Connect with us

Cannabis News

World Health Organization Won’t Ease Coca Leaf Ban, Even As Review Found Prohibition Is More Dangerous Than The Plant

Published

on

“It is unacceptable for humanity to demonize a sacred medicinal plant. It was a political decision rather than a scientific one.”

By Mattha Busby, Filter

The The World Health Organization had a historic opportunity to ease the strict global ban on the coca leaf-ban, campaigners said, “racist and colonial” the roots. But the agency has decided not to.

WHO expert review he determined in September how millions of people in the Andes consume the coca leaf daily as part of a long-standing cultural practice without significant negative effects, and conversely that coca control strategies are associated with significant public health harm.

And yet, on December 2nd, the WHO’s Expert Committee on Drug Dependence (ECDD) recommended that the plant be kept in Annex I of the United Nations drug treaties—the most restrictive category of control—because coca leaves can be converted relatively easily into cocaine.

“The simplicity of extracting cocaine from cocaine and its high yield and profitability are well known,” ECDD wrote. “The Commission has also examined evidence of significant increases in the cultivation of cocaine and the production of cocaine-related substances in the context of significant and growing public health concerns about the use of cocaine. In this context, the Commission believes that the reduction or elimination of international controls on the coca leaf may pose a particularly serious risk to public health.”

The commission noted a 34 percent year-on-year increase in cocaine production in 2023, with some countries experiencing historically high levels. But supporters of reform emphasize that coke is not cocaine. They point out that the WHO review supports the plant’s medical potential and the lack of evidence of problematic coca leaf use anywhere in the world — two key criteria a drug must meet to be placed on a less restrictive schedule.

“It is unacceptable for humanity to demonize a sacred medicinal plant”, Jaison Perez Villafaña, guardian of wisdom or mother From the Arhuaco community in Colombia, he said The filter. “It was a political decision rather than a scientific one. Coca leaf (help) is not to blame for the fact that humans with economic interests turned it into cocaine”.

The ECDD said it recognized that “the coca leaf has important cultural and therapeutic value to indigenous peoples and other communities and that there are exceptions to the traditional use of the coca leaf in certain national settings.” A coalition of indigenous coca leaf producers and consumers he wrote The WHO in October asked the UN body to “clearly distinguish” between traditional coca use and cocaine-related issues.

Steve Rolles, senior policy analyst at the Transform Drug Policy Foundation, called the WHO’s suggestion that keeping coca on Schedule 1 would limit cocaine production “ridiculous”, saying the decision exposed the “moral and scientific failure” of drug control worldwide.

“While we might expect them to emerge from political institutions embedded in drug war narratives, there was a sense that the more objective, scientific and nominally independent corners of the UN would maintain a level of pragmatism and principle, even if their recommendations were later rejected by UN political entities.” he wrote It’s LinkedIn.

“The dangers of cocaine powder or smoked crack cocaine, creations of the global North, which is also by far the largest market for both, depend on the traditional use of coca, chewed or in tea, which only occurs in the South,” added Rolles. “It is the global South where the burden of the failed war on cocaine and the criminalization of entire cultures is felt most acutely.”

In 2020, following a WHO recommendation, the United Nations Commission on Narcotic Drugs voted to ease international controls on cannabis, recognizing its medical value after decades of “referral madness”. For reform advocates, the decision represented a slow and delayed shift to evidence-based programming. That is why there was hope that the UN system could also separate the coca leaf — which contains less than 1 percent of the alkaloid cocaine — from the refined powder that feeds global demand.

However, coca will continue to be treated as if it has the same risk profile as cocaine, after a WHO review confirmed that coca chewing has not caused any documented deaths, is not associated with high addiction or “abuse” potential, and has possible therapeutic applications, from anti-inflammatory effects to modest improvements in post-meal glucose.

“The WHO decision is deeply disappointing and disturbing,” Ann Fordham, executive director of the International Council on Drug Policy, said in a press release. “This was no ordinary study, it was a critical test of the UN drug control system. The Commission has demonstrated that it cannot objectively assess the evidence or consider the human rights implications of prohibition. Instead, it has chosen to reinforce the racist and colonial foundations of international drug control. This decision makes it clear that the system is broken and resistant to meaningful reform.”

