Cannabis Hills to Die on

In my years writing about cannabis, I’ve come to appreciate the importance of intellectual flexibility. Our minds are like gardens – they need regular pruning, watering, and sometimes complete replanting of ideas. Yet, many of us tend our mental gardens with rigid devotion to certain beliefs, refusing to uproot concepts that may have outlived their usefulness.

The truth is, we all harbor faulty premises within our minds. These are things we “know” to be true, beliefs we’ve cultivated over years or even decades, that might not stand up to serious scrutiny. But here’s where it gets interesting – these beliefs aren’t just ideas we hold; they become integral parts of who we think we are.

Carl Jung called this constructed identity our “persona” – the mask we wear to interact with the world. Our opinions and beliefs form the very structure of this mask, reinforcing our sense of self and how we present ourselves to others. When these beliefs are challenged, it can feel like an attack on our very identity.

This brings us to the concept of “hills to die on” – those opinions we’ll defend to the bitter end, even in the face of contrary evidence. These are the beliefs that have become so entrenched in our persona that challenging them feels like a threat to our very existence. In the cannabis community, these hills are particularly numerous and fiercely defended, perhaps because the plant itself has been subject to so much misinformation and stigma over the years.

Recently, I stumbled upon a fascinating Reddit thread where cannabis enthusiasts shared their own “hills to die on” – the cannabis-related beliefs they refuse to compromise on. As we explore these perspectives, I invite you to reflect on your own immovable positions. What are the hills you’ve chosen to defend? How did they become so important to your identity?

So pack a bowl, get comfortable, and let’s take a journey through the valley of cannabis hills. You might find some familiar territory – or discover new heights worth exploring.

In sorting through the chaotic landscape of Reddit opinions, I decided to rank responses from most to least popular to identify the cannabis hills that matter most. One position towers above all others, garnering a staggering 2.9k upvotes in under 48 hours: home cultivation should be legal. When the cannabis community speaks this loudly, lawmakers would be wise to listen.

I’ll proudly join this battalion atop cultivation hill. The fundamental right to grow plants that naturally occur on Earth shouldn’t be up for debate. Think about it – how did we reach a point where governments can declare parts of nature illegal? It’s like outlawing clouds or criminalizing sunsets.

Whether we’re talking about cannabis, coca plants, poppies, psilocybin mushrooms, or peyote, the principle remains the same: no government should have the authority to restrict humans from cultivating what Mother Nature freely provides. The fact that I can legally grow deadly nightshade in my garden but face imprisonment for growing cannabis exposes the absurdity of our current laws.

The right to grow is about more than just cannabis – it’s about personal sovereignty and our relationship with the natural world. When we criminalize nature, we don’t just restrict access to plants; we sever our ancient connection to the earth itself. The overwhelming support for home cultivation rights suggests that people are ready to reclaim this relationship, one seed at a time.

This is a hill worth defending – and clearly, I’m not alone in my willingness to die on it.

The second most defended hill in our Reddit valley, with 1.1k upvotes, boldly declares that cannabis is superior to alcohol. This is another hill I’ll gladly die on, and the science backs this position up.

Dr. David Nutt’s groundbreaking research on drug harm rankings revealed what many of us already suspected – alcohol dominates the danger charts by a significant margin. While cannabis carries its own set of potential risks, they pale in comparison to the widespread devastation caused by booze. From physical health impacts to societal costs, alcohol consistently proves to be the more destructive substance.

I speak from personal experience here. After switching from heavy drinking to cannabis in my early twenties, the differences became stark. Now, two decades later, I routinely get mistaken for being ten years younger than my beer-loving peers. While this is just my personal story, I suspect a proper longevity study comparing heavy cannabis users to heavy drinkers would yield similar results.

This isn’t just about vanity – it’s about quality of life. Cannabis users generally maintain more active lifestyles compared to heavy drinkers, likely due to alcohol’s more severe impact on physical health and motivation. While the stereotype of the “lazy stoner” persists, the reality is that cannabis users are often hiking trails, hitting the gym, or engaging in creative pursuits while their drinking counterparts nurse hangovers.

The verdict is clear: when it comes to choosing your substance, cannabis is the safer bet than booze.

Rounding out our top three hills, with 1.8k upvotes, is the adamant belief that traditional flower reigns supreme over cartridges. While I understand the passion behind this position, I’m not quite ready to die on this particular hill.

