Connect with us

Cannabis News

Smart root zone monitoring in stone wool cultivation

Published

on

In modern professional horticulture, medicinal crops such as cannabis and high-yielding vegetable production, root zone management is the cornerstone of consistent quality and yield. Rockwool substrates offer a very stable and correctable root environment, but this advantage is fully exploited when decisions are supported by reliable and well-interpreted data. Sensors in the root zone provide continuous information on water content, EC and temperature. Used correctly, they allow growers to anticipate plant needs rather than reacting to stress signals. Used incorrectly, they introduce noise, false confidence, and misdirection. The difference is in strategy, location and interpretation. Remember that sensors are just another tool and should not replace traditional monitoring methods.

Why Root Zone Monitoring Becomes Essential at Scale
Every grower evaluates the root zone, consciously or not. In smaller installations, this is often done visually and by touch: lifting blocks, assessing the color of rockwool, or observing the attitude of plants. These methods are valuable, but subjective and difficult to standardize.

As operations grow and the number of plants increases, manual assessment quickly reaches its limits. Weighing slabs or blocks on a scale adds objectivity, but at discrete moments and with significant manual labor. In larger facilities, the manpower required to continuously monitor root conditions throughout the crop is simply not available.

Root zone sensors address this reality. They provide continuous data streams that show trends, dynamics and responses to irrigation and climate change over time. In scaled cultivation, sensors are therefore not only a precision tool, but a practical necessity. Importantly, they do not replace experience; they formalize, making intuition measurable and repeatable.

© CULTIWOOL SA
Location, representation and care of sensors
A sensor does not measure the crop; measures the exact micro-environment in which it is installed. Correct positioning is therefore essential.

Sensors should be installed in the active root zone of a healthy, representative plant, at a depth where the roots remain active throughout the crop cycle. They should never be placed directly next to a drip, as this results in high moisture readings that do not reflect average root conditions. Therefore, consistent dripper placement is essential not only for block performance, but also for consistent sensor data.

The wider greenhouse context matters just as much. Sensors should not be placed in corners, edges, near walkways or in areas subject to shadows, drafts or uneven watering. Border plants and atypical sites experience conditions different from the majority of the crop and will yield data that are not representative of the compartment.

Once installed, the sensors must remain in place for the duration of the crop cycle. Repeated removal and reinsertion disturbs the structure of the rockwool, alters the local water distribution, and compromises the consistency of the data. If a sensor needs to be removed, it should never be put back in the same place. Previously used insertion points contain moisture and residual pockets that can affect EC readings. In such cases, the sensor must be installed in a new, unobstructed location.

Consistency in positioning is what allows producers to confidently recognize trends, responses and deviations.

How many sensors are enough?
A single sensor can never represent an entire greenhouse, and in most cases, not even an entire compartment. Changes in light distribution, uniformity of irrigation, air flow and plant development inevitably create them within the crop.

At the same time, the deployment of sensors must be economically rational. The goal is not maximum sensor density, but reliable representation. In practice, this means installing multiple sensors per compartment in areas with comparable growing conditions.

Instead of focusing on individual readings, the most robust approach is to work with average data. Each sensor reflects the conditions of its specific location; by combining their readings, growers create a stable reference that reduces the risk of overreaction to local changes and supports safer and more consistent decision-making. Again, a sensor is just one tool to consider.

Interpreting root zone data in rockwool
Rockwool allows precise control of the air-water ratio in the root zone. Sensors should therefore be used to observe dynamics rather than isolated values.

Meaningful interpretation is based on the behavior of the back-dry between irrigation events, wetting rate, EC stability and how these parameters respond to climatic conditions. Sudden spikes or drops often indicate improper watering, uneven distribution, or location effects rather than actual plant demand.

Root zone data gain real value when cross-referenced with climate parameters such as temperature, humidity and VPD, as well as visual observations of crops. Integrated platforms and multiple data sources, such as those enabled by solutions like SenseNL, help validate trends and clarify cause-and-effect relationships.

