Cannabis News

Looking at the competitive advantages of LED lighting in the greenhouse

Published

2 months ago

August 25, 2025

admin

On a controlled environment, it grows to manage different parameters as well as compared to open conditions in the field.

Warming gives the producers an edge to grow any crop, with the orchids to delicate orchids. When it grows inside, it’s all light. You know that traditional lighting doesn’t cut more. Therefore, more and more greenhouse operators are changing to greenhouse lighting and lower energy consumption, healthier plants and great returns.

Why Light Themes in Greenhouses
Plants are photosyntetically active active radiation (PAR), which is the wavelengths (400-700 nm) photosynthesis. When plants receive the right light at the right time, they grow faster, stronger and consistently.

However, sunlight is not enough. This occurs especially in northern latitudes, and even more during the winter. Enter additional lighting.

High pressure sodium (HPS) lights have been years. However, they are not energy efficient. Adjustable LED greenhouse lighting provides more customizable ways to help your crops.

What to look for in the modern LED lighting system
Not all LED lighting solutions are created equal. To ensure maximum value, a system must be remembered. The most advanced and effective solutions are various key features that improve functionalities and benefits.

This feature is a cloud-based control platform. This allows breeders to manage and manage LED greenhouse lighting and energy consumption from anywhere. Taking advantage of the power of cloud technology, growers can ensure that their systems are constantly working on, even when they are physically present in the greenhouse.

Another important aspect of advanced LED lighting solutions is AI adaptations. The lighting should automatically adjust the intensity and spectrum to maintain optimal levels with the change in mood light, seasons or production objectives. This suitability guarantees that plants receive the exact amount of light necessary to grow, regardless of external conditions.

Finally, a dynamic lighting system supports specific crop “recipes”. These systems allow the recipe to create and tune recipes for recipes, adapting to special needs of different crops. When customizing the lighting conditions adapted to plant requirements, the growers can optimize the health and productivity of plants, with better results and the use of resources can be more efficient.

Advantages of using LED Greenhouse Lighting
LED greenhouse lighting offers many advantages on traditional systems. One of the most significant advantages is improved energy efficiency. LEDs use less power than the usual growing lights, often reducing energy consumption by 40 or more compared to high-pressure sodium (HPS) sydium. Reducing energy use returns directly to the utility invoices, especially during time, especially for large-scale greenhouses. Beyond the economic benefits, lower energy consumption also reduces the impact of the operation of the carbon trace and the environment.

Another advantage of LED lighting is the ability to focus on specific spectrums. The full spectrum LEDs allow vitarians to repeat the sunlight accurately, but it consists of a dynamic capacity to control real strength. While the Static LED improves traditional lighting, they have no adaptability. A dynamic LED system allows vineyards to create customized light recipes adapted to specific requirements of different phases and growth phases. Whether the roots, vegetative growth or promoting flowering, receive the exact light that plants need at all times, optimizing the health and productivity of plants.

As for LonGevity, modern LED has a typical lifestyle of more than 50,000 hours. HPS Bulbs compared to 10,000-hour life of 10,000 hours. This extended life means less replacement and less maintenance, and offering more tranquility and providing more operational coherence.

In addition, LED provides less heat than HPS lights, it facilitates control of the temperature and moisture of the greenhouse. The reduced heat output is essential to maintain optimal growth conditions, both temperature and humidity essential for planting health. Environmental controls are healthier plants and then better benefits.

Dynamic LED Lighting: Secret Precision Agriculture Weapon
Dynamic LED lighting takes the ability to control the greenhouse environment to the next level. These systems adjust the lighting in real time based on greenhouse room conditions, type of growth, growth phase and outside the weather. In other words, it is not a “set and forget” system; Answering, adaptive and fully in your control.

In a sense, the dynamic LED lighting is like a smart thermostat. If you need more red flowers to push the flower or if you want to imitate long sunny sunny days in January. Dynamic controls and cloud-based technologies offer crops according to the cultivation needs of a tailor-made lighting plan.

Which crop is most likely to take advantage of the LED greenhouse lighting?
Almost all greenhouse-raised crops can benefit LED lighting, certain crops are particularly highlighted because of the advantages they gain.

