Cannabis News
Has Medical Marijuana Already Priced Itself Out of the Cannabis Market?
Published
10 months agoon
By
admin
According to Cache Valley Daily, around 60% of Utah’s medicinal cannabis users obtain their cannabis from sources other than the state’s authorized market. The study, done by Cannabis Public Policy Consulting (CPPC) on behalf of the Utah Department of Agriculture and Food (UDAF), sheds light on accessibility issues in the state’s medicinal cannabis program.
Dr. Brandon Forsyth, Director of Industrial Hemp and Medical Cannabis at UDAF, emphasized the need of conducting annual market analyses to evaluate the performance of Utah’s Medical Cannabis program in guaranteeing patients’ access to vital treatment.
Surveying close to 200 medical cannabis patients, the study discovered that while monthly prices for medical cannabis products in Utah rank among the lowest in the nation, nearly a quarter of patients still seek products outside the state due to cost constraints within Utah.
Among those surveyed, 58% expressed satisfaction with the availability of medical cannabis within the state, while 41% indicated either limited or very limited access to products.
Statistics from the Marijuana Policy Project estimate approximately 71,850 registered medical cannabis patients in Utah.
Cost Concerns Drive Patients Out-of-State
A sizable fraction of patients are still drawn to unregulated sources by the appeal of cheaper rates, even in Utah, despite efforts to create a controlled market for medicinal cannabis. Although Utah has some of the lowest monthly costs in the US for medical cannabis products, according to a CPPC survey, over 25% of patients are forced to look for alternatives outside of their state because of financial limitations. This discrepancy calls into question the accessibility and cost of medicinal marijuana under Utah’s current legal system.
The decision to obtain cannabis from unregulated sources is often driven by the stark contrast in pricing between Utah’s legal market and neighboring jurisdictions. Patients facing high medical expenses may find the cost savings offered by unregulated sources to be a compelling factor in their decision-making process. Additionally, factors such as taxes and regulatory burdens imposed on legal dispensaries may contribute to the perception of inflated prices within the state, further incentivizing patients to explore alternative avenues.
Beyond the immediate financial considerations, patients may also perceive unregulated sources as more flexible and accommodating to their individual needs. While legal dispensaries adhere to strict regulations and may face limitations in product variety or availability, illicit channels may offer a wider range of options at potentially lower costs. This discrepancy highlights the importance of not only addressing price competitiveness but also ensuring that legal dispensaries can adequately meet the diverse needs of medical cannabis patients in terms of product selection and availability.
A multimodal strategy that puts price, accessibility, and regulatory compliance first is needed to address the problem of patients obtaining cannabis through unregulated channels. The regulated and uncontrolled markets may come closer together if regulatory procedures are made more efficient, legal dispensaries’ overhead expenses are decreased, and patient-centered pricing schemes are put into place. Utah’s medical cannabis program may aim to provide equitable access to safe and inexpensive treatment choices for all qualifying patients by addressing the underlying issues that lead patients to look for alternatives outside of the legal framework.
Mixed Perceptions of Supply Availability
The survey conducted by CPPC among Utah’s medical cannabis patients reveals a nuanced landscape of supply availability perception within the state. While a majority express satisfaction, a significant portion also report limited or very limited access to essential treatments. This disparity underscores the complexity of ensuring consistent and equitable supply distribution.
Uneven dispensary distribution across regions contributes to varied perceptions of accessibility. Patients in areas with more dispensaries may feel better served compared to those in underserved regions. Expanding the geographical reach of dispensaries could mitigate access discrepancies and ensure equitable distribution statewide.
Supply chain dynamics, including cultivation and distribution disruptions, impact product availability. Patients dependent on medical cannabis for health management may face heightened anxiety during shortages. Addressing these challenges requires robust infrastructure and proactive measures to ensure uninterrupted access to medication for all patients.
Growth in Patient Enrollment
Statistics from the Marijuana Policy Project show that Utah’s medical cannabis program has shown a steady increase in patient registration, with an estimated 71,850 registered medical cannabis patients. The state’s growing need for medicinal cannabis as a therapeutic alternative is shown by this spike in patient numbers. But in order to properly satisfy the growing demand, accessibility concerns must be addressed and a dependable supply chain must be maintained.
