Connect with us

Cannabis News

The Best Stoner Side Hustles to Make Extra Weed Money in 2024



stoner side hustle

A Stoner’s Guide to Side Hustling


Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you know life’s gotten crazy expensive lately. It doesn’t matter if your paycheck is bigger than it used to be – everything costs an arm and a leg now. A gallon of milk will set you back more than your monthly utility bills!


With costs skyrocketing, a lot of people are looking for ways to supplement their income and bring in extra cash flow. Hey, we all like our comforts and little indulgences in life. So picking up a side hustle to fund those extras makes total sense. Plus, building up multiple income streams is how you create real wealth over time.


That’s what this article is all about – exploring three solid methods for generating supplemental income through your own entrepreneurial efforts. We’re not talking about get-rich-quick schemes here. Instead, these are techniques you can build sustainably into money-making systems to boost your bank account without killing yourself.


For all you stoners out there looking to subsidize your herb habit or just afford more of life’s finer things, we’ll dive into: 1) Using AI to create a passive income blog attached to products or ads, 2) Developing and selling your own products, and 3) Opening a brick-and-mortar Headshop. With some creativity and elbow grease, you can turn these side hustles into decent revenue streams.



We’re living in revolutionary times, folks. AI has completely transformed the playing field, ushering in a new era that most people still don’t fully grasp. I’m not exaggerating when I say this technological breakthrough is on the same level as the discovery of the internet itself.


AI has drastically reduced the effort and labor required for creating digital content and even physical products. With AI assistants, a single individual now has access to virtually infinite minds – able to tap into a vast pool of knowledge and find answers to any questions. It’s an unprecedented force-multiplier.


This democratization of AI means that anyone with a smartphone and internet connection theoretically has the ability to build a viable business in a relatively short timeframe. The barriers to entrepreneurship have never been lower when you can leverage AI to augment your skills and efforts.


Whether you want to write a book, launch a product, start a YouTube channel, or spin up an e-commerce store – AI can accelerate and empower you to make it happen as a lean, nimble solopreneur. You don’t need a huge team, millions in startup capital, or special expertise in every area. AI fills those gaps.


The enterprising folks who recognize this paradigm shift and start putting AI to work building their own business ventures will be the ones surfing the new wave of opportunity. If you’re still just going to a 9-to-5 without any irons in the fire, you’re already falling behind the curve.


In this AI-powered era, not building something of your own design – a source of self-directed income and a path toward financial freedom – means watching the world pass you by. This is the Renaissance 2.0, and AI entrepreneurs will be the pioneers and leaders. Don’t get left behind.



Can you still make money from blogging in 2024? Absolutely! The problem is most people simply don’t understand how to properly monetize a blog. Well, I’m here to tell you that blogging remains one of the easiest and most reliable ways to build a passive income stream. While I won’t dive into all the nitty-gritty details, I’ll provide the general path to take your blog from zero to cash flow in around 6 months to a year.


There are a few key things to keep in mind when starting a money-making blog: niche selection, content quality, posting frequency, traffic acquisition, and monetization analytics. Let’s break it down:


Niche – You’ll want to find a topic that intersects your personal interests and passions, but is also a proven “money niche” where people spend cash. Sports, for example, is generally a lucrative area of focus. But “sports” alone is too broad – you’d want to niche down further to something like “golfing.” The more specific and niche you get, the more you can realistically monetize. Just know that richer niches also tend to have more competition.


Content Quality – While AI can simply spit out generic articles on any topic, that low-quality output won’t draw an audience. Instead, use AI as an assistive tool while you provide the unique ideas, perspective, and editorial oversight. Come up with interesting angles, flesh out your outline, then collaborate with AI to craft share-worthy, media-rich content that you’d genuinely want to read yourself.


Frequency – Consistent publishing is less critical if you’re delivering ultra high-quality content that provides immense value. Still, try to post new longform content (1,000-2,000 words) at least once or twice per week. Quality over mediocre quantity.


Traffic – Paid advertising is the easiest way to drive traffic to your blog. But you don’t want to rely solely on that from the start. Build an initial audience for free via social media (Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, etc.), video platforms like YouTube, sites like Reddit, and other online communities. Test content in these free channels first – if posts get solid engagement, then invest in promoting them as ads.


