Connect with us

Cannabis News

The Art of Cherry Picking and the Real Problem with Cannabis in America



art of cherry picking weed

The Art of Cherry Picking

Providing Perspective to non-nuanced news opinions


Yes, this will be the opinion of an opinion – because the article I’m about to cover poses as a “news” article but in actuality is a poorly constructed opinion. It is my objective today to disembowel the contents of this article and showcase how the “Machine” utilizes information to sustain a policy that is corrosive to society as a whole.


In today’s “sniper session”, we’re going to be analyzing an article written by a man named Ben Leonard, who according to his Politico bio is;


Ben Leonard is a health technology reporter at POLITICO, covering digital health action from D.C. at agencies, in Congress and in the White House, as well as the industry at large.


He’s also a co-author of POLITICO’s Future Pulse newsletter.


The article in question is titled; “Pot is making people sick. Congress is playing catch-up.”


While many of the things Ben says in the article are factually correct, the way it is presented comes paints cannabis in a biased light. I aim to set the record straight.


Argument 1: Recent Health Problems with Cannabis


In the article Ben writes in his opening statements;


But the policymakers overseeing legalization were flying surprisingly blind about its effect on public health. Only recently has a steady flow of data emerged on health impacts, including emphysema in smokers and learning delays in adolescents.



Except, he fails to provide any sources to that claim. It’s simply left in there and the reader is meant to trust Ben’s opinion.


I’d like to see the data on this “new information”. Especially since I’m a person who is monitoring all things within the cannabis space, I would know of this “streams of data” that suggest people are getting sick.


And while it’s true, there are people who get intoxicated from cannabis, the truth of the matter is that it’s a miniscule percentage compared to the larger population that consume cannabis.


The use of cannabis as a medicinal and recreational substance dates back thousands of years, with evidence of its consumption and cultivation found in various cultures and civilizations around the world. In recent decades, scientists and researchers have been studying the effects of cannabis on the human body, with a particular focus on its medicinal properties and safety for consumption.


One of the leading countries in cannabis research is Israel, where scientists have been studying the plant and its effects for many years. Israel has been at the forefront of cannabis research, conducting clinical trials and publishing numerous studies on the topic. These studies have provided valuable insight into the effects of cannabis on the human body and have helped to dispel many of the myths and misconceptions surrounding its use.


Despite the restrictions on cannabis research in the United States, the data and scientific literature on the topic is vast and robust. The overwhelming majority of studies suggest that cannabis is safe for consumption for the majority of people, with only a small subset of people with pre-existing conditions potentially experiencing negative effects.


The available data and scientific literature on cannabis consumption suggests that it is generally safe for the majority of people. While further research is always necessary, the evidence to date suggests that the plant has been used safely and effectively by humans for thousands of years and that its use poses relatively few risks to the majority of people.


Argument 2: “Evidence is overwhelming (maybe)”


While this following section isn’t a single citation of evidence, each study couldn’t prove a causal relationship between whatever the issue was and cannabis. For example,


The researchers found that from 2011 to 2019, teenagers in states that legalized recreational cannabis saw a “slight” uptick in asthma rates in kids ages 12 to 17 compared with states in which cannabis remained illegal. The team, from the City University of New York, Columbia University, the University of California San Diego and others, also found an increase in asthma among children in some racial and ethnic groups.


Except, kids in that age group predominantly utilizes vaporizers as opposed to smoking joints and a 2020 study entitled, “Medical Cannabis in Asthma Patients” concluded;


Cannabis has a bronchodilator effect on the airways and might have an anti-inflammatory effect on asthmatic patients. However, harmful effects on the lungs are mainly attributed to smoking and include airway irritation and the development of chronic bronchitis symptoms.



Which means, if these kids are predominantly “vaping”, and not smoking, then it’s probably in their best interest to consider what elements are placed within the vaping devices. We know a few years ago EVALI caused major concern, however, I doubt that the researchers are even thinking in this manner.


This is because, when researchers talk about age groups like 12-17, they don’t understand the cultural implications behind the consumption of cannabis. I do, because I’ve been writing on cannabis culture for 15 years.


Obviously, there would be an influence in the results if you factor “smoking vs vaping vs eating it” all of which will have different impacts on the individual. Not to mention that cannabis already has a unique effect on each person due to their endocannabinoid system.


The rest of the article also points out suggestive “evidence” linking it to other conditions I have shown in previous articles to be a fancy way of interpreting data according to narrative.


