Cannabis News
Why is the DEA, an Enforcement Agency, Making the Decision on Whether Marijuana is Legal or Not?
Published
9 months agoon
By
admin
The DEA shouldn’t be in charge of scheduling Marijuana says Jesse Ventura
And he’s not alone!
In a recent development that has caught the attention of cannabis advocates and lawmakers alike, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has indicated that it is following the necessary procedures in its marijuana rescheduling review.
This revelation came in response to a letter sent by a group of 21 lawmakers from both the House and Senate, urging the agency to promptly deschedule marijuana. The DEA’s Acting Chief of Congressional Affairs, Michael Miller, stated in a letter to Senator Elizabeth Warren and others that the agency will “follow the procedures that Congress set forth in the Controlled Substances Act, including an opportunity for a public comment period and a hearing.”
While these comments may seem routine, they provide valuable insight into the DEA’s potential plans for the coming weeks and months. The mention of a public comment period and hearing is particularly significant, as these steps would only be necessary if the DEA decides to reschedule marijuana from its current Schedule I status. This could mean that the agency is considering either rescheduling marijuana to Schedule III, as recommended by the Department of Health and Human Services, or descheduling it entirely.
If the DEA does choose to reschedule or deschedule marijuana, the public will have a 30-day window to provide comments on the recommendation before it can officially take effect. This opportunity for public input is crucial, as it allows stakeholders, experts, and concerned citizens to voice their opinions and contribute to the decision-making process.
The DEA’s acknowledgment that it is carefully following the procedures outlined in the Controlled Substances Act while conducting its administrative review of marijuana’s schedule is a positive sign for those who have long advocated for a change in the drug’s legal status.
However, the agency’s motives and the eventual outcome of this review remain uncertain.
But should the DEA even have the authority to schedule cannabis? This question lies at the heart of the ongoing debate surrounding marijuana policy in the United States. In this article, we’re going to explore this idea in detail, examining the arguments for and against the DEA’s role in determining the legal status of cannabis.
Since the beginning of the Biden Administration’s efforts to reschedule marijuana, there have been doubts about the endgame. When they revealed their push for Schedule III, it became apparent that this was a move to grant the pharmaceutical industry control over the cannabis market.
Here’s a timeline of the events that have unfolded:
-
Late 2022: President Biden issues an executive order directing HHS to review marijuana’s status as a Schedule I drug and provide a recommendation on rescheduling.
-
August 2023: After a year-long review, HHS sends a letter to the DEA requesting that marijuana be moved to Schedule III.
-
September 2023: An anonymous Biden Administration official expresses belief that marijuana will be moved to Schedule III before the 2024 election.
-
October 2023: A bipartisan group of 31 congressmembers sends a letter to the DEA, urging them to consider fully descheduling marijuana.
-
December 2023: HHS releases a 250-page document explaining their rationale for wanting the DEA to reschedule marijuana to Schedule III.
-
January 2024: Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser leads a group of 12 state attorneys general in sending a letter to the DEA, advocating for rescheduling.
-
February 2024: Speculation about an impending announcement from the DEA begins to circulate.
-
March 2024: President Biden becomes the first president to promote marijuana law reform during a State of the Union address.
-
April 2024: The DEA indicates they are in the process of writing a recommendation, with Administrator Anne Milgram set to make a decision on marijuana’s scheduling status.
The most recent development, with the DEA actively working on a recommendation, is significant because it suggests that the agency is closer than ever to potentially rescheduling marijuana.
Historically, the DEA has not been this close to making such a monumental change in cannabis policy.
It’s worth noting that the popularity of cannabis legalization has reached an all-time high, and with the November elections looming, Democrats may be doubling down on cannabis reform to secure the significant “cannabis vote” that could sway the outcome of the elections.
However, if cannabis isn’t rescheduled or legalized prior to November, there is no guarantee that the Biden Administration won’t backpedal or pull a “bait and switch” tactic. The cannabis community must remain vigilant and continue to push for meaningful reform, regardless of the political landscape.
Former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura has been a long-time advocate for cannabis legalization, and his recent interview with Marijuana Moment highlights his unwavering commitment to the cause.
Ventura’s personal experience with the benefits of medical marijuana has fueled his passion for reform, as he credits cannabis with saving his wife’s life when she developed late-in-life epileptic seizures.
Ventura’s support for cannabis legalization dates back to his gubernatorial campaign, when he openly embraced the issue despite warnings from his party that it could cost him the election. “It didn’t hurt me a bit,” Ventura said.
“It actually, I think in the end, strengthened me because it showed the public I have balls enough to bring up topics that were real in life and not be the typical politician and sweep them under the rug and run from them.”
