Connect with us

Cannabis News

Florida Marijuana Legalization Campaign Sues State Over ‘Nonsensical’ Delay In Ballot Initiative Review

Published

on

A Florida campaign working to put a marijuana legalization initiative on the 2026 ballot has filed a lawsuit in the state Supreme Court, alleging that officials are violating election laws by unjustifiably stalling the review process for the measure.

Smart & Safe Florida filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court on Thursday, alleging that the secretary of state has failed to comply with the law’s mandate to “immediately send” enough signatures to the attorney general to initiate a fiscal and legal review.

With 662,543 signatures verified by the Secretary of State so far, that’s more than triple the 220,016 signatures needed to push the review forward. The campaign reached that initial threshold over the summer and notified state officialsbut he says that he has not received an answer.

“It is senseless, and contrary to specific constitutional and statutory orders, that the Secretary (of State) and the Director (of the Division of Elections) indefinitely refuse to issue the Article 15.21 letter and frustrate the constitutional order,” the filing says, referring to the notification that the Secretary of State must send to the attorney general when the signature is received.

Attorneys for the campaign also noted that Smart & Safe Florida is involved in other lawsuits state is taking ‘illegal’ steps to force nearly 200,000 voter signatures to be invalidated has presented Officials say the signatures are invalid because the petitions signed by voters do not include the full text of the initiative.

“Therefore, perhaps Respondents speculate that the Secretary’s Directive may ultimately result in the invalidation of a sufficient number of Petitions to bring the measure below the threshold for issuing Section 15.21,” the Supreme Court said. “It’s a dubious presumption at best that Smart & Safe has collected more than three times the number of valid verified applications required statewide and nearly doubled the number of congressional districts.”

“In any event, speculation about Defendants’ motive is futile here because the law is clear that Smart & Safe has the right, and Defendants have a mandatory statutory duty, to issue a Section 15.21, because the statutory requirements have been met,” it says.

“The Secretary and the Director seem to see that the regional officials are valid and behind the reported requests (and as reflected on the Division’s website). The respondents seem to be refusing Article 15.21, that the fulfillment of the Secretary’s Directive by the county officials can lead to the Request that there is no legal source of the authors.

what the case The goal is to compel the court to “force the Florida Secretary of State to follow Florida law and fulfill his mandatory statutory duty to advance the ballot initiative for Supreme Court review as required by the Florida Constitution,” Smart & Safe Florida said in a statement.

“Florida law clearly states that once a statewide ballot initiative collects more than 25 percent of the signatures, the Secretary of State must begin the Supreme Court review process and forward the language to the state Attorney General,” he said. “For reasons unknown, that has not happened, and we are asking the court to step in and compel the secretary to follow Florida’s long-standing law, as Florida Smart & Safe far exceeded that threshold last summer.”

As for the other issue regarding the state’s effort to cancel the approximately 200,000 signatures already collected, the secretariat initially Smart & Safe sent a letter of resignation to Florida in Marchadvising the campaign on the interpretation of the rules regarding the inclusion of the full text of the proposed initiative in its petitions for signatures.

This is the second vote of the campaign. They successfully got a vote on a version of the 2024 initiative, and a majority voted to pass it, but not enough to meet the state’s 60 percent threshold to pass a constitutional amendment.

In the background of this case, in August a federal judge ruled against Smart & Safe Florida—Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) to provide “full relief” from provisions of a law he signed to impose other severe restrictions on signature gathering.

Although the law DeSantis signed in May was not directly aimed at the cannabis initiative, there has been concern among supporters that it could jeopardize an already complex and expensive process to gather enough signatures to put it on the ballot. That’s because it would block non-residents and non-citizens from collecting signatures for ballot measures.

In March, two Democratic members of Congress representing Florida asked the federal government to investigate What they described as an “illegal diversion” of millions in state Medicaid funds Through a group with ties to DeSantis. The money was used to fight a popular ballot initiative the governor vehemently opposed that would have legalized adult marijuana.

