Connect with us

Cannabis News

How Much Cannabis Do You Need to Take in Order to Lower Your Golf Score by 10 Strokes?



cannabis to lower your golf score

Does cannabis catalyze superhuman feats or induce sluggishness? From couch-locked stereotypes to unmatched creativity, popular perspectives spin both directions. As legal access expands, the question holds big implications for policies restricting adult use. Yet while many leagues uphold blanket bans, research remains preliminary and contentious exploring marijuana’s actual impact across consumption levels.


On one extreme, prohibitionist holdouts insist no amount leaves capabilities fully intact, branding the plant an inherent performance inhibitor warranting strict rules. They advocate “common sense” caution towards intoxication, eyeing impairment rather than potential tools for growth hiding behind social stigma. Just say no.


Conversely, some enthusiasts evangelize enhanced outcomes in athletics, music or other arenas from disinhibiting anxiety, easing injuries, inspiring practice and unlinking repetitive thought loops. Through this lens, responsible cannabis use facilitates present-moment mastery unlocking legendary status trailing only tireless work ethics. Just say yes.


Of course polarized portrayals oversimplify reality’s messy shades of gray. But lacking solid data for context, both commentators load statements with moralistic assumptions instead of objective substance. This hijacks reasonable discussion.


Fortunately, early journalistic experiments examining grass’ actual effects on golf across rising THC amounts provide templates to build upon. Skills become measurable against individual baselines rather than ideological talking points allowing exploration of nuance often trampled by agendas.


While more rigorous studies must replicate findings before final conclusions, this research signals mapped terrain where practical impacts manifest, opening doors to expand policies hugging lines beyond rhetoric comfort zones. Sometimes only pioneering events alter inertial assumptions, anchoring evolution where old beliefs woefully underperformed. From tiny seeds…



Golf attracts scientific performance analysis for good reason – the sport encompasses a range of athletic variables allowing granular measurement. Consistently contending requires harnessing physical power, finesse, strategic course management and steely concentration across hours of sustained mental stamina. Precise ball-striking relies on refined technique and coordination where microscopic errors balloon scores rapidly. Putts measure mere rotational deviations dictating scores rising exponentially. Moreover, each hole changes angle, terrain and hazards testing adaptability. It is mental and physical gauntlet running without pause.


This breadth of technical, tactical and temperamental diversity explains golf’s enduring magnetism for analytics. The game provides multifaceted testbed covering the whole spectrum of human capable capabilities. It reveals the slightest influences that assist or erode the capacity producing elite execution repeatedly. In this sense, examining grass through golf promises detection across impact dimensions that isolated mechanical tests cannot.  Does weed improve your golf game?


This brings us to the focus study of this article.


This exploratory research recruited three golfers across skill levels and had them play completely sober to establish performance baselines. They hit five drives to measure distance, five approach shots checking accuracy, and took five putts documenting consistency. After getting clean bills of health, participants then consumed measured THC dosages via vape pens starting around 6 milligrams. They retested golf skills at set intervals as intoxication levels increased incrementally up to 50 milligrams total intake.


Early doses showed cannabis decreasing inhibition as predicted, improving driving distance but hindering fine motor control. Testers pushed swing speeds faster while precision suffered slightly on touch shots and putting. Essentially some skills enhanced by lowering overthinking and anxiety while complex hand-eye-body calibrations declined from chemical interference. Golf grew more adventurous and fun but extra effort required mitigating focus lapses.


Then around 16-18 milligrams, the golden zone emerged. All participants describe entering immersive flow states with elevated euphoria empowering supreme presence. Feel and focus unified assuring both power and accuracy; athletic grace moved seamlessly without doubting internal chatter disturbing perfectionism. Testers reported effortlessly tapping innate talent and repetitions without consciously recalling every micro-movement. “Being in The Zone” elevated best assets.


But pushing further expecting linearly better performance, issues cascaded by 50 milligrams total THC consumption. All golfers by this level felt functionality compromised by intensifying fatigue and impaired motor function on the golf course.  Attention drifted, motivation dipped and complications snowballed. Simple routines became puzzles too onerous untangling. They needed assistance identifying their equipment and aimless wanderings cut tests short. Function followed form into dysfunction.


