Connect with us

Cannabis News

Florida Marijuana Legalization Campaign Sues State Over ‘Nonsensical’ Delay In Ballot Initiative Review

Published

on

A Florida campaign working to put a marijuana legalization initiative on the 2026 ballot has filed a lawsuit in the state Supreme Court, alleging that officials are violating election laws by unjustifiably stalling the review process for the measure.

Smart & Safe Florida filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court on Thursday, alleging that the secretary of state has failed to comply with the law’s mandate to “immediately send” enough signatures to the attorney general to initiate a fiscal and legal review.

With 662,543 signatures verified by the Secretary of State so far, that’s more than triple the 220,016 signatures needed to push the review forward. The campaign reached that initial threshold over the summer and notified state officialsbut he says that he has not received an answer.

“It is senseless, and contrary to specific constitutional and statutory orders, that the Secretary (of State) and the Director (of the Division of Elections) indefinitely refuse to issue the Article 15.21 letter and frustrate the constitutional order,” the filing says, referring to the notification that the Secretary of State must send to the attorney general when the signature is received.

Attorneys for the campaign also noted that Smart & Safe Florida is involved in other lawsuits state is taking ‘illegal’ steps to force nearly 200,000 voter signatures to be invalidated has presented Officials say the signatures are invalid because the petitions signed by voters do not include the full text of the initiative.

“Therefore, perhaps Respondents speculate that the Secretary’s Directive may ultimately result in the invalidation of a sufficient number of Petitions to bring the measure below the threshold for issuing Section 15.21,” the Supreme Court said. “It’s a dubious presumption at best that Smart & Safe has collected more than three times the number of valid verified applications required statewide and nearly doubled the number of congressional districts.”

“In any event, speculation about Defendants’ motive is futile here because the law is clear that Smart & Safe has the right, and Defendants have a mandatory statutory duty, to issue a Section 15.21, because the statutory requirements have been met,” it says.

“The Secretary and the Director seem to see that the regional officials are valid and behind the reported requests (and as reflected on the Division’s website). The respondents seem to be refusing Article 15.21, that the fulfillment of the Secretary’s Directive by the county officials can lead to the Request that there is no legal source of the authors.

what the case The goal is to compel the court to “force the Florida Secretary of State to follow Florida law and fulfill his mandatory statutory duty to advance the ballot initiative for Supreme Court review as required by the Florida Constitution,” Smart & Safe Florida said in a statement.

“Florida law clearly states that once a statewide ballot initiative collects more than 25 percent of the signatures, the Secretary of State must begin the Supreme Court review process and forward the language to the state Attorney General,” he said. “For reasons unknown, that has not happened, and we are asking the court to step in and compel the secretary to follow Florida’s long-standing law, as Florida Smart & Safe far exceeded that threshold last summer.”

As for the other issue regarding the state’s effort to cancel the approximately 200,000 signatures already collected, the secretariat initially Smart & Safe sent a letter of resignation to Florida in Marchadvising the campaign on the interpretation of the rules regarding the inclusion of the full text of the proposed initiative in its petitions for signatures.

This is the second vote of the campaign. They successfully got a vote on a version of the 2024 initiative, and a majority voted to pass it, but not enough to meet the state’s 60 percent threshold to pass a constitutional amendment.

In the background of this case, in August a federal judge ruled against Smart & Safe Florida—Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) to provide “full relief” from provisions of a law he signed to impose other severe restrictions on signature gathering.

Although the law DeSantis signed in May was not directly aimed at the cannabis initiative, there has been concern among supporters that it could jeopardize an already complex and expensive process to gather enough signatures to put it on the ballot. That’s because it would block non-residents and non-citizens from collecting signatures for ballot measures.

In March, two Democratic members of Congress representing Florida asked the federal government to investigate What they described as an “illegal diversion” of millions in state Medicaid funds Through a group with ties to DeSantis. The money was used to fight a popular ballot initiative the governor vehemently opposed that would have legalized adult marijuana.

The lawmakers’ letter alleges that a $10 million donation from a state legislative settlement was misappropriated to the Hope Florida Foundation, which later sent the money to two political nonprofits, and sent $8.5 million to the anti-Amendment 3 campaign.

The governor said this in February The latest measure to legalize marijuana is in “big trouble” with the state Supreme CourtHe announced that it will be blocked from going before the voters next year.

“There are a lot of different views on marijuana,” DeSantis said. “It shouldn’t be in our Constitution. If you feel strongly about it, you have a legislative election. Bring back the candidates you think will be able to deliver what you think about it.”

“But when you put these things in the Constitution, and I think, I mean, the way they were written, there’s all kinds of things going on here. I think it’s going to have a lot of trouble getting passed by the Florida Supreme Court,” he said.

the last the initiative It was introduced to the secretary of state just months after initial versions failed in the November 2024 election, despite President Donald Trump’s endorsement.