Tomatoes and peppers are photosaintically actively active radiation (PAR) and examples of the custom spectrums that provide LED lighting. The light spectrum to satisfy its specific needs, the breeders can significantly improve the growth and performance of these crops.

The green leaves and herbs also have a big impact from LED lighting. With a controlled environment LEDs, these crops can develop more closely and flavorful green extensions. LED systems for proper light conditions ensures strong growth and improved quality.

To obtain flowers and decorations, LED lighting provides detailed control over the intensity and photoperiod, which is key to regulating flowering cycles and improving coloring. This level of control allows vineyards to produce flowers with richer flowers and coherent flowering models, improving the marketing of cosmetic appeals and crops.

Berries also benefit the additional LED lighting. Coherent lighting helps maintain uniform performance and sweetness throughout the year. Ensuring the optimal environmental environment, LED systems allow berries to produce non-more abundant crops, but regardless of seasonal changes.

Measurement of light efficiency measurement and return on investment
How do you know that your lighting system is doing effectively?
A metric key grows light efficiency, measured in micromols of joule (μmol / j). It is indicated by how much light can be used in all energy units. The higher the number, the performance improves.

Higher efficiency engineering dynamic gardening system reduces stronger crops, higher performance and energy costs. For example, if you grow tomatoes in January, you can recreate the sun without electricity bills.

Crops, objectives, and suina, the farms see the whole roi in less than five years, allowing energy saving, reduced maintenance and better returns. For example, an Ontario tomato breeder, such as July can repeat the strong sun in mid-January without electricity bills.

Margins are in the industry and competition that can be close; These results make a real difference.

XXI. Century Greenhouse data are driven, energy efficient and adaptable. LED greenhouse lighting is in the middle of the evolution.

For more information:
Sollum technologies
(Protected by email)
sollumtechnologies.com

Related Topics:advantages competitive greenhouse LED lighting

Up Next

Missouri Initiative To Unify Marijuana And Hemp Regulations Will Be Filed Within Days As Activists Aim For 2026 Ballot

Don't Miss

Google Now Allows Marijuana Business Advertisements Under New Pilot Program In Canada

Cannabis News

Betting on the potential for craft cannabis in a fledgling market

Published

5 hours ago

November 4, 2025

admin

Drive up the highway. Step into 8 Lindstrom and you’ll find a small group doing something radical on the Minnesota cannabis side.

Concentrate Labs, which operates the Roots & Resin Farm, has chosen flavor, purity and Minnesota craftsmanship over shortcuts. The flower is being grown and harvested, designed not only for smoking, but for conversion into solvent-free rosin, and the form of vapor inhalation is a concentrate that can be drained or heated.

Instead of the flower, the real action of the rosin is in the trichomes – the tiny, glassy glands that frost each bud. Rosin is simply those trichome heads harvested as ice water hash (made by washing the trichomes from flowers in ice water) and then carefully pressed with heat and pressure. No hydrocarbons, no ethanol, no post-processing chemicals. Just plant, water, temperature and time.

This year, Concentrate Labs co-founders Preston Torres and Max Young joined the first wave of non-tribal growers approved to grow and harvest cannabis for adult use. Their Lindstrom site stood out as an early entry, and one that was primarily geared toward rosin, rather than commodity flower. Craftsmanship is a decision and a commitment to quality.

Cannabis News

Oklahoma Activists Withdraw 2026 Marijuana Legalization Ballot Initiative

Published

5 hours ago

November 4, 2025

admin

Oklahoma activists have withdrawn a marijuana legalization initiative they had hoped to put on the state’s 2026 ballot.

After a brief but aggressive signature push to secure ballot placement, Oklahomans for Responsible Cannabis Action (ORCA) ultimately failed to submit petitions by the deadline, according to the secretary of state.

It’s a critical setback for advocates, who partnered with retailers across the state — from existing medical cannabis dispensaries to tattoo parlors — to place orders. More than 500 locations provided support by serving as signature locations.

ORCA needed to submit 172,993 valid signatures by Monday, and despite the campaign’s optimism about progress, the Secretary of State confirmed that no cuts have been made.