While still very preliminary, these results mirror expectations. Some cannabis compounds temporarily improve mood, health or concentration in reasonable moderation benefiting performance depending on fitness demands. But in excess psychedelic intensity human operate optimally without added stimulation. Dose and mindset remain key; one can claim no universal boon or blockade solely attributable to grass.



With inexorable momentum carrying cannabis legalization forward now that public opinion, state laws and economic forces unite behind reform, the need for impartial performance research grows urgent. As prohibition walls crumble, predictable calls to regulate adult access through practical guardrails rise in tandem. This science lag must catch up supplying evidence separating reefer madness rhetoric about blanket impairment from realistic nuance across situations and intake levels.


For just as no substance acts uniquely positive or negative in all people for all undertakings, no unified prohibition or permission provides optimal flexibility honoring contextual suitability. Blanket bans cloth more sociopolitical aims, not reason or science. Responsible, ethical policymaking requires insight into actual impacts balancing costs against benefits varied populations face from unique biologies to intended uses spanning medicinal, spiritual, creative or recreational intents carrying distinct outcomes.


Exploratory research like tracking grass’ golf game effects helps illuminate key considerations differentiating regulation based on arbitrary morality versus minimizing potential acute harms from misuse while maximizing adult access freedom. Since standardized workplace/athletic prohibitions grow antiquated beside proliferating state experiments, data modeling real-world scenarios points policy toward greatest net benefit through compromise.


What dosage ranges appear assisting some performance facets while hindering others? Do patterns emerge around optimal duration and delivery methods? How do impacts vary across user psychologies, metabolisms and tolerance levels? Only by grasping cannabis complexity beyond monolithic framing can society structure environments facilitating positives while mitigating risks given the inherent impossibility enforcing universal prohibition without immense collateral oppression.


So whether further research confirms, contradicts or clarifies non-linear links between marijuana and human performance, we better know where lines lay. Beyond stereotypes and ideology exist facts empowering public safety policies seeking net gain.


Since smooth legalization integration demands public buy-in, collecting data demonstrating when cannabis improves recreation, health and happiness against potential costs steers culture toward maximal thriving. Stigma fueled by uncertainty invites education illuminating realistic life enhancement and inhibition variables affecting work, ethics, spirituality and community.



While controlled trials tracking cannabis’ impacts on golfing prowess seem unconventional, this exploratory template offers immense public value as legalization unfolds. By moving beyond stereotypes to assess nuanced performance effects across moderating factors, we collectively gain improved understanding of responsible use translating to pragmatic policies. The days of misinformation warranting blanket prohibition expire as data clarifies complexity beyond rhetoric.


And with national reforms nearing inevitability as public opinion and state laws reshuffle intelligently regulated integration, we require clearer guidelines maximizing social benefit and honoring context. For just as no substance acts uniformly positive/negative across people and situations, no singular legal status satisfies all needs and concerns either. Ethical progress inhabits nuance.


Thus beyond contributing baseline insights about grass’ golfer impression spanning enhancement, impairment and neutrality thresholds, this model pioneers safe environments to expand critical knowledge about real lifestyle impacts. The approach provides templates honoring cannabis’ complex pharmacology through measured science without knee-jerk reactivity.


From anxiety relief and creative inspiration to recreational enhancement with inherent physiological ceiling constraints, cannabis defies framing as just a toxic vice or panacea. Its organic chemical cocktail facilitates experiences unique across batches and bio-individuality. Thus knowledge around particular effects empowers both industries providing products safely alongside consumers navigating choices wisely.


While still extremely preliminary, this budding frontier of sober data investigating grass through objective tests delivering multiple risk/benefit dimensions promises destigmatization as education. And such consciousness promises wiser public policies emphasizing actual societal wellbeing over long outdated moral dictates echoing Anslinger’s ghost.


The impending market requires no less than full illumination to bloom unrestrained by residual superstitions rooted in propaganda. And that pure light beams brighter when science leads the way.