The lawmakers’ letter alleges that a $10 million donation from a state legislative settlement was misappropriated to the Hope Florida Foundation, which later sent the money to two political nonprofits, and sent $8.5 million to the anti-Amendment 3 campaign.

The governor said this in February The latest measure to legalize marijuana is in “big trouble” with the state Supreme CourtHe announced that it will be blocked from going before the voters next year.

“There are a lot of different views on marijuana,” DeSantis said. “It shouldn’t be in our Constitution. If you feel strongly about it, you have a legislative election. Bring back the candidates you think will be able to deliver what you think about it.”

“But when you put these things in the Constitution, and I think, I mean, the way they were written, there’s all kinds of things going on here. I think it’s going to have a lot of trouble getting passed by the Florida Supreme Court,” he said.

the last the initiative It was introduced to the secretary of state just months after initial versions failed in the November 2024 election, despite President Donald Trump’s endorsement.

The revised version of Smart & Safe Florida is expected to be successful in 2026. The campaign — which received tens of millions of dollars from cannabis industry players in the last election cycle, notably from multi-state operator Trulieve — introduced some changes in the new version that address criticisms of opponents of the 2024 push.

For example, it now specifically states that “smoking and vaping marijuana in any public place is prohibited.” Another section states that the legislature should adopt rules governing the “time, place and public manner of consuming marijuana.”


It’s Marijuana Time tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelic and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters By pledging at least $25 per month, you’ll get access to our interactive maps, charts and audio calendars so you never miss a development.


Learn more about our marijuana bill tracking and become a Patreon supporter to gain access

Last year, the governor accurately predicted this The campaign’s 2024 cannabis measure would survive a legal challenge From the state attorney general. It’s not entirely clear why he thinks this version will face a different outcome.

Although there is uncertainty about how the state’s highest court will navigate the measure, a poll released in February It showed the overwhelming support of a bipartisan voter for reform— 67% of Florida voters support legalization, including 82% of Democrats, 66% of independents and 55% of Republicans.

However, the results echo another recent poll by the Florida Chamber of Commerce, a proactive opponent of legalization, which found a majority in favor of reform among likely voters (53 percent). but not enough to be able to set the 60 percent condition.

Another poll of Republican voters in Florida showed only 40 percent of that demographic said they would vote for it of the legalization proposal.

Also, a GOP senator from Florida recently claimed this the legalization campaign “tricked” Trump into supporting the 2024 measure misleading him and the general public about key provisions.

Before the election, Trump said he was sorry last September The 3rd Amendment “would have been great” for the state.

Before commenting, Trump met with Truliev CEO Kim Riverseven with a GOP state senator who favors reform.

Meanwhile, there are medical marijuana officials in Florida actively expunging the records of patients and caregivers with drug-related criminal records. The policy is part of the sweeping budget legislation that DeSantis signed into law earlier this year. The aforementioned provisions address the State Department of Health (DOH). void the records of medical marijuana patients and caregivers if convicted of drug offenses, or pleaded guilty or no contest.

Photo elements courtesy of the user rawpixel and Philip Steffan.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Become a patron on Patreon!

Cannabis News

30MHz brings full-cycle climate tracking to cannabis cultivation

Published

on

By

Most greenhouse growers know the feeling: something has gone wrong somewhere, but by the time the last crop appears, it’s too late to know where. When a crop moves from a reproductive to a production compartment, each stage has its own climate goals and its own data. Until now, no single tool tied all of this together in a single view.

30MHz has built that tool. The Crop Strategy allows growers to set weekly climate targets for each crop and compartment, covering parameters such as total PAR and temperature bandwidth, before the start of the season. As the crop moves through each production phase, the dashboard monitors whether reality is following the plan. When it is not, an alert is issued in time for action.

Early adopters found deviations at the compartment level within days of going live. In one case, a grower caught a temperature drift that would have reduced final yield in the second week and corrected it the same week, something that would have gone unnoticed until harvest.