The revised version of Smart & Safe Florida is expected to be successful in 2026. The campaign — which received tens of millions of dollars from cannabis industry players in the last election cycle, notably from multi-state operator Trulieve — introduced some changes in the new version that address criticisms of opponents of the 2024 push.

For example, it now specifically states that “smoking and vaping marijuana in any public place is prohibited.” Another section states that the legislature should adopt rules governing the “time, place and public manner of consuming marijuana.”


It’s Marijuana Time tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelic and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters By pledging at least $25 per month, you’ll get access to our interactive maps, charts and audio calendars so you never miss a development.


Learn more about our marijuana bill tracking and become a Patreon supporter to gain access

Last year, the governor accurately predicted this The campaign’s 2024 cannabis measure would survive a legal challenge From the state attorney general. It’s not entirely clear why he thinks this version will face a different outcome.

Although there is uncertainty about how the state’s highest court will navigate the measure, a poll released in February It showed the overwhelming support of a bipartisan voter for reform— 67% of Florida voters support legalization, including 82% of Democrats, 66% of independents and 55% of Republicans.

However, the results echo another recent poll by the Florida Chamber of Commerce, a proactive opponent of legalization, which found a majority in favor of reform among likely voters (53 percent). but not enough to be able to set the 60 percent condition.

Another poll of Republican voters in Florida showed only 40 percent of that demographic said they would vote for it of the legalization proposal.

Also, a GOP senator from Florida recently claimed this the legalization campaign “tricked” Trump into supporting the 2024 measure misleading him and the general public about key provisions.

Before the election, Trump said he was sorry last September The 3rd Amendment “would have been great” for the state.

Before commenting, Trump met with Truliev CEO Kim Riverseven with a GOP state senator who favors reform.

Meanwhile, there are medical marijuana officials in Florida actively expunging the records of patients and caregivers with drug-related criminal records. The policy is part of the sweeping budget legislation that DeSantis signed into law earlier this year. The aforementioned provisions address the State Department of Health (DOH). void the records of medical marijuana patients and caregivers if convicted of drug offenses, or pleaded guilty or no contest.

Photo elements courtesy of the user rawpixel and Philip Steffan.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Become a patron on Patreon!

Cannabis News

Lower Sioux Community signs Tribal State cannabis compact

Published

on

By


The Lower Sioux Indian Community is the latest tribal nation to sign a cannabis treaty with the state. The agreement allows the Lower Sioux Community to supply cannabis flowers and products to state-licensed dispensaries and businesses. Eric Taubel of the Office of Cannabis Management says the state and…

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Hawaii Senate Passes Bill To Allow Medical Marijuana Use By Seriously Ill Patients In Health Facilities

Published

on

By

The Hawaii Senate has passed a bill to allow qualified patients access to medical marijuana in health care facilities.

After receiving a favorable report in committee last week, Sen. Joy San Buenaventura’s (D) legislation advanced to the full floor on Tuesday as part of the consensus schedule with a 25-0 vote. A The version of the house proposal has also moved in this session.

The bill states, “It is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this chapter to protect the ability of terminally ill patients and chronically ill patients over the age of sixty-five to safely use medical cannabis in specified health care facilities.”

Advocates would like the order to allow health facilities to use medical cannabis, but as written the policy would only allow those, exempting residential treatment centers from the proposed law.

Other exceptions contained in the legislation, SB 2408that medical marijuana may not be used for substance abuse recovery in hospitals, state hospitals or acute general hospital emergency departments “while the patient is receiving emergency services and care.”

Under the proposal, smoking and vaping of cannabis would be prohibited in health care facilities, “provided that the home health agency prohibits smoking or vaping before or during the home health agency staff’s stay at the facility.”

General acute care hospitals could not allow patients with a chronic illness to use medical cannabis unless they were terminally ill.

If a federal regulatory agency, the Department of Justice, or the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) takes enforcement action against a health care facility related to its medical cannabis policy, or specifically notifies the facility that it is violating federal law, the health care facility may rescind the policy.

Meanwhile, last week, another Hawaii Senate committee passed a bill allow patients immediate access to medical cannabis once records are submittedinstead of waiting for the cards to be delivered, as is the case under current legislation.

Buenaventura, the head of the Health and Human Services Committee, is also a sponsor of his chamber’s version of the proposal. More of his panels has just passed legislation to legalize low-dose, low-potency marijuanaeven as their peers in the House of Representatives have said, the prohibition of cannabis in the state will not end this year.

