Connect with us

Cannabis News

Washington Lawmakers Take Up Bill To Legalize Marijuana Home Grow Amid Police Opposition

Published

on

“I’m a veteran and I see no reason why I can’t grow some plants in my home for my own personal use.”

By Aspen Ford, Washington State Standard

After more than a decade of failed attempts, supporters Changing Washington State law to allow domestic marijuana they are getting discouraged, but not giving up.

This year they are back in Parliament, encouraging MPs to make a change. They argue that homegrown cannabis would not put much of a dent in the regulated retail sale of marijuana, and that the penalties for home growing fall disproportionately on people of color.

Law enforcement groups and cities are among those opposed to it, because it exposes children to the drug and adds to the burden on local police.

Senate Bill 6204 It would allow adults over the age of 21 to grow up to six cannabis plants at home. Two adults living together can grow up to 12 plants and in households with three or more adults can grow up to 15. The Senate Labor and Commerce Committee held a hearing on the bill on Monday.

The proposal is the 11th year lawmakers have introduced legislation to allow home cultivation since Washington legalized recreational cannabis in 2012.

Washington is one of only three states to legalize medical and recreational cannabis, but bans domestic marijuana. When Colorado legalized recreational cannabis the same year Washington did, it also allowed home cultivation.

“I’m a veteran and I don’t see any reason why I can’t grow some plants in my house for my own personal use,” Tumwater resident Erik Johansen told the Senate committee. “There are no children there.”

Some critics of the bill say the state would lose millions of dollars a year in tax revenue if consumers chose to grow marijuana at home instead of paying a 37 percent excise tax on cannabis when they buy the products.

Advocates say that’s difficult because growing cannabis is particularly difficult.

“We’re not your competition. We’re your neighbors and your customers,” John Kingsbury, chair of the Cannabis Alliance’s patient committee, said at this week’s hearing.

“If you’re willing to commit crimes against your neighbors to protect half a percent of your sales, then the promise of I-502 has gone terribly wrong,” added Kingsbury, referring to the ballot initiative that voters approved in 2012 to legalize the sale of recreational marijuana.

On average, between 2013 and 2019 in Washington, blacks were five times more likely to be arrested for home cultivation than whites and Hispanics were 2.4 times more likely, according to a 2022 report by the state’s Social Equity in Cannabis Task Force.

Sen. Rebecca Saldaña, D-Seattle, the bill’s lead sponsor, said that even if the smell bothers the neighbors of home growers, the law could be enforced and managed.

As written, people who do not control the smell of marijuana plants or who have them in places visible to the public can face a third-degree civil infraction. Law enforcement can seize and destroy plants from a home that grow beyond the legal limit.

The Liquor and Cannabis Council would not be involved in home grow regulation.

James McMahan, policy director of the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Chiefs of Police, said law enforcement would need a search warrant and probable cause to make a seizure.

The association is against the bill. “We are concerned about the continued normalization of marijuana for our youth,” McMahan said.

The Association of Washington Cities also opposes it. “It creates a huge burden on local law enforcement,” said Derrick Nunnally, the group’s government relations advocate.

The bill prohibits the cultivation of cannabis in foster homes and family day care homes. There are no restrictions for households with children.

In places where marijuana businesses are banned, residents would still be able to grow it at home.

House Bill 2614It was a companion bill scheduled for a hearing in the House Committee on Consumer Protection and Business on Friday, but was pulled from the agenda for consideration. His primary sponsor is Rep. Shelley Kloba, D-Bothell.

“The legalization of home brew in Washington state is inevitable,” Kingsbury said. “My only hope is that I live long enough to see it happen.”

“It would be disappointing if legalization turned into corporate weed,” he added.

This story was first published by the Washington State Standard.

Marihuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Maximizing cannabis yields with intercanopy and subcanopy lighting

Published

on

By







Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Transportation Groups Warn Feds Of Marijuana Rescheduling’s ‘Consequences’ For Drug Testing Of Truck Drivers And Pilots

Published

on

By

A coalition of transportation and safety organizations said they have “serious safety concerns” about the Trump administration’s move to federally regulate marijuana.