Monetization & Analytics – Once you have steady traffic, that’s where you can leverage your audience to make money through channels like affiliate marketing, brand sponsorships, banner ads, and more. Cannabis brands, for instance, have very few options to advertise online – so a high-traffic cannabis niche blog could earn thousands per month on autopilot from banner ads alone.


If you’re on a bootstrapped budget, I recommend spending only what’s needed to buy a domain and set up a basic blog. Use free email marketing tools to start building your list. Concentrate your effort on producing stellar content over many months. Once you’ve built up a loyal following and consistent traffic, connect your blog to something like Google AdSense to start monetizing. With diligence, your passive income blog could be earning a substantial side revenue within 6-12 months.



This option for generating income gives you more control over your revenue stream, but it’s also more difficult to execute. Building a successful digital product requires deeper marketing knowledge, demographic research skills, payment processing setup, tax considerations, and more.


There’s a lot involved in product development, but if you can create something that solves legitimate problems for people and makes their lives better or easier in some way, you’ve got a potential winner on your hands. The keys are ensuring your product is practical, accessible, and truly beneficial.


When developing digital products, keep these factors in mind: It should solve a real, widespread problem that your target audience experiences. Ask yourself – does it make their lives more convenient or fulfill an unmet need or desire? The more urgent and universal the problem you’re solving, the bigger the potential market. Accessibility is also critical – your product needs to be straightforward for anyone to access and use with little friction.


So what types of digital products might you develop? If you’re pursuing the blogging option to build a topical brand, some straightforward products could include ebooks, branded merchandise like t-shirts or phone cases, online courses, or membership sites. While you might not traditionally think of them as “products,” those are absolutely digital products you can package and sell.


The beauty of digital products is that you have infinite inventory available at essentially zero marginal cost. Once created, you can sell unlimited copies without any restocking fees or additional production costs. Theoretically, this allows for infinite revenue potential.


The biggest challenge in product development is generating consistent sales. You’ll need a solid marketing strategy and sales funnel in place from the very start, along with advertising budget to promote your offers to the right target audiences across the channels they frequent.


To get started, select your niche, identify the core problems or challenges that your prospective customers face, and examine how current solutions may be falling short. See if you can create something superior that better addresses those unmet needs in an exciting new way. Solve a tight, specific problem that plagues your audience, and they’ll open their wallets for your product.


Digital products also allow creative pricing and partnership models. You can enlist affiliates to promote your product for a revenue share. Or build in continuity with recurring subscription models for products like membership sites or software. You can even bundle products together into higher-perceived-value packages.


The keys are diligent research to validate demand, innovative problem-solving to create something valuable, and intelligent marketing to get your stellar product in front of the right buyer audiences. Do that, and you’ve got a turnkey system for generating digital income.


Option 3: Start a Headshop


I can’t tell you how many people I know that started with a small headshop in a small market, and after a few years are rolling in money. The truth of the matter is that headshops for the most parts, are perfectly legal avenues of making money.


Many of my friends have started with as little as $200 and over the course of a few years built their shops to be generating thousands of dollars per day. Of course, this side-hustle can easily become a full time thing, but if you’re a stoner looking to make some extra cash, here’s how you can do it.


When asking ChatGPT on how one would start a headshop with $100 this is what it had to say:


Starting a headshop with just $100 is a challenge but not impossible, especially if you approach it with creativity and strategic planning. The key is to start small, focus on high-margin items, and gradually expand your inventory and customer base.


Here’s a step-by-step guide:


  1. Market Research


  • Identify Your Niche: Understand what specific products are in demand within your local area or the online community you aim to serve. Are customers looking for smoking accessories, CBD products, or something else?

  • Know Your Competition: Identify what they’re doing well and what gaps you can fill.


2. Legal Considerations


3. Initial Product Purchase


With $100, your initial purchase must be very strategic.

 Focus on items that are:


  • High Margin: Small, inexpensive items that can be sold at a higher markup.

  • Popular & Fast-Selling: Rolling papers, lighter accessories, small glass pipes, or CBD gummies can be a good start.

  • Directly From Wholesalers: Buying directly from manufacturers or wholesalers can cut down costs.


4. Sales Platform


  • Start Online: Avoid the overhead of a physical store by starting with an online shop. Use free or low-cost e-commerce platforms like Shopify or Etsy to set up your shop.

  • Social Media Marketing: Use social media platforms to market your products. This is where your market research on your target audience comes in handy.