“You always knew something wasn’t right, but you couldn’t pinpoint it,” says Lars van der Lely, Customer Success Manager at 30MHz. “Now you see exactly which compartment, which week and what to do.”

© 30MHz

The module includes weekly climate targets for each crop and compartment, real-time monitoring at multiple production stages, real alerts when deviations from targets, side-by-side comparison of two crops in different zones or seasons, inter-annual benchmarking in a single view and direct integration of sensor data to keep strategy and measurements in sync.

The tool has also been used in the cultivation of cannabis. “The parameters that matter most are temperature, including canopy and root zone differentials, RH and VPD, light intensity and DLI, and substrate moisture and EC, especially during transplanting,” explained the 30MHz team. “Propagation requires high RH, often 80 to 90 percent, to compensate for underdeveloped root systems, while flowering requires a much lower VPD to encourage transpiration and trichome development. What makes us unique is that all of our tools work for all types of crops: cannabis, flowers, and edibles.”

In terms of compliance, all sensor data is time-stamped, stored and retrievable. Custom dashboards and exports consolidate historical climate data for each location and zone, eliminating the manual work of extracting and combining records from multiple sources. The Crop Strategy adds a layer of structured monitoring of growing cycles on top of that. “Our honest response is that 30MHz already has the data infrastructure upon which a compliance workflow can be built,” says the 30MHz team. “Currently we don’t have GMP-style batch records or audit reports, but for a serious prospect of medical cannabis in the EU, this could be a co-development conversation, or a collaboration angle with a QMS or compliance software provider.”

Cultivation Strategy is also the data base for the next 30MHz build. Once a plant’s plan is structured and linked to actual sensor results, the platform can automatically generate personalized recommendations. The RTR module already does this for energy use, and is estimated to save producers 10 to 15 percent annually. Cultivation Strategy brings this same intelligence to the entire production journey.

For more information
30MHz
(email protected)
30mhz.com

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Tariffs’ Impact On Some Cannabis Businesses May Erase Any Benefits They See From 280E Tax Relief Under Rescheduling (Op-Ed)

Published

on

By

“The revision removes a major structural penalty, but the tariffs will reshape who gets the profits. Everyone else, the big dispensary companies, could emerge as the main beneficiaries.”

By Justin Leiby, Cannabis Research Institute

With federal cannabis reorganization partially underway and the potential end of 280E tax penalties looming, it’s an open question how much relief the cannabis industry will get. Regardless of the future, 280E is a significant financial impact for cannabis operators.

I conduct an annual survey of cannabis operators for the Illinois Office of Cannabis Regulation, and in the most recent survey operators estimate that 44 percent of their operating expenses in 2024 were not deductible under 280E, Schedules I and II. That it only applies to the drugs listed. Assuming a 21 percent corporate tax rate, that means a penalty of $92 per $1,000 spent.

Under the Trump administration’s current process of moving cannabis to Schedule III, the pain of the 280E penalty has not been distributed equally, and those who suffered the most may reap greater benefits beyond the (hopefully) temporary importance of separating medical and adult operations.

Small operators report more 280E waivers than large firms (45 percent vs. 37 percent of operating expenses), while firms that rely entirely on dispensary operations do as well as those that do not (50 percent vs. 43 percent).

Comparing the impacts of 280E and tariffs

To put the financial impact of the reorganization into context, it should be noted that some of the benefits may never materialize to operators thanks to the impact of tariffs imposed over the past year.

I combine Illinois survey responses with public financial filings to better understand the relative impacts. Like all businesses, cannabis operators have two types of operating costs: the direct costs of acquiring and producing products such as raw materials (“costs of goods sold”) and the indirect costs of operating the business such as rent and insurance (“selling, general and administrative expenses” or “G&A”).

Tariffs primarily affect the larger portion of the former, while 280E primarily affects the latter.