To be fair…


Ben isn’t calling for keeping cannabis illegal, and that I can respect. But what he is doing is painting cannabis as some “dangerous threat” to society when in reality it isn’t. The danger that we’re seeing, and all of the evidence that he is pointing to suggests that the populace is “uneducated” when it comes to drug use.


Drug prohibition has long been a source of confusion and misinformation, creating a “drug-dumb” populace that lacks a basic understanding of the effects of certain substances and how they interact with the body and mind. This ignorance is the result of decades of fear-mongering and propaganda aimed at demonizing drugs, particularly those classified as “illegal”. The taboo nature of the topic and the fear of legal repercussions have made it difficult for individuals to obtain accurate information about the effects of drugs and their potential benefits or risks.


Cannabis is a prime example of the negative consequences of drug prohibition. Despite its long history of use, dating back thousands of years, the plant has been demonized and vilified for decades, perpetuating myths and misconceptions about its effects. The result is a generation of people who lack basic knowledge about the drug and its potential benefits and risks.


By keeping people in the dark about drug consumption, the government is essentially “giving children scissors to run with on a busy highway”. The lack of accurate information and education about drugs increases the risks associated with drug use, leading to potentially dangerous and life-threatening situations.


Drug prohibition creates a “drug-dumb” populace that lacks basic knowledge about the effects of drugs and their interaction with the body and mind. The continued demonization of drugs and the taboo nature of the topic perpetuates this ignorance and increases the risks associated with drug use. It is time to end the war on drugs and embrace a more rational and evidence-based approach to drug policy.


This is precisely why the article is missing the point…it’s not necessarily about cannabis but rather the people who are using it. Kids are drinking booze too, we have regulations on the table for that.


But the federal government refuses to legalize cannabis. Keeping it in the dark, keeping people dumb. The results and potential negative consequences of cannabis is not a result of the plant, but the ignorance surrounding it.


If people understood that edibles release 11-hydroxy THC which is 10x more potent than Delta-9, they wouldn’t leave candies around for kids to find. They would lock up their stashes, they would educate their children in a similar fashion as they do with booze – which in America is dismal.


In the United States, drug education is left to the hands of street dealers, who have a vested interest in keeping their customers addicted and uninformed. This lack of accurate and comprehensive drug education perpetuates the cycle of addiction and contributes to the high rates of drug-related harm in the country.


The War on Drugs has only exacerbated the problem, leading to increased criminalization of drug use and a lack of resources for treatment and education. The focus has been on punishment rather than prevention, leaving individuals who use drugs without the knowledge or resources to make informed decisions about their own health.


The only way to make the world safer is through the legalization of all drugs and the de-stigmatization of drug use for adults. This would allow for the regulation of drugs and the provision of accurate information about their effects and risks. It would also provide funding for treatment and harm reduction programs, reducing the burden on the criminal justice system and improving public health.


Legalization and de-stigmatization would also remove the profit motive from the drug trade, reducing the influence of street dealers and other criminal elements. By taking the drug market out of the hands of criminals and putting it under the control of the government, we can ensure the safety and quality of the drugs being sold, while also reducing the spread of diseases such as HIV and hepatitis.


In conclusion, the current approach to drug education and the War on Drugs have only contributed to the problem and left individuals vulnerable to harm. The only way to make the world safer is through the legalization of all drugs and the de-stigmatization of drug use for adults, allowing for the regulation of drugs, the provision of accurate information, and the funding of harm reduction programs.





Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Can a CBD Vape Pen Help You Sleep Better?




cbd vape pen for sleep

CBD vape pen does not cause sedation. Instead, it helps reduce anxiety, destress, reduce pain, improve mood, and thus help sleep. It may be better than using sedatives as it does not alter sleep quality or architecture.

Sleep disorders are very common and may increase the risk of a range of health conditions like obesity, diabetes, various mood disorders, including depression, and more. Poor sleep may also lower immunity and slow down regenerative processes.

There is a reason to consider CBD vape pens: they help you sleep better. Sedatives may help a person sleep quickly, but people often wake up with heavy-headedness or even headaches the next day. This is because sedatives alter brain function and sleep architecture. However, CBD vapes do not have those side effects; thus, it is a more natural way to enhance sleep.

How Does CBD Affect Sleep?

