changes in Minnesota’s cannabis laws. The state legalized medical cannabis in 2014, allowed some hemp-derived THC products for adults in 2022, and approved adult use Legalization of cannabis in 2023.

The findings counter concerns that reforming cannabis laws and expanding regulated access to adults would necessarily increase consumption among minors. The researchers noted that teen cannabis use has also declined nationally during a period when more states have enacted policies legalizing medical and adult use.

However, the authors did not conclude that legalization caused the decline. Instead, they pointed to broader changes in adolescent behavior, including less unstructured in-person socializing, more parental monitoring, increased screen time, and corresponding declines in alcohol use, nicotine use, and other risk behaviors.

While cannabis use declined across all study populations, marginalized youth generally remained more likely to report past-month use than their more socially privileged counterparts. However, these inequalities narrowed for many groups between 2013 and 2025.

Researchers had originally expected that marginalized students would experience smaller reductions in cannabis use, resulting in widening disparities. Instead, some marginalized populations experienced greater declines than their comparison groups.

The authors suggested that remaining inequalities may be related to stress related to racism, homophobia, bullying, poverty and other forms of discrimination. They recommended that youth cannabis prevention efforts focus on health equity and stigma reduction, rather than addressing increasingly permissive cannabis policy as the primary driver of adolescent use.

The study, “Changing Cannabis Use Among Diverse Adolescents Over a 12-Year Period of Policy Change: Trends and Disparities,” was supported by the Cannabis Research Center at the University of Minnesota School of Public Health. According to the authors, the funder had no role in the design, analysis or decision to publish the study.

Ganjapreneur: Providing everyday knowledge since 2014, the leading digital business magazine for cannabis industry professionals. to join our community of over 40,000 cannabis entrepreneurs.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Cannabis Industry News

Massachusetts Election Officials Reject Latest Challenge of Legalization Repeal Question

Published

on

By

Massachusetts Election Officials Reject Latest Challenge of Legalization Repeal Question

A challenge to the voting initiative that seeks to repealing adult-use cannabis laws in Massachusetts was rejected Tuesday by the State Voting Law Commission, NBC Boston reports. The challenge from the Stop the Repeal campaign alleged that many signatures were “fraudulently obtained,” were not “genuine,” were “illegible” and excluded required addresses or included missing marks, and that the Coalition for a Healthy Massachusetts failed to submit the required 12,429 certified signatures.

To keep the question from appearing on the November ballot, the commission would have had to agree to disqualify 123 signatures, but it concluded Stop the Repeal had not met its burden of proof that the signatures were illegally obtained or otherwise disqualifying.

The commission declined to disqualify 231 signatures because of the missing signs, saying the signs appear mostly on the back of petitions and “do not appear to be intentional signs and do not provide voters with any information.”

“Instead, they are erroneous pen marks that have no material effect on the remainder of the content of the petition.” – Massachusetts State Voting Law Commission via NBC Boston

The commission refused to invalidate another 99 signatures that Stop the Repeal argued were “non-genuine”, with one person signing multiple names. The commission said the campaign did not “prove by substantial evidence” that the signatures were signed by the same person.

The commission ordered the question to appear on the ballot in November.

Ganjapreneur: Providing everyday knowledge since 2014, the leading digital business magazine for cannabis industry professionals. to join our community of over 40,000 cannabis entrepreneurs.

TG joined Ganjapreneur in 2014 as a news writer and began hosting the Ganjapreneur podcast in 2016. He is based in upstate New York, where he also teaches media at a local university.

Continue Reading

cannabis policy

Cannabis Legalization Bill Reintroduced in the Senate 

Published

on

By

Cannabis Legalization Bill Reintroduced in the Senate 

or bill federal cannabis legalization has been reintroduced in Congress, led by Democratic Senators Cory Booker (NJ), Chuck Schumer (NY) and Ron Wyden (OR). The Cannabis Stewardship and Opportunities Act would remove cannabis entirely from the Controlled Substances Act and create a Cannabis Products Center to regulate the production, labeling, distribution, sales and other elements of the cannabis industry’s production and retail.

In a statement, Booker said, if passed, the legislation would “dismantle the unjust and outdated federal prohibition of marijuana, create a federal regulatory framework to protect public health and safety, erase past convictions for low-level cannabis offenses, and provide restorative justice to communities most harmed by decades of failed drug policy.”

