Cannabis News

Florida Republican Governor Candidates Are United In Opposing Marijuana Legalization

Published

2 months ago

May 7, 2026

admin

“I don’t support recreational marijuana. I think the current regulatory system around medicinal use is fine.”

Author: Mitch Perry, Phoenix, Florida

the subject of Should Florida legalize recreational cannabis? Smart & Safe Florida, the organization behind the initiative to return to voters this November, disappeared as a major campaign issue earlier this year after falling short of the nearly 880,000 verified petition signatures needed to qualify for the statewide ballot.

That defeat came a year and a half after nearly 56 Floridians voted to legalize recreational marijuana on the November 2024 ballot, a clear majority but far short of the 60 percent needed for passage.

While it’s not something voters will decide this year, Floridians may want to know where the candidates for statewide office stand.

Speaking at a “Business Women for Byron” campaign event Tuesday at the Getaway, a waterfront restaurant and Tiki bar in St. Petersburg, the first question an audience member asked GOP gubernatorial candidate Byron Donalds was his stance on the issue.

“I don’t condone recreational marijuana,” Donalds responded. “I think the current regulatory system around drug use is fine.”

Donalds has previously admitted to being arrested for possession of “a dime bag of marijuana” as a teenager, and recently admitted to CBS Miami he actually sold small amounts of cannabis in his youth.

Now he says he doesn’t support expanding legal weed use beyond the 924,820 Floridians listed as medical marijuana patients, according to the Office of Medical Marijuana Use.

Acceptance in medicine, but never for entertainment

Other Republicans running for governor share Donalds’ sentiments.

“I am against recreational marijuana in Florida,” investment firm CEO James Fishback told the Phoenix in a text message. “I’ve seen what it’s done in cities that have already tried it, from New York to Chicago to Washington DC. The stench of pot in public parks and outside our schools can never reach Florida.”

However, Fishback says he will always protect “the right of those who have a legitimate medical purpose, including our U.S. military veterans.”

“No one should be denied herbal medicine and pushed toward an addictive prescription from big pharma for painkillers,” she said. “As governor, I will support medical marijuana. But I won’t allow champs to smoke pot in a public park, just like we already don’t allow them to drink in one.”

“I’ve been clear from day one. I am totally opposed to legalizing marijuana,” Gov. Jay Collins said in a video posted on social media on April 26. “We’ve seen the impact in other states, and it’s not where Florida is headed. I’m with Governor DeSantis on this one. No compromise, and no money from the marijuana industry. That’s all my opponents can say.”

“I’m against recreational marijuana,” former House Speaker Paul Renner said Wednesday at a panel discussion on high energy prices in Hillsborough County.

“We have medical. It was put in the Constitution (in 2016). If people want to get it, they can get it. And we opened that up as much as needed, but I’m against recreation. Period. If it goes back to the ballot, like Gov. DeSantis did.”

DeSantis announced in June 2024 that he would use a political action committee to fight the constitutional amendment on recreational marijuana, saying he could not believe the Florida Supreme Court had agreed to allow the measure’s language to go on the November ballot.

He later used tens of millions of taxpayer dollars to campaign against that proposal and another measure that would have guaranteed abortion rights in Florida, according to a Tampa Bay Times report.

Where are the Democrats?

Phoenix caught up with the two top Democrats running for governor this year: former GOP U.S. Rep. David Jolly and Orange County Mayor Jerry Demings.

“I think the role of the governor is to represent the majority of the state, and the majority of the state asked for it, and I think we should,” Jolly told the Phoenix in a phone call Tuesday.

The Pinellas County Democrat says he voted against Amendment 3 in 2024, which would have called for the legalization of recreational marijuana use for adults.

But since announcing his candidacy last year, Jolly has emphasized that he will work to implement all of the recent constitutional amendments that have been approved by a majority in Florida, but have failed to reach the high margin of 60 percent needed to take advantage.

“Recreational marijuana received more than 50 percent of the vote in the constitutional amendment process and I would support enactment and introduce any amendment that received more than 50 percent of the vote in the legislature. That includes open primaries, recreational marijuana, and the 4th Amendment on reproductive freedom,” he said.

The only major gubernatorial candidate Phoenix couldn’t clear was Demings. While serving as Orlando’s police chief in the 2010s, Demings opposed constitutional amendments that would have legalized medical marijuana. 2014 and 2016

The Phoenix reached out to the Demings campaign by phone and email for two days this week, but did not receive a response. Calls to the phone number listed in the latest press release from the Demings campaign were answered by a recording that the person with the number did not have a voice mail system set up.

President Trump passed the 3rd Amendment

One prominent Florida Republican who supported the 3rd Amendment in 2024 was President Donald Trump.

“As I’ve said before, I believe it’s time to end the unnecessary arrests and incarcerations of adults for small amounts of marijuana for personal use. We also need to put smart rules in place, giving adults access to a safe and tested product,” Trump posted on Truth Social in September 2024. “Like Florida, I will vote YES on Amendment 3 in November.”

In that position, the president promised to work to make marijuana a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act if elected to the White House, which he did in an executive order in December.