5. Customer Engagement & Feedback



6. Reinvest Profits


  • Expand Your Inventory: Gradually add more products based on customer demand and feedback.

  • Marketing: Invest in more targeted advertising (Facebook ads, Google AdWords) as you start to generate revenue.



I think everyone should be working on a side hustle in this capacity. A.I allows you to write like a copywriter, design like a graphic designer, and research like a master if you know how to ask it the right questions.


These days, the age of solopreneurs is very possible with an army of A.I bots behind them. In this article I provided three solid ways to generate money, more than 90% of you will do nothing about it, but for the brave few who will begin their venture…I hope this served you well!


Make some bank stoner!





Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Foreign Investment in U.S. Cannabis: Five Key Considerations




Cannabis investments are difficult enough when the investor is a U.S.-based person or entity. But things can get immensely more complicated when foreign investment is on the table. Today I want to highlight some of the top considerations for foreign investors and U.S. cannabis companies alike.

1. Legality could cause serious headaches

To this day, cannabis remains federally illegal. State legality has zero effect on federal law. Even the possible rescheduling to schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) will not make cannabis federally legal. Things are clearly a mess.

In our cannabis team’s experience, a huge number of foreign investors do not appreciate the nuances between state and federal law and how it could effect them. For example, federal tax laws are unforgiving and don’t allow standard deductions for marijuana businesses. Additionally, federal illegality means that businesses will be siloed without interstate commerce, can’t get access to banking, can’t get access to basically anything for market rate, and so on.

All of these things mean that investments are simply unlikely to net big returns. Sadly to say, lots of investors end up writing off their investments. While federal legality alone isn’t the only reason that businesses, and by extension foreign investments, fail, it’s certainly a big one.

2. Cannabis investment may not be compatible with home country laws

This is actually probably more important than point 1. Cannabis is still illegal in most places in the world. There are still places where possession of cannabis can lead to the death penalty. While possession in a such a country is different from investing into the U.S., the governments in those countries may not see eye to eye, and such investments could lead to a host of different penalties. I’ve spoken with attorneys and business people from other countries who have said that foreign investment directly into a cannabis company is simply not possible.

What this can often lead to is investment into adjacent or ancillary companies in overly complicated deals. And when something is ancillary to the industry and/or a deal is overly complicated, netting a healthy return on investment is even more unlikely.

3. The cannabis industry and immigration law do not mix

Probably the first issue that comes up when looking at foreign investment is immigration and visa status. Immigration law is the province of the federal government. That means that it does not mix well with cannabis. If you’ve been in this space long enough, you’ll have heard of things like denial of naturalization petitions, denial of visas, arrests, and even lifetime bans on entry into the states. So for foreign investors who plan on relocating to the U.S. or even visiting to see the company they are investing in, there are huge risks.

4. Disclosure will likely be required

All states with legal cannabis markets require disclosure of certain people affiliated with a cannabis business. In many states, this includes investors, lenders, or people with other financial interests. Sometimes, the disclosures can be relatively benign, and in other cases much more aggressive.

For reasons expressed in points 2 and 3 above, a lot of foreign investors aren’t exactly thrilled to learn that they have to give personal data (and maybe undergo background checks) over to a state agency. This is yet another reason why foreign investments are often made into ancillary companies — to avoid disclosures. But even that isn’t always likely to fix the issue, and again, overly complicated investments into ancillary companies aren’t necessarily great.

5. Investment targets may get things wrong

Foreign investors often make a critical mistake in assuming that their targets know what they are doing. I’m not talking about operational issues — though a lot of companies clearly need help there — but about legal structures. It’s not unheard of for an investor to want to invest into a company that promises something it legally cannot do — like sell stock to a foreign investor in a state with a residency requirement. Yet things like this do happen from time to time, and once a foreign investor gives money over, it’s a lot harder to get it back.

Foreign investors who know what they are doing usually work with lawyers or other professionals experienced in their target jurisdiction, not only to diligence the target’s operations, finances, etc., but also to make sure that the fundamental aspects of the investment won’t trigger massive legal liabilities.

For some of our older posts on foreign investment in the U.S. cannabis industry, see below:

Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

America Can’t Defend Its Border Because Border Patrol Agents Are Smoking Too Much Weed?




border patrol marijuana policy

A Republican senator is pushing back against a recent policy change by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) that reduced the term of ineligibility for work due to past marijuana use from two years to three months. The senator doubts the trustworthiness of recruits who have used cannabis and believes that this move jeopardizes the safety and integrity of Border Patrol agents.


