Connect with us

Cannabis News

Was the Woman Who Stabbed Her Boyfriend 100x and Blamed Weed Part of a New PsyOps Program?

Published

on


psych ops cannabis

Ganja Theory – Is the Bryn Spejcher Killing a PsyOp?

 

In a world riddled with complex narratives and covert agendas, the term “PsyOp” or Psychological Operation, has become a critical concept in understanding the manipulation of public perception. Originating from military strategy, PsyOps are operations intended to convey selected information and indicators to audiences, influencing their emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately, the behavior of governments, organizations, groups, and individuals. The purpose? To induce or reinforce behavior favorable to the originator’s objectives.

 

Historically, PsyOps have been used in various contexts. During World War II, for instance, false radio broadcasts and leaflets were used to mislead enemy troops. In the Cold War era, the use of media and propaganda to shape political sentiment was rampant. Even in modern times, the internet and social media have become fertile ground for such operations, blurring the lines between truth and manipulation.

 

However, what happens when the principles of PsyOps infiltrate into everyday narratives, particularly those concerning public health and safety? This brings us to a peculiar case that recently sparked a lightbulb moment in my mind – the story of Bryn Spejcher.

 

Bryn Spejcher, a woman who brutally murdered her boyfriend Chad O’Melia after allegedly taking a hit from a bong, claimed that cannabis induced a psychotic state leading to the crime. Strangely, her punishment was a mere 100 hours of community service and two years probation, a sentence that’s bewilderingly lenient for such a violent act. Furthermore, the lack of substantial psychiatric evaluation or any prison time for manslaughter raises eyebrows. Instead, Spejcher was sent out to propagate the “ills of cannabis.”

 

The light sentence and the subsequent narrative shift towards cannabis-induced psychosis seem too orchestrated, too convenient. Could this be a contemporary example of a PsyOp, specifically targeting the public’s perception of cannabis? The modus operandi fits: use a real, tragic event and spin a narrative that serves a broader agenda – in this case, painting cannabis in a negative light.

 

When one begins to peel back the layers and compare similar stories, a pattern emerges, aligning eerily with tactics previously seen in PsyOps. Are we witnessing a sophisticated and sinister ploy to sway public opinion against cannabis using Spejcher’s case as a vehicle?

 

Let’s delve deeper into this intriguing possibility and unravel whether the Bryn Spejcher killing is more than just a tragic crime, but a calculated PsyOp with far-reaching implications in the ongoing discourse around cannabis.

 

 

The Bryn Spejcher case is an extraordinary tale that not only stirs deep emotions but also invokes a sense of déjà vu for those familiar with the history of cannabis propaganda. Spejcher’s story, with its bizarrely lenient sentencing for a brutal crime, serves as a stark reminder of the power of narrative framing in shaping public perception, especially regarding cannabis.

 

Spejcher received a sentence so mild it borders on the incredulous for the murder of Chad O’Melia. Even accepting her claim of cannabis-induced psychosis at face value, the punishment stands in stark contrast to the gravity of her actions. Her role now, as a spokesperson warning about the dangers of cannabis, seems less like retribution and more like a strategic move in a broader narrative.

 

This turn of events echoes a familiar tone for those of us who have been in the trenches of cannabis journalism for over a decade. It’s reminiscent of the tactics employed by Henry Anslinger, a name synonymous with the early criminalization of cannabis and the propagation of “Reefer Madness.”

Anslinger, the first commissioner of the U.S. Treasury Department’s Federal Bureau of Narcotics, was notorious for his role in demonizing cannabis.

 

His methods were not just about law enforcement; they were a comprehensive campaign that leveraged racism and mass hysteria. Collaborating with influential figures like William Randolph Hearst and the DuPont family, Anslinger fueled a propaganda machine that churned out sensational and often wildly fabricated stories about the effects of cannabis.

 

During the height of the Reefer Madness era, the public was bombarded with tales of insanity, violence, and moral decay – all supposedly caused by cannabis. These narratives were strategically crafted to instill fear and justify the stringent regulations and harsh penalties for cannabis use. Anslinger’s racist and alarmist rhetoric painted cannabis as a scourge that needed to be eradicated, a message that was effectively disseminated through media and policy.