His success in the election serves as a testament to the fact that people are willing to elect officials who are open about their cannabis use and support for reform. Ventura believes that if he were running for office today, he would make cannabis legalization a top campaign issue to align with the “loyal” base of consumers eager for change.
One of the key points Ventura raised in the interview was his criticism of the Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) role in the cannabis rescheduling process. He questioned why the DEA, an enforcement agency, is allowed to make decisions on the legal status of marijuana, stating, “I guess the first thing that I did was I had to scratch my head and go, ‘Why is the DEA, the enforcement people, allowed to make the decisions on whether it should be legal or not?'”
Ventura pointed out the inherent conflict of interest in the DEA’s involvement, saying, “Excuse me, they have the biggest conflict of interest of anybody on the planet, right? Because if they keep it illegal, that means they stay in business and they get way more money allocated to them by the federal government to continue to go out and bust people for cannabis. How come they’re the deciding agency?”
He further emphasized his point by drawing a comparison to law enforcement, stating, “Excuse my French, but that’s bullshit. You know, that’s like putting the police in charge of lawmaking. You elect people to make laws. The police merely enforce the law. Why are you allowing the enforcer of the law to make the law?”
Ventura’s critique of the DEA’s role in the rescheduling process highlights the need for a more impartial and evidence-based approach to cannabis policy reform. As support for legalization continues to grow, with a recent poll showing that one in five American adults are regular marijuana consumers, it is crucial that the decision-making process is guided by science and public opinion rather than the interests of enforcement agencies.
As the 2024 presidential election approaches, Ventura believes that embracing cannabis reform could be a winning strategy for candidates looking to secure the significant “cannabis vote.” While he acknowledged that President Donald Trump might face pushback from his evangelical base if he were to support legalization, Ventura maintains that the time is right for bold action on cannabis policy.
With his newly launched cannabis brand, Jesse Ventura Farms, the former governor is committed to making a positive impact on the industry and the lives of those who can benefit from medical marijuana. As he continues to champion reform, Ventura’s message is clear: it’s time for the federal government to catch up with public opinion and end the prohibition of cannabis once and for all.
Jesse Ventura’s critique of the Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) role in the cannabis rescheduling process is spot on. The fact that the very agency responsible for enforcing drug laws is also tasked with determining the legal status of substances like marijuana is an inherent conflict of interest. As Ventura aptly put it, this arrangement is akin to allowing the police to make the laws they enforce. It’s an insane setup that undermines the principles of fairness and impartiality in our legal system, and it’s something that America needs to address urgently.
While the potential rescheduling of cannabis to Schedule III might seem like progress, it’s crucial to recognize that this move could be primarily a power grab by the pharmaceutical industry. If marijuana remains on the controlled substance act in any capacity, it is still, in essence, illegal. To put this into perspective, we can equate the situation to slavery: descheduling would be akin to liberty, while Schedule III is like having permission to go to town unattended while still being considered someone’s property. True progress will only be achieved when cannabis is completely removed from the controlled substance act.
As the 2024 elections approach, it’s important for voters to be aware of the games politicians play when it comes to hot-button issues like cannabis legalization. While Democrats may tout their support for reform as a core part of their campaign strategy, it’s worth noting that they failed to legalize marijuana despite having majority control over the past four years. This inconsistency should give pause to anyone who believes that campaign promises will inevitably lead to meaningful change.
At the end of the day, the path to genuine cannabis reform is fraught with obstacles, including entrenched interests, political maneuvering, and a lack of political will. As citizens, it is our responsibility to hold our elected officials accountable and demand that they take action to end the failed war on drugs and the unjust prohibition of marijuana.
Only by remaining vigilant, informed, and engaged can we hope to achieve the kind of lasting change that will benefit individuals, communities, and our nation as a whole.
THE DEA STRUGGLES ON CANNABIS, READ ON…
WHY IS THE DEA ARRESTING MORE PEOPLE FOR WEED AFTER LEGALIZATION?
You may like
-
An Important Lesson from the 2024 Elections
-
Fiji police concerned about the increasing number of marijuana plants uprooted from maritime islands
-
The unusual sacrament celebrated in this US church
-
New California Bill to Allow Limited Amount of THC in Hemp-Derived Products
-
Winter Romance Guide: Pairing Date Nights in Brooklyn with Infused Products
-
Windy City’s Weed Chef – GanjaVacations Jamaica
Cannabis News
An Important Lesson from the 2024 Elections
Published
1 day agoon
January 26, 2025By
admin
Retrospect: An Important Lesson to learn from the 2024 Elections
Well folks, here we are again. Donald Trump is back in the White House, and if his previous term taught us anything, we’re strapping in for one hell of a rollercoaster ride. I can already feel my inbox filling up with requests to write about the latest Trump cannabis controversy or whatever inflammatory tweet is setting the internet ablaze.
