Connect with us

cocaine

Article: Morocco’s Mocro Maffia threatens Europe and North Africa

Published

on


Morocco, Belgium and the Netherlands have become pivotal in the growing Latin America-Europe cocaine chain. Says article…

Belgium and the Netherlands have overtaken Spain as Europe’s main entry points for cocaine coming from Latin America. The 65.6 tonnes of the drug intercepted at Antwerp port in 2020 nearly doubled in 2022. And Morocco is a crucial link in the chain.

When the Netherlands opened its cannabis market in the 1970s, Dutch and Belgian nationals of Moroccan descent drew on their family ties to cannabis growers in the northern mountains of Morocco’s Rif region. What started as hashish trafficking slowly extended to cocaine, a more lucrative drug. The powerful Mocro Maffia drug cartel emerged from this trade in the 1990s. Working mainly from Belgium and the Netherlands, it controls a third of Europe’s cocaine market.

Latin American drug traffickers have increasingly used Morocco and other Maghreb countries, and dealers with a foothold in Morocco and Europe, like the Mocro Maffia, for their transnational cocaine trade. Colombian and Mexican cartels used the group to facilitate the drug route into Europe via Spain’s southern city of Algeciras.

But since Spanish and Italian authorities tightened their border control and search operations, that route has become risky says criminologist and co-founder of Crim’HALT, Fabrice Rizzoli. Preferred entry points now are ports in Belgium and the Netherlands, where massive volumes of container traffic make it difficult for authorities to address the problem. In its 2021 report, Rotterdam’s port authority said it was ‘working with various agencies in the port to maintain security and combat drugs-related crime.’

Corruption is the key enabler of cocaine trafficking from Latin America to Rotterdam and Antwerp via Africa. For Latin American drug cartels, the Mocro Maffia’s ability to corrupt government officials makes it a strategic ally.

Audio exchanges intercepted through the Sky ECC app reveal how Mocro Maffia members boasted about bribing customs officers in the Port of Dakar, which is used as a transit point. Likewise, dockers in Antwerp and Rotterdam are paid up to €100 000 to relocate containers to avoid police and customs control.

Rizzoli says Belgium and the Netherlands are also both money laundering centres. Antwerp, the world diamond processing capital, is a destination for cleaning drug proceeds (sometimes paid in diamonds). Belgium’s real estate sector is a primary money laundering route.

The Netherlands is an ideal place for drug traffickers seeking to reinvest their money. A reported €16 billion is laundered annually due to the country’s large, internationally oriented highly digitised financial sector and open, trade-oriented economy. The creation of shell companies is a crucial conduit for money laundering in the Netherlands.

The Mocro Maffia uses violence to expand its reach into the cocaine market. In the past decade, over 100 people have died in violence between the Mocro Maffia and Belgian drug traffickers. The group is also suspected of involvement in the murder of a Moroccan judge’s son.

Derk Wiersum, an Amsterdam lawyer specialising in organised crime and drug trafficking networks, and Peter R de Vries, a journalist reporting on drug trafficking, were assassinated in 2019 and 2021, allegedly by the Mocro Maffia. And recently, a Belgian girl of Moroccan origin was killed when her parents’ home was shot at – allegedly by the group.

In September 2021, an alert was raised by Dutch security services, who believed that Prime Minister Mark Rutte was under threat from the Mocro Maffia. Likewise, Dutch Crown Princess Catharina-Amalia is protected by heavy security following kidnapping threats linked to the group. The Mocro Maffia thrives in the Netherlands partly because disorganised public authorities are faced with organised criminality, says Hans Werdmölder, author of Nederland Narcostaat.

The government and law enforcement must raise their game to counter the threat. Adequate modern surveillance equipment such as drones, mobile scanners and robots are lacking in the Netherlands, Belgium and Morocco (and North Africa). Installing or modernising such equipment – and training law enforcement to use it – could enable better detection at drug transit hubs in Morocco and the Rotterdam and Antwerp ports.

Graft must also be addressed. Rizzoli suggests a different approach, saying authorities should change their mindset about drugs. Rather than focusing on stopping the trade, he says, the associated violence must be curbed. In Italy for example, drastic legislation and judicial measures in the 1980s have ended almost all violence related to drug trafficking.

Italian authorities punish drug traffickers financially, targeting their assets. Rizzoli says around US$6 billion in assets are confiscated from drug traffickers yearly in Italy, of which 60% is eventually permanently seized. These resources are redistributed to non-governmental organisations, showing citizens the concrete results of government action against drug dealers and the mafia.

In a short time, the Mocro Maffia has become a major trafficking group in Europe. Its links with organised criminal groups in Morocco and Latin America make it a persistent and growing threat to Europe, North African states and their populations.

Operations such as that which led to the arrest of 49 members of organised crime groups in November 2022 and asset-linked approaches by the European Union and North African authorities must be stepped up. Without this, the Mocro Maffia will have an open road to increasing its trafficking web between the two continents.

Source:  https://issafrica.org/iss-today/moroccos-mocro-maffia-threatens-europe-and-north-africa



Source link

Continue Reading

cocaine

Prince Harry’s U.S. Visa Drug Case Quietly Closed, Details Sealed

Published

on

By


The U.S. legal case surrounding Prince Harry’s visa application and his admitted drug use has quietly come to a close, with a federal judge issuing a sealed ruling. The case was initiated after Prince Harry’s public revelations in his memoir, Spare, where he openly discussed his past use of drugs such as cocaine and psychedelics. These admissions raised questions about whether he received special treatment from U.S. immigration authorities, as such disclosures could, under normal circumstances, complicate or bar entry to the U.S. under existing immigration laws.