The US Department of Justice announced last month that it would immediately move FDA-approved marijuana products, along with items regulated by a state medical marijuana license, under Title III. Medical cannabis falls under the category of controlled drugs that have a recognized medical use, such as Tylenol, and not Schedule I drugs, such as heroin and LSD, which have no medical use and a high potential for abuse.

This story was first published by the Florida Phoenix.

user photo Philip Steffan.

Marihuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Cannabis News

Maximizing cannabis yields with intercanopy and subcanopy lighting

Published

8 hours ago

July 4, 2026

admin

Cannabis News

Transportation Groups Warn Feds Of Marijuana Rescheduling’s ‘Consequences’ For Drug Testing Of Truck Drivers And Pilots

Published

9 hours ago

July 4, 2026

admin

A coalition of transportation and safety organizations said they have “serious safety concerns” about the Trump administration’s move to federally regulate marijuana.

Led by the American Trucking Association, the groups sent a letter to federal officials Monday asking them to take steps to ensure truck drivers, pilots, transit operators and other safety-sensitive workers continue to be tested for cannabis.

“If employers do not take the necessary steps to preserve the ability of security-sensitive transportation workers to test for marijuana, this change could have significant consequences for the safety of passengers and the entire transportation industry,” wrote Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Administrator Terrance Cole, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, and Transportation Secretary J.

The organizations said they understand that federal officials are being “urgently” reorganized under an executive order from President Donald Trump, that they are “deeply concerned that the current process does not adequately take into account agencies responsible for transportation safety or protecting the traveling public” and that they want the agencies to “work together.” ongoing cannabis redistricting hearings and rulemaking process to address these concerns.

In May, the Department of Transportation (DOT) issued new guidelines saying just that Truck drivers, airline pilots and other safety-sensitive workers still cannot use medical marijuana without penalty despite the Trump administration’s move to reschedule.

“Marijuana use is incompatible with safety-sensitive functions,” the department said.

Medical review officers (MROs) who receive drug test results indicating cannabis use cannot rule them out as negative for illegal substance use, even if an employee claims it was a result of state-licensed medical marijuana.

“Currently, there is no way for an MRO to verify that a laboratory-confirmed marijuana drug test result is positive when an employee claims the positive was caused by a state-licensed marijuana product,” the DOT said, explaining that after the reprogramming, medical marijuana dispensed under state law “does not” constitute a drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The transportation groups said in the new letter that the DOT’s drug-testing program “is in accordance with the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs and HHS-certified laboratories.”

“While DOT has expressed its intention to continue testing marijuana, a commitment we greatly appreciate, it is unclear whether DOT will retain its ability to rely on HHS procedures and certifications after the rescheduling,” they wrote. “Without this alignment, DOT may retain the authority to conduct testing, but lack the scientific and procedural infrastructure to do so.”

“Practically, this would mean that truck and bus drivers, pilots, flight attendants, air traffic controllers, air mechanics, railroad workers, dispatchers and signal workers, transit operators and pipeline workers could continue to perform high-risk safety roles without a reliable means of verifying that they are not actively using marijuana. It relies on controlled substance testing to identify end use and prevent potentially impaired individuals from fulfilling their safety-related obligations. While the planning could create legal or regulatory loopholes, the regulated employer-based drug testing agency warned that the final rules should not jeopardize marijuana testing for safety-sensitive transportation workers.”

“Regardless of the broader policy goals of the review, the federal government should not move forward to preserve transportation drug testing programs and mitigate the risks of increased and unchecked deterioration of our roads, railroads, public transportation systems, pipelines, airspace, and maritime corridors,” the letter says.

The organizations specifically ask federal officials to:

Support long-term marijuana testing for all safety-sensitive transportation workers;
Confirm the authority of DOT-regulated employers to perform such tests;
Ensure HHS laboratory certification and testing guidelines remain available and aligned with DOT’s safety mission; and
Establish a coordinated federal strategy to address the transportation security implications of rescheduling.

“The public and the workers who keep our transportation system running safely deserve a process that ensures these safeguards are firmly in place before any final action is taken,” he said. the letter he says

Earlier this month, the House Appropriations Committee approved a provision to allow federal officials to continue requiring government employees and security-sensitive employees, such as truck drivers and airline pilots must be drug tested for marijuana, “regardless of any future change in legal status or schedule.”

This was followed by a press conference organized by prohibitionist groups and a drug-testing industry association, where both Republican lawmakers joined the proclamation. “Cut” to marijuana rescheduling by asserting that safety-sensitive transportation workers can still be punished for testing positive for THC.

Legislators and abolitionist activists argued that moving marijuana to Schedule III would lead to a 1986 executive order signed by President Ronald Reagan defining illegal drugs under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) in relation to the use of cannabis by truck drivers and other airline employees.

Last October, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy suggested that President Donald Trump was “putting pressure” on rescheduling cannabis.arguing that marijuana is “truly addictive” and that policy reform on the issue sends a “dangerous” message.

“At a time when the culture is encouraging and celebrating the use of marijuana, we’re not talking about risk,” Duffy said.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.