Source link

Cannabis News

Australia Cannabis: Recreational Use Legislation Update




Australia is said to have one of the highest cannabis prevalence rates in the world and public attitudes to its use are shifting. North American, European and other cannabis companies looking for investment opportunities would do well to follow these shifts.

Growing cannabis for medicinal and scientific purposes was legalized under federal law in 2016. Low-THC hemp foods were then legalized federally in 2017. Recreational use, though, remains prohibited under federal law. Similarly, at the state and territory level it is mostly illegal to use, possess, grow, and sell cannabis. Despite these continuing prohibitions, there are legislative trends toward legalization.

If passed, the Legalising Cannabis Bill 2023 would change the federal landscape. It would legalize cannabis for adult recreational use in Australia. The Bill would establish the Cannabis Australia National Agency as a statutory agency to register cannabis strains and regulate cannabis activities. These activities include growing and possessing plants, manufacturing and selling cannabis products, operating cannabis cafes, and importing and exporting cannabis products.

The Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee is presently conducting an inquiry into the Bill. Submissions have now closed and public hearings have opened. The Committee’s reporting date is May 31, 2024. The Bill is expected to be debated in federal parliament later this year. At the same time, cannabis legalization bills are now being debated in several Australian states.

Despite shifting public attitudes, federal legalization may still be a way off. While the federal Bill has been promoted by a minority party, it does not enjoy the support of the ruling party or the major opposition party. It also lacks the support of the Australian Medical Association.

Stay tuned for updates on Legalising Cannabis Bill 2023 and all thing Australian cannabis. And please reach out to us if you are interested in doing business in Australia.

Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Why Is Everyone Suddenly Eating Magic Mushrooms and Having Wild Sex?




magic mushrooms and sex

New Study Reveals That Magic Mushroom Consumers Have Better Sex Lives

Magic mushrooms have been on a heyday, thanks to the numerous health and therapeutic benefits it has been proven to offer. These include, but are not limited to: treating anxiety and depression, PTSD, OC, suicidal thoughts, and other mental illnesses.

However, we’re only starting to discover the myriad of benefits that the humble magic mushroom has. Now, there’s even new science suggesting that psilocybin can help improve sex lives.


In what is believed to be the first-ever study to delve deeper into the connections between sex and arousal with magic mushrooms, researchers have discovered fascinating findings. Investigators at the Imperial College London surveyed almost 300 individuals before and after taking magic mushrooms. They focused on two subject groups: individuals who consumed psychedelics for recreation or wellness, and those who were consuming it for clinical study purposes to analyze its impacts on depression. Thanks to the data, they were able to pull incredible insight into the link between sex and psychedelic experiences.

The data shows that on average, there are improvements on several areas pertaining to sexual function for as long as 6 months after psychedelic experiences. Psychedelic consumption has been shown to positively impact arousal, sexual satisfaction, enjoyment, self-esteem, connection, communication, and attraction to one’s partner – all of which contribute to better sex lives. For the group who were taking magic mushrooms as part of a clinical trial for depression, nearly half experienced improvements when it came to interest in sex, satisfaction, and arousal. In contrast, individuals who are treated with popular pharmaceutical antidepressants usually say that their sex lives are negatively impacted.


“We believe this is the first scientific study to explore the effects of psychedelics on sexual functioning. Our findings suggest potential implications for conditions that negatively affect sexual health, including clinical depression and anxiety,” said Tomasso Barba, the study’s first author, and a PhD candidate at the Centre for Psychedelic Research.


“This is particularly significant given that sexual dysfunction, often induced by antidepressants, frequently results in people stopping these medications and subsequently relapsing,” they added.  

In addition, it’s nothing short of fascinating that the results showed that the improvements in sexual function were observed for up to 6 months among some participants. However, it’s important to note they didn’t study performance while high on the drug, which is how many people on psychedelics experiment with sex: while on magic mushrooms.


“It’s important to stress our work does not focus on what happens to sexual functioning while people are on psychedelics, and we are not talking about perceived ‘sexual performance’,   they emphasized.


They do call for more studies on the subject. “While the findings are indeed interesting, we are still far from a clear clinical application, because psychedelics are yet to be integrated into the medical system. In future, we may be able to see a clinical application, but more research is needed,” said Dr. David Erritzoe.


