Connect with us

Psychedelics

Media Report: EU bodies provide perspective on regulation of psychedelics

Published

on


Psychedelic Health UK report

In what marks an important development for Europe, a number of EU bodies have published a joint commentary in the world-leading medical journal, The Lancet, acknowledging the therapeutic potential of psychedelics. 

The European Medicines Agency (EMA), experts from the EU regulatory network and representatives from the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ECNP) have jointly issued the commentary.

Entitled ‘The Therapeutic Potential of Psychedelics: The European Regulatory Perspective’, the commentary explores classic psychedelics specifically – mescaline, DMT, LSD and psilocybin – as potential treatments for mental health conditions. 

See also  PAREA 2023: campaigning for psychedelic therapy in Europe 

The authors highlight that, with mental health problems affecting more than one in six people, this brings considerable economic costs that exceed 4% of gross domestic product across the EU. In this regard, they emphasise the need for effective and safe new treatments for mental disorders.

Exploring a number of challenges that will need to be addressed, the authors raise issues informed by work for the EMA, the EMA’s Central Nervous System Working Party and the ECNP.

See also  Discussing Alberta’s move to regulate psychedelic therapy

The Psychedelic Access and Research European Alliance (PAREA) has welcomed the development, which it describes as an “opportunity to open up an institutional debate about moving towards safe, effective and accessible adoption of psychedelic-assisted therapies in Europe.”

Research and clinical trials

Some of the key issues addressed by the authors include challenges with research methodology to enable valid efficacy estimations in clinical trials. 

The authors cover double blinding, the roles of positive and negative expectancy, and the use of independent, blinded external raters (including psychedelic naive patients).

Additionally, the need for investigation to establish optimum doses of psychedelics and individualised dosing, along with the relation between characteristics of the acute psychedelic experience and clinical improvement, are highlighted.

Regarding psychedelic-assisted psychotherapies, the authors note the need for trials to establish the added value of psychedelics compared with psychotherapy or psychological support alone, and that preparatory psychotherapy sessions should be investigated.

Barriers to research in Europe

Classic psychedelics all sit in Schedule 1 of the UN’s Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971, meaning it is currently extremely difficult to carry out research into the substances due to the costs associated with licensing.

The authors highlight this as another issue that needs to be addressed, suggesting that the UN’s classification of the substances may need to change due to their potential as a therapeutic, along with the fact that they do not show potential for addiction – one of the criteria a substance must meet to be classified in Schedule 1 of the Convention.

The authors state: “Classic psychedelics do not show potential for addiction and the justification for the UN schedule 1 classification (ie, drugs with “no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse”), as adopted in the 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances, should be questioned by evidence of the therapeutic potential of psychedelics.”

Tadeusz Hawrot, Founder and Executive Director of PAREA, told Psychedelic Health: “The most restrictive scheduling of psychedelic compounds directly contributed to and reinforced a long scientific stagnation by detracting scientists from conducting research in this area. 

“Likewise, European governments and EU bodies have been discouraged from supporting psychedelics research. This lack of public funding has been further undermining the ability to pursue psychedelics research, especially for those scientists who are less resourced and are not affiliated with the industry. 

“Consequently, companies and private donors typically fund psychedelic trials and the regulatory constraints and patent incentives create a pharmaceutical landscape that privileges high-cost synthetic variants over existing substances.

“Relying predominantly on industry-supported research to achieve the regulatory approval is not an equitable solution to rescheduling psychedelics with medicinal properties and yet, currently approval of scheduled medicines (by regulators such as EMA) and rescheduling are effectively synonymous. 

“Psychedelics should have their classifications reviewed based on the recent scientific and medical progress, independent of their possible regulatory approval as medicines. The support from The Lancet commentary authors in this regard is much welcome.”

Regulating psychedelic therapy

As symbolised by recent developments – such as Australia’s rescheduling of MDMA and psilocybin for depression and PTSD, Canada’s inclusion of the latter on its Special Access Programme (SAP) and Colorado and Alberta’s moves to decriminalise psychedelics – the need to address regulation around psychedelics is becoming increasingly important. 

Under Australia’s new approach, any psychiatrist looking to prescribe psychedelic therapies will need to be approved under the Authorised Prescriber Scheme by the TGA following approval by a human research ethics committee.