Don’t get me wrong – if given the choice at home, I’ll typically reach for a joint over a vape pen. There’s something almost ceremonial about the ritual of rolling and smoking that a cart just can’t replicate. Perhaps it’s my old-school sensibilities talking, shaped by decades of traditional consumption, but bud just feels more… authentic.

However, let’s be real – carts have their time and place. Picture yourself at a family reunion where your in-laws would faint at the mere mention of cannabis. Or maybe you’re traveling, far from your comfortable smoking spot. In these situations, a discrete cart can be a lifesaver. No telltale smell lingering on your clothes, easy to conceal, quick to consume, and reliably effective.

This is where I diverge from the Reddit consensus. While the community seems ready to plant their flag firmly in team flower, I see value in both methods depending on the context. It’s not about which is “better” – it’s about which is more appropriate for the situation at hand.

Maybe some hills aren’t meant for dying on, but rather for finding the perfect vantage point to appreciate both sides of the valley.

The fourth most defended hill in our Reddit landscape, garnering 1.1k upvotes, proclaims that moderation trumps tolerance breaks. While I understand the sentiment, my two decades of cannabis experience suggest a more nuanced approach might be beneficial.

Let me take you on a brief journey through my evolution with cannabis. In my younger years, I was the quintessential excessive smoker – armed with easy access, cheap prices, and a rebellious spirit. Cannabis became my shield against existential angst, unprocessed grief over losing my father, and the general chaos of early adulthood.

It wasn’t until I took a few years off in my early twenties that I gained clarity about my relationship with the plant. Upon returning at 23, I approached cannabis differently – not as an escape route, but as a precision tool for enhancing certain aspects of life while diminishing others. This shift in perspective changed everything.

Through mindful consumption, I’ve maintained a productive daily relationship with cannabis for years. However, I’ve also learned the value of periodic breaks. My annual month-long abstinence serves as a valuable check-in with my unaltered self, revealing aspects of my psyche that might be masked by regular use.

So while I agree that moderation should be the cornerstone of cannabis consumption, I can’t completely dismiss the power of intentional breaks. The key lies in finding your personal balance – using cannabis as a tool for enhancement rather than escape, while maintaining the courage to face yourself without it occasionally.

The fifth hill in our journey, garnering 394 upvotes, stakes its claim on a fundamental question of liberty: “If you can drink, I can smoke.” This isn’t just a hill I’d die on – it’s a mountain I’d fortify and defend with everything I’ve got.

At its core, this argument isn’t really about cannabis versus alcohol; it’s about bodily autonomy and personal sovereignty. If you’re an adult who contributes to society, pays taxes, and handles your responsibilities, shouldn’t you have the fundamental right to decide what goes into your own body? The fact that this even needs to be debated reveals a disturbing truth about our relationship with authority.

Let’s be brutally honest here – if you don’t have the right to alter your own consciousness as you see fit, can you truly claim to be free? When a government claims the authority to dictate which substances you can and cannot consume, they’re essentially asserting ownership over your mind and body. You become their property, subject to their arbitrary rules about which forms of intoxication are acceptable.

The hypocrisy becomes especially glaring when you consider alcohol’s privileged position in society. We actively promote and celebrate a substance that causes tremendous harm, while criminalizing generally safer alternatives. Ask yourself: if heroin were legalized tomorrow, would you suddenly feel compelled to try it? Of course not. Those who want to use these substances already do, regardless of their legal status.

The bottom line is simple: if you can drink, I should be able to smoke. Anything less is just selective enforcement of social control.

Our journey through these cannabis hills reveals some core values that unite the community – from the fundamental right to grow our own plants to the basic freedom of choosing cannabis over alcohol. While Reddit offered many more hills worth exploring, these top five seemed to capture the essential battles being fought in the ongoing war for cannabis acceptance and legalization.

Of course, not every hill needs to be defended to the death. As we’ve seen, some positions benefit from a more nuanced approach, acknowledging the validity of multiple perspectives. That’s the beauty of these discussions – they reveal both our shared values and our unique experiences with this remarkable plant.

What about you? Which of these hills resonates most strongly with your beliefs? Perhaps you have your own cannabis hill that wasn’t covered here – a position you’d gladly defend to the bitter end.