Experts have long argued that the logic behind the coca ban is selective and ignores existing treaty precedent. Plants such as ephedra used to manufacture methamphetamine, psilocybin-containing mushrooms, and cacti that produce mescaline remain unscheduled at the plant level, although they are used to produce controlled substances.

While open persecution of coca chewers has eased in the Andes, the ban still shapes daily life in parts of the region, from farmers losing crops to stopping aerial fumigation campaigns, eradication forces and communities caught between the networks that dominate the cocaine trade. In a September study, an independent group of experts hired by the WHO said that studies that showed exposure to harmful glyphosate-based pesticides such as Roundup, a probable carcinogen, by aerial spraying of coca crops by authorities “increased the number of abortions and increased the number of medical consultations related to dermatological and respiratory diseases in communities”.

The review added that another study showed that forced coca eradication encouraged coca growers to increase production through the use of toxic agrochemicals “on more or subsequent coca plots, increasing exposure to these chemicals.”

Villafaña and other indigenous leaders have warned that these pressures are cultural violence. Coca is central to Andean communities’ spiritual practice, conflict resolution, work, ceremony, and community health; however, using it outside of the narrow “traditional” exemptions puts people at risk of criminal penalties.

“It would be useful for us as a culture,” said Villafaña, “if the world recognized it as a sacred plant and did not demonize it.” But, he added, the decision would not otherwise affect his community, as its members will continue to chew coca as they have always done.

This the article Originally published by the author the filteran online magazine that deals with drug use, drug policy and human rights from a harm reduction perspective. Keep the filter on Bluesky, X or Facebookand sign up for their newsletter.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Australian medicinal cannabis sales fall nearly 30% in second half of 2025

Published

on

By

Australian medicinal cannabis sales fell 28.5% in the second half of 2025 compared to the first half of the year, according to new data released by the Penington Institute in April 2026, marking the first significant drop in sales recorded since the country’s medicinal cannabis framework was introduced in 2016.

Data obtained by the Penington Institute from the Australian Department of Health, Disability and Aging through a freedom of information request shows sales peaked at 3.72 million units in the second half of 2024 and remained at 3.70 million units in the first half of 2025, before falling to 2.65 million units in the second half of the year. The decline followed a period of particularly significant growth in late 2023 and 2024, driven by increasing scrutiny from regulators and medical organizations over prescribing practices.

The Penington Institute attributes the reversal largely to a stepped-up enforcement campaign that has unfolded on multiple regulatory fronts since 2023. The Therapeutic Goods Administration banned the importation, advertising and supply of medicinal cannabis in 2023, and then issued millions of dollars in fines to non-compliant companies. The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency published new clinical guidance for prescribers in July 2025 and, by mid-2025, had taken enforcement action against more than 50 doctors, with further investigations underway. Ahpra also issued explicit warnings warning health officials to prioritize patient well-being over profits.

The enforcement push was in response to documented concerns about high-volume, commercially driven prescriptions, some clinics conducting very brief clinical consultations, illegally advertising the drug to the public, failing to check real-time prescription monitoring systems, and using closed-loop business models in which medical cannabis brand companies also ran clinics prescribing their own products.

A wider TGA review of the patient access framework is ongoing. As of early April 2026, no reform recommendations have been announced. The Penington Institute’s report warns against major restrictions on patient access, the therapeutic benefits the drug provides to a large number of Australian patients, the lack of clear evidence linking medicinal cannabis to significant public health harm, and the presence of a robust illicit market that would absorb patients who would not be able to access legal avenues if access were restricted.

The report also points to product compliance testing as an area where existing standards are not applied consistently. Australian quality standards cover all medicinal cannabis products, but the TGA does not check compliance before the products reach patients, only conducting limited post-market risk-based testing, the results of which are not published. The issue is particularly relevant given that almost two-thirds of the flower volume sold in Australia in 2024 was imported, with some countries of origin maintaining lower regulatory standards than Australia. In April 2024, the TGA confirmed that it had not carried out tests on imported products in the previous 12 months.