The expanding patient enrollment highlights the importance of proactive measures to enhance the accessibility and affordability of medical cannabis treatments. With a larger patient population relying on these medications to manage their health conditions, it becomes paramount to streamline regulatory processes, optimize supply chain logistics, and implement pricing strategies that cater to patients’ financial realities. By doing so, Utah’s medical cannabis program can better accommodate the evolving needs of its growing patient base.
In addition, the increasing number of patients enrolled emphasizes how important it is for industry players, patient advocacy organizations, and regulatory bodies to keep working together. Through communication and collaboration, Utah can better negotiate the intricacies of its medical cannabis environment, recognizing and resolving issues while optimizing the program’s advantages for patients throughout the whole state. In order to guarantee that Utah’s medical cannabis program is patient-centered, flexible, and responsive as it develops to meet the demands of its growing patient base, a cooperative approach will be essential.
Bottom Line
Utah’s medical cannabis program grapples with significant challenges, including patients seeking products from unregulated sources, varying perceptions of supply availability, and a growing number of registered patients. Resolving these issues demands a concerted effort to improve accessibility, affordability, and regulatory adherence within the state’s legal framework. By prioritizing patient-centric approaches and fostering collaboration among stakeholders, Utah can fortify its medical cannabis program to better cater to the diverse needs of its patient population. This entails streamlining regulatory processes, optimizing supply chain logistics, and implementing pricing strategies that align with patients’ financial realities. Through proactive measures and sustained cooperation, Utah can enhance the accessibility and effectiveness of its medical cannabis program, ensuring equitable access to safe and beneficial treatment options for all eligible patients across the state.
UTAH’S BIGGEST CASH CROP? READ ON…
You may like
-
Cannabis Oil Helps Skin Wounds and Cuts Heal Faster According to New Skin Research Report
-
The Wellness Retreat Renaissance Normalizes Psychedelic Therapy
-
Reader poll: Best stoned love activities
-
Hawaii Lawmakers Approve Recreational Cannabis Legalization Bill
-
Should Dogs Wear A Coat in Cold Snowy Weather
-
Try This Mouthwatering Pasta With An Optional Marijuana Kick
Cannabis News
Cannabis Oil Helps Skin Wounds and Cuts Heal Faster According to New Skin Research Report
Published
4 hours agoon
February 8, 2025By
admin
How Cannabis Oil Helps Skin Wounds Heal Faster, According To Research
Cannabis in its many forms, from edibles to inhaled weed, tinctures to oils and so much more, have been proven to be beneficial for its countless therapeutic benefits.
Typically, cannabis is ingested in the human body. It’s smoked, eaten, drank, or applied underneath the tongue. These methods allow cannabis to be metabolized by various systems in the human body, thus enabling the cannabinoids to do their healing work from the inside out. But the use of cannabis topicals is also a fast-growing segment.
Weed topicals and transdermals, such as patches, oils, balms, and salves, infused with cannabinoids, have been shown to have healing properties for skin applications as well. Cannabidiol (CBD) in particular, possesses incredible anti-inflammatory properties that aid in the healing of wounds, ulcers, localized pain, bacterial infections, and so much more.
The results of a recent scientific review were published, initially by Marijuana Moment, backing up the growing body of research that cannabis oil is effective for a variety of applications though this one focuses on skin wounds. For the report, investigators from educational institutions in Thailand and India analyzed the effect of cannabis oil on reactive oxygen species (ROS) when wounds are healing. These chemicals promote damage in tissues and cells, causing a longer time to heal wounds.
“Increased ROS levels can hinder wound healing by exacerbating inflammation and cellular damage,” says the paper. “CBD’s antioxidant properties mitigate these effects, fostering a more conducive environment for tissue regeneration,” it reads. The authors also found that cannabis oil was helpful in reducing the oxidative damage caused by ROS, thereby improving antioxidant mechanisms in the wound, which has the potential to speed up wound healing.
“Cannabis oil, especially its primary bioactive constituents, CBD and THC, demonstrates considerable potential in facilitating skin wound healing by modifying oxidative stress via the regulation of reactive oxygen species,” reads the research. In summary, the excellent antioxidant properties of CBD work well to mitigate the negative effects of ROS, promoting tissue regeneration. The authors also acknowledge the analgesic and antibacterial properties of marijuana, which contributes to a reduction in microbial load.
Read up below about the benefits of transdermal cannabis application and its benefits for various skin diseases.
CBD Topicals Work Better Than Conventional Meds For Skin Ulcers
In a 2023 study out of Italy, researchers found that a CBD topical was more effective in addressing wound pain and speeding up wound healing among patients with skin ulcers caused by scleroderma. The randomized trial data, which was published in Advances in Skin and Wound Care, specifically focuses on scleroderma ulcers, a rare autoimmune condition characterized by skin tightening and narrowing of blood vessels.