 

The case of Bryn Spejcher, in its handling and subsequent narrative, seems to be a modern iteration of this age-old tactic. The light sentence and the pivot to a public anti-cannabis crusade bear an uncanny resemblance to the fear-mongering techniques of the past. It’s as if the shadows of Reefer Madness loom over this case, hinting at a possible orchestrated effort to reignite old fears and biases against cannabis.

 

This striking parallel raises critical questions about the underlying motives and the potential players behind such a narrative. Are we witnessing a contemporary PsyOp, a carefully orchestrated campaign using Spejcher’s story to sway public opinion and policy on cannabis? The similarity to Anslinger’s methods cannot be overlooked, suggesting a possible resurgence of old propaganda tactics in new garb.

 

As we delve deeper into the Spejcher case, it’s crucial to maintain a critical eye and question the narratives being presented. History has shown us the power of propaganda, especially when it comes to cannabis, and the Spejcher case might just be the latest chapter in this ongoing saga.

 

 

While not venturing into the realm of outright denial of the events that transpired, there is a need to critically examine the narrative surrounding Spejcher’s claim of cannabis-induced psychosis. Is it a case of genuine mental health crisis or a convenient plot point in a larger narrative?

 

The reality of the situation is stark. The crime committed by Spejcher was real and horrific. However, the claim of psychosis induced by cannabis consumption raises doubts, especially considering the background and context. It’s plausible that Spejcher might indeed be a disturbed individual with underlying psychological issues, and the cannabis angle could be either a red herring or a trigger, not the root cause.

 

The leniency of her sentence is where the plot thickens. Such a mild punishment for a violent crime is not just unusual; it’s alarming. This judicial decision sets a dangerous precedent and fits neatly into the age-old narrative of “weed kills,” a slogan reminiscent of the Reefer Madness era. It’s a narrative that’s been debunked time and again, yet it resurfaces, repackaged for a modern audience.

 

This leniency could potentially be leveraged to weave a social narrative aligning with prohibitionist views. The case could be referenced in future legal contexts, citing the dangers of marijuana as a justification for maintaining tight control over its use and distribution. The “Spejcher defense” might become a template for similar cases, artificially inflating the instances of cannabis-induced violence.

 

This manipulation of public perception serves the interests of those advocating for continued prohibition and criminalization of cannabis. It overlooks the reality that millions consume cannabis without resorting to violence, even when using potent strains. The case of Bryn Spejcher, therefore, becomes more than a tragic crime; it transforms into a tool for those aiming to uphold a prohibitionist stance, by instilling fear and justifying stringent regulations. This careful orchestration of events and narratives raises the question: Are we witnessing a sophisticated PsyOp in play?

 

 

Label me a skeptic, or even call me crazy, but the Spejcher case echoes a disturbing trend in the history of cannabis legislation and propaganda. It’s a familiar tale, where mental illness is conveniently intertwined with cannabis use to justify stringent laws and societal paranoia.

 

Take, for instance, the infamous tale peddled by Harry Anslinger, the architect of cannabis prohibition. He once spun a yarn about a young man in Florida who, after a single puff of marijuana, gruesomely murdered his family with an axe. The truth was starkly different: the individual was suffering from severe psychotic schizophrenia, with or without cannabis. Yet, this story became a cornerstone of the Reefer Madness era, shaping public opinion and policy for decades.

 

Fast forward to the Spejcher case, and we see a hauntingly similar narrative. Spejcher claimed she had to kill her boyfriend and a dog to “come back to life” from a perceived state of death, a narrative eerily mirroring the Florida incident. It portrays Spejcher as someone who, facing an existential dilemma, chose homicide as a route to self-preservation. If true, this paints a portrait of a deeply troubled individual, far beyond the reach of mere cannabis-induced psychosis.

 

Yet, it’s the sentencing that raises the most significant red flags. In a scenario where the psychotic break was real, one would expect rigorous psychiatric intervention and long-term observation. Instead, Spejcher’s story becomes a platform for anti-cannabis rhetoric, her sentence a mere slap on the wrist. This leniency is perplexing, especially considering the severity of the crime.