But I’ll be honest with you – I’m going to try my damnedest to avoid turning this platform into yet another Trump commentary channel. Lord knows we’ve got enough of those already. Between the mainstream media’s obsession with every presidential syllable and the circus surrounding Elon Musk and RFK Jr.’s alliance with Trump, we’re already drowning in political theater. I mean, just look at the current media frenzy over “Did Elon Nazi Salute?” after Trump’s inauguration speech. If that’s any indication, we’re in for four years of non-stop sensationalism.
Here’s the thing though – as someone who prides himself on staying above the partisan fray (and believe me, that’s getting harder by the day), I feel obligated to share some hard-earned wisdom about navigating the cannabis landscape during these politically charged times. The last four years under Biden’s administration taught us some valuable lessons about political promises and cannabis reform, and those insights are more relevant than ever as we enter this new chapter.
So grab your favorite strain, settle into your comfy spot, and let old Reginald share some perspective on what we’ve learned and how to keep our heads straight during what’s sure to be an… interesting four years ahead.
If there’s one thing I’ve learned from years of covering cannabis politics, it’s that weed polls better than politicians – and boy, do they know it. It might sound like I’m hitting the bong too hard, but the numbers don’t lie. Election after election, cannabis legalization consistently polls higher than any candidate running for office. With pseudo-legalization spreading across the country like wildfire, there are more cannabis supporters than ever before, making us quite the tempting voting bloc.
This reality wasn’t lost on the Democrats during their four-year stint. They dangled cannabis reform like a carrot on a stick, making grand promises about prioritizing legalization. Remember Kamala Harris, suddenly becoming cannabis’s biggest cheerleader? The same Kamala who oversaw countless marijuana prosecutions as California’s Attorney General was now preaching about social justice and legalization. The irony was thicker than smoke in a hotboxed Volkswagen.
For the first few years of the Biden administration, we got nothing but lip service. Then, as election season approached – wouldn’t you know it – suddenly cannabis reform became urgent. Pot pardons! Rescheduling! It was like watching a dealer who ghosted you for months suddenly sliding into your DMs with “you up?”
And some folks ate it up. I saw countless posts from well-meaning stoners declaring their undying loyalty to Biden-Harris based solely on these eleventh-hour cannabis promises. But let’s get real – those pardons didn’t free a single soul from prison, and the rescheduling circus? Well, that’s still stuck in bureaucratic limbo, likely to face years of litigation if it ever materializes.
Here’s the kicker though – despite all this pot pandering, Trump still won. Why? Because while cannabis reform is important, Americans were more concerned about putting food on their tables, feeling safe in their communities, and managing the immigration crisis. The Democrats were so busy virtue signaling about helping marginalized communities that they forgot about the broader population’s immediate concerns. That’s like focusing on growing exotic strains while your basic crops are dying – it might sound cool, but it won’t feed the masses.
The result? Not only did they lose the election, but they strung along millions of cannabis supporters for absolutely nothing. No legalization, no meaningful reform, just empty promises and disappointed voters. And therein lies our lesson, my friends. Politicians will always love pot pandering because they know we’re passionate about legalization. But when their promises go up in smoke, we’re the ones left holding an empty bag.
Here’s a draft in Reginald Reefer’s voice:
Let me tell you why I stay away from political parties like they’re contaminated bathwater. It’s not because I don’t care about society or our collective rights – quite the opposite. It’s because these parties are like ill-fitting suits; they might look good on the rack, but once you try them on, nothing quite sits right.
Take me, for example. On some issues, I’m as “Republican” as they come. I believe in keeping government small (because let’s face it, they tend to mess up everything they touch), rewarding merit over handouts, cutting through red tape, and protecting individual liberties. You know, the whole “leave me alone to grow my plants in peace” mentality.
But flip the coin, and suddenly I’m singing from the Democratic hymnal. I believe in drug reform (obviously), holding big corporations accountable for their shenanigans, protecting Mother Earth, and letting people love whoever they damn well please. Some might say this makes me a libertarian, but I prefer to think of myself as an anarchist – not in the “chaos in the streets” sense, but in the “I don’t need a master telling me what to do” sense.
Now, if I were to play the political game (which I’m not, but let’s pretend), here’s how I’d approach it. During campaign season? Sure, I’d fight like hell to get my candidate in office. Wave the signs, spread the word, do the whole song and dance. But the moment they win? That’s when the real work begins.
See, this is where most people get it wrong. They treat their political party like a sports team, blindly cheering even when their players are dropping the ball. But that’s not how democracy should work. The minute your candidate takes office, you need to transform from their biggest cheerleader into their harshest critic.
Stop swooning over their tweets and start scrutinizing their actions. Forget what they promised on the campaign trail – what are they actually doing now? Are they following through, or are they just blowing smoke? If they’re not living up to their word, it’s time to make some noise. Call your representatives, flood their offices with emails, make your voice heard.