“RETIRATION PROMOTIONS OF THE AUTHORITY”, website of the office he says. “November 3, 2025; No application brochure filed on behalf of IP449; IP449 is no longer active in the office of the Secretary of State.”

Despite the decentralized, largely volunteer nature of the campaign effort and not actively verifying signatures collected, ORCA founder Jed Green, who could not be reached for comment Monday or Tuesday, told Marijuana Moment last month that the group had “a pretty big stack” of signed petitions on hand.

The campaign was still discussing hundreds of signed petitions as of Monday evening.

It was a tight turn to deliver the signatures, as the campaign only started collecting them in August, and advocates were given about three months to do the work.

There were particular challenges this election cycle, as Gov. Kevin Stitt (R) gave final approval to the legislation earlier this year, which some advocates worry will block future citizen-led policy changes, including cannabis reform.

It is laid down by law Additional requirements regarding the initiative language that voters see on the ballot and also revised signature-gathering policies to require petitioners to submit signatures of only 11.5 percent of registered voters in a single county for bills and 20.8 percent for constitutional measures. The law is currently being challenged for reasons unrelated to the specific cannabis proposition.

Green said earlier that it’s one of the main differences between the initiative his own the organization A previous one that was pushed this year and failed on the 2023 ballot is that it accounted for concerns about licensing rules. Many have criticized the expansion of the state’s medical marijuana law, which led to a proliferation of dispensaries, and Green said the failed adult-use measure effectively duplicated that licensing scheme.

Here’s what ORCA’s latest marijuana legalization initiative would accomplish:

It would allow adults over the age of 21 to purchase and possess up to eight ounces of cannabis for personal use. They can also contain up to 12 plants grown and harvested, and contain up to one ounce of concentrated cannabis.
The proposed Constitutional amendment would also provide that Oklahoma banks will not be penalized for servicing state-licensed cannabis businesses.
The initiative also includes protections for adults not to be penalized for “health care, housing, employment, public assistance, public welfare, parental rights, educational opportunity, extracurricular activities” and “licensing or authorized activities” such as firearm ownership and driving privileges as a result of legal cannabis activity.
Within these safeguards, the presence of THC metabolites in a person’s system could not be used as evidence of impairment.
Local governments would not be able to impose bans on the cultivation of marijuana at home, and any regulations they impose on the activity could not be an “undue burden.” Furthermore, there is no public ordinance on the public smoking of marijuana that could be more restrictive than what is currently in place for tobacco.
Existing medical cannabis licensees, as well as new retail licensees, would be able to start selling to adult consumers 60 days after the measure goes into effect. After 180 days, they could start distributing cannabis products to adults.
The same state departments that oversee the current medical cannabis program would be responsible for regulating the adult-use market.
It would impose a 10 percent excise tax on adult marijuana products, and the initiative provides that the legislature will be empowered to lower but not raise that tax rate.
The revenue from those tax dollars would go to the state general fund (40 percent), as well as the county governments where the retail sales occurred (30 percent) and municipal governments (30 percent). For unincorporated jurisdictions, the revenue would be split equally, 50 percent to the general fund and 50 percent to the counties.
60 days after the measure goes into effect, the tax rate on marijuana for registered cannabis patients would be waived.
It also states that state-licensed marijuana businesses cannot be prevented from engaging in interstate commerce if there is a change in federal law, or a court action, that authorizes such activity. If that happens, the legislature would be allowed to impose a 3 percent wholesale tax on cannabis exported across state lines.

Meanwhile, in the middle of the signature collection process, law enforcement leaders with the Oklahoma Chiefs Association and the Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs. was raising concerns about cannabis.

—
It’s Marijuana Time tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelic and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters by pledging at least $25/month, you’ll get access to our interactive maps, charts, and audio calendars so you never miss a development.

Learn more about our marijuana bill tracking and become a Patreon supporter to gain access
—

Also in Oklahoma, lawmakers advanced a bill that was targeted in March Protecting the gun rights of state-registered medical marijuana patientsalthough federal law still prohibits cannabis users from possessing firearms regardless of patient status.

It would be another state bill introduced by a GOP lawmaker in January criminalizing the use of medical cannabis during pregnancy.