Share your thoughts in the comments below. Let’s keep this conversation growing.

Inspiration: What’s a cannabis related hill you’d die on?

HOW TO DEFEND YOUR CANNABIS OPINIONS, READ ON…

CANNABIS DEBATES – WHAT YOU SHOULD SAY OR NOT SAY!

The decline in cannabis use among teenagers is a surprising and significant development, particularly as legalization and normalization of cannabis have increased in recent years. A recent study shows that teen cannabis use has reached its lowest point in 30 years, challenging preconceived notions about the effects of cannabis legalization on younger populations. This article explores the study’s findings, reasons behind the decline, implications for public policy, and the broader social context that has shaped these trends.

Historical Context of Teen Cannabis Use

Cannabis has long been one of the most commonly used substances among teenagers. During the 1980s and 1990s, cannabis use among teens was rampant, with many viewing it as a recreational drug that carried relatively few risks. Popular culture at the time often glamorized drug use, making it seem like a rite of passage for young people.

However, starting in the early 2000s, a combination of policy changes, public awareness campaigns, and societal shifts began to alter perceptions of cannabis use. Laws regulating cannabis became stricter, and educational programs focused on substance abuse prevention were introduced in schools. These efforts aimed to curb rising trends in drug use, but the legalization of cannabis in some states during the 2010s raised concerns that these gains could be undone.

The Study: Methodology and Findings

The groundbreaking study, conducted by a coalition of public health researchers, analyzed data from surveys involving tens of thousands of teenagers across the United States. The researchers tracked cannabis use trends over the past three decades, comparing rates of usage among different age groups, genders, and regions.

Key Findings:

• Reduced Regular Use: Among those who did report using cannabis, fewer teens indicated frequent or habitual use compared to previous decades. Occasional experimentation has replaced the consistent patterns seen in earlier generations.

• Geographical Trends: States with legalized cannabis did not see significantly higher rates of teen use compared to states where cannabis remains illegal. In some cases, legalized states reported even lower rates of use among teenagers.

• Perception of Harm: Interestingly, while teens generally reported lower rates of cannabis use, the perception of harm associated with cannabis has not increased significantly. This suggests that the decline is due to factors beyond fear of health consequences.

• Education and Awareness Campaigns – Public health campaigns emphasizing the risks of cannabis use, particularly for developing brains, have been instrumental In shaping teen behavior. Schools, community organizations, and government agencies have collaborated to deliver consistent messaging about the dangers of substance use. These programs often highlight scientific findings showing how cannabis can impair memory, decision-making, and learning abilities in teenagers. By presenting cannabis as a health risk rather than a harmless recreational activity, educators have successfully deterred many teens from experimenting with the drug.

• Changing Social Norms Paradoxically, the legalization and regulation of cannabis may have contributed to its declining appeal among teenagers. Cannabis has moved from being a “forbidden fruit” associated with rebellion to a substance viewed more as a medicinal or adult product. Legalization often brings strict regulations on marketing and accessibility, making it harder for teenagers to obtain cannabis. The regulated market also emphasizes responsible use, which diminishes the allure of cannabis as a symbol of defiance or independence.

• Alternative Forms of Entertainment The digital revolution has provided teenagers with countless alternatives to substance use. Online gaming, social media platforms, streaming services, and virtual reality experiences have become dominant sources of entertainment for many teens. These activities offer immediate gratification and social interaction without the risks associated with drug use.

• Peer Influence and Parental Involvement Research consistently shows that peer influence is one of the strongest predictors of teen behavior. As more teenagers choose to abstain from cannabis, the social pressure to use the drug diminishes. Additionally, modern parenting practices play a role in the decline. Parents today are more likely to monitor their children’s activities, engage in open conversations about drug use, and set clear expectations. This increased involvement has been linked to lower rates of substance use among teens.

• Focus on Physical and Mental Health – The cultural emphasis on wellness and mental health has also shaped teen attitudes toward cannabis. Many young people are more mindful of their physical and mental well-being than previous generations. Activities like yoga, fitness challenges, and mindfulness practices have gained popularity, promoting lifestyles that discourage drug use.

Implications for Public Policy

The findings of this study carry significant implications for policymakers and public health officials.

One of the most controversial aspects of cannabis legalization was the fear that it would lead to increased use among teens. However, the study’s results suggest that legalization, when coupled with effective regulation and education, does not necessarily result in higher rates of underage use.