The legislation would allow adults over the age of 21 to legally possess and use certain amounts of low-dose, low-THC cannabis, with the product limited to no more than 5 milligrams of THC per serving. In liquid form, twelve ounces can contain 5 milligrams of THC.

Senate committee action follows Senior lawmakers in the House indicated that proposals to legalize cannabis would not move forward In the 2026 session, citing the lack of sufficient support in their chamber.

Despite hopes that those bills – including one from House Judiciary and Hawaiian Affairs Committee Chairman David Tarnas (D) that would put legalization before voters on the ballot – would advance this year, sponsor and House Speaker Nadine Nakamura (D) said there was not enough support in the legislature to pass this round.

State officials released a report in January the potential economic impact of recreational marijuana legalization on the stateincluding the revenue effects associated with domestic and international tourism.

All told, the researchers said survey data and comparative analysis indicate Hawaii could see $46-90 million in monthly marijuana sales in the fifth year of implementation, after taking into account the maximum tax rate of 15 percent on cannabis products.

The Hawaii Senate narrowly defeated a proposal last year that would have increased the amount of cannabis a person could possess without risk of criminal charges by five times.

If the measure had become law, the amount of decriminalized cannabis in Hawaii would have increased from the current 3 grams to 15 grams. Possession of any marijuana up to that 15-gram limit would have been classified as a civil infraction, punishable by a $130 fine.

The Senate bill that would legalize marijuana for adults, on the other hand, has finally stalled. That measure, SB 1613, did not make it out of committee during one term of the legislature.

While advocates believed there was sufficient support for the legalization proposal in the Senate, it is widely believed that House lawmakers would ultimately defeat the measure, as they did last February with a companion legislative bill, HB 1246.

In 2024, a The legislation passed by the Senate also failed in the House.

It came just days after last year’s House vote to stop the bill approval of a pair of committees at a joint hearing. Prior to that hearing, jurors received nearly 300 pages of testimony, including from state agencies, advocacy organizations and members of the public.

Gov. Josh Green (D) signed separate legislation last year allow medical marijuana caregivers to grow marijuana on behalf of five patients than the current one.

And in July, the governor signed another bill Establishes several new rules for Hawaiian hemp productsincluding the requirement for distributors and retailers to obtain registration from the Department of Health.

Legislators also sent a bill to the governor help speed up the expungement process for people who want to clear their past marijuana-related criminal records– a proposal Green signed the law last April.

This measure, HB 132, of Tarnas, aims to speed up the abolition Green’s pilot program signed into law in 2024. Specifically, it will eliminate a distinction between marijuana and other Schedule V drugs for the purposes of the decriminalization program.

The bill’s sponsors said the law’s current wording forces state officials to manually comb through thousands of criminal records to identify those eligible for expungement in the pilot program.

Meanwhile, in November, Hawaii officials detailed the rules allow medical marijuana dispensaries to sell a wide range of products for patients— including dry herb vaporizers, rolling papers and grinders — while revising state code to clarify that cannabis oils and concentrates can be marketed for inhalation.

The department as well He confirmed that he is in favor of federal marijuana reorganization– The policy change that President Donald Trump ordered to be carried out quickly, but which has not yet been implemented.


It’s Marijuana Time tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelic and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters by pledging at least $25/month, you’ll get access to our interactive maps, charts, and audio calendars so you never miss a development.


Learn more about our marijuana bill tracking and become a Patreon supporter to gain access

Regulators are also launching a series of courses designed for this purpose educate doctors and other healthcare professionals about medical marijuana as the state’s cannabis program expands.

The under the medical marijuana expansion bill signed by the governor In late June, it not only makes cannabis easier for more patients to access, but also contains a provision that advocates find problematic.

Before lawmakers sent the legislation to Green, a conference committee revised the plan, including a provision allowing the DOH to access medical marijuana patient records held by doctors for any reason.

user photo Brian Shamblen.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Become a patron on Patreon!

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Smart root zone monitoring in stone wool cultivation

Published

on

By

In modern professional horticulture, medicinal crops such as cannabis and high-yielding vegetable production, root zone management is the cornerstone of consistent quality and yield. Rockwool substrates offer a very stable and correctable root environment, but this advantage is fully exploited when decisions are supported by reliable and well-interpreted data. Sensors in the root zone provide continuous information on water content, EC and temperature. Used correctly, they allow growers to anticipate plant needs rather than reacting to stress signals. Used incorrectly, they introduce noise, false confidence, and misdirection. The difference is in strategy, location and interpretation. Remember that sensors are just another tool and should not replace traditional monitoring methods.

Why Root Zone Monitoring Becomes Essential at Scale
Every grower evaluates the root zone, consciously or not. In smaller installations, this is often done visually and by touch: lifting blocks, assessing the color of rockwool, or observing the attitude of plants. These methods are valuable, but subjective and difficult to standardize.