Senator James Lankford (R-OK) wrote to CBP Acting Commissioner Troy Miller, expressing severe concerns about the effects of this shift. He stated that the amendment blatantly contradicts the Border Patrol’s principal mission of safeguarding the country from illicit drugs.


Ironically, no one in the Senator’s office seemed worried about the US and Canadian border where cannabis has been recreationally legal for 7 years now.  Many Canadians have been stopped and banned for cannabis use, yet the security issue does not seem relevant at the Northern border, just the Southern.


While the exact timing of the CBP’s policy revision remains unclear, Senator Lankford disclosed that his office became aware of it during a briefing last month.


The senator alleges that CBP officers told his staff that ambiguity generated by disparities between state and federal marijuana regulations in places where cannabis has been legalized had a role in the policy shift. Senator Lankford did, however, emphasize that CBP, as a federal agency, is responsible for ensuring that federal rules governing the use of illegal substances are obeyed.


Additionally, the senator asserted that individuals who admit to past marijuana use often disclose involvement in other criminal activities, which he deemed unsurprising. He attributed this to the fact that irrespective of state laws, users frequently obtain marijuana from unlicensed vendors in the “gray market” due to its lower cost.


Furthermore, Senator Lankford alleged that licensed cannabis establishments frequently encounter corruption issues, citing reports of malpractices within his state’s medical marijuana program. He claimed that undocumented immigrants are exploited for labor and subjected to adverse conditions in these facilities.


Addressing worries about the health repercussions of cannabis usage, the senator cited a putative relationship between marijuana intake and diseases including schizophrenia and psychosis. Despite contradicting study findings on the subject, Senator Lankford emphasized the need for federal government screening for psychiatric disorders and illegal drug use during background checks for federal jobs.


In conclusion, Senator Lankford cautioned that regular marijuana use, particularly in states where it is legalized, could significantly affect the trustworthiness of Border Patrol recruits, especially considering the incidence of psychosis among heavy cannabis users.


Concerns Over Border Patrol Recruits’ Ties to Transnational Criminal Organizations Due to Altered Marijuana Use Review Period


Lankford expressed concern that shortening the period for reviewing marijuana use history raises the risk of Border Patrol recruits having financially supported transnational criminal organizations for marijuana cultivated by illegal immigrant labor. This scenario directly contradicts the Border Patrol’s mission and could lead to significant security and integrity issues among agents.


In his capacity as the Ranking Member of the Subcommittee on Governmental Operations and Border Management, Lankford emphasized his Subcommittee’s authority over Federal hiring and border management. He strongly objected to the policy change, fearing it would undermine the security and integrity of the Border Patrol workforce. Consequently, he urged CBP to revoke the policy and reinstate the two-year review period for marijuana use among Border Patrol recruits.


The senator presented eleven questions to CBP, seeking clarification by May 7 on various aspects, including the rationale behind the cannabis policy alteration, its impact on polygraph passage rates, and any other modifications to employment standards related to past marijuana use.


In essence, Lankford’s stance is clear: despite acknowledging CBP’s ongoing recruitment challenges and advocating for legalization to bolster border security and increase the agency’s personnel, he believes that hiring individuals who may have used cannabis three months prior, as opposed to two years ago, poses an unacceptable risk.


Meanwhile, CBP advised its employees and their families against using even federally legal CBD products last year. The federal legalization of hemp and its derivatives has complicated CBP’s enforcement efforts, prompting officials to seek portable marijuana analyzers to swiftly identify cannabinoid profiles and differentiate between marijuana and hemp.


Lankford’s opposition to the policy change is unsurprising, given his longstanding reputation as a fervent prohibitionist. For instance, last September, he spearheaded a separate letter urging the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to reject a recommendation to reschedule cannabis.


Potential Impact on Border Security and Drug Interdiction Efforts


Senator Lankford is concerned about more than just the short-term effects of shorter qualifying periods for recruits to the Border Patrol. He predicts a chain reaction that may make border security and drug interdiction efforts less successful. Lankford contends that CBP runs the danger of admitting people who may have engaged in criminal activity in the past, especially those connected to transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), by loosening the scrutiny on prior marijuana usage. Because TCOs frequently take advantage of gaps in border control to move narcotics, weapons, and people across international borders, such links directly endanger national security.