Selecting the right sensor for the right substrate
Not all sensors in the root zone are interchangeable. Sensor technology must be matched with the physical properties of the substrate to generate accurate and meaningful data. They must also be properly maintained and stored to ensure accuracy.

Different substrates, such as rockwool and cocopeat, have fundamentally different structures, water retention characteristics and EC dynamics. Sensors designed for cocopeat will not give reliable readings on rockwool, and vice versa.

Also in rockwool cultivation, the selection of sensors is important. Blocks and slabs differ in volume, water distribution and root development patterns. Sensors designed for stone wool blocks are therefore not always suitable for slabs, and vice versa. Matching the sensor to the substrate material and its form factor is critical to obtaining reliable root-site data.

Driving for uniformity and stability
In both medicinal and vegetable cultivation, success is defined by uniformity and repeatability. Correctly installed and correctly interpreted root zone sensors help to identify variability early, reduce differences between plants and support stable establishment or vegetation strategies.

Combined with high-quality stone wool substrates, the sensors become a powerful ally in precision farming, improving consistency without replacing the grower’s experience.

From data points to confident decisions
Root zone sensors aren’t about collecting more numbers; they are about creating clarity. When sensors are strategically placed, deployed in sufficient numbers, and handled consistently, they make rockwool farming a predictable and correctable system.

By averaging data from multiple representative locations, producers reduce risk, avoid overcorrection, and drive with confidence. In professional horticulture, where uniformity, stability and scale define success, reliable root zone data becomes the basis rather than an experiment, cycle after cycle.

For more information:
Cultiwool
(email protected)
www.cultiwool-substrate.com

Cannabis News

Australian medicinal cannabis sales fall nearly 30% in second half of 2025

Published

on

By

Australian medicinal cannabis sales fell 28.5% in the second half of 2025 compared to the first half of the year, according to new data released by the Penington Institute in April 2026, marking the first significant drop in sales recorded since the country’s medicinal cannabis framework was introduced in 2016.

Data obtained by the Penington Institute from the Australian Department of Health, Disability and Aging through a freedom of information request shows sales peaked at 3.72 million units in the second half of 2024 and remained at 3.70 million units in the first half of 2025, before falling to 2.65 million units in the second half of the year. The decline followed a period of particularly significant growth in late 2023 and 2024, driven by increasing scrutiny from regulators and medical organizations over prescribing practices.

The Penington Institute attributes the reversal largely to a stepped-up enforcement campaign that has unfolded on multiple regulatory fronts since 2023. The Therapeutic Goods Administration banned the importation, advertising and supply of medicinal cannabis in 2023, and then issued millions of dollars in fines to non-compliant companies. The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency published new clinical guidance for prescribers in July 2025 and, by mid-2025, had taken enforcement action against more than 50 doctors, with further investigations underway. Ahpra also issued explicit warnings warning health officials to prioritize patient well-being over profits.

The enforcement push was in response to documented concerns about high-volume, commercially driven prescriptions, some clinics conducting very brief clinical consultations, illegally advertising the drug to the public, failing to check real-time prescription monitoring systems, and using closed-loop business models in which medical cannabis brand companies also ran clinics prescribing their own products.

A wider TGA review of the patient access framework is ongoing. As of early April 2026, no reform recommendations have been announced. The Penington Institute’s report warns against major restrictions on patient access, the therapeutic benefits the drug provides to a large number of Australian patients, the lack of clear evidence linking medicinal cannabis to significant public health harm, and the presence of a robust illicit market that would absorb patients who would not be able to access legal avenues if access were restricted.

The report also points to product compliance testing as an area where existing standards are not applied consistently. Australian quality standards cover all medicinal cannabis products, but the TGA does not check compliance before the products reach patients, only conducting limited post-market risk-based testing, the results of which are not published. The issue is particularly relevant given that almost two-thirds of the flower volume sold in Australia in 2024 was imported, with some countries of origin maintaining lower regulatory standards than Australia. In April 2024, the TGA confirmed that it had not carried out tests on imported products in the previous 12 months.

