Connect with us

Cannabis News

Rhode Island Marijuana Regulators Weigh How To Award New Dispensary Licenses

Published

on

“It is unfair to everyone who has invested time, money and attention in this process. We ask that there be no delay.”

By Christopher Shea, Rhode Island Currant

State cannabis regulators have yet to decide how they will handle the allocation of 20 retail cannabis licenses to applicants selected by lottery before May.

The state planned to issue 24 licenses but reduced the number based on the distribution of applicants among the state’s six geographic areas. A total of 98 applications were submitted by the Rhode Island Cannabis Control Board’s December 29, 2025 deadline. One has since been withdrawn, Rhode Island Cannabis Administrator Michelle Reddish told the board at Friday’s monthly meeting.

A second applicant withdrew after the meeting, Cannabis Control Board spokesman Charon Rose confirmed Tuesday.

Commission staff are still reviewing applicants’ qualifications before they enter the final lottery that will award retail licenses. A breakdown of applicants available on the commission’s website shows that more than half — 56 — are seeking general retail licenses. Another 19 were cooperative workers and the remaining 23 were for social equity applicants, or those affected by the war on drugs.

State regulations passed last year set a maximum of four retailers zoneat least one license designated for a social equity applicant, and for a worker-owned cooperative.

Nearly a third of all retail license applications — 31 — were in Zone 6, along with all of Pawtucket, East Providence, Bristol and Newport counties.

Zone 1, which covers Burrillville, Cumberland, Glocester, North Smithfield and Smithfield, saw only two applications, both for social equity licenses. Applicants that did fall back were Die of Laughter, which applied to Zone 5, and Green Dolphin, which applied to Zone 4.

At the committee’s Friday meeting, the committee raised the possibility of phasing out the license release.

“Many stakeholders have raised the issue that if all potential licenses come online at the same time, the price of the product could drop so quickly that no one would win,” said Commissioner Robert Jacquard.

Kevin Rouleau, chief operating officer of Portsmouth-based Newport Cannabis Company, warned that a rapid saturation of the state’s small market could lead to a “race to the bottom” as more established businesses like his try to survive the new competition.

“This is going to hurt everybody, especially farmers who get pennies on the dollar for their produce,” Rouleau said.

The cultivators who participated in the meeting did not feel that way.

“We’re absolutely fine moving forward with the retail stores and we’re not concerned about that outcome,” Rhode Island Growers Association representative Nicholas Lacroix told the commission during the public comment period.

However, Reddish was concerned that the rapid expansion could lead to problems that have occurred in other states.

Cannabis revenue in Michigan fell in 2025, despite record total sales, driven by falling prices. The Oregon market has come under increased pressure from large harvests and low wholesale prices. In Massachusetts, merchants describe a “race to the bottom” that has wiped out many businesses from their market.

“Based on these examples, there is a need to discuss whether the commission should use its ability to take proactive steps to support a stable and successful cannabis industry, prepare to respond to market changes in real time and adjust course if necessary,” he said.

But attorney Allan Fung, a former Cranston mayor and former GOP congressional and gubernatorial candidate, appeared on behalf of several candidates. the applicantshe said that the market should ultimately be the entity that dictates price and competition.

“It’s unfair to everyone who has invested time, money and attention in this process,” Fung told commissioners. “We ask that there be no delay.”

It has already been a slow road for the state to establish its own recreational cannabis market. More than a year passed before the three-member committee was inaugurated in June 2023. The commission had to hire staff to write proposals and review rules adopted in other states. Rhode Island’s rules governing retail cannabis were finally approved in May 2025. Chairman Kim Ahern stepped down last October to become attorney general, and Gov. Dan McKee (D) has yet to name a successor.

Meanwhile, eight medical dispensaries in the state have been authorized to sell recreational cannabis under hybrid licenses.

“The only people who benefit from these dispensaries being slow are the current dispensaries who have a monopoly on the cannabis market,” said Spencer Blier, director of Warwick-based Mammoth Inc. CEO and founder of cultivator.

Because few applications were submitted for Zone 1, Reddish informed the board on Jan. 16. the meeting that regulators would issue up to 20 licenses statewide.

“Depending on how the application process is completed, that number may decrease,” Reddish said Friday.

Starting Jan. 1, the state Office of Cannabis had 90 days to review applications and confirm they met eligibility requirements before entering a lottery, according to a schedule approved by the commission at its Oct. 20 meeting.

Applicants must still obtain the necessary local approvals to enter the random drawing. Regulators aimed to start issuing licenses before May, although the regulations do not specify how many will be issued at one time.

The commissioners did not vote on Friday. The board decided to decide how many licenses to grant at a time for a future meeting.

The next meeting organized by the committee is Friday, March 20, at 1:00 p.m.