Furthermore, Lankford questions the reliability of background checks and polygraph tests in identifying individuals with ties to criminal organizations, particularly given the evolving nature of drug-related crimes. The shortened review period may not provide sufficient time to uncover deeper associations or patterns of behavior indicative of criminal involvement. This, in turn, could lead to the infiltration of Border Patrol ranks by individuals sympathetic to or actively engaged in illicit activities, compromising the integrity of the agency and its mission to safeguard the nation’s borders.


Lankford’s worries about the wider social effects of permissive marijuana laws among law enforcement agencies go beyond the direct security ramifications. He argues that CBP’s decision may undermine attempts to curb drug misuse and related criminal activity by sending a message of tolerance toward drug use. It also calls into doubt the coherence of federal drug enforcement initiatives, particularly given disparate state legalization policies for marijuana. Lankford highlights the necessity of a unified strategy for border security and drug control, one that respects federal authority while taking into account the intricacies of changing state laws.


Bottom Line


Senator James Lankford’s staunch opposition to the recent policy change by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, which shortened the term of ineligibility for Border Patrol recruits due to past marijuana use, underscores concerns about potential risks to national security and the integrity of law enforcement agencies. His apprehensions regarding the infiltration of criminal elements into the Border Patrol workforce, coupled with doubts about the efficacy of screening procedures, highlight the broader implications of drug policy shifts within federal agencies. Lankford’s stance emphasizes the importance of maintaining stringent standards in border security efforts while navigating the complex landscape of state and federal marijuana regulations.





Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Can Florida Pull 60% of the Votes Needed on Election Night to Pass Legal Weed?




florida votes on recreational cannabis and abortion

In a blow to Gov. Ron DeSantis and other Florida conservatives opposed to the measure, the state’s Supreme Court on Monday approved a recreational marijuana constitutional amendment for the November 2024 statewide ballot.


The proposal, known as Amendment 3, will legalize the “non-medical personal use of marijuana products and marijuana accessories by an adult” 21 or older if approved by 60% or more of statewide voters. It would take effect six months after the election.


The cannabis industry may have a secret “ace card” up their sleeve if Ohio is any indication off liberal voter turnout.  You may remember that Ohio voted on cannabis legalization and abortion rights on the same ballot and voting night last year.  This dual liberal ballot caused a swell or women and liberals to hit the voting booths, passing both measures in the same night.  Florida finds itself in the same situation this November, with abortion rights on the same ballot.  A “two birds, one stone” voting night may happen again as more liberals and women come out to vote.


In 2021, the court rejected two proposed constitutional amendments for recreational marijuana. But this time five justices ruled favorably on the measure with only two opposing.


The amendment was the subject of a multi-million-dollar campaign, spearheaded by Smart & Safe Florida, a group that’s collected more than $40 million in recent years. Two dozen states have already legalized recreational weed.


The Florida amendment would allow non-medical marijuana possession of up to 3 ounces, with no more than 5 grams in concentrated form.


To get a measure on the Florida ballot, supporters must first get 891,523 signatures from residents. The Supreme Court then must decide whether the amendment language sticks to a single subject and isn’t misleading, which can be a difficult threshold to overcome.


But, for the majority of justices, it met that bar.


In light of those limited considerations, we approve the proposed amendment for placement on the ballot,” Justice Jamie Grosshans, appointed by Gov. Ron DeSantis, in the majority opinion.


The state Supreme Court Monday also effectively upheld a six-week abortion ban but also OK’d a ballot measure that would guarantee access to abortion, even further raising the stakes of an already pivotal presidential election.


Florida’s Attorney General Against Legalization of Recreational Cannabis


Ashley Moody, the attorney general of Florida, expressed her disapproval of the recreational marijuana ballot issue, claiming it was deceptive and did not satisfy the required requirements.


Additionally, Moody’s chastised the proposal for supposedly benefiting Trulieve, the biggest medicinal marijuana provider in the state and the main source of money for Smart & Safe Florida. Kim Rivers, the CEO of Trulieve, praised the court’s ruling and said she was looking forward to helping the campaign move closer to the autumn ballot.


The legalization of medical marijuana in Florida stemmed from a 2016 ballot measure approved by over 71% of voters. Previous polls have indicated broad support among Floridians for the 2024 recreational marijuana measure.