For the study, Italian researchers analyzed the effects of topical CBD oils compared to conventional treatments. A group of 25 patients with digital ulcers (in the fingertips) were studied; they were randomly chosen and assigned to use CBD for one month while 20 other patients were prescribed to take conventional therapeutic medications.
They found that the participants who were given CBD observed more significant pain relief and more efficient wound healing compared to those in the control group.
“Although mean wound-related pain NRS (numeric rating scale) scores did not differ between CBD-treated patients and control patients at baseline, their mean scores differed significantly after 1 month,” wrote the researchers. More particularly, the patients who took CBD saw a pain score decrease of 29% over the course of the study, while those who were given conventional meds only saw a 6% decrease.
Topical CBD Effective For Skin Cancer
In a case report of a 64-year-old woman who had a medical history of squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), topical application of 20% CBD ointment was found to be effective in treating the cancerous lesion.
The investigators involved, from the University of California at Riverside and UC Davis, wrote a summary of their findings after analyzing the woman, writing: “She self-initiated treatment with topical cannabinoid oil, twice daily, and the lesion completely resolved within four weeks. Several prior biopsy-confirmed squamous cell carcinomas on her dorsal hands also completely regressed after similar treatment with topical cannabinoid oil,” they wrote.
“Both malignant cancer and chronic dermatitis completely resolved within four weeks of twice-daily treatment. We attribute the clearance of her skin tumor to the cannabidiol,” they wrote. However, they suggest more investigation into the benefits of cannabidiol for squamous cell carcinoma and other non-melanoma skin cancer types.
Benefits of Topical Application
Whether for skin wounds, ulcers, skin cancer, or pain, topical delivery of cannabinoids is an excellent way to benefit from its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. After all, the skin is well-known for its abundance of cannabinoid receptors, both CB1 and CB2. These are particularly found in skin cells including the sebaceous glands, keratinocytes, and even various sensory neurons. Because of the direct receptor expression in the skin, this makes it simpler for cannabinoids to act directly on skin issues.
It must be said that topical or transdermal application of cannabinoid products also bypasses gastrointestinal metabolism, a process also known as prevention of first-pass metabolism. This results in a more stable level of cannabinoid and longer-lasting benefits without the patient having to experience psychoactive properties that are linked to smoking, consuming edibles, drinking, and other oral routes of administration. This is why, even if you apply THC-infused topicals to the skin, you won’t get high.
Conclusion
Marijuana topicals possess a wide range of benefits for patients of skin diseases. Because of cannabinoids’ anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antibacterial properties, it’s become easier to understand how it can contribute to such powerful wound healing and pain relief – oftentimes, even more effective than conventional medications!
CANNABIS AND SKIN CARE, READ ON…
Cannabis News
If You Smoke Weed around Your Kids, Will They Test Postive for THC?
Published
1 day agoon
February 7, 2025By
admin
The legalization and decriminalization of cannabis in many parts of the world have sparked widespread debate about its societal, medical, and personal implications. While much of the focus has been on adult usage and its effects, an often-overlooked issue is how secondhand cannabis smoke impacts children living in homes where the drug is consumed. Recent research has revealed that children exposed to cannabis smoke in their homes are at risk of testing positive for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the psychoactive compound in cannabis. This finding raises significant concerns about the health, safety, and developmental outcomes for these children.
In this article, we will delve into the findings of recent studies, explore the potential health risks associated with secondhand cannabis smoke, and discuss broader social and legal implications. We will also examine how parents and caregivers can mitigate these risks to protect children from inadvertent exposure.
The Science Behind Secondhand Cannabis Smoke
Secondhand smoke refers to the involuntary inhalation of smoke exhaled by a smoker or released from a burning substance. While tobacco secondhand smoke has been extensively studied and linked to numerous health issues, secondhand cannabis smoke is a relatively new area of research. Cannabis smoke contains many of the same harmful chemicals as tobacco smoke, including carcinogens, fine particulate matter, and respiratory irritants. However, cannabis smoke also contains cannabinoids like THC and cannabidiol (CBD), which can have psychoactive or physiological effects when absorbed into the body.
When cannabis is smoked indoors or in enclosed spaces, it creates an environment where non-smokers, including children, can inadvertently inhale these substances. Unlike adults who may choose to avoid such environments, children are particularly vulnerable because they lack agency over their living conditions and are often in close proximity to their caregivers.