Together, these costs consume 84 cents of every dollar of revenue generated by cannabis operators, paying creditors and non-280E taxes consumes another six cents. I calculate a 280E penalty of three cents on the dollar by multiplying an average write-off of 44 percent, an SG&A percentage of 35 percent, and a US corporate tax rate of 21 percent. Considering the small profit margins of cannabis, the economic benefit of removing the 280E penalty is undeniable.

However, this will be partially or fully offset by tariffs that increase input costs such as packaging, vape hardware and building materials. One in six operators reported increases of 20 percent or more in input costs and more than half reported increases of 5 percent or more.

In my example, even a modest 5 percent increase wipes out most of the gain from 280E penalty relief, and an 18 percent increase wipes out all gains entirely.

Variable and deferred benefits

Like 280E, the fare load is heavier on some operators than others; in this case, cultivation and brewing operations that rely on imported packaging products, construction, and high-tech hardware. One in six cultivation and infusion companies (17 percent) reported input cost increases of more than 20 percent, while dispensary-only companies reported no such impact.

Because dispensary-only operators experience greater tax distortions from 280E and report lower tariff impacts, they will benefit the most from ending the 280E penalty.

Replanning Changes Competitive Landscape

The reorganization removes a large structural penalty, but the tariffs will reshape who takes the profits. All else being equal, large dispensary companies may be the main beneficiaries.

That’s right, observations like this start the debate instead of solving it. Some of the benefits of the rescheduling will not be realized immediately because operators have made long-term strategic choices based on the 280E tax cuts and cannot immediately release those choices.

For example, in the Illinois survey, more than half of operators reported that 280E led them to cut discretionary investments in product development, research, and sustainable technologies necessary to reach a market. Similar percentages indicate a shift to leaner staffing patterns, from security protocols to customer experience and changing facility designs for tax reasons, such as more difficult to limit retail space.

“Who wins” depends on how well operators can adapt to the new landscape.

Justin Leiby, Ph.D., is a professor of accounting at the University of Illinois Gies College of Business and faculty-in-residence at the Cannabis Research Institute. His research and teaching focuses on audit, governance and risk management, and includes extensive collection and analysis of operational and financial data from the cannabis industry.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Become a patron on Patreon!

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Custom Cones USA launches Cones Canada

Published

on

By

Custom Cones USA has announced the launch of Cones Canada, a wholly Canadian operation designed to meet the growing needs of Canadian pre-roll producers, processors and brands.

With a stocked warehouse in Ontario and a dedicated Canadian e-commerce platform, Cones Canada eliminates the complication that Canadian businesses have historically faced in sourcing pre-rolled cones: no import fees, no customs delays and no currency conversion headaches. Orders are billed in Canadian dollars (CAD) and shipped from Ontario to anywhere in Canada.

Why Cones Canada, why now?
The legal cannabis market in Canada continues to grow, and pre-rolls are a $1.4 billion market. In 2024, pre-rolls passed as the top category in the country, and retained their title in 2025 with 77.2 million units sold, again the highest of any category, according to cannabis analytics firm Headset.

Canadian growers and processors have long relied on Custom Cones USA’s reputation for quality. Its cones have been tested to Health Canada standards for flowers and are trusted by leading pre-roll manufacturers worldwide. However, cross-border orders came with additional cost, time and logistical complexity.

“We’ve been supplying Canadian cannabis brands for years, and the demand from our Canadian customers made this next step an easy decision,” said Harrison Bard, co-founder and CEO of Custom Cones USA. “With Cones Canada, we’re bringing the same products, the same quality standards, and the same expert support that our customers have always trusted. Only now we’re doing it without limits.”

Cones Canada’s Ontario facility carries four of the most popular pre-rolled cone sizes from the Custom Cones USA catalog, each in two types of European-sourced paper: Refined White and Natural Brown.

In addition to ready-to-ship bulk cones, Cones Canada offers access to Custom Cones USA’s machine, packaging and custom branding options, including full-color filter tip printing, cigar bands and outer wraps. and custom packaging, Canadian brands can build a distinctive, shelf-ready product line backed by Pre-Roll Experts.

For more information:
Cones Canada
conescanada.ca/

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media