CBD interacts with the body’s endocannabinoid system (ECS), which plays a crucial role in regulating various physiological processes, including sleep. The ECS consists of cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2) throughout the body. CBD may influence these receptors to promote balance and homeostasis, potentially improving sleep quality (1).

Research suggests that CBD may help alleviate factors that negatively impact sleep, such as anxiety, pain, and stress. By addressing these underlying issues, CBD can indirectly contribute to better sleep.

Potential Benefits of Using a CBD Vape Pen for Sleep

CBD vape pen is not as potent as sedatives, but it is safer. Additionally, CBD vape pens may be better than CBD oils or gummies in certain ways. Thus, many people find CBD vape ben as one of the better ways to enhance sleep quality. Some reasons to consider CBD vape pens are:

Faster Absorption and Quick Relief

One of the primary advantages of using a CBD vape pen is the speed at which CBD enters the bloodstream (2). Unlike oral consumption, which can take up to an hour or more to take effect, vaping allows CBD to be absorbed almost immediately. This quick action can be beneficial for individuals who have difficulty falling asleep due to anxiety or racing thoughts.

Anxiety and Stress Reduction

Anxiety and stress are common causes of sleep disturbances. CBD has been shown to have anxiolytic (anxiety-reducing) properties. It can help calm the mind and prepare the body for sleep. Using a CBD vape pen allows users to experience these calming effects quickly, making it easier to relax and fall asleep (3).

Pain Relief

Chronic pain can significantly disrupt sleep patterns. CBD is known for its analgesic (pain-relieving) properties, which can help alleviate pain and discomfort. Vaping CBD can provide rapid relief from pain, allowing individuals to settle into a more comfortable and restful state for sleep.

Improved Sleep Quality

Beyond helping individuals fall asleep, CBD may also improve overall sleep quality. Some studies suggest that CBD can influence sleep architecture, potentially increasing the amount of time spent in deep sleep stages. Deep sleep is essential for restorative rest and overall health.

Greater Benefit with Each Day

When using CBD for better sleep, it is essential to understand that some benefits are experienced from the very first hours of CBD vaping, but some benefits are experienced on consistent use.

When one uses a CBD vape pen, it almost immediately reduces stress and calms nerves. However, on consistent use, CBD accumulates a bit in a system. This means peak benefit from CBD vape pen use is experienced between days three and five.

Further, on continued CBD use through vaping or other means, some changes occur in the body. This includes altered stress response and specific changes in the brain structure. Such changes occur gradually over weeks. Hence, it is vital to keep using CBD to experience all its health effects.

Considerations for Using a CBD Vape Pen for Sleep

Although most CBD vape pens would help, it is vital to choose high-quality vape pens. Quite often, people choose products that are of poor quality, and then they wrongly conclude that CBD does not work for them. So, here are a few things to consider when using CBD vape pens for sleep:

Choosing the Right Product

When selecting a CBD vape pen, choosing a high-quality product from a reputable source is important. Look for vape pens that use pure CBD oil without harmful additives or contaminants. Third-party lab testing can provide assurance of the product’s quality and safety.

Dosage and Usage

Finding the right dosage of CBD can vary from person to person. It’s generally recommended to start with a low dose and gradually increase until the desired effects are achieved. For sleep, a lower dose might be sufficient, as higher doses of CBD can sometimes have a stimulating effect.

Timing of Use

To optimize the benefits of a CBD vape pen for sleep, timing is crucial. It’s typically best to use the vape pen 15 to 30 minutes before bedtime. This allows enough time for the calming effects of CBD to take hold, helping you relax and prepare for sleep.

Potential Side Effects

While CBD is generally well-tolerated, it’s important to be aware of potential side effects. Common side effects may include dry mouth, dizziness, and mild drowsiness. These effects are typically mild and temporary.

Legal Considerations

In the UK, CBD products must contain less than 0.2% THC to be legal. Ensure that the CBD vape pen and oil you purchase comply with local regulations to avoid any legal issues.

The Bottom Line

A CBD vape pen is an effective and fast way to improve sleep quality. However, do not forget to take other measures. So, improve your sleep routine, manage underlying causes, and make lifestyle changes. When CBD is combined with other lifestyle interventions, it can be of great help. Choosing high-quality products, starting with a low dose, and considering integrating other healthy sleep practices for the best results is crucial.