This data can inform future cannabis policies, encouraging states to adopt balanced approaches that prioritize public health without resorting to prohibition.

The success of current prevention strategies highlights the importance of continued investment in education. Policymakers should expand programs that teach teenagers about the risks of cannabis use and empower them to make informed choices.

While cannabis use has declined, other substances, such as vaping products and prescription drugs, remain prevalent among teens. Policymakers must take a comprehensive approach to substance use prevention, addressing all potential risks to teen health.

Broader Societal Context

The decline in teen cannabis use reflects broader societal changes that have reshaped attitudes toward drugs, health, and youth behavior.

Technology as a Double-Edged Sword

While technology has provided teens with alternatives to drug use, it also presents new challenges. The rise of social media has introduced issues like cyberbullying, anxiety, and body image concerns. Policymakers and educators must ensure that the benefits of technology outweigh its potential harms.

The Role of Media

Media portrayals of cannabis have shifted over the years, influencing public perception. In the past, movies and music often glamorized drug use, but modern media tend to present a more nuanced view. Documentaries, news programs, and social media influencers frequently discuss the risks and benefits of cannabis in a balanced way, contributing to more informed decision-making among teens.

The Importance of Community

Strong community networks have played a crucial role in reducing teen cannabis use. Schools, religious organizations, and neighborhood groups have fostered environments where young people feel supported and engaged. These connections reduce the likelihood of teens turning to drugs as a form of escape or rebellion.

Challenges and Opportunities Ahead

Despite the encouraging trends, challenges remain in ensuring that teen cannabis use continues to decline.

While overall use has dropped, some communities still report higher rates of cannabis use among teens. Factors such as socioeconomic status, access to education, and community resources play a role in these disparities. Targeted interventions are needed to address these inequities.

As cannabis products evolve, new challenges may arise. Edibles, vaping devices, and synthetic cannabinoids pose unique risks that require updated education and prevention strategies.

The progress made over the past three decades must be maintained through sustained effort and investment. Policymakers, educators, and parents must remain vigilant, adapting strategies to meet the needs of future generations.

Conclusion

The decline in teen cannabis use to a 30-year low is a remarkable achievement that reflects the success of education, regulation, and shifting social norms. It challenges fears that legalization would lead to widespread underage use and offers valuable lessons for managing public health.

As society continues to navigate the complexities of cannabis regulation, the priority must remain on protecting young people and empowering them to make healthy choices. The findings of this study are not just a milestone but a call to action—to build on this progress and ensure a healthier future for all.

By understanding the factors behind this decline and addressing ongoing challenges, we can create a society where young people thrive without the risks associated with substance use.

TEEN CANNABIS YOU DROPPING, READ ON…

WHY TEENS ARE SAYING NO TO CANNABIS AFTER LEGALIZATION!

What are the 50 Most Prescribed drugs in America and How could Cannabis Effect this list?

As someone who’s been closely following the evolution of medical cannabis over the past two decades, I’ve watched in amazement as study after study validates what many patients have known for years – cannabis has legitimate medical applications. We’re not talking about a handful of studies either; we’re looking at over 35,000 published papers, with more than 70% focusing on the therapeutic potential of this remarkable plant.

Recently, while diving into some research, I stumbled upon a fascinating infographic showing America’s 50 most prescribed medications. As I studied this list, a question kept nagging at me: how many of these pharmaceutical heavy-hitters share therapeutic overlap with cannabis? Given that patients in legal medical states consistently report substituting some of their prescription medications with cannabis – often citing fewer side effects and better overall tolerance – I figured this warranted a deeper look.

Now, before we dive in, I need to make something crystal clear: this article isn’t medical advice. I repeat: NOT medical advice. If you’re considering substituting any medication with cannabis, you absolutely must consult your physician first. Some of these medications are vital and cannot be replaced, period. What I’m offering here is merely an analysis of potential therapeutic overlaps, intended to spark informed discussions between patients and their healthcare providers.

In this exploration, I’ll be focusing solely on medications where there’s documented evidence of symptom management overlap with cannabis. Think of this as a conversation starter – a way to better understand where cannabis might fit in our modern medical landscape.

Ready to dive into this fascinating intersection of traditional pharmaceuticals and botanical medicine? Let’s roll!