Recent Research Findings
A groundbreaking study conducted in San Diego County, California, examined whether children living in homes where cannabis is smoked test positive for THC exposure. Researchers collected urine samples from children aged 0 to 13 years who were brought to pediatric clinics for routine care. Caregivers were also surveyed about their cannabis use habits, including whether they smoked indoors or outdoors.
The results were striking: children living in homes where cannabis was smoked had five times higher odds of testing positive for THC compared to those living in non-smoking households. This finding indicates that secondhand exposure to cannabis smoke is not just a theoretical risk but a measurable reality.
Key Findings
-
THC Detection: Detectable levels of THC metabolites were found in the urine samples of children exposed to secondhand cannabis smoke. This suggests that even passive exposure can lead to absorption of psychoactive compounds into a child’s system.
Health Risks Associated with Secondhand Cannabis Smoke
The presence of THC metabolites in children’s systems raises serious concerns about the potential health risks they face. While research on this specific topic is still emerging, existing studies on secondhand tobacco smoke and direct cannabis use provide valuable insights.
1. Respiratory Issues
Cannabis smoke contains fine particulate matter that can irritate the respiratory system. Prolonged exposure may lead to:
-
Increased risk of asthma attacks
-
Chronic bronchitis or other respiratory conditions.
-
Reduced lung function over time.
Children’s lungs are still developing, making them particularly susceptible to damage from inhaled irritants.
2. Cognitive and Developmental Concerns
THC is known to affect brain function by interacting with cannabinoid receptors in the central nervous system. While most studies focus on direct cannabis use during adolescence or pregnancy, there is concern that even low-level exposure through secondhand smoke could impact brain development in young children.
Potential risks include:
-
Impaired memory and learning abilities.
-
Delayed cognitive development.
-
Behavioral issues such as hyperactivity or attention deficits.
3. Chemical Exposure
In addition to THC, cannabis smoke contains harmful chemicals such as ammonia, hydrogen cyanide, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). These substances are known carcinogens and can increase the risk of cancer over time.
4. Psychoactive Effects
Although rare, there have been anecdotal reports of children experiencing mild psychoactive effects after significant exposure to secondhand cannabis smoke. Symptoms may include drowsiness, confusion, or changes in mood.
Broader Implications
The findings about children’s exposure to secondhand cannabis smoke have far-reaching implications that extend beyond individual households. They touch on public health policies, legal frameworks, and societal attitudes toward cannabis use.
1. Public Health Concerns
As more states and countries legalize recreational and medicinal cannabis use, public health agencies must address the unintended consequences for vulnerable populations like children. Educational campaigns similar to those targeting tobacco use may be necessary to raise awareness about the risks of secondhand cannabis smoke.
2. Legal Considerations
In some jurisdictions, exposing children to harmful substances like tobacco or drugs can be considered child endangerment. As evidence mounts about the risks of secondhand cannabis smoke, lawmakers may need to consider whether similar protections should apply.
For example:
These are complex questions that balance individual freedoms with societal responsibility for child welfare.
3. Social Stigma vs Awareness
Cannabis use has historically been stigmatized due to its association with illegal activity. While legalization aims to reduce stigma and promote responsible use, it is crucial not to overlook potential harms—especially those affecting children who cannot advocate for themselves.
Recommendations for Parents and Caregivers
Parents who use cannabis should take proactive steps to minimize their children’s exposure:
The Need for Further Research
While current studies provide valuable insights, much remains unknown about the long-term effects of secondhand cannabis smoke on children’s health and development. Future research should focus on:
-
Longitudinal studies tracking exposed children over time.
-
The impact of different levels of exposure (e.g., occasional vs frequent).
-
Interactions between secondhand tobacco and cannabis smoke.
-
Effective interventions for reducing childhood exposure.
Conclusion
The revelation that children living with cannabis smokers can test positive for THC underscores an urgent need for greater awareness and precautionary measures among parents and caregivers who use cannabis. These findings highlight how changing attitudes toward drug use must be accompanied by thoughtful consideration of its unintended consequences—particularly for vulnerable populations like children. As society continues to navigate the complexities surrounding cannabis legalization, protecting children’s health must remain a top priority. By fostering open dialogue, promoting education, and implementing evidence-based policies, we can ensure that progress in one area does not come at the expense of another generation’s well-being.