That’s the thing about political promises – they’re like rolling papers in the wind unless someone holds these politicians accountable. And who better to do that than the people who put them in office? Don’t let them get comfortable. Don’t let them forget who they work for.
So over these next four years, whether you’re a Trump supporter or just someone trying to navigate this political circus, remember: Your job isn’t to defend your candidate’s every move. Your job is to keep them honest, keep them working, and keep them afraid of disappointing their constituents. Because at the end of the day, politicians are like cannabis plants – they need constant attention and occasional pruning to produce anything worthwhile.
Let’s talk about the orange elephant in the room. Love him or hate him, Trump isn’t your typical politician – mainly because he isn’t one. He’s more like a chaos wizard who somehow got hold of the nuclear codes. But here’s the thing that makes covering Trump so interesting: unlike most politicians who make promises they never intend to keep, this guy actually follows through on some wild stuff.
Take his first few weeks back in office. While the media was having a meltdown about his latest tweet, Trump was busy declassifying JFK and MLK documents that have been gathering dust for decades. But the real head-turner? Pardoning Ross Ulbricht, aka the Dread Pirate Roberts. Here’s a guy who got two life sentences without parole for… what exactly? Creating a website? Sure, people sold drugs on the Silk Road, but by that logic, we should throw Mark Zuckerberg in prison every time someone sells weed through Facebook Messenger.
And he’s not done. RFK Jr. – the black sheep of the Kennedy family who’s been raising hell about pharmaceutical companies – is set to head Health and Human Services. Meanwhile, Trump’s already making good on his immigration promises faster than you can say “build the wall.” It’s clear this isn’t the same Trump from 2016. He’s got new allies, new strategies, and seemingly fewer fucks to give than ever before.
But here’s where things get murky, folks. While Trump’s making moves that have libertarians and anti-establishment types cheering, he’s also cozying up to some seriously sketchy characters. Take Larry Ellison, the Oracle overlord who’s got deeper CIA connections than my grow room has spider mites. For those who don’t know, Oracle started as a CIA project in 1977 with Ellison at the helm, though they’ll swear up and down it’s all ancient history. Yeah, and I’m just growing tomatoes in my basement.
What’s particularly concerning is all this talk about using AI to develop mRNA vaccines. I don’t know about you, but combining artificial intelligence, experimental vaccines, and a company with intelligence agency roots sounds like the plot of a dystopian novel I don’t want to live through.
So here we are, watching Trump do some genuinely positive things while simultaneously setting up what could be the infrastructure for a technocratic surveillance state. It’s like finding out your dealer is giving you great prices but also installing cameras in your house. Sure, the weed’s good, but at what cost?
This is why, my friends, we need to stay vigilant. Celebrate the wins when they come, but keep your eyes wide open and your bullshit detectors finely tuned. Because in Trump’s America 2.0, the only thing we can be certain of is uncertainty itself.
TRUMP ON MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION, READ ON…
Cannabis News
Oregon Cannabis 2025: Legislative Forecast and Report
Published
3 days agoon
January 24, 2025By
admin
The Oregon legislative session formally kicked off this week, on Tuesday, January 21st. It’s a regular session in 2025, meaning we’re in for a longer stretch — a 160-day calendar, versus the 35-day affair we see in even-numbered years.
If you read any of the news articles previewing the 2025 session, you won’t see cannabis as a legislative priority. Most likely, you won’t see it mentioned at all. Legislators seem both wary and weary of cannabis: the 2023 industry scandals implicating public officials are still fairly recent; and, after ten dynamic years and hundreds of adult use cannabis proposals, bills and laws, the program needs to breathe.
All of that said, the Cannabis Industry Association of Oregon (CIAO) and others have been working on their wish lists, and I do expect to see a few new cannabis laws in 2025. Most of it will be scaffolding and maintenance.
Below, I summarize the draft bills currently teed up in the 2025 session (with links), and give some cursory comments. But first I’ll add my usual caveat: a large majority of these introduced bills will not pass. Some contain overlapping concepts and will never go to committee, while others will fail after a hearing or two, or be consolidated into omnibus or placeholder bills.
This is one of the omnibus bills, and one to watch. Its drafter described it to me yesterday as “omnibus but not complete,” in fact. Here’s what’s in there as of today:
- Authorizes the destruction of hoop houses when executing a search warrant to investigate the unlawful production of marijuana.
- This strikes me as potentially problematic, as a due process issue.
- Requires the OLCC to make maps of licensed industrial hemp operations and marijuana production premises available to the Water Resources Department and the Department of Environmental Quality.
- An inter-agency communication issue. Been on the list for a while.
