Connect with us

breaking news

Oregon: CIAO (The Cannabis Industry Alliance of Oregon) Celebrates Plant Tagging Victory

Published

on


The long and short of it is that Oregon growers will be allowed to tag in batches of 100 and not per plant but the kicker is that the new rules don’t kick in until 1 Jan 2024

 

 

Mike Getlin Board Chair writes…

 

Dear CIAO Members, Supporters, and Industry Insiders, 

It’s with deep gratitude for your support over the many years we have fought for this result that I can proudly and definitively report we have finally won on plant tags.

As most of you know from the recent OLCC email, as of January 1st, 2024, we will no longer be required to individually tag plants. The recent rulemaking to this effect was approved by the commission and the new batch tagging rules will go into effect next year.

To me, as a producer going into my seventh year trying to survive the Oregon market, I know the cash savings this change will create for my farm. But after having led this effort for nearly five years, I think this achievement means much more than simply reducing costs.

From the beginning, the fight over METRC tags has really forced a closer look at the core goals of our regulatory system in Oregon. We have a program that was built to keep the feds off our backs and to address a set of concerns that may have been real in 2015 but are now a thing of the past (as they always should have been).

For our industry to thrive, however, we must develop a system of cooperation between the industry and our partners in government that allows for the laws that govern us to evolve fast enough to match the needs of this unique marketplace. That’s what this fight has been about. We needed to answer a simple question: Can Oregon learn from experience and change its system for the better? Today we proved that we can. 

When I first pitched the idea of batch tagging adult plants under one Metrc tag just like immature plants to the OLCC in 2018, Jeff Sessions was still the Attorney General. Needless to say, it fell on deaf ears. Undeterred, my team kept advocating and we were able to slowly start convincing people at the agency and in the legislature to start seeing things our way. Our perseverance finally began to pay off in 2020 when Steve Marks came out to my farm and spent a couple hours crawling around a greenhouse tagging plants. A lot changed after that day.

Soon, instead of us pushing the OLCC to rethink tagging, we moved to a stage where the OLCC was committed to the idea and working hand in hand with us to come up with a solution. This was not as simple as it seems because cutting down on plant tags drastically decreases METRC’s revenue in Oregon, and careful negotiations are necessary to figure out how to do it.

To finally make it happen, the CIAO’s leadership worked carefully, over the last two years, with the OLCC to put this puzzle together, and today’s announcement is the result, victory at last.

Starting January 1, 2024 Oregon Cannabis Farms will be able to batch tag up to 100 adult plants using just 1 Metrc tag.

You can view the whole rule package here – Cannabis Tracking System Batch Plant Tagging – Page 12 is where you can find the language about batch tagging.

For me personally, this is a big win. This is one of the issues that got me involved in public policy in the first place, and has been a core focus of mine for more than five years. I’d be remiss not to thank both Steve Marks and TJ Sheehy for their thoughtful work on this issue. Of course, so much of my gratitude is to all of you who have supported ORCA, FARMS Inc, and OIPA over the years and continue supporting us as the CIAO. Thank you for your contributions, your counsel, your ideas, and your patience. This victory is really yours.

With Gratitude,

Mike Getlin

Board Chair, CIAO



Source link

Continue Reading

Asia Pacific & Australia

It All Turned A Bit Bogan At Aussie Medical Cannabis Symposium

Published

on

By



Thanks to Hemp Gazette for spotting this – I have to admit I missed it and unsurprisingly nobody made me aware of it The Linked in Post from the organisers Some Comments



Source link

Continue Reading

breaking news

And Today’s Mass CCC Drama Is… plot to “take out” O’Brien as punishment for investigating serious allegations of cover-ups, abuse and misconduct within the agency.

Published

on

By


C/- Grant Smith – Ellis

I do hope there is a Netflix scriptwriter following his posts – all this would make a perfect update to Parks & Recreation or The Office..