 

There’s also another point we haven’t even touched on… “If the roles were reversed” would a man receive the same lenient treatment for murdering his girlfriend while under the influence of cannabis? Are we truly equal under law or is it a system of control like religion? It’s a rhetorical question that highlights the gender biases and double standards in our legal system.

 

The Spejcher case, in essence, could be seen as a modern-day PsyOp, echoing the tactics used by Anslinger. It utilizes a blend of mental health issues and cannabis consumption to perpetuate fear and justify continued prohibition. This narrative not only shapes public opinion but also influences future legal proceedings, potentially setting dangerous precedents in the adjudication of cannabis-related crimes.

 

 

As we wrap up this deep dive into the Spejcher case, the lingering question remains: Is it a carefully orchestrated PsyOp or not? From my vantage point, justice seems to have taken a backseat here. The leniency of the sentence, the narrative spun around cannabis-induced psychosis, and the historical echoes of similar cases all point towards a potential PsyOp.

 

Let’s face it, the ruling class has a track record that can often be questioned. Just take a cursory glance at the number of lawmakers with legal troubles – it’s an eye-opener. This case could very well be another instance where those in power manipulate narratives to serve their ends, especially in matters concerning cannabis.

 

So, what’s your take on this Ganja Theory? Is it a plausible scenario, or am I just high on my own supply? Chime in with your thoughts and let’s keep unraveling these tangled narratives together.

 

THE MURDER BLAMED ON CANNABIS PSYCHOSIS, READ ON…

CANNABIS PSYCHOSIS MURDER CASE

COMMIT MUDER, BLAME THE WEED, GET 100 HOURS OF COMMUNITY SERVICE?



Source link

Cannabis News

The One Thing Every Cannabis Consumer Should Know? Reddit Users Give Insider Weed Tips for the Ages!

Published

on

By


reddit on cannabis discussion

What is something every cannabis consumer should know? Reddit Answers!

 

Individual expertise is often lauded as the pinnacle of knowledge, the concept of the “wisdom of crowds” emerges as a fascinating counterpoint, proving that collective intelligence can, in many instances, surpass the insight of any single person. This phenomenon, where group consensus leads to astonishingly accurate judgments, predictions, or solutions, hinges on the diversity of opinions, independence of contributors, and a means of aggregating these varied perspectives into a coherent whole. From predicting election outcomes to estimating the weight of an ox at a county fair, the wisdom of crowds has demonstrated its efficacy time and again, challenging the notion that experts alone hold the keys to knowledge.

 

Cannabis culture, with its rich tapestry of traditions, rituals, and shared experiences, serves as a prime example of this collective wisdom in action. Throughout history, cannabis users have passed down a repository of knowledge, from cultivation tips to consumption etiquette like the emblematic “puff, puff, pass” rule, ensuring that the communal pipe circulates in an orderly fashion. These unwritten rules and shared practices form a body of knowledge that is both practical and profound, embodying the spirit of community and mutual respect that defines cannabis culture.

 

Delving into the digital age, this tradition of shared wisdom has found a new home on platforms like Reddit, where communities of cannabis enthusiasts gather to exchange advice, experiences, and insights. One thread, in particular, stands out as a modern-day gathering around the proverbial campfire: a question posed to the masses, “What is something that you believe every cannabis user should know?” The responses to this inquiry offer a window into the collective psyche of the cannabis community, revealing a blend of humor, caution, and wisdom that can only emerge from a chorus of voices, each contributing their unique perspective to the conversation.

 

This article aims to explore the rich tapestry of advice, tips, and life lessons shared by Reddit’s cannabis community. By examining the most poignant, practical, and sometimes humorous responses, we’ll uncover the essential wisdom that every cannabis consumer, from the novice to the connoisseur, should know. Join us as we navigate through the smoke and mirrors, guided by the collective insight of countless individuals who have traversed the path of cannabis consumption before us.