  1. Kesner AJ, Lovinger DM. Cannabinoids, Endocannabinoids and Sleep. Front Mol Neurosci. 2020 Jul 22;13:125.

  2. Millar SA, Stone NL, Yates AS, O’Sullivan SE. A Systematic Review on the Pharmacokinetics of Cannabidiol in Humans. Front Pharmacol. 2018 Nov 26;9:1365.

  3. Wright M, Di Ciano P, Brands B. Use of Cannabidiol for the Treatment of Anxiety: A Short Synthesis of Pre-Clinical and Clinical Evidence. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2020 Sep 2;5(3):191–6.





Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

The Cannabis Industry Now Supports Over 440,000 Full-Time Jobs




As the 2024 elections draw near, the economic impact of cannabis legalization is set to become a prominent topic in political discourse. With billions in total sales and millions in tax revenue, the economic benefits of legal cannabis are clear. However, beyond the monetary gains, there is a crucial aspect that must not be overlooked: job creation.

The 2024 Cannabis Jobs Report by Vangst reveals that over 440,000 jobs have been generated in states with legal cannabis, marking a 5.4% increase in the past year alone. This growth not only signifies economic stability, but also highlights the industry’s resilience in recovering from past job losses. As new markets like Missouri contribute to this job surge, the report underscores the varying dynamics of job creation across different states: newer markets are expanding while older ones face challenges. Despite these disparities, the forecast remains optimistic, with continued growth in sales and job opportunities anticipated in the coming years.

The economic benefits of legal cannabis

When discussing the economic benefits of fully legalizing cannabis, the subjects of total retail sales and related tax revenue are always immediately discussed, and rightfully so. Forbes estimates that the regulated U.S. cannabis industry will be worth $46 billion in 2028, and will surpass alcohol sales in some counties. Even in more remote and less populous states, cannabis has brought in millions in retail sales and tax revenue. In Maine for instance, cannabis sales reached $217 million in 2023. Missouri, despite a population of roughly six million, was the sixth largest market of all the states with legal cannabis in 2023. In all, Missouri topped $1 billion during its first year of recreational sales.

Job creation in the cannabis industry

As we approach the 2024 elections, cannabis will undoubtedly be an issue on the forefront of discussions. The rapidly increasing, multi-billion dollar figure of total cannabis sales and many millions more in tax revenue will be mentioned prominently. However, when discussing the numerous economic benefits of recreationally legalizing cannabis, politicians who run so heavily on platforms of American job creation, such as the reality TV star turned President, must also acknowledge the thousands of jobs that are created annually from states with legal cannabis.

Recovery and growth

One partial reason identified by the Vangst Report for the dramatic increase in 2023 cannabis jobs, is that cannabis industry overall experienced a loss of about 10,500 jobs from 2022 to 2023. Not only were industry businesses actively creating new roles for prospective employees by the thousands in 2023, they were recuperating from a deficit of job loss. Luckily for this flourishing industry, the legalization and opening of the recreational cannabis market in Missouri easily filled those 10,500 previously lost jobs for their billion-dollar industry.

State-by-state analysis

One noteworthy data set in the Vangst Report was precisely which states’ markets were creating more jobs, and the ages of various state markets in relation to job creation performance. Of the top nine states for cannabis job growth, three saw increases of over 100 percent; and none of those states had legal cannabis before 2018. One of those states, Utah, experienced a growth of about 16 percent, but is still a strictly regulated medical-only market. Even more surprisingly, Utah is the only state that could even be considered “West Coast” among the top nine.

Interestingly and worryingly, the eight states to experience the most staggering job loss all legalized cannabis at least a decade ago. On top of the mountain of issues that the California industry is already facing, the Golden State experienced the highest number of job losses in the past year. Neighbor state Nevada, despite attracting over 40 million tourists a year, experienced a seven percent job numbers drop. Colorado and Washington, the very first two states to legalize recreational cannabis in 2012, experienced the highest percentage of job loss by far, at 16 and 15 percent respectively.

“The national 5.4% growth in jobs wasn’t spread evenly. Now more than ever, America’s cannabis industry is a state by-state, region-by-region job market.” the Vangst Job Report summarized. “Young markets in recently legalized states continue to expand and create employment opportunities, while labor demand in mature markets contracts along with revenue and profit margins.”

Future projections

Even with the notable stagnation or job loss in the thousands for certain states, the report indicates hints of future job growth. Vangst estimates that anywhere from 7,500 to 45,000 jobs could be created in Ohio, for example, which recently legalized adult use cannabis. Out east, With Maryland awarding 75 more retail cannabis licenses, the number of jobs created in that state would almost certainly increase. Overall, the Vangst Report hypothesizes another wildly successful year for cannabis sales.