This story was first published by the Rhode Island Currant.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Maximizing cannabis yields with intercanopy and subcanopy lighting

Published

on

By







Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Transportation Groups Warn Feds Of Marijuana Rescheduling’s ‘Consequences’ For Drug Testing Of Truck Drivers And Pilots

Published

on

By

A coalition of transportation and safety organizations said they have “serious safety concerns” about the Trump administration’s move to federally regulate marijuana.

Led by the American Trucking Association, the groups sent a letter to federal officials Monday asking them to take steps to ensure truck drivers, pilots, transit operators and other safety-sensitive workers continue to be tested for cannabis.

“If employers do not take the necessary steps to preserve the ability of security-sensitive transportation workers to test for marijuana, this change could have significant consequences for the safety of passengers and the entire transportation industry,” wrote Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Administrator Terrance Cole, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, and Transportation Secretary J.

The organizations said they understand that federal officials are being “urgently” reorganized under an executive order from President Donald Trump, that they are “deeply concerned that the current process does not adequately take into account agencies responsible for transportation safety or protecting the traveling public” and that they want the agencies to “work together.” ongoing cannabis redistricting hearings and rulemaking process to address these concerns.

In May, the Department of Transportation (DOT) issued new guidelines saying just that Truck drivers, airline pilots and other safety-sensitive workers still cannot use medical marijuana without penalty despite the Trump administration’s move to reschedule.

“Marijuana use is incompatible with safety-sensitive functions,” the department said.

Medical review officers (MROs) who receive drug test results indicating cannabis use cannot rule them out as negative for illegal substance use, even if an employee claims it was a result of state-licensed medical marijuana.

“Currently, there is no way for an MRO to verify that a laboratory-confirmed marijuana drug test result is positive when an employee claims the positive was caused by a state-licensed marijuana product,” the DOT said, explaining that after the reprogramming, medical marijuana dispensed under state law “does not” constitute a drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The transportation groups said in the new letter that the DOT’s drug-testing program “is in accordance with the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs and HHS-certified laboratories.”

“While DOT has expressed its intention to continue testing marijuana, a commitment we greatly appreciate, it is unclear whether DOT will retain its ability to rely on HHS procedures and certifications after the rescheduling,” they wrote. “Without this alignment, DOT may retain the authority to conduct testing, but lack the scientific and procedural infrastructure to do so.”

“Practically, this would mean that truck and bus drivers, pilots, flight attendants, air traffic controllers, air mechanics, railroad workers, dispatchers and signal workers, transit operators and pipeline workers could continue to perform high-risk safety roles without a reliable means of verifying that they are not actively using marijuana. It relies on controlled substance testing to identify end use and prevent potentially impaired individuals from fulfilling their safety-related obligations. While the planning could create legal or regulatory loopholes, the regulated employer-based drug testing agency warned that the final rules should not jeopardize marijuana testing for safety-sensitive transportation workers.”

“Regardless of the broader policy goals of the review, the federal government should not move forward to preserve transportation drug testing programs and mitigate the risks of increased and unchecked deterioration of our roads, railroads, public transportation systems, pipelines, airspace, and maritime corridors,” the letter says.

The organizations specifically ask federal officials to:

  • Support long-term marijuana testing for all safety-sensitive transportation workers;
  • Confirm the authority of DOT-regulated employers to perform such tests;
  • Ensure HHS laboratory certification and testing guidelines remain available and aligned with DOT’s safety mission; and
  • Establish a coordinated federal strategy to address the transportation security implications of rescheduling.

“The public and the workers who keep our transportation system running safely deserve a process that ensures these safeguards are firmly in place before any final action is taken,” he said. the letter he says

Earlier this month, the House Appropriations Committee approved a provision to allow federal officials to continue requiring government employees and security-sensitive employees, such as truck drivers and airline pilots must be drug tested for marijuana, “regardless of any future change in legal status or schedule.”

This was followed by a press conference organized by prohibitionist groups and a drug-testing industry association, where both Republican lawmakers joined the proclamation. “Cut” to marijuana rescheduling by asserting that safety-sensitive transportation workers can still be punished for testing positive for THC.

Legislators and abolitionist activists argued that moving marijuana to Schedule III would lead to a 1986 executive order signed by President Ronald Reagan defining illegal drugs under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) in relation to the use of cannabis by truck drivers and other airline employees.

Last October, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy suggested that President Donald Trump was “putting pressure” on rescheduling cannabis.arguing that marijuana is “truly addictive” and that policy reform on the issue sends a “dangerous” message.

“At a time when the culture is encouraging and celebrating the use of marijuana, we’re not talking about risk,” Duffy said.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Experts say THC percentage is the wrong way to shop for cannabis

Published

on

By


Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media