In their Lancet commentary, the authors stipulate that given approval, regulation around psychedelics in Europe should see conditions and restrictions related to safe and effective use defined at the time of approval, and monitoring requirements in place before, during, and after administration of the substances.

Regulatory tools that could facilitate this include product characteristics, risk management plans and pharmacovigilance studies, along with educational materials, appropriate training and controlled access programmes.

The authors conclude: “The therapeutic potential of psychedelics has triggered new hopes and high expectations, but larger clinical trials are needed to further evaluate efficacy and safety. 

“A thorough scientific assessment of the benefit–risk balance will be required, as for any other medicines. 

“Developers are encouraged to engage early with the EMA through all available scientific and regulatory platforms in their efforts to overcome the challenges associated with the development of psychedelic treatments.”

Source:  https://psychedelichealth.co.uk/2023/02/15/eu-bodies-perspective-regulation-psychedelics/



Source link

Continue Reading

Psychedelics

Article: Early 2025 Empire State Psychedelic Policy Roundup

Published

on

By


Unique NY-Born Licensing Model for Therapeutic Psilocybin Use Gains Momentum in State Senate Amid Flurry of Psychedelic Bills Filed Across the US

(Albany, NY) As New York’s cannabis industry continues to turn a hefty profit in the earliest days of 2025 so far, many plant medicine community members both within and just beyond the cannabis industry have been steadily laying the groundwork for the next state-level drug policy reform movement rife with seemingly-incompatible, arguably-intertwined intersectional equity enhancement opportunities and profit margin maximization priorities at play: psychedelics.

For those unfamiliar, 2024 brought about a number of presumed-to-be momentum-stalling psychedelic setbacks – first with the FDA’s stunning rejection of a first-of-its-kind MDMA-Assisted Therapy Treatment developed by the Multidisciplinary Association of  Psychedelic Studies (MAPS) and their Public Benefit Corporation (PBC) spin-off Lykos Therapeutics. To compound public misperception of psychedelic policy reform efforts further, a much-discussed and deep-pocketed legal psychedelic therapy-personal possession and home cultivation decrim-focused psychedelic ballot campaign in Massachusetts failed spectacularly – leading some pundits – both pro-legalization and prohibitionists alike – to speculate that “the psychedelic renaissance” as it’s been called by some, had in fact stalled out at large.

Fortunately for the plant medicine community, those naysayers were largely wrong, as in January 2025 alone, a record-breaking 38 psychedelics-related bills were filed in 14 states across the country. Here in New York, prominent psychedelic policy reform advocates have gained serious traction within the state’s legislature, especially after a recent lobbying day at the state Capitol.

Led by the increasingly diverse coalition known as New Yorkers for Mental Health Alternatives and backed by a growing bipartisan interest in alternative mental health treatments, New York’s burgeoning intersectional community of psychedelic activists and legal experts recently gathered in Albany to rally support for two proposed bills aimed at expanding access to psychedelics for therapeutic and personal use.

Avery Stempel NYMHA

“Our 2025 New York State Capitol Lobby Day was a huge success,” said Avery Stempel, co-founder of New Yorkers for Mental Health Alternatives (NYMHA) and founder of Collar City Mushrooms. “Advocates, doctors, and lawyers from Brooklyn to Buffalo traveled to Albany to participate. We had individual meetings with 10 senators and assembly members and talked to many more in the hall while they passed by our tables. There is a lot of energy gathering around the New York bills, and we are hopeful that we will be making some serious traction this year.”

At the forefront of the legislative push is Assembly Bill A2142, introduced by Assemblywoman Amy Paulin (D) alongside four co-sponsors. The bill would create a state-supervised program allowing licensed facilitators, including health and social care professionals, to administer psilocybin-assisted therapy to eligible patients. The measure mirrors a growing movement across the country, following in the footsteps of states like Oregon and Colorado, which have already established legal frameworks for psychedelic-assisted treatment.

A second measure, House Bill 628, introduced by Assemblymember Linda Rosenthal (D) with eight co-sponsors, takes a broader approach. If passed, the legislation would legalize the adult possession and use of several plant- and fungus-based hallucinogens, including psilocybin, mescaline, DMT, ibogaine, and psilocin. The bill is currently under review by the state’s public health committee and, if advanced, would require approval from Governor Kathy Hochul (D) to become law.