The full Pennington Institute report, Medicinal Cannabis Sales and Regulatory Enforcement, can be seen here

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Trump Pushes Congress To Keep Full-Spectrum CBD Legal While Restricting Hemp Products That Pose ‘Health Risks’

Published

on

By

President Donald Trump is urging lawmakers in Congress to act in November to change the law that threatens to federally recriminalize hemp-derived CBD products.

“I’m calling on Congress to update the Act so Americans can continue to have access to the full-spectrum CBD products they trust and support, while maintaining Congress’ intent to restrict the sale of products that pose health risks,” the president said in a Truth Social message Thursday, the same day his administration announced it is moving forward to re-regulate marijuana.

“We need to do this RIGHT and FAST, especially for those who have found CBD to help them,” he said. “Also, I’m told it will help our BIG FARMERS that we love and will always be around.”

Hemp derivatives containing less than 0.3 percent delta-9 THC by drug weight were made federally legal under the 2018 Farm Bill signed by Trump during his first term. But late last year, he signed new legislation with provisions that will redefine hemp, so that only products with a total of 0.4 milligrams of THC per container will remain legal starting November 12.

Industry advocates say the existing provisions threaten to ban intoxicating and synthetic cannabinoids, but serve to take popular full-spectrum CBD products that many Americans use therapeutically off the market.

“ONE IN FIVE adults used it in the past year, and many say it dramatically improved their chronic pain,” the president said in the social media post, adding that hemp-derived CBD “has made a HUGE difference for so many people.”

The administration also referred to a new initiative launched this month Cover up to $500 of hemp-derived products annually for eligible Medicare patients. The program being implemented by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) focuses largely on CBD, but allows products to contain a total of 3 milligrams of THC per serving.

“In December, I signed a very important Executive Order calling for Research and Innovation into Hemp-derived CBD,” Trump said. “Our wonderful Dr. Mehmet Oz moved quickly to follow the Executive Order directive, and set a model in motion for some Seniors this month. But more needs to be done!”

“Please do it, and SOON,” the president said, referring to the sweeping recriminalization congressional fix that will take effect in November. “Thank you for your attention to this matter!”

It’s unclear how far Trump wants to reduce the scope of planned federal restrictions on hemp products and what kinds of revised THC rules and limits he’d prefer to sign into law.

separately In his remarks in the Oval Office on Thursday, the president highlighted the medical benefits of marijuana A few hours after the DOJ issued the rule to federally reorganize cannabis.

“A lot of people are facing big problems, and that seems like the best answer,” the president said in the Oval Office. “They are very happy about it.”

“So hopefully you won’t have to,” he said. “But if you must, I hear it’s the best of all alternatives.”

Meanwhile, the Republican Lawmakers in Congress introduced amendments this week to delay the ban on hemp products for another year and creating the framework to continue the legal sale, with new restrictions and instructions. The House Rules Committee will decide next week whether the pending Farm Bill amendment proposal can be considered for a floor vote.

Several other bipartisan hemp reform bills are also pending in Congress.

Last week, for example, it was introduced by Senators Rand Paul (R-KY), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and Joni Ernst (R-IA). The Hemp Safety Enforcement Act, which would give states the option of federal recriminalization of THC hemp products. it will be established this year. Ernst on Wednesday, however, withdrew his name as a sponsor of the legislation.

Separately, Anti-marijuana organizations filed a lawsuit against the Medicare hemp CBD coverage policyand Health and Human Services attorneys. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and CMS Director Mehmet Oz recently He submitted a letter requesting the filing of the case.

The White House Management and Budget Office has also held a series of meetings a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) CBD product enforcement policy.

The FDA issued the guidance making it clear that it does not intend to interfere Establish a Medicare coverage plan for hemp-derived products.

CMS finalized a rule that will be adopted separately Coverage of certain hemp products, primarily as specialized health-related benefits, through Medicare Advantage the plans

As hemp products become more popular among consumers, some big brands are trying to get in on the action.

The main retailer Target, for example, is expanding its market share of hemp-derived THC beverages. Last year, the company began a pilot program selling cannabis beverages at 10 stores in Minnesota. That apparently went well, and now the company has secured licenses from Minnesota regulators to sell lower-potency edible hemp products — including THC drinks — in 72 stores in the state.