“In 2023 our legal revenue forecast of $29.2 billion came in at $28.8 billion (98.3% accuracy). This year we’re looking for 9.1% growth, with sales increasing to $31.4 billion. By 2030, we predict this will grow to $67.2 billion as more states legalize and more consumers participate. That growth will create more jobs, more wages, more taxes, and more ancillary support. Despite the challenges, this seems like a good problem to have as an industry.”


As the cannabis industry continues to evolve and expand, its economic contributions are becoming increasingly significant– particularly in terms of job creation and tax revenue. Job growth underscores the industry’s resilience and potential to create economic opportunities, even as older markets face challenges.

As the 2024 elections approach, it is imperative for policymakers to recognize and address the multifaceted economic benefits of cannabis legalization, ensuring that discussions extend beyond sales and taxes to include the vital aspect of job creation. With projections indicating continued growth in sales and employment, the cannabis industry stands as a dynamic and promising sector, one poised to make significant contributions to the American economy in the years to come.

Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Drugs are Bad, Mmmkay? – The Subjective Morality around Cannabis and Other Drugs




morality of drugs

The Subjective Morality of Drugs

The question of whether drugs are inherently good or bad has been a topic of debate for centuries.

Society often labels certain substances as “bad drugs” while accepting others as “good.” But how do we measure the morality of a drug? Is it based on its legal status, cultural acceptance, or perceived health risks?

Assessing the “goodness” or “badness” of a drug is a complex task, as it involves considering various factors such as individual health, social impact, and potential for abuse. However, even these factors are subject to cultural and personal biases. What one society deems acceptable, another may view as a moral failing.

This raises the question: Can we truly use morality as a filter to determine whether a drug is good or bad? Moreover, who is the arbiter of this morality? Is it the government, religious institutions, or public opinion?

Interestingly, most people are active drug users, often without realizing it. The world’s most widely consumed psychoactive drug, caffeine, is found in coffee, tea, and various other beverages and foods. Yet, we rarely question the morality of consuming this socially accepted substance.

In this article, we will explore the subjective morality surrounding drugs, challenging the notion that they can be neatly categorized as either good or bad. By examining the hypocrisy in our attitudes towards different substances, we aim to shed light on the complex relationship between humans and the psychoactive compounds we consume.


A drug, in its broadest sense, is any chemical substance that, when consumed, has a physiological effect on the body. This definition encompasses a wide range of substances, from prescription medications to recreational drugs, and even includes everyday substances like caffeine and sugar.

If we accept this expansive definition, it becomes clear that the majority of the world’s population are, in fact, regular drug users.

Substances like caffeine, alcohol, and sugar are consumed daily by billions of people worldwide, often without a second thought.

Let’s take coffee as an example. According to the National Coffee Association, approximately 62% of Americans drink coffee every day, with an average consumption of three cups per day. Globally, over 2.25 billion cups of coffee are consumed each day, making it one of the most popular beverages in the world. Coffee contains caffeine, a stimulant that affects the central nervous system, improving alertness and reducing fatigue.

Similarly, sugar is added to countless food products and is consumed in vast quantities. The World Health Organization reports that the average person consumes around 24 kilograms of sugar per year. Sugar has been shown to have addictive properties and can lead to various health problems when consumed in excess, such as obesity, diabetes, and heart disease.

Despite their widespread use and potential for harm, substances like coffee and sugar are rarely subjected to the same moral scrutiny as illegal drugs like cannabis, cocaine, or heroin. This discrepancy raises questions about the consistency and validity of our moral judgments regarding drug use.

One reason for this inconsistency may be the legal status and cultural acceptance of certain substances. Alcohol, for example, is legal in most countries and is often associated with social gatherings and celebrations. In contrast, drugs like cannabis and cocaine are illegal in many jurisdictions and are often stigmatized as dangerous and morally corrupt.

However, the legal status and cultural acceptance of a substance do not necessarily reflect its potential for harm or addiction. Alcohol, for instance, is responsible for millions of deaths worldwide each year and can lead to severe health problems and addiction.

In light of these considerations, it becomes clear that our moral judgments about drugs are often inconsistent and influenced by factors beyond the inherent properties of the substances themselves.