Here’s a taste of the latest episode

 

In shocking development, former Massachusetts CCC Chair Shannon O’Brien alleges State Treasurer Deb Goldberg violated court order in an attempt to keep secret details about a plot within the CCC to “take out” O’Brien as punishment for investigating serious allegations of cover-ups, abuse and misconduct within the agency.

Furthermore, say O’Brien’s lawyers, Goldberg attempted to spread this incorrectly redacted document to the press in an attempt to obfuscate the serious allegations directed at CCC staff (and currently being hidden from the public by way of these risky redactions).

A section of Thursday’s motion from former CCC Chair Shannon O’Brien, alleging violations of a court order by State Treasurer Deb Goldberg. (Released via MassCourts, 2/13/25)

O’Brien, in turn, is asking the court to order the entire document unsealed for pubic review as a sanction for Goldberg violating the court’s specific instructions as to redactions.

“Given the nature of the underlying proceedings, and the asserted bases for Plaintiff’s removal as Chair of the CCC, the Court is, frankly, skeptical that the administrative record itself is likely to contain a significant amount of protected personal information that satisfied the narrow definition of same under SJC Rule 1:24,” said judge Robert B. Gordan (who is specially assigned to the matter) in a prior ruling instructing Goldberg as to how to go about filing the redacted document in question. Read more background about that ruling here – https://www.patreon.com/posts/121109593

A section of the original court order that O’Brien alleges Goldberg violated. (Released via MassCourts, 1/30/25)

Then, in a strong, rebuke to Goldberg, Judge Gordon went on to say, …[T]he Treasurer has not identified, and the Court has not located, any case authority suggesting that an administrative record filed in the context of a review under G.L.c. 249 Section 4 or G.C.c. 30A is subject to the broader strictures of [the Fair Information Practices Act/FIPA], to claims of attorney-client privileges asserted after the subject information was disclosed in an administrative proceeding, or to a privet promised of confidentiality that a governmental agency may have extended to a complaining employee, such as would justify impoundment or redaction of the administrative record on those grounds.”

In turn, Goldberg’s shocking decision to attempt to hide most of the document in question from public view may well draw the ire of the court upon review thereof.

A hearing on the matter has been requested, but not yet scheduled, in Suffolk Superior Court.

’Brien alleges that a group of CCC staff members –attempting to cover up serious allegations of abuse, misconduct and corruption– “took out” O’Brien with pre-textual smears after she attempted to reform the beleaguered regulatory juggernaut.

Goldberg, O’Brien further alleges, is attempting to hide documents related to O’Brien’s suspension (and eventual dismissal) that may show a plot by Nurys Camargo, Shawn Collins, Cedric Sinclair and other CCC personnel to “take out” O’Brien with pretextual allegations of misconduct. Those documents are currently being kept private by Goldberg’s office because of the explosive allegations of misconduct (directed at some of Goldberg’s friends/allies) included therein.

Plenty more at

https://www.patreon.com/posts/new-overnight-in-122264111?utm_campaign=patron_engagement&utm_source=post_link&post_id=122264111&utm_id=8eb034e7-1b0e-497d-b0de-90b535ee76e9&utm_medium=email

 



Source link

Continue Reading

breaking news

Royal Queen Seeds Fund Campaign In Germany Saying There’s A Lot of Poo In Illegal Weed.. and yes hilarity ensues with puns about smoking good shit

Published

on

By


Only one in five samples classified as “clean”

After eight months of work and with the fantastic support of over 200 volunteers, the submitted samples were tested for biological components, pesticides, and other drugs.* And the results were shocking: Out of more than 300 samples tested, only around 20 percent were classified as safe and clean products. The majority of the remaining 80 percent contained traces of substances such as human and animal feces, Covid-19, and influenza viruses. We also found traces of cocaine, ketamine, crystal meth, MDMA, and even compounds from hairspray, as well as traces of toxic pesticides that are classified as illegal in Europe.

Worst test results in Berlin, Hamburg, and Munich

How the individual cities performed in the study is shown in the following overview, listed in descending order from most to least contaminated samples from 30 German cities and 20 other European metropolises.

*Please see below for detailed information on the analysis methodology.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media