The measure aims to direct the Food and Drug Administration to establish labeling standards for cannabis products, including strength, dosages, servings, place of manufacture and directions for use; create programs and funding to prevent youth cannabis use; and increase funding for comprehensive treatment of opioids, stimulants, and substance use disorders.

“The over-criminalization of cannabis has destroyed many lives, disproportionately harming communities of color. Our Cannabis Stewardship and Opportunity Act is needed and would right historical wrongs by investing in safety, research, worker rights and banking access for the industry. The movement is growing and I will not stop until federal justice is achieved for the legal people. It is long past time the government caught up.” – Schumer in one press release

The proposal would maintain federal bans on trafficking cannabis in violation of state law and create a grant program to help departments combat illegal cannabis; require the Department of Transportation to create standards for cannabis-impaired driving; direct the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to collect data on cannabis-impaired driving, create educational materials on best practices, and conduct public service advertising campaigns; and encourage states to enact bans on open containers of cannabis.

In a statement, Wyden said the “only judicial insanity” he sees “is the continued federal prohibition of cannabis.”

“Our legislation is the most comprehensive proposal on the books to end the federal ban on cannabis while keeping public health and safety front and center,” he said in the statement. “The federal government must rise to the occasion, and our bill is the way to do that.”

Additionally, the bill would transfer federal jurisdiction over cannabis to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau; eliminating the tax code’s restriction on cannabis businesses claiming business expense deductions and implementing an excise tax on cannabis products; establishing market competition rules intended to protect independent manufacturers, wholesalers and retailers and to prevent anti-competitive behaviour.

The measure also contains provisions to encourage cannabis research, prioritize restorative and economic justice for communities and individuals most harmed by federal prohibition and the War on Drugs, and language to strengthen workers’ rights, including eliminating unnecessary pre-employment of federal employees and random drug testing for cannabis.

The proposal is co-sponsored by Senators Michael Bennet (D-CO), John Fetterman (D-PA), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), John Hickenlooper (D-CO), Ben Ray Luján (D-NM), Alex Padilla (D-CA), Gary Peters (D-MI), Tina Smith (D-MN), Raphael-MAD Keyff (D-MN), Raphael-MAD (D-MA). (D-OR), Patty Murray (D-WA), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), and Peter Welch (D-VT).

Ganjapreneur: Providing everyday knowledge since 2014, the leading digital business magazine for cannabis industry professionals. to join our community of over 40,000 cannabis entrepreneurs.

Continue Reading

cannabis policy

Massachusetts Cannabis Legalization Repeal Effort Qualifies for November Ballot

Published

on

By

Massachusetts Cannabis Legalization Repeal Effort Qualifies for November Ballot

Massachusetts officials have confirmed that a ballot initiative seeking to overturn the state’s law legalizing adult cannabis will go before voters in November. Marijuana moment reports.

The Elections Division of the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s Office informed organizers last week that they had submitted 12,551 verified signatures during the second round of petitioning, narrowly clearing the requirement of 12,429 signatures for the Nov. 3, 2026 state election ballot. Under Massachusetts law, ballot campaigns must submit signatures in two rounds, with the Legislature given an opportunity to approve the proposed measures after the first presentation. Lawmakers declined to act on the cannabis proposal in May.

If approved by voters, the measure would repeal laws allowing regulated sales of adult-use cannabis and home cultivation, leaving the state’s legal possession and medical cannabis program intact. A coalition of cannabis business leaders, health care professionals and advocates has started a campaign opposing the proposal.

The campaign behind the repeal measure, the Coalition for a Healthy Massachusetts, previously suspended a signature gatherer after a video surfaced showing the person using fraudulent arguments while gathering signatures for the Massachusetts initiative and a similar proposal in Maine. The campaign said it has “zero tolerance” for fraudulent traffic tactics.

Cannabis advocates had opposed the Massachusetts proposal on grounds that included allegedly deceptive signature-gathering tactics, unrelated topics and an allegedly deficient official summary, but their effort was rejected by the State Voting Law Commission and the state’s Supreme Judicial Court. After last week’s decision, cannabis businesses in Massachusetts came forward another challenge until repeal.

Ganjapreneur: Providing everyday knowledge since 2014, the leading digital business magazine for cannabis industry professionals. to join our community of over 40,000 cannabis entrepreneurs.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media