The US Department of Agriculture published this month shows that US farmers grow $3 billion in hemp crops by 2025— 64% increase compared to the previous year.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

US Representatives introduce the Higher Education Marijuana Research Act

Published

on

By

Cannabis Caucus Co-Chairs Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and Dina Titus (D-NV) yesterday introduced the Higher Education Marijuana Research Act to remove barriers to academic cannabis research, protect universities and researchers, and promote the responsible study of marijuana.
“As Chair of the Congressional Cannabis Caucus, I am proud to support the Higher Education Marijuana Research Act, which removes outdated federal barriers that have long prevented universities from conducting critical cannabis research. This legislation protects universities and researchers while removing barriers so they can make better public health decisions,” said Congressman Ilhan Omar.
“The legal and responsible use of cannabis in Nevada has been an important economic driver across the country and deserves further investigation,” said Congressman Titus. “The Higher Education Marijuana Research Act would eliminate outdated federal restrictions that prevent universities and researchers from studying the full range of cannabis products that Americans actually use.”
Although 40 states have legalized medical marijuana and 24 states have legalized it for recreational use, federal law continues to impose significant barriers that limit meaningful research. Cannabis remains subject to restrictive federal controls that dictate who can conduct research, what products can be studied, and how studies are designed. Researchers are often limited to federally licensed cannabis that does not reflect the potency or variety available in state legal markets. Compounding these challenges, researchers must navigate stringent compliance requirements and uncertainty about legal liability. These obstacles have delayed clinical trials, limited understanding of long-term health effects, and left critical gaps in knowledge.

“It makes no sense for the federal government to interfere with this research when millions of Americans are already using marijuana, whether for medical or recreational purposes,” said Congressman Titus.

The Higher Education Marijuana Research Act is supported by the National Organization for Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), the National Cannabis Industry Association, the Drug Policy Alliance, and the UNLV Cannabis Policy Institute.

“This legislation is needed more than ever as states continue to allow cannabis for medical and adult use. Even if cannabis is federally reclassified in the near future, there will be significant hurdles for scientists hoping to add to the existing research pool, especially when conducting clinical trials on health effects and examining state-regulated products. The bill moves forward again and calls on Congress to take immediate action to facilitate research, develop new medical treatments, to inform evidence-based policy and help consumers make informed choices,” said Morgan Fox, Policy Director of the National Organization for Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML).

“The American public has made it clear that it wants access to safe, regulated, and tested cannabis products, and state legal markets continue to evolve to meet that demand. However, federal barriers have long limited researchers’ ability to study hemp in ways that reflect real-world conditions. The Higher Education Marijuana Research Act is a practical step toward expanding credible, real-world research by providing clarity and protection for NCIA universities. Supporting this legislation will help strengthen the industry’s scientific foundation. and will help better inform policymakers, regulators and consumers,” said Brooke Gilbert, Chief Operating Officer of the National Cannabis Industry Association.

“The Higher Education Marijuana Research Act is common-sense legislation that will help researchers better understand the types of cannabis produced in state-regulated markets. The bill will remove a major barrier that currently prevents scientists from learning more about state-regulated cannabis and its public health implications. Increasing the body of scientific evidence with better-informed research, increasing the body of scientific evidence with more informed research, evidence-based policy anyone who should leave,” he said. Drug Markets and the Legal System.

“Everyone, from members of Congress on both sides of the aisle to the scientific community to the current and previous presidential administrations, has stated that cannabis research is necessary and important. This is the one issue that almost everyone can agree on these days, but not much progress is being made to reduce the current barriers to cannabis research. Congressman Titus’ bill has always been a common sense pro-cannabis research. Cannabis reform, it is only fitting that UNLV Cannabis Policy lead the charge now. The Institute applauds his efforts and hopes others will do the necessary work to reduce current barriers to cannabis research that only serve to maintain outdated prohibition-era policies,” said Riana Durrett, director of the UNLV Cannabis Policy Institute.

Source: Representative Ilhan Omar’s office

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media