 

 

The cannabis community is nothing if not generous with its collective knowledge. From age-old adages to modern consumption tips, the shared wisdom among cannabis enthusiasts is a testament to the plant’s communal spirit. A recent dive into a Reddit thread has unearthed some gems of advice that stand out not only for their practicality but for their reflection of the community’s core values. Here are some of the top-voted comments and why they’re crucial for every cannabis user to know:

 

You can use pipe cleaners to clean your pipes.

 

This piece of advice may seem straightforward, yet it’s a game-changer for anyone new to cannabis or those who have been improvising their cleaning methods. Pipe cleaners, originally designed for tobacco pipes, are perfectly sized and flexible enough to navigate the twists and turns of most cannabis pipes, ensuring a thorough clean. Keeping your pipe clean is not just about aesthetics; it’s about health, ensuring each hit is as pure and enjoyable as the first.

 

2When deciding how many edibles…You can always take more, but you can’t take less.

 

Edibles can be a delicious and effective way to consume cannabis, but their delayed onset can catch even experienced users off guard. This advice is a crucial reminder of the importance of dosing cautiously. By starting low and going slow, users can avoid uncomfortable experiences and find the dose that brings them the most pleasure and relief.

 

Stay hydrated.

 

Cottonmouth isn’t just an annoyance; it’s a sign that your body needs hydration. Cannabis can decrease saliva production, leading to dry mouth, which can be mitigated by keeping a bottle of water handy. Staying hydrated enhances the experience, ensuring you’re comfortable and focused on enjoying the high, not distracted by thirst.

 

If you have an underlying mental health disorder, cannabis can negatively amplify the symptoms.

 

Cannabis affects everyone differently, and for those with mental health conditions, it can sometimes exacerbate symptoms. This advice underscores the importance of self-awareness and possibly consulting with a healthcare provider to understand how cannabis interacts with mental health on an individual basis.

 

It affects your memory, as well as your memory.

 

This humorous comment highlights a well-known side effect of cannabis: short-term memory impairment. While usually temporary and often seen as part of the fun, it’s a gentle reminder to be mindful of your consumption, especially if you have responsibilities that require sharp recall.

 

Going for surgery? Tell the Anesthesia doctors that you smoke, and don’t lie about how much you smoke.

 

Cannabis can affect how the body responds to anesthesia, potentially requiring adjustments to dosages. Being honest with medical professionals ensures you receive the safest and most effective care, emphasizing the importance of transparency in all healthcare discussions involving cannabis.

 

It hits some folks very differently than others.

 

Cannabis’s effects can vary widely from person to person due to differences in body chemistry, tolerance, and the strain consumed. This diversity in experiences is a reminder of the subjective nature of cannabis use and the importance of finding what works best for you.

 

Cross joints are not worth the structural effort unless you are doing it for the swag points.

While a cross joint might look cool, thanks to popular culture, the effort to reward ratio is often skewed. This comment humorously points out that simpler methods of consumption are just as effective, if not more so.

 

Weed isn’t a personality.

 

Cannabis culture is rich and diverse, but it’s vital to remember that your worth isn’t tied to your consumption habits. This advice champions authenticity and finding a community that values you for who you are, not just for your shared interest in cannabis.

 

You smell like weed, you’re just smell blind to it

 

Cannabis has a strong, distinctive smell that can linger on clothes and in hair. This practical reminder is crucial for anyone who needs to maintain a certain discretion about their consumption, highlighting the importance of being mindful of your surroundings and the impression you leave.

 

Each of these pieces of advice from Reddit’s cannabis community embodies a blend of practicality, caution, and humor. Together, they form a guidebook for respectful, safe, and enjoyable cannabis consumption, reflecting the collective wisdom that makes the cannabis culture so unique and supportive.

 

 

The collective wisdom shared by the cannabis community on platforms like Reddit isn’t just anecdotal chatter; it’s a profound accumulation of experiences, trials, and errors that have been upvoted into the thousands, sometimes tens of thousands. These numbers are not mere metrics; they represent a communal nod of agreement, an acknowledgment that “Yes, this is the truth as we know it.” The practical tips, cautionary tales, and humorous observations that have resonated most profoundly within this community underscore a deep and nuanced understanding of cannabis and its effects on the body, mind, and social fabric.