Can Psychedelics Unlock The Key To Better, More Satisfying Sex?

As millions of us are plagued by mental health disorders, ranging from everyday anxiety to more severe depression, our sex lives will naturally suffer.

It is known that for many of us, especially women, mental health is critical to sexual satisfaction and pleasure. Sure, it’s an integral part of being human – experiencing sexual joy and arousal, but when we’re suffering from hard-to-treat mental conditions, it can be difficult to enjoy sex. Perhaps that’s where the potential of psychedelics, such as magic mushrooms, come in.


When one is struggling with family conditioning, previous traumas, depression, and self-acceptance, pleasure can be shameful and even painful to even address. But psychedelics can help open us up mentally, and challenge past thoughts that have to do with social conditioning, receiving love and pleasure. All in all, psychedelics can help create new mental pathways that make it easier for us to receive pleasure.


These days, it’s no longer uncommon for couples to medicate with psychedelics together. And we don’t just mean magic mushrooms: MDMA, LSD, and ayahuasca are other forms of healing psychedelics that can help couples work through their own traumas and issues together, and as a result, enjoy better sex.


In another study from 2021, researchers utilized interviews to conduct a qualitative study to understand the impact of microdosing MDMA on male and female couples whose ages ranged from 20 to 35 years old. The interview questions were focused on how microdosing psychedelics affected their sexuality, confidence, relationship satisfaction, inhibition, and openness.

The participants reported that microdosing did indeed have a positive effect on sexual well-being as well as other aspects, most especially because of its ability to reduce anxiety and stress. As a result, they experienced heightened sexual pleasure, desire, and communication. Overall, they reported better sex and they attributed it to microdosing.




Aside from these studies, psychedelics are already an accepted tool for young people all around the world to help them improve many aspects of their lives, including sex. It is becoming clear that the ability of psychedelics to help where pharmaceutical medications fail in treating everyday mental illnesses and stress that hinder sex lives, can transform how we relate, show up, and communicate in our intimate relationships. We hope to see more studies on the subject so we can learn more about the specifics involved, and the magic that psychedelics brings into human lives.





Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

How Can Cops Tell the Difference Between Hemp and Marijuana?




police test for hemp or cannabis

Researchers funded by the federal government have unveiled novel techniques for distinguishing between marijuana and hemp by precisely measuring the THC levels in both flowers and edibles.


The National Institute of Justice (NIJ), a branch of the Justice Department, is championing the findings from two research endeavors it sponsored, focusing on refining cannabis lab testing. These findings are being disseminated to specific law enforcement agencies.


The primary goal of these projects was to streamline testing procedures to address the increasing backlog in crime labs, exacerbated by the federal legalization of hemp with THC levels of up to 0.3 percent under the 2018 Farm Bill. This legalization has complicated cannabis-related cases.


According to a recent update by NIJ, existing testing methods fall short of accurately quantifying THC levels in samples. However, the researchers supported by NIJ have made a breakthrough by utilizing two distinct forms of mass spectrometry—gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and direct analysis in real time-high-resolution mass spectrometry (DART-HRMS)—to isolate THC content, along with other cannabinoids.


Pioneering Techniques


The GC-MS methodology was pioneered by a team at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), enabling them to extract THC from samples and conduct precise cannabinoid content analysis. The Department of Justice (DOJ) initially disclosed in 2020 its allocation of $350,000 in funding to NIST for this research endeavor.


Conversely, the DART-HRMS approach presents a solution to another complexity in cannabis testing encountered in forensic laboratories. This method facilitated the determination of THC levels in various products such as baked goods, candies, beverages, and plant materials with minimal pre-treatment requirements.


Rabi Musah, the primary researcher on the DART-HRMS team, envisions that the accelerated utilization of DART-HRMS for THC detection in cannabis samples could mitigate testing backlogs, reduce chemical reagent expenses, and streamline analysis protocols, as noted by NIJ.


NIST’s GC-MS technique has already catalyzed the development of new standard operating procedures for laboratories, with outcomes integrated into training procedures for law enforcement entities like the Montgomery County Police Department and Maryland State Police.