By recognizing the widespread use of drugs in our society and the arbitrary nature of our moral distinctions, we can begin to have a more honest and nuanced conversation about drug use and its consequences.

We can move away from the “morality of drugs” and enter into the realm of the “science of drugs.”


Throughout history, various movements have used morality as a tool to push for the prohibition of certain drugs. These campaigns often relied on fear-mongering, racism, and sexual stigmatization to advance their agendas.

One notable example is the temperance movement of the early 20th century, which sought to ban alcohol in the United States. Proponents of the movement argued that alcohol consumption was a moral failing that led to poverty, domestic violence, and societal decay. Interestingly, they also used sexual purity as a motivator, suggesting that alcohol use led to promiscuity and the erosion of traditional family values.

This moralistic rhetoric ultimately contributed to the passage of the 18th Amendment, which ushered in the era of Prohibition.

Similarly, the prohibition of marijuana in the United States has its roots in racism and moral panic. In the early 1900s, cannabis was associated with Mexican immigrants, who were blamed for various social problems. The media fueled this narrative with sensationalized stories, such as the infamous “Reefer Madness” film, which depicted marijuana use as a gateway to violence, sexual deviancy, and insanity.

By portraying cannabis as a threat to moral society, proponents of prohibition were able to pass the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937, effectively criminalizing the drug.

The story of opium prohibition also has a dark history of racism and moral judgment. In the late 1800s, Chinese immigrants were instrumental in building America’s railroads. Many of these workers used opium, which was legal at the time, to cope with the harsh working conditions and loneliness.

However, as anti-Chinese sentiment grew, opium use became a target for moral crusaders. They portrayed Chinese immigrants as morally depraved and a threat to white society, using this rhetoric to push for the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 and, eventually, the Harrison Narcotics Tax Act of 1914, which restricted opium use.

Looking back at the history of prohibition, it becomes clear that these policies were often rooted in prejudice, fear, and a misguided sense of morality.

The consequences of these actions have been devastating, leading to the criminalization of large segments of the population, the rise of organized crime, and the perpetuation of harmful stereotypes.

Today, we continue to grapple with the stigma and moral judgments that our predecessors attached to drug use. The War on Drugs, launched in the 1970s, has disproportionately targeted communities of color and has led to mass incarceration, while doing little to address the root causes of addiction and drug abuse.

In light of this history, it is important to recognize that prohibition itself, not the drugs it aims to suppress, is often the true source of immorality.

By perpetuating harmful stereotypes, fueling racial discrimination, and criminalizing individuals who need help, prohibition has caused immense harm to society.

As we move forward, it is crucial that we reexamine our moral assumptions about drug use and work towards policies that prioritize public health, compassion, and evidence-based approaches to addiction and substance abuse. Only by confronting the misguided morality of prohibition can we hope to build a more just and equitable society.


As we’ve explored throughout this article, the question of whether drugs are inherently good or bad is a complex one, deeply entangled with historical, cultural, and moral perceptions.

We are left with the realization that morality may have little bearing on the objective effects of drugs, as individual beliefs and societal norms often shape what is considered acceptable or deviant.

If we accept that drugs are amoral—that is, void of intrinsic moral classifications—then our approach to drug policy should be guided by scientific evidence and empirical data, rather than subjective moral judgments.

Under this lens, we might find that alcohol, a substance responsible for countless deaths and social ills, would be classified as a Schedule I drug, while substances like sugar and caffeine, which also have addictive properties and potential health risks, would face greater regulation.

Yet, despite the evidence, we find ourselves grappling with the morals of a bygone era, which continue to dictate our relationship with the substances we consume.

The War on Drugs, born out of fear, racism, and moral panic, has led to devastating consequences, from mass incarceration to the stigmatization of addiction, while failing to address the complex social and economic factors that contribute to substance abuse.

It is time for us to break free from the shackles of outdated moral perceptions and embrace a new approach to drug policy—one that prioritizes harm reduction, public health, and individual liberty.

By dismantling the Controlled Substance Act and reevaluating our entire framework for regulating drugs, we can begin to address the root causes of addiction and provide support for those who need it most.

As we move forward, let us not allow the moral judgments of the past to dictate the policies of the future. Instead, let us chart a new course, guided by compassion, reason, and a commitment to evidence-based solutions.

Only then can we hope to build a society that truly promotes the well-being of all its members, regardless of their relationship with drugs.

Source link

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media