 

These top comments, highlighted for their popularity and relevance, serve as guiding lights for anyone navigating the vast and sometimes overwhelming world of cannabis. They paint a picture of a community deeply aware of the plant’s powers and pitfalls. From the importance of starting low and going slow with edibles to the necessity of staying hydrated, these insights underscore the respect and mindfulness with which cannabis should be approached. Moreover, the discussions around mental health and the need for honesty with medical professionals about cannabis use reflect a mature, responsible stance towards consumption that prioritizes safety and health.

 

For newcomers to cannabis, the wisdom encapsulated in these Reddit threads is invaluable. It’s a distillation of countless personal journeys with the plant, offering a roadmap through potential challenges and towards more enriching experiences. If you’re new to cannabis, taking a long, hard think about what’s been written here isn’t just advisable; it’s essential. These insights offer a foundation upon which to build your own relationship with cannabis, informed by the collective experiences of a community that spans the globe.

 

The sticky bottom line is this: the cannabis community’s shared wisdom, as demonstrated in these top comments, reveals a sophisticated, multifaceted relationship with the plant. It’s a relationship characterized by enjoyment, caution, and an ongoing commitment to learning and sharing knowledge. For anyone embarking on their cannabis journey, there’s perhaps no better starting point than the lived experiences of those who have walked the path before. In this community’s wisdom, there’s a wealth of knowledge waiting to be tapped into, ensuring that your journey with cannabis is as safe, enjoyable, and enriching as possible.

 

REDDIT ON CANNABIS, READ ON…

REDDIT CANNABIS TIPS

THE REDDIT GUIDE TO HEALTHY CANNABIS HABITS, READ THIS!

 



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Australia Cannabis: Recreational Use Legislation Update

Published

on

By


Australia is said to have one of the highest cannabis prevalence rates in the world and public attitudes to its use are shifting. North American, European and other cannabis companies looking for investment opportunities would do well to follow these shifts.

Growing cannabis for medicinal and scientific purposes was legalized under federal law in 2016. Low-THC hemp foods were then legalized federally in 2017. Recreational use, though, remains prohibited under federal law. Similarly, at the state and territory level it is mostly illegal to use, possess, grow, and sell cannabis. Despite these continuing prohibitions, there are legislative trends toward legalization.

If passed, the Legalising Cannabis Bill 2023 would change the federal landscape. It would legalize cannabis for adult recreational use in Australia. The Bill would establish the Cannabis Australia National Agency as a statutory agency to register cannabis strains and regulate cannabis activities. These activities include growing and possessing plants, manufacturing and selling cannabis products, operating cannabis cafes, and importing and exporting cannabis products.

The Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee is presently conducting an inquiry into the Bill. Submissions have now closed and public hearings have opened. The Committee’s reporting date is May 31, 2024. The Bill is expected to be debated in federal parliament later this year. At the same time, cannabis legalization bills are now being debated in several Australian states.

Despite shifting public attitudes, federal legalization may still be a way off. While the federal Bill has been promoted by a minority party, it does not enjoy the support of the ruling party or the major opposition party. It also lacks the support of the Australian Medical Association.

Stay tuned for updates on Legalising Cannabis Bill 2023 and all thing Australian cannabis. And please reach out to us if you are interested in doing business in Australia.



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Why Is Everyone Suddenly Eating Magic Mushrooms and Having Wild Sex?

Published

on

By


magic mushrooms and sex

New Study Reveals That Magic Mushroom Consumers Have Better Sex Lives


Magic mushrooms have been on a heyday, thanks to the numerous health and therapeutic benefits it has been proven to offer. These include, but are not limited to: treating anxiety and depression, PTSD, OC, suicidal thoughts, and other mental illnesses.

However, we’re only starting to discover the myriad of benefits that the humble magic mushroom has. Now, there’s even new science suggesting that psilocybin can help improve sex lives.

 

In what is believed to be the first-ever study to delve deeper into the connections between sex and arousal with magic mushrooms, researchers have discovered fascinating findings. Investigators at the Imperial College London surveyed almost 300 individuals before and after taking magic mushrooms. They focused on two subject groups: individuals who consumed psychedelics for recreation or wellness, and those who were consuming it for clinical study purposes to analyze its impacts on depression. Thanks to the data, they were able to pull incredible insight into the link between sex and psychedelic experiences.