CANNABIS AROUND KIDS, WHAT ABOUT SURGING ASTHMA? READ ON…
IS CANNABIS CAUSING A SURGE IN KIDS’ ASTHA CASES IN LEGAL STATES?
Cannabis News
Do You Know Why Alcohol is Legal and Cannabis is Not?
Published
2 days agoon
February 6, 2025By
admin
Why is alcohol legal and cannabis isn’t?
As I scrolled through Reddit the other day, I stumbled upon a question that perfectly encapsulates the absurdity of modern drug policy: “Why is alcohol legal but cannabis isn’t?” The responses were predictably brief, with most users simply typing “politics” and calling it a day. While they’re not wrong, this answer barely scratches the surface of a complex and fascinating history of prohibition, propaganda, and profit.
The irony of this situation has always struck me. Here we have alcohol, a substance that according to the CDC claims nearly 140,000 lives annually in the United States alone, enjoying widespread social acceptance and legal status. Meanwhile, cannabis – a plant that has never caused a single documented overdose death – remains federally illegal and stigmatized in many parts of the country.
But to understand this paradox, we need to dig deeper than just “politics.” We need to unravel a tangled web of racial prejudice, corporate interests, government overreach, and one of the most successful propaganda campaigns in human history. The story involves corrupt bureaucrats, lumber barons, pharmaceutical companies, and a systematic effort to demonize both the plant and its users.
So today, I’m going to break down exactly why your neighbor can legally drink themselves into oblivion every weekend, while you might face jail time for possessing a plant that humans have used safely for thousands of years. Trust me, by the time we’re done, you’ll understand just how deep this rabbit hole goes.
Pack yourself a bowl (where legal, of course), get comfortable, and let’s dive into one of the most fascinating examples of how money, power, and prejudice can shape society’s laws and values. The truth behind cannabis prohibition is stranger – and more infuriating – than fiction.
The story of alcohol prohibition in America reads like a cautionary tale about the unintended consequences of moral crusading. It all began with the temperance movement, led by organizations like the Women’s Christian Temperance Union and the Anti-Saloon League. These groups, predominantly composed of Protestant middle-class women, saw alcohol as the root of society’s evils – from domestic violence to poverty. Their intentions weren’t entirely misplaced; alcohol abuse was indeed wreaking havoc on American families.
But as we’ve learned time and time again, making something illegal doesn’t make it disappear – it just drives it underground. When the 18th Amendment kicked in and Prohibition became the law of the land in 1920, something predictable happened: people didn’t stop drinking. Instead, they turned to bootleggers and speakeasies. The unregulated black market that emerged brought with it a host of new problems.
Without any quality control or safety standards, bootleggers started producing moonshine and other spirits in less-than-sanitary conditions. Some of this bathtub gin contained methanol or other toxic substances, leading to blindness, organ failure, and death. It turns out that when you push something into the shadows, it becomes far more dangerous than when it’s regulated and controlled.
But the body count wasn’t just from bad booze. The illegal alcohol trade gave rise to organized crime on a scale America had never seen before. Rival gangs fought bloody turf wars in the streets of Chicago, New York, and other major cities. Those classic scenes of Tommy Gun-wielding mobsters weren’t Hollywood fiction – they were ripped straight from the headlines of the era.
Overseeing this noble experiment in prohibition was a man whose name would later become synonymous with drug criminalization: Harry J. Anslinger. As head of the Department of Prohibition, Anslinger had built his career on enforcing alcohol prohibition. But by the early 1930s, with public opinion turning and repeal looming, he saw the writing on the wall. He needed a new crusade to justify his position and maintain his power.
Enter cannabis – a plant primarily associated with Mexican immigrants and African American jazz musicians. For Anslinger, it was the perfect target: exotic enough to seem threatening, used primarily by marginalized communities, and not yet widely understood by the general public. Little did anyone know that Anslinger’s quest to save his job would set in motion decades of misguided drug policy that we’re still grappling with today.
You know what’s fascinating about history? Sometimes the most impactful changes happen through clever wordplay and manipulation. Take cannabis prohibition, for example. In the 1930s, hemp was on track to become America’s first billion-dollar crop, as reported by Popular Mechanics. Americans knew hemp as the versatile plant that gave them rope, paper, fabric, and even medicine. It was about as controversial as cotton.
So how do you make something so deeply woven into the fabric of American life illegal? Simple – you give it a scary foreign name and associate it with society’s deepest fears. Enter Harry Anslinger’s masterclass in propaganda, backed by the mighty media empire of William Randolph Hearst and the industrial muscle of DuPont.
