Connect with us

Cannabis Law News

European Commission Refers Hungary To The Court Of Justice Over Cannabis Vote

Published

on


Last week the European Commission announced that it referred Hungary to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for voting against the European Union’s position on removing cannabis from Schedule IV of the Convention on Narcotic Drugs at a meeting back in December 2020. Below is more information about it via a news release from the European Commission:

Today, the European Commission decided to refer Hungary to the Court of Justice of the European Union for f voting against the position of the Union on the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations on scheduling cannabis and cannabis-related substances, as outlined in the Council Decision (EU) 2021/3.

On 2 December 2020, at the reconvened 63rd session of the United Nations (UN) Commission on Narcotic Drugs, Hungary voted against the Union position twice during the vote on the WHO recommendations in the listing of the substances under international control. Under EU law, the decisions on the international scheduling of substances under the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961, as amended by the 1972 Protocol, and the Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971, fall under the exclusive competence of the European Union. Hence, the Council decision determining the Union position is binding on the EU Member States in line with the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

The Commission therefore launched the infringement procedure against Hungary with a letter of formal notice sent on 18 February 2021, followed by a reasoned opinion on 12 November 2021. As the reply from the Hungarian authorities to both the letter of formal notice and reasoned opinion was unsatisfactory, the Commission has decided to refer Hungary to the Court of Justice of the European Union for failing to fulfil its obligations under the Council decision and acting in breach of the exclusive external competence of the Union as well as of the principle of sincere cooperation.

Background

On 24 January 2019, the World Health Organization presented six recommendations concerning the rescheduling of cannabis and cannabis-related substances under the UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961, as amended by the 1972 Protocol, and the UN Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971.

On 23 November 2020, the Council adopted Council Decision (EU) 2021/3 on the position to be taken, on behalf of the European Union, at the reconvened 63rd session of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs, on the scheduling of cannabis and cannabis-related substances under the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961, as amended by the 1972 Protocol, and the Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971. The decision was addressed to the Member States in accordance with the Treaties and, according to Article 288 TFEU, was binding in its entirety for the Member States who were called upon to vote in the Commission on Narcotic Drugs.

The vote in the Commission on Narcotic Drugs concerning the WHO recommendations took place on 2 December 2020. Hungary voted against those recommendations. In addition, Hungary made a statement in the Commission on Narcotic Drugs strongly contradicting the EU position.

For More Information

Council Decision (EU) 2021/3

WHO Recommendations on cannabis and cannabis-related substances

Infringement decisions database

EU infringement procedure

Link to February 2023 infringements package



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis Law News

Duane Morris Partner Michael Schwamm Named a “Notable Leader in Cannabis”

Published

on

By


Duane Morris partner Michael Schwamm has been named to Green Market Report’s 2023 list of Notable Leaders in Cannabis, which recognizes industry professionals who have demonstrated a willingness to effect meaningful change in a dynamic industry.

Read Mr. Schwamm’s profile in the publication.

Duane Morris Partner Michael Schwamm Named a “Notable Leader in Cannabis”



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis Law News

Michigan Businessman Sentenced to 2+ Years In Prison for Cannabis Industry Bribes

Published

on

By


A Michigan businessman on Thursday was sentenced to more than two years in federal prison for bribing the former head of the state cannabis licensing board, the Associated Press reports. John Dalaly pleaded guilty to the charges in April, admitting that he had paid Rick Johnson at least $68,200 in cash and other benefits, including two private flights to Canada, and hired Johnson’s wife, who helped him fill out forms that would end up in front of the state Medical Marihuana Licensing Board, as a consultant for $4,000 a month. 

Johnson, a Republican who served as House speaker from 2001 to 2004 chaired the board for two years before it was disbanded in 2019. He has admitted to accepting at least $110,000 in bribes while head of the board and is currently awaiting sentencing. Prosecutors are recommending a six-year prison term for Johnson.

Two lobbyists have also pled guilty in the scheme.

Following Dalaly’s sentencing, U.S. Attorney Mark Totten said, “Public corruption is a poison to our democracy, and we will hold offenders accountable whenever and wherever we find them.”

Read more

Michigan Businessman Sentenced to 2+ Years In Prison for Cannabis Industry Bribes



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis Law News

NJ state panel has ordered a police officer be reinstated after she was fired for using cannabis

Published

on

By


Header Image

Joshua Bauchner Ansell Law  co-chair of the Litigation Department, head of the Controlled Substances and Regulatory Law Department, and a member of the Community Association and Bankruptcy departments. He devotes his practice to complex commercial, class action, bankruptcy-related and securities litigation

The NJ Monitor writes

The first battle in the war over whether New Jersey law enforcement officers can use cannabis when they’re off duty is over, and the cops who want to partake in legal weed are winning.

Recent decisions from a state administrative law judge and the Civil Service Commission found in favor of a Jersey City cop who was fired after she used cannabis, with the judge ruling against the city’s claim that it can fire officers even if they use the substance legally and not on duty.

The decisions are significant not just because they appear to be the first to wade into this controversy after a handful of local leaders came out against letting their officers partake in legal weed. They are also noteworthy because Jersey City’s Democratic mayor, Steve Fulop, is seeking to become the state’s next governor. Fulop has ignored a 2022 memo issued by Attorney General Matt Platkin that says cops can use cannabis when they’re off duty.

The attorney for the officer in question did not respond to a request for comment. He is also representing three other Jersey City police officers who were fired after using cannabis. Those three cases have yet to make it to the Civil Service Commission.

Joshua Bauchner, a Woodland Park-based lawyer who specializes in civil and cannabis litigation, called the city’s actions here “distasteful.”

“It’s a travesty that Jersey City would press this case. There’s no rational basis for it,” Bauchner said.

Read more at

New Jersey cops are winning fight to use cannabis while off duty



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media