The full Pennington Institute report, Medicinal Cannabis Sales and Regulatory Enforcement, can be seen here

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Trump Pushes Congress To Keep Full-Spectrum CBD Legal While Restricting Hemp Products That Pose ‘Health Risks’

Published

on

By

President Donald Trump is urging lawmakers in Congress to act in November to change the law that threatens to federally recriminalize hemp-derived CBD products.

“I’m calling on Congress to update the Act so Americans can continue to have access to the full-spectrum CBD products they trust and support, while maintaining Congress’ intent to restrict the sale of products that pose health risks,” the president said in a Truth Social message Thursday, the same day his administration announced it is moving forward to re-regulate marijuana.

“We need to do this RIGHT and FAST, especially for those who have found CBD to help them,” he said. “Also, I’m told it will help our BIG FARMERS that we love and will always be around.”

Hemp derivatives containing less than 0.3 percent delta-9 THC by drug weight were made federally legal under the 2018 Farm Bill signed by Trump during his first term. But late last year, he signed new legislation with provisions that will redefine hemp, so that only products with a total of 0.4 milligrams of THC per container will remain legal starting November 12.

Industry advocates say the existing provisions threaten to ban intoxicating and synthetic cannabinoids, but serve to take popular full-spectrum CBD products that many Americans use therapeutically off the market.

“ONE IN FIVE adults used it in the past year, and many say it dramatically improved their chronic pain,” the president said in the social media post, adding that hemp-derived CBD “has made a HUGE difference for so many people.”

The administration also referred to a new initiative launched this month Cover up to $500 of hemp-derived products annually for eligible Medicare patients. The program being implemented by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) focuses largely on CBD, but allows products to contain a total of 3 milligrams of THC per serving.

“In December, I signed a very important Executive Order calling for Research and Innovation into Hemp-derived CBD,” Trump said. “Our wonderful Dr. Mehmet Oz moved quickly to follow the Executive Order directive, and set a model in motion for some Seniors this month. But more needs to be done!”

“Please do it, and SOON,” the president said, referring to the sweeping recriminalization congressional fix that will take effect in November. “Thank you for your attention to this matter!”

It’s unclear how far Trump wants to reduce the scope of planned federal restrictions on hemp products and what kinds of revised THC rules and limits he’d prefer to sign into law.

separately In his remarks in the Oval Office on Thursday, the president highlighted the medical benefits of marijuana A few hours after the DOJ issued the rule to federally reorganize cannabis.

“A lot of people are facing big problems, and that seems like the best answer,” the president said in the Oval Office. “They are very happy about it.”

“So hopefully you won’t have to,” he said. “But if you must, I hear it’s the best of all alternatives.”

Meanwhile, the Republican Lawmakers in Congress introduced amendments this week to delay the ban on hemp products for another year and creating the framework to continue the legal sale, with new restrictions and instructions. The House Rules Committee will decide next week whether the pending Farm Bill amendment proposal can be considered for a floor vote.

Several other bipartisan hemp reform bills are also pending in Congress.

Last week, for example, it was introduced by Senators Rand Paul (R-KY), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and Joni Ernst (R-IA). The Hemp Safety Enforcement Act, which would give states the option of federal recriminalization of THC hemp products. it will be established this year. Ernst on Wednesday, however, withdrew his name as a sponsor of the legislation.

Separately, Anti-marijuana organizations filed a lawsuit against the Medicare hemp CBD coverage policyand Health and Human Services attorneys. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and CMS Director Mehmet Oz recently He submitted a letter requesting the filing of the case.

The White House Management and Budget Office has also held a series of meetings a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) CBD product enforcement policy.

The FDA issued the guidance making it clear that it does not intend to interfere Establish a Medicare coverage plan for hemp-derived products.

CMS finalized a rule that will be adopted separately Coverage of certain hemp products, primarily as specialized health-related benefits, through Medicare Advantage the plans

As hemp products become more popular among consumers, some big brands are trying to get in on the action.

The main retailer Target, for example, is expanding its market share of hemp-derived THC beverages. Last year, the company began a pilot program selling cannabis beverages at 10 stores in Minnesota. That apparently went well, and now the company has secured licenses from Minnesota regulators to sell lower-potency edible hemp products — including THC drinks — in 72 stores in the state.