As operations grow and the number of plants increases, manual assessment quickly reaches its limits. Weighing slabs or blocks on a scale adds objectivity, but at discrete moments and with significant manual labor. In larger facilities, the manpower required to continuously monitor root conditions throughout the crop is simply not available.

Root zone sensors address this reality. They provide continuous data streams that show trends, dynamics and responses to irrigation and climate change over time. In scaled cultivation, sensors are therefore not only a precision tool, but a practical necessity. Importantly, they do not replace experience; they formalize, making intuition measurable and repeatable.

© CULTIWOOL SA
Location, representation and care of sensors
A sensor does not measure the crop; measures the exact micro-environment in which it is installed. Correct positioning is therefore essential.

Sensors should be installed in the active root zone of a healthy, representative plant, at a depth where the roots remain active throughout the crop cycle. They should never be placed directly next to a drip, as this results in high moisture readings that do not reflect average root conditions. Therefore, consistent dripper placement is essential not only for block performance, but also for consistent sensor data.

The wider greenhouse context matters just as much. Sensors should not be placed in corners, edges, near walkways or in areas subject to shadows, drafts or uneven watering. Border plants and atypical sites experience conditions different from the majority of the crop and will yield data that are not representative of the compartment.

Once installed, the sensors must remain in place for the duration of the crop cycle. Repeated removal and reinsertion disturbs the structure of the rockwool, alters the local water distribution, and compromises the consistency of the data. If a sensor needs to be removed, it should never be put back in the same place. Previously used insertion points contain moisture and residual pockets that can affect EC readings. In such cases, the sensor must be installed in a new, unobstructed location.

Consistency in positioning is what allows producers to confidently recognize trends, responses and deviations.

How many sensors are enough?
A single sensor can never represent an entire greenhouse, and in most cases, not even an entire compartment. Changes in light distribution, uniformity of irrigation, air flow and plant development inevitably create them within the crop.

At the same time, the deployment of sensors must be economically rational. The goal is not maximum sensor density, but reliable representation. In practice, this means installing multiple sensors per compartment in areas with comparable growing conditions.

Instead of focusing on individual readings, the most robust approach is to work with average data. Each sensor reflects the conditions of its specific location; by combining their readings, growers create a stable reference that reduces the risk of overreaction to local changes and supports safer and more consistent decision-making. Again, a sensor is just one tool to consider.

Interpreting root zone data in rockwool
Rockwool allows precise control of the air-water ratio in the root zone. Sensors should therefore be used to observe dynamics rather than isolated values.

Meaningful interpretation is based on the behavior of the back-dry between irrigation events, wetting rate, EC stability and how these parameters respond to climatic conditions. Sudden spikes or drops often indicate improper watering, uneven distribution, or location effects rather than actual plant demand.

Root zone data gain real value when cross-referenced with climate parameters such as temperature, humidity and VPD, as well as visual observations of crops. Integrated platforms and multiple data sources, such as those enabled by solutions like SenseNL, help validate trends and clarify cause-and-effect relationships.

Selecting the right sensor for the right substrate
Not all sensors in the root zone are interchangeable. Sensor technology must be matched with the physical properties of the substrate to generate accurate and meaningful data. They must also be properly maintained and stored to ensure accuracy.

Different substrates, such as rockwool and cocopeat, have fundamentally different structures, water retention characteristics and EC dynamics. Sensors designed for cocopeat will not give reliable readings on rockwool, and vice versa.

Also in rockwool cultivation, the selection of sensors is important. Blocks and slabs differ in volume, water distribution and root development patterns. Sensors designed for stone wool blocks are therefore not always suitable for slabs, and vice versa. Matching the sensor to the substrate material and its form factor is critical to obtaining reliable root-site data.

Driving for uniformity and stability
In both medicinal and vegetable cultivation, success is defined by uniformity and repeatability. Correctly installed and correctly interpreted root zone sensors help to identify variability early, reduce differences between plants and support stable establishment or vegetation strategies.

Combined with high-quality stone wool substrates, the sensors become a powerful ally in precision farming, improving consistency without replacing the grower’s experience.

From data points to confident decisions
Root zone sensors aren’t about collecting more numbers; they are about creating clarity. When sensors are strategically placed, deployed in sufficient numbers, and handled consistently, they make rockwool farming a predictable and correctable system.

By averaging data from multiple representative locations, producers reduce risk, avoid overcorrection, and drive with confidence. In professional horticulture, where uniformity, stability and scale define success, reliable root zone data becomes the basis rather than an experiment, cycle after cycle.

For more information:
Cultiwool
(email protected)
www.cultiwool-substrate.com

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media