Led by the American Trucking Association, the groups sent a letter to federal officials Monday asking them to take steps to ensure truck drivers, pilots, transit operators and other safety-sensitive workers continue to be tested for cannabis.

“If employers do not take the necessary steps to preserve the ability of security-sensitive transportation workers to test for marijuana, this change could have significant consequences for the safety of passengers and the entire transportation industry,” wrote Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Administrator Terrance Cole, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, and Transportation Secretary J.

The organizations said they understand that federal officials are being “urgently” reorganized under an executive order from President Donald Trump, that they are “deeply concerned that the current process does not adequately take into account agencies responsible for transportation safety or protecting the traveling public” and that they want the agencies to “work together.” ongoing cannabis redistricting hearings and rulemaking process to address these concerns.

In May, the Department of Transportation (DOT) issued new guidelines saying just that Truck drivers, airline pilots and other safety-sensitive workers still cannot use medical marijuana without penalty despite the Trump administration’s move to reschedule.

“Marijuana use is incompatible with safety-sensitive functions,” the department said.

Medical review officers (MROs) who receive drug test results indicating cannabis use cannot rule them out as negative for illegal substance use, even if an employee claims it was a result of state-licensed medical marijuana.

“Currently, there is no way for an MRO to verify that a laboratory-confirmed marijuana drug test result is positive when an employee claims the positive was caused by a state-licensed marijuana product,” the DOT said, explaining that after the reprogramming, medical marijuana dispensed under state law “does not” constitute a drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The transportation groups said in the new letter that the DOT’s drug-testing program “is in accordance with the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs and HHS-certified laboratories.”

“While DOT has expressed its intention to continue testing marijuana, a commitment we greatly appreciate, it is unclear whether DOT will retain its ability to rely on HHS procedures and certifications after the rescheduling,” they wrote. “Without this alignment, DOT may retain the authority to conduct testing, but lack the scientific and procedural infrastructure to do so.”

“Practically, this would mean that truck and bus drivers, pilots, flight attendants, air traffic controllers, air mechanics, railroad workers, dispatchers and signal workers, transit operators and pipeline workers could continue to perform high-risk safety roles without a reliable means of verifying that they are not actively using marijuana. It relies on controlled substance testing to identify end use and prevent potentially impaired individuals from fulfilling their safety-related obligations. While the planning could create legal or regulatory loopholes, the regulated employer-based drug testing agency warned that the final rules should not jeopardize marijuana testing for safety-sensitive transportation workers.”

“Regardless of the broader policy goals of the review, the federal government should not move forward to preserve transportation drug testing programs and mitigate the risks of increased and unchecked deterioration of our roads, railroads, public transportation systems, pipelines, airspace, and maritime corridors,” the letter says.

The organizations specifically ask federal officials to:

  • Support long-term marijuana testing for all safety-sensitive transportation workers;
  • Confirm the authority of DOT-regulated employers to perform such tests;
  • Ensure HHS laboratory certification and testing guidelines remain available and aligned with DOT’s safety mission; and
  • Establish a coordinated federal strategy to address the transportation security implications of rescheduling.

“The public and the workers who keep our transportation system running safely deserve a process that ensures these safeguards are firmly in place before any final action is taken,” he said. the letter he says

Earlier this month, the House Appropriations Committee approved a provision to allow federal officials to continue requiring government employees and security-sensitive employees, such as truck drivers and airline pilots must be drug tested for marijuana, “regardless of any future change in legal status or schedule.”

This was followed by a press conference organized by prohibitionist groups and a drug-testing industry association, where both Republican lawmakers joined the proclamation. “Cut” to marijuana rescheduling by asserting that safety-sensitive transportation workers can still be punished for testing positive for THC.

Legislators and abolitionist activists argued that moving marijuana to Schedule III would lead to a 1986 executive order signed by President Ronald Reagan defining illegal drugs under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) in relation to the use of cannabis by truck drivers and other airline employees.

Last October, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy suggested that President Donald Trump was “putting pressure” on rescheduling cannabis.arguing that marijuana is “truly addictive” and that policy reform on the issue sends a “dangerous” message.

“At a time when the culture is encouraging and celebrating the use of marijuana, we’re not talking about risk,” Duffy said.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Experts say THC percentage is the wrong way to shop for cannabis

Published

on

By


Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media