Momentum for these reforms received a boost with the recent filing of Senate Bill S5303 by State Senator Julia Salazar (D). The measure serves as a companion bill to A2142, signaling increased legislative interest in the possibility of a hearing on psychedelic policy in Albany later this year. According to NYMHA leaders, this marks a critical step in New York’s efforts to bring psychedelic-assisted therapy into the mainstream.

Jonah Martindale, Rick Doblin, Gina Giorgio

“We are seeing that in the last few years, there has been a shift in the popularity of alternative treatments for the worsening mental health crisis, such as psychedelics,” said Jonah Martindale, a New York City resident, NYMHA coalition member, and advocate with Students for Sensible Drug Policy (SSDP). “The openness of various politicians across the political spectrum for these bills seems to reflect that. Now is the time to keep building momentum.”

Supporters of the bills argue that psychedelic-assisted therapy has the potential to revolutionize mental health care, offering new hope for individuals suffering from treatment-resistant conditions such as PTSD, depression, and substance use disorders. Medical research and clinical trials have shown promising results in recent years, prompting lawmakers in various states to reconsider their stance on these substances.

However, despite the growing enthusiasm, challenges remain. Critics have raised concerns about public safety, regulatory oversight, and the potential for misuse. Law enforcement officials and some health professionals caution that broader legalization could lead to unintended consequences, particularly if access to psychedelics is not accompanied by rigorous safety protocols.

Read full article

Early 2025 Empire State Psychedelic Policy Roundup

 



Source link

Continue Reading

Psychedelics

Linked In Post – Jon Dennis, Psychedelic Lawyer: Washington SB 5201, the regulated psilocybin access bill, was considered today by the Senate Committee on Labor & Commerce ( 18 Feb 2025)

Published

on

By


Washington SB 5201, the regulated psilocybin access bill, was considered today by the Senate Committee on Labor & Commerce. The bill would require low-income and other taxpayers to subsidize regulated access that is cost-prohibitive for many, while continuing to criminalize the same activities outside of the regulated marketplace.

For context, Oregon’s regulated system was promised to be self-funded by licensing fees and sales taxes, but the program needed a $3.1MM bailout in 2023, and the program is now seeking an additional $3.5MM bailout from the legislature. This is despite already-exorbitant licensing fees, including a $2,000 annual fee for facilitators. (By contrast, the annual fee for an Oregon law license is $683; the annual fee for medical doctors is $702.)

Taxing residents for the administration of a costly access program, while criminalizing affordable access outside the program, is problematic–particularly in Washington where local governments representing 14% of the entire population have already called on state lawmakers to decriminalize psilocybin and other plant-based psychedelic substances. Washington lawmakers must do better and not ignore the socio-economic and criminal justice impacts of a regulated-only access program.



Source link

Continue Reading

Psychedelics

Alert: We are just over a week away from the Natural Medicine Division opening our application process to individuals who are interested in becoming business Owners or Natural Medicine Handlers, and to business applications for Healing Centers, Cultivations, Testing Facilities and Product Manufacturers.

Published

on

By


Dear Interested Parties:

 

We are just over a week away from the Natural Medicine Division opening our application process to individuals who are interested in becoming business Owners or Natural Medicine Handlers, and to business applications for Healing Centers, Cultivations, Testing Facilities and Product Manufacturers.

 

This week, we wanted to share some logistical information about the application process.

 

We encourage you to submit your application online, and there will be instructions on how to submit applications on the Natural Medicine Division website.

However, based on stakeholder feedback, we will be opening up limited appointment slots for in-person assistance at our Lakewood office starting on Friday, Jan. 10, 2025. At this time, Fridays will be the only day that we will be offering in-person natural medicine licensing application assistance. We will be open from 9 a.m. to noon and 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. for in-person Friday appointments.

We are finalizing the applications and will be sharing those prior to our application process coming online. You can always check out our Public Resources folder to find information and compliance tools.

As always, please reach out to us at [email protected].us if you have any questions.

 

Stay tuned!

The Natural Medicine Division



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media