Anslinger knew he couldn’t demonize “hemp” or “cannabis” – terms Americans associated with industry and medicine. Instead, he latched onto the Mexican slang term “marijuana,” turning it into the boogeyman of his propaganda campaign. This wasn’t just clever marketing; it was calculated racism. Hearst, still bitter about Pancho Villa’s raids on his Mexican timber holdings, was more than happy to help paint a picture of dangerous, marijuana-crazed Mexicans threatening American values.
The propaganda machine worked overtime. Hearst’s newspapers filled their pages with sensational stories about “reefer madness” – tales of marijuana-induced violence, sexual deviancy, and moral corruption. Meanwhile, DuPont, having just patented their synthetic fibers and plastics, was keen to eliminate their biggest natural competitor. It was a perfect storm of corporate interests, racial prejudice, and government overreach.
The result? The 1937 Marihuana Tax Act – a masterpiece of bureaucratic deception. On paper, it didn’t make cannabis illegal; it just required a tax stamp for its cultivation and distribution. The catch? Anslinger, who controlled the stamps, simply refused to issue them. It was like requiring a permit to breathe but never giving anyone the paperwork. Just like that, America’s most valuable crop became a criminal enterprise.
But here’s where it gets really interesting. When World War II broke out and the Navy needed hemp for ropes and parachutes, suddenly all that “reefer madness” propaganda went out the window. The government released their “Hemp for Victory” campaign, encouraging farmers to grow the very plant they’d demonized just years before. Amazing how quickly “dangerous marijuana” became patriotic hemp when it served the war effort.
After the war, though, it was right back to prohibition. The plant that had helped win the war was once again relegated to the shadows, its true identity buried under decades of propaganda and prejudice. And that’s why today, we’re still using the term “marijuana” – a linguistic relic of one of the most successful disinformation campaigns in American history.
Before we continue with the next bit, I have to mention that during WWII, hemp was legalized again to help beat the Nazis. Films like “Hemp for Victory” were released to have farmers begin cultivating hemp for the war effort. However, once the final barrel cooled down after WWII, they rescinded this special war time request and began tinkering on something far more sinister.
If you ever want to understand how deeply politics can corrupt policy, look no further than the late 1960s and early 1970s. Richard Nixon was facing a perfect storm of political opposition: antiwar protesters questioning his Vietnam policies, the civil rights movement demanding equality, and a counterculture that openly defied traditional authority. For Nixon and his allies, this wasn’t just about politics – it was about control.
But how do you legally suppress political dissent in a democracy? You can’t just arrest people for protesting or being black – at least not openly. But what if you could criminalize their lifestyle? Enter the Controlled Substances Act of 1971, perhaps the most ingenious piece of oppressive legislation ever crafted.
The CSA wasn’t just about making drugs illegal; it was about creating a legal monopoly for pharmaceutical companies while giving law enforcement a weapon to use against “undesirable” populations. The language in the Act literally hands all power over drug manufacturing, research, and distribution to pharmaceutical companies. It’s not even subtle about it – it’s right there in black and white.
To enforce this new corporate drug monopoly, Nixon created the Drug Enforcement Administration. Think of them as the pharmaceutical industry’s private security force, paid for with your tax dollars. Anslinger’s dream of permanent employment in drug enforcement was finally realized, Big Pharma got exclusive rights to the drug trade, and Nixon? Well, he got exactly what he wanted.
As John Ehrlichman, Nixon’s domestic policy chief, later admitted: “We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities.”
But here’s where it gets really dark. Remember the 13th Amendment? The one that abolished slavery? There’s a tiny loophole in there that says slavery is prohibited “except as punishment for a crime.” This wasn’t an oversight – it was a feature. By criminalizing drug use, particularly in targeted communities, the state created a new form of legal slavery.
The results have been staggering. Since 1971, over 20 million Americans have been arrested for drug offenses, many ending up in private prisons where they provide cheap labor for corporations. The United States now imprisons more of its own citizens than any other country in the world. We literally have more people in prison than China, and they have four times our population!
This isn’t just the war on drugs – it’s the continuation of systemic oppression through different means. The CSA turned American citizens into potential slaves, all while ensuring that the real drug dealers – pharmaceutical companies – could operate with impunity. It’s a system so perfectly corrupt, it would make Machiavelli blush.
There you have it, the breakdown why alcohol is now legal and cannabis isn’t. Of course, maybe over the next few years we could see that change as well – Trump energy is chaos and things could swing either way under his rule. We’ll see what happens.
ONE MORE REASON WHY ALCOHOL IS LEGAL, READ ON…
WHY ALCOHOL IS LEGAL AND CANNABIS WAS MADE ILLEGAL!