- Repeals the prohibition on a marijuana retailer locating within 1,000 feet of a building where a public prekindergarten or kindergarten program is provided.
- Something we’ve dealt with more than once, including with the Department of Justice way back when. Just a clarification needed.
- Allows the State Department of Agriculture to inspect biomass and processed industrial hemp stored at the location of a licensed industrial hemp operation.
Here are a few concepts that may be added:
- Grant OLCC authority to move from a one-year licensing cycle to a two-year cycle, as with alcohol.
- This could cut a lot of red tape for both OLCC and industry. The devil would be in the details as to marijuana retailer tax issues, but as a concept I really like it.
- Re-up the grant program targeting illegal grows in southwest Oregon, at current service levels.
- This grant has been around since 2018: the sheriffs and victim’s rights folks are the main proponents. If you’d like to see data, the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission program published a recent report here.
- Requires OHA to study the medical use of marijuana.
- This is a funny little bill and probably just a placeholder. We’ve only had a medical marijuana statute in Oregon for 27 years!
- Removes requirements that a registry identification cardholder who produces marijuana for personal medical use register with OHA.
- Requires a person responsible for a marijuana grow site that produces marijuana for medical use for three or more registry identification cardholders to apply for a designation from the OLCC.
- Directs OHA to issue electronic registration cards.
- Requires marijuana retailers to offer for sale medical grade cannabinoid items that contain not more than 20 percent total THC.
- Creates health care and employment protections for a person who is a registry identification cardholder.
This is an Oregon Cannabis Commission bill with some strong concepts, but it will need a lot of amending. OLCC has been slowly absorbing OHA’s medical marijuana program for years. At first that upset people, but a full windup is a fait accompli. SB 162 has a good chance to pass in some form.
- Requires OLCC to study cannabis.
- Directs OLCC to submit findings to the interim committees of the Legislative Assembly related to the judiciary not later than September 15, 2026.
Placeholder.
Same as SB 188. Placeholder.
- Ends special tax assessment for land, if the owner or the person in control of the land gets a civil penalty for growing marijuana on the land or is found guilty of growing it there.
- Makes an exception if the owner reasonably didn’t know about the pot or called the police as soon as they did know.
- Disqualifies land from farm use special assessments upon a final civil penalty or judgment of conviction for the illegal growing of marijuana against the landowner or person in possession and control of the land.
- Provides an exception for a landowner or other obligated taxpayer who reasonably lacked knowledge of the illegal growing of marijuana or promptly notified a law enforcement agency of the illegal growing of marijuana.
This bill appears to be poorly conceived and poorly structured at present. I’m guessing it doesn’t go anywhere for several reasons, not least of which will be the fiscal impact consideration.
- One-liner: establishes a division in the Department of State Police to enforce laws related to illegal marijuana cultivation.
I doubt it goes anywhere.
This one, along with SB 557 and 558 just below, are the CIAO bills. (You can view CIAO’s legislative priorities here.) Each of these bills are sponsored by Senator Floyd Prozanski, longtime industry supporter.
- Allows a marijuana producer, marijuana wholesaler, marijuana processor or marijuana retailer to use a motion detection camera system at a licensed premises.
- I was surprised this would be disallowed by OLCC.
- Directs OLCC to establish by rule an industrial hemp endorsement for marijuana producers.
- Prohibits OLCC from requiring physical tags or other identifiers on certain marijuana plants.
- This would be very useful and cut down on lots of pointless “compliance” and labor and waste.
- Allows a marijuana item transport vehicle to use a digital manifest and edit the manifest during transport.
- Let’s get with the times.
- Allows the State Department of Agriculture (ODA) to define “industrial hemp” by rule.
- Allows a marijuana licensee to engage in the interstate commerce of industrial hemp and marijuana. Becomes operative if federal law or the United States Department of Justice allow or tolerate the interstate commerce of industrial hemp or marijuana.
- I need to ask about this too. In 2019, we passed SB 582 which already allows export of marijuana when the federal environment changes. This proposal seems very similar.
- Requires at least one OLCC commissioner to hold a marijuana processor, marijuana producer, marijuana retailer or marijuana wholesaler license.
Creative, and probably going nowhere.
- Allows a marijuana licensee to provide samples of marijuana items to other marijuana licensees at temporary events registered with OLCC.
- Allows the commission to establish by rule a temporary events registration system. Allows a marijuana wholesaler to sell marijuana items to a marijuana retailer at a temporary event.
- Allows a marijuana producer to provide samples of seeds and immature marijuana plants to permitted workers.
- Allows a marijuana producer, marijuana processor and marijuana wholesaler to provide samples of marijuana items in specified amounts to permitted workers.
A bunch of rulemaking coming up for OLCC if this passes. But it all makes sense.