The US Department of Agriculture published this month shows that US farmers grow $3 billion in hemp crops by 2025— 64% increase compared to the previous year.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

US Representatives introduce the Higher Education Marijuana Research Act

Published

on

By

Cannabis Caucus Co-Chairs Ilhan Omar (D-MN) and Dina Titus (D-NV) yesterday introduced the Higher Education Marijuana Research Act to remove barriers to academic cannabis research, protect universities and researchers, and promote the responsible study of marijuana.
“As Chair of the Congressional Cannabis Caucus, I am proud to support the Higher Education Marijuana Research Act, which removes outdated federal barriers that have long prevented universities from conducting critical cannabis research. This legislation protects universities and researchers while removing barriers so they can make better public health decisions,” said Congressman Ilhan Omar.
“The legal and responsible use of cannabis in Nevada has been an important economic driver across the country and deserves further investigation,” said Congressman Titus. “The Higher Education Marijuana Research Act would eliminate outdated federal restrictions that prevent universities and researchers from studying the full range of cannabis products that Americans actually use.”
Although 40 states have legalized medical marijuana and 24 states have legalized it for recreational use, federal law continues to impose significant barriers that limit meaningful research. Cannabis remains subject to restrictive federal controls that dictate who can conduct research, what products can be studied, and how studies are designed. Researchers are often limited to federally licensed cannabis that does not reflect the potency or variety available in state legal markets. Compounding these challenges, researchers must navigate stringent compliance requirements and uncertainty about legal liability. These obstacles have delayed clinical trials, limited understanding of long-term health effects, and left critical gaps in knowledge.

“It makes no sense for the federal government to interfere with this research when millions of Americans are already using marijuana, whether for medical or recreational purposes,” said Congressman Titus.

The Higher Education Marijuana Research Act is supported by the National Organization for Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), the National Cannabis Industry Association, the Drug Policy Alliance, and the UNLV Cannabis Policy Institute.

“This legislation is needed more than ever as states continue to allow cannabis for medical and adult use. Even if cannabis is federally reclassified in the near future, there will be significant hurdles for scientists hoping to add to the existing research pool, especially when conducting clinical trials on health effects and examining state-regulated products. The bill moves forward again and calls on Congress to take immediate action to facilitate research, develop new medical treatments, to inform evidence-based policy and help consumers make informed choices,” said Morgan Fox, Policy Director of the National Organization for Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML).

“The American public has made it clear that it wants access to safe, regulated, and tested cannabis products, and state legal markets continue to evolve to meet that demand. However, federal barriers have long limited researchers’ ability to study hemp in ways that reflect real-world conditions. The Higher Education Marijuana Research Act is a practical step toward expanding credible, real-world research by providing clarity and protection for NCIA universities. Supporting this legislation will help strengthen the industry’s scientific foundation. and will help better inform policymakers, regulators and consumers,” said Brooke Gilbert, Chief Operating Officer of the National Cannabis Industry Association.

“The Higher Education Marijuana Research Act is common-sense legislation that will help researchers better understand the types of cannabis produced in state-regulated markets. The bill will remove a major barrier that currently prevents scientists from learning more about state-regulated cannabis and its public health implications. Increasing the body of scientific evidence with better-informed research, increasing the body of scientific evidence with more informed research, evidence-based policy anyone who should leave,” he said. Drug Markets and the Legal System.

“Everyone, from members of Congress on both sides of the aisle to the scientific community to the current and previous presidential administrations, has stated that cannabis research is necessary and important. This is the one issue that almost everyone can agree on these days, but not much progress is being made to reduce the current barriers to cannabis research. Congressman Titus’ bill has always been a common sense pro-cannabis research. Cannabis reform, it is only fitting that UNLV Cannabis Policy lead the charge now. The Institute applauds his efforts and hopes others will do the necessary work to reduce current barriers to cannabis research that only serve to maintain outdated prohibition-era policies,” said Riana Durrett, director of the UNLV Cannabis Policy Institute.

Source: Representative Ilhan Omar’s office

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media