Looking at our infographic, we can break down these top 50 prescribed medications into several distinct categories:

• Antihypertensives: Medications that control high blood pressure

• Pain Management: Including both opioids and non-opioid analgesics

• Mental Health: Covering antidepressants, anti-anxiety medications, and antipsychotics

• Diabetes Management: Drugs that help control blood sugar levels

• Gastrointestinal: Medications for acid reflux, ulcers, and digestive issues

• Antibiotics: Drugs that fight bacterial infections

• Respiratory: Medications for asthma and breathing difficulties

• Statins: Cholesterol-lowering medications

• Hormones: Including thyroid medications and birth control

• Anti-inflammatory: Drugs that reduce inflammation and treat arthritis

Now, let’s be real here – cannabis isn’t some miracle cure-all that’s going to replace every medication on this list. You’re not going to treat a bacterial infection with cannabis, and it’s certainly not going to replace insulin for diabetics. Anyone telling you different is selling snake oil, plain and simple.

However, where cannabis does shine is in several key categories: pain management, mental health, gastrointestinal issues, and inflammation. These are areas where we have solid research backing cannabis’s therapeutic potential, and where many patients report significant benefits. Throughout the rest of this article, we’ll dive deep into these specific categories, examining where cannabis might offer alternative or complementary options for patients under proper medical supervision.

Remember, even in these categories, cannabis isn’t necessarily a replacement but rather another tool in the medical toolbox. It’s about expanding options, not limiting them.

After pouring through thousands of studies on cannabis, certain therapeutic applications consistently rise to the top. The research shows particularly promising results in:

• Chronic Pain Management: A comprehensive 2021 systematic review published in JAMA found that cannabis-based medicines provided significant pain relief for various chronic pain conditions, with patients reporting a 30% or greater reduction in pain.

• Anxiety and Depression: While more research is needed, studies suggest that CBD, particularly in combination with THC, can help reduce anxiety symptoms. A notable 2019 review in the Journal of Clinical Medicine found that 79.2% of patients reported anxiety reduction after cannabis treatment.

• Sleep Disorders: Research indicates cannabis can improve both sleep quality and duration, though interestingly, different cannabinoid ratios appear to have varying effects. Some users report success with high-CBD strains for sleep, while others find THC-dominant varieties more effective.

• Nausea and Appetite Stimulation: This is one of cannabis’s best-documented benefits, particularly for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. The American Cancer Society has acknowledged its effectiveness in this area.

• Muscle Spasticity: Multiple studies, particularly in MS patients, show cannabis can significantly reduce muscle spasms and associated pain.

However – and this is crucial – cannabis isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution. Your endocannabinoid system is as unique as your fingerprint. What works wonders for your friend might give you anxiety, or might not work at all. This individual variation is due to differences in our endocannabinoid systems, including receptor density, endocannabinoid production, and enzyme activity.

Think of it like this: if your endocannabinoid system is a lock, cannabis compounds are keys. But everyone’s lock is slightly different, which is why finding the right “key” (strain, dosage, consumption method) often requires patient experimentation under medical supervision.

This individual response factor is precisely why proper medical guidance is essential when considering cannabis as a treatment option. It’s not just about trying cannabis – it’s about finding the right approach for your specific physiology.

Looking at this infographic, several medications immediately jump out as having therapeutic overlap with cannabis. Let’s break these down by category and crunch some numbers that might explain why Big Pharma isn’t exactly thrilled about cannabis legalization.

Pain Management & Anti-inflammatory Medications:

• Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen (Vicodin): $3.7 billion annually

• Tramadol: $2.5 billion annually

• Naproxen: $2.5 billion annually

• Celecoxib (Celebrex): $4.7 billion annually

• Meloxicam: $1.7 billion annually Total Impact: $15.1 billion annually

Cannabis has shown significant potential in managing both chronic and acute pain, potentially affecting millions of patients currently using these medications. Studies consistently show that states with medical cannabis programs see a 20-25% reduction in opioid prescriptions.

Mental Health Medications:

• Sertraline (Zoloft): $37.7 billion annually

• Escitalopram (Lexapro): $31.7 billion annually

• Trazodone: $2.1 billion annually

• Alprazolam (Xanax): $1.1 billion annually Total Impact: $72.6 billion annually

While cannabis isn’t a direct replacement for antidepressants or anti-anxiety medications, many patients report using it successfully to manage symptoms of anxiety, depression, and sleep disorders. Studies show particularly promising results for anxiety and PTSD management.