- Increases the maximum percentage of tax that the governing body of a city or county may impose on the sale of marijuana items. 20% of the proceeds go to the city or county at issue.
- Requires a percentage of a newly enacted or increased amount to be transferred to the county in which the collecting retail establishment is located, provided the county is eligible for Oregon Marijuana Account distributions.
This will get the cannabis industry’s hackles up, severely. Similar bills have been beaten back in prior years and I expect the same result here.
- Establishes a state public bank task force.
The Governor vetoed this bill last time around, citing “logistical challenges.” I haven’t had a chance to talk with the sponsors of SB 583, so I’m not sure what the plan is on reintroduction. As a guy from North Dakota — the only state in the union with a state-chartered bank; and as an equitable banking access proponent — I hope this one succeeds.
- Exempts from public records disclosure the residential address or personal phone number of an individual who holds a permit issued under ORS 475C.273.
The reference there is to marijuana worker permits. Good idea. The proposed law should probably sweep in ORS 475C.269 as well.
- States that the person must tell the OHA or the OLCC where the person plans to grow, process or produce the marijuana or psilocybin and who owns the site that the person plans to use. Specifies some cases when the OHA or the OLCC cannot give permission to the person.
- Requires an applicant for a license to manufacture psilocybin to submit to OHA information regarding the ownership and location of the premises to be licensed, and prohibits the authority from issuing a license in specified circumstances.
- Requires an applicant for a license to produce or process marijuana to submit to the OLCC information regarding the ownership and location of the premises to be licensed. Prohibits the commission from issuing a license in specified circumstances.
- Requires an applicant for a medical marijuana grow site or medical marijuana processing site registration to submit to the authority information regarding the ownership and location of the premises to be registered. Prohibits OHA from issuing a registration in specified circumstances.
This is a big and rangy bill with concepts overlapping some of the others. Expect it to be absorbed somewhere, in some form.
- Provides items that have cannabis in them must have a label that says a person has to be at least 21 years old to consume or use the item.
- Requires labels on marijuana items and inhalant delivery systems that contain industrial hemp-derived vapor items to include that the minimum age for consumption or use is 21 years of age.
Everyone would have to re-do their labels.
- Requires that marijuana items and stores warn people that the use of marijuana by a person who is pregnant might cause danger.
- Requires a marijuana retailer and a medical marijuana dispensary to post warning signs regarding the consumption or use of marijuana during pregnancy.
- Requires marijuana items and inhalant delivery systems that contain an industrial-hemp derived vapor item to include in labeling that consumption or use of marijuana during pregnancy may be dangerous.
Some speech and label issues here.
- Requires OLCC to study itself. Directs OLCC to submit findings to the interim committees of the Legislative Assembly related to economic development not later than September 15, 2026.
Placeholder. Same as 2276.
Similar to the two above.
- Directs OLCC to look at cannabis and report to the judiciary committees. Directs the commission to submit findings to the interim committees of the Legislative Assembly related to the judiciary not later than September 15, 2026.
I believe this one also comes via the Oregon Cannabis Commission, like SB 176. And like SB 176, it likely has legs but will also see some amendments along the way.
- Provides that organizations that provide hospice, palliative care or home health care services, as well as certain residential facilities, must write policies and teach their staff about the medical use of marijuana.
- Same requirement of any such organization or residential facility that is designated as an additional caregiver for a medical marijuana cardholder.
- Protects an organization or residential facility and its employees and contractors from certain criminal liability related to the medical use of marijuana.
- Prohibits the Oregon State Board of Nursing from taking disciplinary action against a nurse for discussing the medical use of marijuana with a patient. (Note: nurses are already allowed by statute to discuss medical marijuana use with patients, consistent with First Amendment protections)
- Expands the definition of “debilitating medical condition” for the medical use of marijuana. The specific add-on I’m seeing is “the need for hospice, palliative care, comfort care or other symptom management, including comprehensive pain management.”
______
That’s all she wrote for now. I’ll check in again at the end of the session, or before that with any significant developments.
Cannabis News
Why Does Cannabis Make Exercise So Much More Rewarding?
Published
3 days agoon
January 24, 2025By
admin
Why Cannabis makes exercise more rewarding
Ah, the “lazy stoner” stereotype – a relic of prohibition that’s aged about as well as “Reefer Madness.” As someone who’s been writing about cannabis for years, I’ve watched this tired cliché fade into obscurity, replaced by a much more nuanced understanding of who actually uses cannabis.
These days, you’re just as likely to find a joint in the gym bag of a professional athlete as you are in the purse of a suburban mom heading to yoga class. Cannabis consumers no longer fit neatly into the box that prohibitionists tried to stuff us in for decades. The plant has found its way into every corner of society, from high-powered executives to creative professionals, from extreme sports enthusiasts to retirees looking to stay active.