Cannabis Oil Helps Skin Wounds and Cuts Heal Faster According to New Skin Research Report

The Wellness Retreat Renaissance Normalizes Psychedelic Therapy

Reader poll: Best stoned love activities

Hawaii Lawmakers Approve Recreational Cannabis Legalization Bill

Should Dogs Wear A Coat in Cold Snowy Weather

Try This Mouthwatering Pasta With An Optional Marijuana Kick

The Best Easy Super Bowl Cocktails

If You Smoke Weed around Your Kids, Will They Test Postive for THC?

What does the marijuana industry have in common with Harley-Davidson?

Royal Queen Seeds Fund Campaign In Germany Saying There’s A Lot of Poo In Illegal Weed.. and yes hilarity ensues with puns about smoking good shit

Distressed Cannabis Business Takeaways – Canna Law Blog™

United States: Alex Malyshev And Melinda Fellner Discuss The Intersection Of Tax And Cannabis In New Video Series – Part VI: Licensing (Video)

What you Need to Know

Drug Testing for Marijuana – The Joint Blog

NCIA Write About Their Equity Scholarship Program

It has been a wild news week – here’s how CBD and weed can help you relax

Cannabis, alcohol firm SNDL loses CA$372.4 million in 2022

A new April 20 cannabis contest includes a $40,000 purse

Your Go-To Source for Cannabis Logos and Designs

UArizona launches online cannabis compliance online course
Trending
-
Cannabis News2 years ago
Distressed Cannabis Business Takeaways – Canna Law Blog™
-
One-Hit Wonders2 years ago
United States: Alex Malyshev And Melinda Fellner Discuss The Intersection Of Tax And Cannabis In New Video Series – Part VI: Licensing (Video)
-
Cannabis 1012 years ago
What you Need to Know
-
drug testing1 year ago
Drug Testing for Marijuana – The Joint Blog
-
Education2 years ago
NCIA Write About Their Equity Scholarship Program
-
Cannabis2 years ago
It has been a wild news week – here’s how CBD and weed can help you relax
-
Marijuana Business Daily2 years ago
Cannabis, alcohol firm SNDL loses CA$372.4 million in 2022
-
California2 years ago
A new April 20 cannabis contest includes a $40,000 purse