The data shows that on average, there are improvements on several areas pertaining to sexual function for as long as 6 months after psychedelic experiences. Psychedelic consumption has been shown to positively impact arousal, sexual satisfaction, enjoyment, self-esteem, connection, communication, and attraction to one’s partner – all of which contribute to better sex lives. For the group who were taking magic mushrooms as part of a clinical trial for depression, nearly half experienced improvements when it came to interest in sex, satisfaction, and arousal. In contrast, individuals who are treated with popular pharmaceutical antidepressants usually say that their sex lives are negatively impacted.

 

“We believe this is the first scientific study to explore the effects of psychedelics on sexual functioning. Our findings suggest potential implications for conditions that negatively affect sexual health, including clinical depression and anxiety,” said Tomasso Barba, the study’s first author, and a PhD candidate at the Centre for Psychedelic Research.

 

“This is particularly significant given that sexual dysfunction, often induced by antidepressants, frequently results in people stopping these medications and subsequently relapsing,” they added.  


In addition, it’s nothing short of fascinating that the results showed that the improvements in sexual function were observed for up to 6 months among some participants. However, it’s important to note they didn’t study performance while high on the drug, which is how many people on psychedelics experiment with sex: while on magic mushrooms.

 

“It’s important to stress our work does not focus on what happens to sexual functioning while people are on psychedelics, and we are not talking about perceived ‘sexual performance’,   they emphasized.

 

They do call for more studies on the subject. “While the findings are indeed interesting, we are still far from a clear clinical application, because psychedelics are yet to be integrated into the medical system. In future, we may be able to see a clinical application, but more research is needed,” said Dr. David Erritzoe.

 

Can Psychedelics Unlock The Key To Better, More Satisfying Sex?

As millions of us are plagued by mental health disorders, ranging from everyday anxiety to more severe depression, our sex lives will naturally suffer.


It is known that for many of us, especially women, mental health is critical to sexual satisfaction and pleasure. Sure, it’s an integral part of being human – experiencing sexual joy and arousal, but when we’re suffering from hard-to-treat mental conditions, it can be difficult to enjoy sex. Perhaps that’s where the potential of psychedelics, such as magic mushrooms, come in.

 

When one is struggling with family conditioning, previous traumas, depression, and self-acceptance, pleasure can be shameful and even painful to even address. But psychedelics can help open us up mentally, and challenge past thoughts that have to do with social conditioning, receiving love and pleasure. All in all, psychedelics can help create new mental pathways that make it easier for us to receive pleasure.

 

These days, it’s no longer uncommon for couples to medicate with psychedelics together. And we don’t just mean magic mushrooms: MDMA, LSD, and ayahuasca are other forms of healing psychedelics that can help couples work through their own traumas and issues together, and as a result, enjoy better sex.

 

In another study from 2021, researchers utilized interviews to conduct a qualitative study to understand the impact of microdosing MDMA on male and female couples whose ages ranged from 20 to 35 years old. The interview questions were focused on how microdosing psychedelics affected their sexuality, confidence, relationship satisfaction, inhibition, and openness.

The participants reported that microdosing did indeed have a positive effect on sexual well-being as well as other aspects, most especially because of its ability to reduce anxiety and stress. As a result, they experienced heightened sexual pleasure, desire, and communication. Overall, they reported better sex and they attributed it to microdosing.

 

Conclusion

 

Aside from these studies, psychedelics are already an accepted tool for young people all around the world to help them improve many aspects of their lives, including sex. It is becoming clear that the ability of psychedelics to help where pharmaceutical medications fail in treating everyday mental illnesses and stress that hinder sex lives, can transform how we relate, show up, and communicate in our intimate relationships. We hope to see more studies on the subject so we can learn more about the specifics involved, and the magic that psychedelics brings into human lives.

 

CANNABIS AND SEX, DOES IT HELP OR HURT, READ ON…

MARIJUANA AND SEX STUDY

BONING WHILE STONING – WHAT MARIJUANA DOES TO YOU DURING SEX!



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media