What’s particularly fascinating, and what many people might not realize, is that cannabis users tend to be more physically active than non-users. Yeah, you read that right – contrary to the old stereotype of the couch-locked stoner surrounded by empty chip bags, research shows that cannabis consumers generally move more than their non-consuming counterparts.
In fact, a new federally funded study has just confirmed what many of us in the cannabis community have known for years: people are significantly more physically active on days they use marijuana. This isn’t just anecdotal evidence anymore – we’re talking about hard data that directly challenges decades of anti-cannabis propaganda.
Today, we’re going to dive deep into the science behind this phenomenon, and I’ll throw in some personal insights from years of observing and writing about cannabis culture. Why does cannabis seem to enhance physical activity for so many users? Is it purely physiological, or is there something more complex at play?
Buckle up, fellow cannabis enthusiasts and curious minds – we’re about to explore why getting high might actually help you get moving!
Let’s dive into this fascinating federally funded study that’s challenging everything we thought we knew about cannabis and physical activity. The research team, comprised of experts from prestigious institutions including the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences and the University of Colorado Boulder, tracked 98 adult cannabis users over a four-week period, monitoring their physical activity levels and substance use patterns through smartphone-based surveys.
What makes this study particularly interesting is its real-time tracking methodology, known as ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Instead of relying on participants to remember their activities weeks or months later, researchers collected data about cannabis use, physical activity, and other behaviors as they happened. This approach provides a more accurate picture of how cannabis use relates to daily activities.
The results? They’re pretty eye-opening. The study found a clear positive association between cannabis use and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). In other words, people moved more on days they used cannabis. As the researchers noted, “Daily cannabis use was positively associated with daily physical activity.”
But why does this happen? The research team proposed several intriguing mechanisms. According to their findings, cannabis might increase exercise enjoyment and motivation, enhance recovery from physical activity, and activate the endocannabinoid system, which in turn triggers the dopaminergic system. This leads to increased feelings of psychological reward associated with physical activity. In simpler terms, cannabis might make exercise feel more rewarding, both physically and mentally.
However, like any good research, this study has its limitations. The sample size was relatively small at 98 participants, and the study only included people who already used cannabis at least once during the month. We still need more research to understand how these findings might apply to a broader population or to people who are just starting to use cannabis.
Here’s where things get really interesting though. Understanding the relationship between cannabis and exercise could have far-reaching implications for public health. As America grapples with an opioid epidemic and rising obesity rates, finding natural ways to make physical activity more appealing and rewarding could be game-changing. If cannabis can help people enjoy exercise more and recover better, it might offer a safer alternative to prescription painkillers for athletes and fitness enthusiasts.
This could tie perfectly into the growing “Make America Healthy Again” movement. Instead of viewing cannabis as a hindrance to health and wellness, we might start seeing it as a tool for promoting active lifestyles. Imagine if legal cannabis states started developing programs that combine cannabis education with fitness initiatives – we could be looking at a whole new approach to public health.
Of course, more research is needed. We need larger studies, longer-term follow-ups, and investigations into different populations and types of physical activity. But one thing’s clear: the old stereotype of the lazy stoner is going up in smoke, replaced by a more nuanced understanding of how cannabis might actually help people lead more active lives.
As someone who’s been both writing about cannabis and exercising regularly for years, I’ve noticed something fascinating about combining the two. Joe Rogan once described smoking weed before working out as enabling him to “feel every muscle” work individually, and I’ve got to say, he’s onto something. When you’re high during exercise, there’s an enhanced mind-body connection that’s hard to explain unless you’ve experienced it. It’s as if cannabis amplifies your proprioception – your awareness of your body’s position and movement in space.
But here’s where it gets really interesting. Most of us don’t work out in complete silence; we’ve got our carefully curated playlists pumping through our headphones. And this is where cannabis adds another layer to the experience. I recently wrote about what I call “Psychoactive Listening” – how cannabis seems to enhance our connection with music, making us more immersed in every beat and melody. When you combine this with exercise, something magical happens.
Think about it: cannabis, music, and movement create a perfect trinity for achieving what athletes call “the flow state.” You know that sweet spot where you’re not thinking about your workout anymore, you’re just… doing it? Cannabis seems to help quiet that chattering “monkey mind” that usually won’t shut up about how many reps you have left or whether you remembered to buy milk. Instead, you’re fully present in the moment, moving with the music, feeling every muscle engagement, completely immersed in the experience.
Speaking from personal experience, there’s definitely a difference between working out sober and working out with a little cannabis in your system. Don’t get me wrong – I’m not suggesting you get completely blazed before hitting the gym. But a light buzz can transform a mundane workout into an almost meditative experience. The post-workout euphoria? That’s on another level entirely. It’s like the natural runner’s high gets amplified, creating a sense of accomplishment and well-being that can last for hours.