Photo by Chris Wallis // Side Pocket Images.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Cannabis News

Report reveals California cannabis cultivation and regulatory process puts Tribal cultural resources at risk

Published

1 day ago

November 3, 2025

admin

A comprehensive new report by researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, and Northeastern University reveals that California’s cannabis cultivation threatens Tribal cultural resources. As in other fields of development, however, protecting these resources faces systemic challenges.

Based on the findings of a two-year survey of tribal and agency representatives across the state, the survey found that the state’s current consultation policies, while stronger than in many other states, are inadequate and inconsistently applied, leading to significant risks of irreparable damage to tribal cultural heritage.

“Our research shows a significant disconnect between state policy and the experiences of California’s indigenous tribes. The current cannabis permitting system, while well-intentioned, does not adequately protect ancestral lands and cultural resources,” said Jennifer Sowerwine, the project’s principal investigator and a UC Cooperative Extension specialist in UC Berkeley’s Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management. “It’s not just about historic preservation; it’s about respecting tribal sovereignty and perpetuating old damage by this new industry. These findings provide a clear roadmap for the state to move beyond performative consultation to a process that is truly meaningful and just.”

Jeremy Sorgen, principal investigator of the project and research faculty at Northeastern University’s Oakland campus, said, “One of the first things we’ve heard from Tribal Historic Preservation Officers and county officials involved in cultural resource protection efforts is that cannabis cultivation occurs on lands that are highly likely to be sensitive to Tribes.”

A good place to grow cannabis can be a Tribal cultural resource
“If it’s relatively flat, near a water source and facing south, it can be not only a good place to grow cannabis, but also a ceremony or a village site or some other place of cultural significance to the tribes,” said Sorgen, who is also a researcher at the UC Berkeley Cannabis Research Center. “What this means is that cannabis producers, historically and today, are actively selecting Tribal cultural resources.”

In 2014, California Assembly Bill 52 amended the California Environmental Quality Act, or CEQA, to include statutory requirements for the protection of tribal cultural resources. This law was enacted shortly before Proposition 64 legalized the use of cannabis in 2016. The study “Examining Tribal Sovereignty over Cannabis Permitting on Native Ancestral Lands” investigated the intersection of these two laws and found that AB 52, while strengthening Tribal consultation at the local level, retains the same problems as previous state and federal cultural resources laws.

The study was designed, conducted and analyzed in collaboration with the seven-member Tribal Advisory Committee, and included comprehensive surveys of 46 Tribal representatives and 56 agency officials, along with 61 in-depth interviews conducted across the state.

The report offers several recommendations for the Department of Cannabis Control and other state agencies to address these systemic problems. Key recommendations include: Working directly with tribal governments to develop fairer consultation processes and accurate maps of ancestral lands. Other recommendations include starting consultations as soon as a permit application is received, providing specific funding and training to Tribes and agency staff involved in consultations, and promoting stronger data sharing agreements between state, local, and Tribal governments.

The new tools support Tribal sovereignty in the consultation
Based on the research findings, the research team and Tribal consultants have developed two sets of tools to support tribal controls in the consultation process.

“California has some of the strongest cultural resource protection laws in the US, but meaningful consultation is undermined by structural problems in the consultation process,” said Shasta Gaughen, environmental director and historic preservation officer for the Pala Band of Mission Indians and a member of the Tribal Advisory Board. “We brought together Tribal historic preservation officials from across the state to develop a toolkit that reflects Tribal consultation experiences, is concise and easy to use, and empowers Tribes, not agencies, to set consultation requirements.”

The By Tribes, For Tribes Consultation Policy Toolkit provides a customizable Consultation Policy template and additional materials for Tribes looking to create their own consultation policies or ordinances. The “by Tribes, for Tribes” approach allows Tribes to proactively guide government agencies in consultative processes based on Tribal preferences, rather than reacting to agency interpretations as required by law.

The UC Berkeley Cannabis Site Mapping Tool provides Tribes with a means to assess the extent of cannabis cultivation on their ancestral or aboriginal land. It can be used to determine possible threats to tribal cultural resources and sensitive sites.

Source: Mavens Notebook