Furthermore, in 2022, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) issued a call for portable marijuana analyzers to expedite cannabinoid profile identification and aid in differentiating between marijuana and hemp.


In a separate initiative, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) announced in 2019 its pursuit of a device capable of distinguishing between hemp and marijuana, particularly since the legalization of the former crop.


The ramifications of hemp legalization became evident in Texas, where marijuana possession arrests decreased by nearly 30% from 2018 to 2019 after the state legalized the non-intoxicating cannabis crop. Subsequently, prosecutors in Texas dismissed numerous low-level cannabis cases following hemp legalization. In 2020, officials announced that laboratories would no longer conduct testing in misdemeanor cases, citing capacity limitations within the Department of Public Safety.


Meanwhile, stakeholders in the hemp industry and agricultural officials nationwide are urging Congress to increase the THC limit for hemp to one percent by dry weight. A researcher from the Department of Justice recently questioned the rationale behind the current 0.3 percent THC limit, suggesting it was arbitrarily based on a decades-old anecdote.


Advancements in Law Enforcement Procedures


The integration of novel testing methods heralds a significant shift in law enforcement strategies concerning cannabis-related cases. Crime lab forensic studies have advanced to a new level of paradigm with the use of the DART-HRMS method and the GC-MS technology developed by NIST. Law enforcement officers will be able to distinguish between marijuana and hemp with remarkable accuracy thanks to these state-of-the-art approaches, which promise increased precision and efficiency. By integrating these advanced technologies into routines for standard operating procedures and training, law enforcement organizations are providing their staff with the necessary resources to handle the complex terrain of changing cannabis laws.


This revolutionary method improves the ability to conduct investigations and makes it easier to comply with state and federal laws on cannabis. Law enforcement organizations may ensure compliance with the ever-changing legal framework pertaining to cannabis cultivation, distribution, and use while efficiently upholding justice with the use of these cutting-edge tactics. Officers will be better prepared to handle the issues raised by the legalization of cannabis and its effects on law enforcement procedures as they become used to these innovative techniques.


Legal and Regulatory Implications of Hemp Legalization


The legalization of hemp with THC levels of up to 0.3 percent under the 2018 Farm Bill has sparked significant legal and regulatory ramifications. This legislative shift has not only complicated cannabis-related cases but has also necessitated a reevaluation of existing law enforcement protocols. As prosecutors and law enforcement officials grapple with the distinction between marijuana and hemp, the landscape of criminal justice procedures undergoes notable evolution. The dismissal of numerous low-level cannabis cases in states like Texas following hemp legalization underscores the profound impact of this legislative change on law enforcement practices.


Furthermore, the proposal to raise hemp’s THC limitations to 1% of dry weight is indicative of continuing discussions about federal cannabis legislation. The debate over THC restrictions highlights the necessity for a nuanced approach to cannabis regulation as advocates for legislative changes, including agricultural officials and hemp sector players, are in favor of it. In the meanwhile, the Department of Justice’s examination of the present THC restriction of 0.3 percent emphasizes how crucial evidence-based policymaking is to determining how cannabis legislation will develop in the future. Stakeholders from a variety of industries must negotiate the tricky convergence of legal, scientific, and sociological factors surrounding the legalization of hemp as regulatory frameworks continue to change.


Bottom Line


The integration of novel cannabis testing methods, including DART-HRMS and GC-MS, marks a significant advancement in law enforcement’s ability to differentiate between marijuana and hemp, streamlining investigative procedures and ensuring compliance with evolving legal frameworks. These state-of-the-art technologies promise heightened precision and efficiency, empowering law enforcement agencies to navigate the complexities of cannabis-related cases with unprecedented accuracy. As debates surrounding THC limits and federal cannabis legislation persist, stakeholders must engage in evidence-based policymaking to shape the future of hemp regulation. By staying abreast of legal and regulatory developments, law enforcement agencies can adapt their procedures accordingly, ensuring justice is served while upholding compliance with the law, thus paving the way for more effective practices in the dynamic landscape of cannabis legalization.





Source link

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media