Exercise already releases endorphins and activates our endocannabinoid system naturally – that’s why we feel so good after a workout. When you add cannabis to the mix, you’re essentially double-dipping into these feel-good mechanisms. The combination can make exercise feel less like a chore and more like an enjoyable activity you actually look forward to.
This trend of combining cannabis and fitness couldn’t have come at a better time. With obesity-related illnesses on the rise and many people struggling to maintain regular exercise habits, anything that makes physical activity more appealing is a win. If cannabis can help people find more joy in movement and make exercise feel less like a punishment and more like a reward, we might be looking at a powerful tool for promoting public health.
Who knows? Maybe the future of fitness isn’t just about counting reps and tracking macros – maybe it’s about finding that sweet spot where wellness meets wellness, where getting healthy and getting high go hand in hand.
As we wrap up our deep dive into cannabis and exercise, I can’t help but see a massive opportunity on the horizon. With fitness becoming an increasingly central focus in American culture and cannabis users proving to be more active than previously thought, we’re looking at the perfect storm for a new kind of wellness revolution.
Think about it: How many people would be interested in a “Stoned Yoga” class where the instructor understands how to guide slightly elevated participants through mindful movements? Or what about organized “High Runs” where like-minded individuals can experience that legendary runner’s high while actually being high? These aren’t just pipe dreams – they’re legitimate business opportunities waiting to be seized by enterprising cannabis enthusiasts.
The research backs up what many of us have known anecdotally: cannabis users like to move. We’re not just sitting around playing video games (though there’s nothing wrong with that either). We’re out there hiking, lifting, running, and yoga-ing our way to better health. The stereotype of the lazy stoner is dead, and in its place, a new archetype is emerging – the active, health-conscious cannabis consumer.
For those of you who’ve been looking to carve out your niche in the cannabis industry, this could be your moment. The intersection of cannabis and fitness is still relatively unexplored territory, ripe with possibilities. Whether you’re thinking about becoming a cannabis-friendly personal trainer, starting a stoner sports league, or launching a line of workout gear for the cannabis community, the time to act is now.
Remember, the future of wellness doesn’t have to choose between being healthy and being high. As this research shows, maybe the best path forward is one that embraces both. So grab your gym bag, pack your favorite strain, and get ready to be part of the green fitness revolution. The world of active stoners awaits!
Inspiration: https://www.marijuanamoment.net/people-are-more-physically-
active-on-days-they-use-marijuana-new-federally-funded-study-shows-smashing-lazy-stoner-stereotype/
WEED AND EXERCISE, READ ON…
THE LAZY STONER MYTH DEBUNKED, WHY PEOPLE ARE ACTIVE!
An Important Lesson from the 2024 Elections
Fiji police concerned about the increasing number of marijuana plants uprooted from maritime islands
The unusual sacrament celebrated in this US church
New California Bill to Allow Limited Amount of THC in Hemp-Derived Products
Winter Romance Guide: Pairing Date Nights in Brooklyn with Infused Products
Windy City’s Weed Chef – GanjaVacations Jamaica
Weird cannabis strain delivers exceptional high
This Is New York Cannabis
PoliticsThese States Are The Most Likely To Legalize Marijuana In 2025, According To Top Advocacy Groups
5 Key Benefits of Self Pleasure
Distressed Cannabis Business Takeaways – Canna Law Blog™
United States: Alex Malyshev And Melinda Fellner Discuss The Intersection Of Tax And Cannabis In New Video Series – Part VI: Licensing (Video)
What you Need to Know
Drug Testing for Marijuana – The Joint Blog
NCIA Write About Their Equity Scholarship Program
It has been a wild news week – here’s how CBD and weed can help you relax
Cannabis, alcohol firm SNDL loses CA$372.4 million in 2022
A new April 20 cannabis contest includes a $40,000 purse
Your Go-To Source for Cannabis Logos and Designs
UArizona launches online cannabis compliance online course
Trending
-
Cannabis News2 years ago
Distressed Cannabis Business Takeaways – Canna Law Blog™
-
One-Hit Wonders2 years ago
United States: Alex Malyshev And Melinda Fellner Discuss The Intersection Of Tax And Cannabis In New Video Series – Part VI: Licensing (Video)
-
Cannabis 1012 years ago
What you Need to Know
-
drug testing1 year ago
Drug Testing for Marijuana – The Joint Blog
-
Education2 years ago
NCIA Write About Their Equity Scholarship Program
-
Cannabis2 years ago
It has been a wild news week – here’s how CBD and weed can help you relax
-
Marijuana Business Daily2 years ago
Cannabis, alcohol firm SNDL loses CA$372.4 million in 2022
-
California2 years ago
A new April 20 cannabis contest includes a $40,000 purse