While Governor DeSantis, who has appointed five of the court’s seven justices, had anticipated the court’s approval of the recreational marijuana measure, he recently expressed concerns about its potential impact. Specifically, he mentioned worries about the odor and the lack of restrictions on where and when marijuana could be consumed, including near schools. He criticized the broad language of the amendment, stating it was the most extensive he had encountered.


Justice Meredith Sasso, appointed by DeSantis and one of the dissenting voices, believed the amendment misled voters, citing its language regarding the “allowance” of recreational marijuana.


Moody argued in court filings that describing the amendment as “allowing” marijuana use is misleading, as marijuana remains illegal federally, despite its legality in over 20 other states. However, Justice Grosshans, writing for the majority, found the amendment’s summary not misleading, noting the court’s prior rulings on medical marijuana and its jurisdiction over state, not federal, law.


Potential Implications for Florida’s Cannabis Industry


There has been much conjecture on the significant consequences that Amendment 3’s passage by the Florida Supreme Court may have for the state’s rapidly expanding cannabis sector. Leading companies in the field, including Florida’s well-known medical marijuana supplier Trulieve, are positioned to profit from the growing market as recreational marijuana use gets closer to approval. With the potential to solidify its position as a leading participant in the medical and recreational cannabis sectors, Trulieve’s significant financial support of Smart & Safe Florida’s campaign highlights the company’s strategic interest in the amendment’s successful passage.


However, alongside established players like Trulieve, the legalization of recreational marijuana is expected to spur increased competition within Florida’s cannabis market. As the state opens its doors to non-medical cannabis use, new entrants are likely to emerge, seeking to seize a slice of the lucrative market pie. This influx of competition could lead to innovations in product offerings, retail experiences, and branding strategies as companies vie for consumer attention and loyalty in an increasingly crowded marketplace.


Furthermore, Amendment 3’s adoption is likely to change Florida’s cannabis laws about retail, wholesale, and growing. The elements of the amendment, such as possession limitations and regulatory frameworks, will be crucial in determining the operational parameters that enterprises in the state’s cannabis market must adhere to. Stakeholders in the sector are keeping a close eye on changes as politicians and regulatory bodies strive to create rules for compliance and enforcement. This is so they can efficiently manage the constantly changing regulatory landscape.


Political Ramifications and Public Opinion on Recreational Marijuana


The approval of Amendment 3 by the Florida Supreme Court not only carries significant implications for the state’s cannabis industry but also holds substantial political ramifications. Governor Ron DeSantis, who has appointed the majority of the justices on the court, had previously expressed mixed sentiments regarding the legalization of recreational marijuana. While anticipating the court’s approval, DeSantis recently voiced concerns about potential societal impacts, including odor concerns and the absence of stringent consumption restrictions, especially in proximity to educational institutions.


In addition to DeSantis’s stance, the passage of Amendment 3 amplifies the ongoing discourse surrounding recreational marijuana at both the state and national levels. Florida’s Attorney General, Ashley Moody, echoed concerns about the amendment’s language and its potential to mislead voters. The debate surrounding the amendment reflects broader discussions on the legalization of cannabis across the United States, with advocates emphasizing social equity, criminal justice reform, and economic opportunities, while opponents highlight public health and safety concerns.


The public’s perception of marijuana use for recreational purposes in Florida seems to be changing despite differing opinions. Voters overwhelmingly supported the legalization of medical marijuana in 2016, demonstrating the increasing acceptability of cannabis use for therapeutic purposes. Recent polling indicates a similar trend in support of legalizing cannabis for recreational use, reflecting Floridians’ changing views on the drug. The result of the Amendment 3 vote will not only influence Florida’s cannabis industry but also act as a gauge for larger social views toward marijuana legalization in the US as the state prepares for the November 2024 election.


Bottom Line


The approval of Amendment 3 by the Florida Supreme Court marks a significant milestone in the state’s journey towards the potential legalization of recreational marijuana. Despite opposition from Governor Ron DeSantis and other conservatives, the amendment’s passage signals a shift in public opinion and could have far-reaching consequences for Florida’s cannabis industry, political landscape, and societal norms. As stakeholders navigate the evolving regulatory environment and prepare for the upcoming ballot in November 2024, all eyes will be on the outcome of the vote and its impact on the future of marijuana policy in the Sunshine State.





Source link

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media