The legal action was spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, which sought transparency regarding whether the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) followed standard procedure when granting Harry his visa. They filed a lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to compel DHS to release Prince Harry’s visa records. The group’s argument was rooted in the public’s right to know if a high-profile figure like Harry was given preferential treatment in his immigration process.

The Sealed Ruling and Lack of Public Disclosure

The federal judge, Carl Nichols, closed the case quietly and opted to seal the ruling, meaning the public will not have access to the details of the decision. This has left many questions unanswered, particularly around whether Prince Harry’s admissions of prior drug use were factored into his visa application process. Under U.S. immigration law, prior drug use can be grounds for visa denial, especially if disclosed during the application process. However, because the ruling is sealed, it remains unclear if his application received special consideration.

Legal experts believe that sealing the ruling is not uncommon in cases involving privacy concerns or high-profile individuals. The closure of the case without public disclosure could be an effort to shield the U.S. government and Prince Harry from further scrutiny while allowing room for potential appeals or other legal steps that may be taken in private​.

Background and Public Interest

The legal scrutiny of Prince Harry’s visa application came after his candid admissions in Spare and various interviews where he spoke openly about using drugs, including psychedelics for therapeutic purposes. In his memoir, Harry detailed his use of drugs to cope with the mental and emotional stress following his mother, Princess Diana’s, death. He also admitted to using cocaine recreationally in his youth. His honesty sparked debates over whether someone with his history would ordinarily be permitted to live in the United States, raising concerns about the transparency of U.S. immigration processes when it comes to high-profile individuals.

The Heritage Foundation argued that the public deserved to know if DHS had granted Harry any exemptions or leniencies in light of his admissions. Under normal circumstances, U.S. visa applicants are required to disclose any drug use, which can lead to rejection or additional scrutiny in the application process. Despite these concerns, the judge’s ruling, by being sealed, avoids making any explicit details about Harry’s visa or potential leniencies publicly available.

Legal Precedents and Considerations

Immigration law experts have noted that while drug use is generally a red flag for visa applicants, there are pathways to admission even for those who have admitted to previous drug use. The case, however, has raised broader questions about the fairness and consistency of U.S. immigration enforcement. It is unknown if Harry’s celebrity status played any role in the handling of his visa application, and the sealed ruling leaves room for speculation.

Additionally, under U.S. law, drug use disclosed after entry into the country, such as through a memoir, does not automatically trigger deportation or visa cancellation. The DHS’s refusal to release Harry’s visa records—despite the public interest—further fuels debate over the transparency and fairness of how immigration laws are applied to individuals with high profiles.

Prince Harry’s U.S. Visa Drug Case Quietly Closed, Details Sealed
Prince Harry’s U.S. Visa Drug Case Quietly Closed, Details Sealed

The Heritage Foundation’s Argument

The Heritage Foundation, which pursued the FOIA lawsuit, has expressed disappointment with the closure of the case and the sealed ruling. They maintain that the public deserves to know whether Prince Harry was treated differently than ordinary applicants. The case, however, highlights a tension between the public’s right to know and the privacy rights of individuals, particularly those with a high level of fame and media attention.

Despite the Foundation’s push for transparency, the government’s stance on withholding the records reflects the complexities of balancing public interest with personal privacy, especially under the protections afforded by U.S. immigration law. The sealed ruling may indicate that no significant irregularities were found, but without public access to the decision, speculation remains.

What’s Next?

Although the case has been closed, Prince Harry’s visa status may remain a point of public interest, especially in light of upcoming political dynamics. Notably, former U.S. President Donald Trump hinted that, if re-elected, he might re-examine Prince Harry’s visa status, potentially opening up further political debates about immigration policies for high-profile individuals.

For now, the case’s quiet closure suggests that both the U.S. government and Prince Harry prefer to avoid further public scrutiny, keeping the specifics of his visa application confidential.

Conclusion

Prince Harry’s visa case, which raised questions about his admissions of drug use and how they were handled by U.S. immigration authorities, has been quietly closed with a sealed ruling. While the decision leaves many questions unanswered, it highlights the complex interplay between privacy, public interest, and immigration law. The public may never fully know whether Harry’s visa was granted under special conditions or if his case was handled routinely, but the debate over transparency in immigration decisions involving high-profile individuals will likely persist.



Source link

Continue Reading

cocaine

American Airlines ex-mechanic gets 9 years prison for smuggling cocaine hidden under cockpit

Published

on

By


A former American Airlines (NASDAQ:) aircraft mechanic was sentenced on Friday to nine years in prison after being convicted of trying to smuggle cocaine hidden beneath the cockpit of a flight to New York from Jamaica.

Paul Belloisi, 56, of Smithtown, New York, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Dora Irizarry in Brooklyn, after being convicted in May 2023 of conspiring to possess cocaine, conspiring to import cocaine and importing cocaine.

The case arose from a routine search of American flight 1349 following its Feb. 4, 2020 arrival at New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport, where Belloisi had been an American mechanic for more than two decades, from Montego Bay, Jamaica.

Read more

https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/american-airlines-exmechanic-gets-9-years-prison-for-smuggling-cocaine-hidden-under-cockpit-3605920



Source link

Continue Reading

cocaine

$40K worth of cocaine, fentanyl seized during Farmington drug bust

Published

on

By



$40K worth of cocaine, fentanyl seized during Farmington drug bust



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media