Gastrointestinal Medications:

• Omeprazole (Prilosec): $3.4 billion annually

• Pantoprazole: $2.7 billion annually

• Ondansetron: $2.3 billion annually Total Impact: $8.4 billion annually

Cannabis has shown effectiveness in managing nausea, increasing appetite, and reducing gastrointestinal inflammation. Many patients with conditions like IBS and Crohn’s disease report significant benefit from cannabis use.

Sleep Medications:

Cannabis, particularly indica strains and CBD-rich varieties, has shown promise in helping with sleep disorders.

Running the Numbers: If we total up just these categories where cannabis shows therapeutic overlap, we’re looking at approximately $98 billion in annual pharmaceutical sales. Now, let’s be conservative and assume that only 25% of patients might successfully transition to cannabis-based treatments (remember, cannabis isn’t effective for everyone, and some patients may need to continue their current medications). That would still represent a potential $24.5 billion annual impact to pharmaceutical industry revenues.

But here’s where it gets really interesting: In states with medical cannabis programs, studies show:

• Opioid prescriptions drop by 20-25%

• Anxiety medication prescriptions decrease by 12-15%

• Sleep aid prescriptions reduce by 10-15%

• Anti-inflammatory prescriptions decline by 15-20%

If we apply these more realistic reduction percentages across our categories:

• Pain/Anti-inflammatory ($15.1B × 20%) = $3.02B reduction

• Mental Health ($72.6B × 15%) = $10.89B reduction

• Gastrointestinal ($8.4B × 15%) = $1.26B reduction

• Sleep ($1.9B × 15%) = $285M reduction

Total Potential Annual Impact: $15.455 billion

This helps explain why pharmaceutical companies spend millions lobbying against cannabis legalization. It’s not just about losing direct sales – it’s about losing market share in some of their most profitable categories.

Remember, these numbers are conservative estimates. The actual impact could be significantly higher, especially considering that cannabis often helps with multiple symptoms simultaneously. For example, a patient might use cannabis not just for pain, but also for sleep and anxiety, potentially replacing several medications with a single plant-based treatment.

This analysis also doesn’t account for the potential growth in cannabis-based pharmaceutical products, which could offset some of these losses for companies willing to adapt to changing market conditions. However, it does illuminate why many pharmaceutical companies view cannabis legalization as a significant threat to their current business model.

After diving deep into these numbers, it becomes crystal clear why pharmaceutical companies are pushing so hard for Schedule III classification rather than full legalization. We’re looking at potential losses of over $15 billion annually – and that’s with conservative estimates. Schedule III would allow them to maintain control over cannabis through FDA-approved medications while keeping the plant itself just restricted enough to protect their profits.

This isn’t speculation – it’s simple economics. When you follow the money, you’ll find that many of the loudest voices against cannabis legalization are directly or indirectly funded by pharmaceutical interests. Despite overwhelming public support for legalization (recent polls show over 70% of Americans favor it), our government continues to drag its feet. Why? Well, $15 billion worth of annual revenue can buy a lot of political influence.

But here’s what really gets me: imagine a world where you could grow your own medicine in your backyard. Where you wouldn’t need to choose between paying for prescriptions and putting food on the table. Where natural alternatives aren’t demonized to protect corporate profits. That’s what this debate is really about – returning the power of healing back to the people.

Now, I need to put my serious hat on for a moment: while this analysis shows interesting overlaps between cannabis and pharmaceutical medications, NEVER make medical decisions based on an article you read online – even one of mine. Your health isn’t something to experiment with. Always consult with a qualified healthcare provider before making any changes to your medication regimen.

The truth is, cannabis isn’t going to replace all these medications, nor should it. But it deserves a place at the table – not as a patented pharmaceutical product, but as a natural medicine accessible to all who need it.

IMG URL: https://www.reddit.com/r/coolguides/comments/1ho66sa/

a_cool_guide_most_commonly_prescribed_drugs/#lightbox

BIG PHARMA CREATES CLIENTS, NOT CURES, READ ON…

BIG PHARMA CREATES CLIENTS NOT CURES, READ WHY HERE!