Louisiana’s attorney general has declined to participate in a lawsuit he initially filed. question the federal cannabis rescheduling action announced by President Donald Trump Department of Justice in April.
The suit, filed last month by Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill (R) and the attorneys general of Indiana and Nebraska, says officials must “show that this agency action does not comply” with the requirements of federal law, “was improperly promulgated and was otherwise procedurally improper,” “exceeds the perpetrator or is consistent with arbitrary” capriciousness, abuse of discretion, and not in accordance with law.
“Consequently, petitioners request that this Court declare this recent agency action unconstitutional and vacate,” reads the filing filed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
But on Friday, Murrill filed a motion saying, “Petitioner State of Louisiana respectfully moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b), as applied by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 20, to dismiss Louisiana as petitioner in this proceeding.”
“This motion seeks to dismiss Louisiana only. Defendants do not oppose this motion,” he said. “Louisiana therefore respectfully requests that the Court dismiss Louisiana solely from this proceeding, and that each party bear its own costs.”
It’s not clear why Murrill was first involved, then left the case a few days later. Representatives for the Attorney General’s Office did not immediately respond to Marihuana Moment’s request for comment for this story.
Last week the court consolidated the complaint of the State Attorneys General a A separate lawsuit filed earlier last month by the prohibitionist organization Smart Approaches to Marijuana (SAM). and the Drug and Alcohol Screening Association (NDASA).
Also last week, anti-marijuana activists, substance abuse professionals, doctors and a cannabis-focused biopharmaceutical corporation filed one. An additional lawsuit seeking to challenge the Trump administration’s move to deregulate marijuana.
Under an action announced in April by Attorney General Todd Blanche, marijuana products regulated by a state medical cannabis license were immediately changed from Schedule I to Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). Annex, as well as marijuana products approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). An An administrative hearing scheduled for this month will examine the broader rescheduling of cannabisincluding for recreational products.
“AG’s Reinstatement Order violates the regulatory requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 USC §§ 551 to 559, and section 201 of the CSA, 21 USC § 811, exceeds the Attorney General’s statutory authority under the CSA, and is otherwise arbitrary and capricious and does not meet SAM’s statutory requirements, as claimed by both petitions. reorganization action.
Torridon Law was signed by lawyers at PLCC, where former US Attorney General William Barr, who led the DOJ during Trump’s first term, is a partner.
SAM announced in January that it was Hiring Barr’s firm to fight cannabis rescheduling After Trump signed an executive order directing officials to quickly complete the process.
The defendants named in the two now consolidated lawsuits are the Department of Justice, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Blanche and DEA Administrator Terrance Cole.
A federal judge last month dismissed a separate lawsuit brought by SAM challenge a new Trump administration initiative to cover hemp-derived products up to $500 annually for eligible Medicare patients
Meanwhile, last month the House committee Federal officials voted to block further steps to reschedule cannabis.
Read Louisiana’s the movement to remove the following from the marijuana redistricting lawsuit: