Connect with us

Cannabis News

Trump ‘Supports’ Hemp THC Ban That’s Advancing In Senate, White House Says

Published

4 weeks ago

on

President Donald Trump “endorses it.” He proposed banning THC-containing hemp products included in the Senate spending billA White House spokesman says cannabis, alcohol and other interests are continuing efforts to influence the final deal.

A day after the Senate passed the debt relief package – with provisions that would effectively wipe out the market for hemp operators – a White House staffer told NBC News that the president “supports the current language in the hemp bill.”

While Trump endorsed cannabis reform on the campaign trail (including a pending marijuana redistricting proposal), he has also expressed concern about the non-medical use of cannabis. In his first term, he signed the 2018 Farm Bill that federally legalized hemp and its derivatives, but has been less vocal on issues related to cannabis’ cousin.

Now, eager for a plan to reopen the government amid a historic shutdown, the White House says it stands by the controversial ban, which is just one part of a larger legislative package.

Marijuana Moments reached out to the White House for additional comment, but a representative was not immediately available.

Meanwhile, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) hasn’t thrown in the towel yet, introducing an amendment calling for the leader to crack down on hemp language altogether.

But there are many competing voices on the issue, including a coalition of alcohol companies that sent a letter to senators Monday urging them to back the current language.

The American Distilled Spirits Alliance (ADSA), the Beer Institute (BI), the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States (DISCUS), Wine America and the Wine Institute said in the letter that Paul’s “short-sighted actions could threaten the delicately balanced deal to reopen the federal government.”

“Producers of alcoholic beverages, one of the most highly regulated consumer products, are calling on the Senate to reject Senator Paul’s attempts to allow hemp-derived THC products to be sold across the country without federal regulation and oversight,” it says. “We stand ready to work with Congress and the Administration to enact meaningful regulations that protect consumers and ensure a safe and orderly marketplace for these toxic products when this loophole is addressed.”

The alcohol companies individually pushed the Congress stand on the hemp ban in a letter to the leader last week.

Under current law, cannabis products are considered legal hemp if they contain less than 0.3 percent delta-9 THC by dry weight.

The new legislation specifies that, within a year of taking effect, the weight will be applied to all THC—including delta-8 and other isomers. Also, “as tetrahydrocannabinol (or any other marketed cannabinoid) with similar effects in humans or animals (as determined by the Secretary of Health and Human Services).”

The new definition of legal hemp would also prohibit “any hemp-derived cannabinoid intermediate product marketed or sold as an end product or directly to an end consumer for personal or household use,” as well as products containing cannabinoids that are synthesized or manufactured outside of the cannabis plant or that cannot be produced naturally by the plant.

Legal hemp products would be limited to a total of 0.4 milligrams of total THC or any other cannabinoid with similar effects per container.

Within 90 days of the bill’s passage, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other agencies would be required to “publish a list of all cannabinoids known to FDA to be naturally produced by a Cannabis sativa L. plant, as reflected in the peer-reviewed literature,” “all tetrahydrocannabinol classes known to be plants of the cannabinoid class known” and “all cannabinoids” known to occur naturally. Cannabinoids that have or are marketed as having effects similar to cannabinoids of the tetrahydrocannabinol class.”

The language differs slightly from provisions in legislation advanced out of the House and Senate Appropriations panels, which would have banned products with “quantifiable” amounts of THC, to be determined by the HHS secretary and the agriculture secretary.

Separately, the newly released appropriations legislation omits language passed by the House earlier this year. let VA doctors recommend medical cannabis to their military veteran patients in states where it is legal.

The appropriations bill’s progress comes amid a push by parties on both sides of the hemp debate as they negotiate a deal to influence Congress.

For example, last week more than 50 alcohol distributors have come together Oppose efforts in Congress to ban hemp products containing THCinsisting to lawmakers that as demand for alcohol has “declined”, the cannabis market has helped sustain their industry.

It is interesting that there is a special distribution among the agents of alcohol, many of them have reported lobbying on hemp issues this year. There seems to be disagreement on the way forward between the wholesalers that distribute alcohol and hemp products and the big brands that market their drinks.

A major consumer trade association, its member corporations include Coca-Cola, General Mills, Kraft Heinz and Nestlé. Pressuring Congress to ban THC-containing hemp products.

Meanwhile, a bipartisan group of 39 state and territory attorneys general recently petitioned Congress. clarifying the federal definition of hemp and imposing regulations preventing the sale of intoxicating cannabinoid products.

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison (D), who helped write that letter to congressional leaders last month, he defended his decision amid criticism from industry players and advocates He questioned why attorneys general in states with strong hemp markets like Minnesota would promote federal recriminalization of those products.

Two GOP lawmakers—Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD)—has committed to a complete ban on THC-containing hemp products. But others like Paul have insisted that such a policy change would destroy the industry. And Paul had warned before that he would go far stick to large-scale spending legislation if the entire ban is kept intact.

The senator also pushed back against a recent letter from state and territory attorneys general imploring Republican leaders to completely prevent the marketing of intoxicating hemp products.

—
It’s Marijuana Time tracking hundreds of cannabis, psychedelic and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters by pledging at least $25/month, you’ll get access to our interactive maps, charts, and audio calendars so you never miss a development.

Learn more about our marijuana bill tracking and become a Patreon supporter to gain access
—

As for legislative opportunities, Paul recently ran for the legislature This requires a study and report on the state’s regulatory models for hemp It could inform future revisions to the federal law—rather than outright banning sales, as McConnell wanted.

In August, McConnell – who pushed for federal hemp legalization under the 2018 Farm Bill – took to the Senate floor. criticized those who opposed the ban, including Paul.

Meanwhile, Paul recently introduced a stand-alone bill that would go in the opposite direction of the hemp ban, proposing to triple the concentration of THC that the crop could legally containaddressing several other concerns expressed by industry about federal regulations.

The senator introduced legislation in June called the Hemp Economic Mobilization Plan (HEMP) Act. It reflects versions backed up in recent sessions.

read it the letter Alcohol companies below on the proposed hemp ban:

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Become a patron on Patreon!

Related Topics:
Continue Reading

Cannabis News

The forgotten story behind autoflowering cannabis

Published

7 hours ago

on

December 6, 2025

By

Many of the things that are common in modern cannabis come from a time when curiosity about the plant could lead to real problems. With the market now dominated by hybrid genetics, it is a common belief that it is almost impossible to bring anything back to an original cultivar. However, many of these initial building blocks came from the first wave of cannabis exploration, when a handful of growers traveled across continents in search of unique local varieties. Nevil Schoenmakers was one of them, and what he spotted on the side of a highway during a trip to Turkey left a mark on the history of cannabis that has never been erased.

On the way to Turkey
Dwight Diotte of D9 Canna Consulting still remembers those early years. A time when the modern industry was just an idea and the world of cannabis lived in the shadows between one country and another. Everyone in that circle followed clues more than maps, and it all felt like a treasure hunt with pocket knives and curiosity.

So how did cannabis ruderalis enter the cannabis world. The story begins with a road trip. Nevil was moving through Eastern Europe on one of his journeys to find his seed when he saw something strange on a highway in Hungary. The plants, already in flower, stand out against the July heat. He stopped so suddenly that his car screeched. Then he ran across like someone who had just seen a myth pass by.

© Dwight Diotte

He took some branches and dried them in the car heater. He soon realized that what he found was something special. He paused again, and turned around. Turkey could wait. What he had just discovered demanded attention, “and perhaps saved him from a more dangerous detour,” Dwight notes. The Cold War was still very real and the borders of that region were not yet friendly to roving plant hunters.

Sparking the seeds of something new
By the time Dwight saw Nevil the following year in the Netherlands, the seeds of the mystery were already on the table. They were tiny, dark and impossible to germinate with the usual tricks. Dwight remembers gently cracking the pebbles and soaking them as Nevil thought animals might do in the wild. “It felt less like horticulture and more like archaeology,” Dwight recalls.

Once they sprouted, the surprise came quickly. These were no ordinary plants. They went from seed to flower oblivious to the light of day and seemed determined to complete their cycle, encouraged or not. The concept of autoflowering did not yet exist. “Nevil saw the plants blooming on the fifth or seventh node and understood that something new was on the table.”

This was the birth of the modern ruderalis work, although at the time no one was thinking in neat categories. “We were trying to understand what we found.”

Claiming ownership
Dwight wandered between Canada and Europe during those years and witnessed it all. He helped raise funds for what would later become the famous Cannabis Castle, watched the early grow in action and watched Nevil push ruderalis as far as he could before returning to his passion for long-flowering cannabis. “The Finola project was created in the mid-90s and its founders claimed credit for the autoflowering breakthrough, even though the genetics went back to the same region that Nevil had explored, if not the same plants as Nevil himself,” Dwight said.

Everyone involved in that era seemed to reinvent themselves every season. The seed companies changed their names. Growers moved between projects. Some developed legendary cultivars. Others disappeared completely from public life. Through it all, Nevil remained a figure who kept one foot in research mode and the other in business reality. When the Dutch tightened regulations in the nineties, the landscape changed again, and a series of legal dramas followed across continents. “A few years later the dust settled and life moved on, but the seeds of his legacy had already been planted.”

According to Dwight, many of the fog lines that dominate the shelves today have their origins in Nevil. “It’s the same in the autoflowering category. Even after turning his attention away from ruderalis, he produced work that breeders talk about in low tones and reverence.”

Heritage
Dwight still grows ruderalis for fun. He says that plants teach him things. He says that even after forty years they still amaze him. “Nevil Schoenmakers always worked with what he found and let the plants say what they wanted to be. But the evidence is hard to ignore. When the first little black seeds were opened in Hungary, the industry of the future cracked with them. And even today, every time an autoflower appears on a legal shelf anywhere in the world, a small part of that moment is still on the side of the road in Eastern Europe.”

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

World Health Organization Won’t Ease Coca Leaf Ban, Even As Review Found Prohibition Is More Dangerous Than The Plant

Published

7 hours ago

on

December 6, 2025

By

“It is unacceptable for humanity to demonize a sacred medicinal plant. It was a political decision rather than a scientific one.”

By Mattha Busby, Filter

The The World Health Organization had a historic opportunity to ease the strict global ban on the coca leaf-ban, campaigners said, “racist and colonial” the roots. But the agency has decided not to.

WHO expert review he determined in September how millions of people in the Andes consume the coca leaf daily as part of a long-standing cultural practice without significant negative effects, and conversely that coca control strategies are associated with significant public health harm.

And yet, on December 2nd, the WHO’s Expert Committee on Drug Dependence (ECDD) recommended that the plant be kept in Annex I of the United Nations drug treaties—the most restrictive category of control—because coca leaves can be converted relatively easily into cocaine.

“The simplicity of extracting cocaine from cocaine and its high yield and profitability are well known,” ECDD wrote. “The Commission has also examined evidence of significant increases in the cultivation of cocaine and the production of cocaine-related substances in the context of significant and growing public health concerns about the use of cocaine. In this context, the Commission believes that the reduction or elimination of international controls on the coca leaf may pose a particularly serious risk to public health.”

The commission noted a 34 percent year-on-year increase in cocaine production in 2023, with some countries experiencing historically high levels. But supporters of reform emphasize that coke is not cocaine. They point out that the WHO review supports the plant’s medical potential and the lack of evidence of problematic coca leaf use anywhere in the world — two key criteria a drug must meet to be placed on a less restrictive schedule.

“It is unacceptable for humanity to demonize a sacred medicinal plant”, Jaison Perez Villafaña, guardian of wisdom or mother From the Arhuaco community in Colombia, he said The filter. “It was a political decision rather than a scientific one. Coca leaf (help) is not to blame for the fact that humans with economic interests turned it into cocaine”.

The ECDD said it recognized that “the coca leaf has important cultural and therapeutic value to indigenous peoples and other communities and that there are exceptions to the traditional use of the coca leaf in certain national settings.” A coalition of indigenous coca leaf producers and consumers he wrote The WHO in October asked the UN body to “clearly distinguish” between traditional coca use and cocaine-related issues.

Steve Rolles, senior policy analyst at the Transform Drug Policy Foundation, called the WHO’s suggestion that keeping coca on Schedule 1 would limit cocaine production “ridiculous”, saying the decision exposed the “moral and scientific failure” of drug control worldwide.

“While we might expect them to emerge from political institutions embedded in drug war narratives, there was a sense that the more objective, scientific and nominally independent corners of the UN would maintain a level of pragmatism and principle, even if their recommendations were later rejected by UN political entities.” he wrote It’s LinkedIn.

“The dangers of cocaine powder or smoked crack cocaine, creations of the global North, which is also by far the largest market for both, depend on the traditional use of coca, chewed or in tea, which only occurs in the South,” added Rolles. “It is the global South where the burden of the failed war on cocaine and the criminalization of entire cultures is felt most acutely.”

In 2020, following a WHO recommendation, the United Nations Commission on Narcotic Drugs voted to ease international controls on cannabis, recognizing its medical value after decades of “referral madness”. For reform advocates, the decision represented a slow and delayed shift to evidence-based programming. That is why there was hope that the UN system could also separate the coca leaf — which contains less than 1 percent of the alkaloid cocaine — from the refined powder that feeds global demand.

However, coca will continue to be treated as if it has the same risk profile as cocaine, after a WHO review confirmed that coca chewing has not caused any documented deaths, is not associated with high addiction or “abuse” potential, and has possible therapeutic applications, from anti-inflammatory effects to modest improvements in post-meal glucose.

“The WHO decision is deeply disappointing and disturbing,” Ann Fordham, executive director of the International Council on Drug Policy, said in a press release. “This was no ordinary study, it was a critical test of the UN drug control system. The Commission has demonstrated that it cannot objectively assess the evidence or consider the human rights implications of prohibition. Instead, it has chosen to reinforce the racist and colonial foundations of international drug control. This decision makes it clear that the system is broken and resistant to meaningful reform.”

Experts have long argued that the logic behind the coca ban is selective and ignores existing treaty precedent. Plants such as ephedra used to manufacture methamphetamine, psilocybin-containing mushrooms, and cacti that produce mescaline remain unscheduled at the plant level, although they are used to produce controlled substances.

While open persecution of coca chewers has eased in the Andes, the ban still shapes daily life in parts of the region, from farmers losing crops to stopping aerial fumigation campaigns, eradication forces and communities caught between the networks that dominate the cocaine trade. In a September study, an independent group of experts hired by the WHO said that studies that showed exposure to harmful glyphosate-based pesticides such as Roundup, a probable carcinogen, by aerial spraying of coca crops by authorities “increased the number of abortions and increased the number of medical consultations related to dermatological and respiratory diseases in communities”.

The review added that another study showed that forced coca eradication encouraged coca growers to increase production through the use of toxic agrochemicals “on more or subsequent coca plots, increasing exposure to these chemicals.”

Villafaña and other indigenous leaders have warned that these pressures are cultural violence. Coca is central to Andean communities’ spiritual practice, conflict resolution, work, ceremony, and community health; however, using it outside of the narrow “traditional” exemptions puts people at risk of criminal penalties.

“It would be useful for us as a culture,” said Villafaña, “if the world recognized it as a sacred plant and did not demonize it.” But, he added, the decision would not otherwise affect his community, as its members will continue to chew coca as they have always done.

This the article Originally published by the author the filteran online magazine that deals with drug use, drug policy and human rights from a harm reduction perspective. Keep the filter on Bluesky, X or Facebookand sign up for their newsletter.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

We are full of plans

Published

1 day ago

on

December 5, 2025

By






Marc Salvany and Ad van der Vorst:






“We are full of plans,” Agrolux director Marc Salvany told the more than 40 participants who attended the Six Days track cycling event in Rotterdam last Wednesday, invited by Agrolux. They were given a look behind the scenes (and the route), and a moment was set aside to find out how the new management sees the future of the company. “We want to honor the legacy of the Agrolux brand, a brand that many of you have known for so long.”

© Agrolux Nederland BVMarc Salvany and Ad van der Vorst

Paying homage to the brand
Last Wednesday, while the riders on the Ahoy track were cycling around the unbearably slow or lightning-fast track, a special moment was happening in the middle of the cycling track: the introduction of the revamped Agrolux.

Since the end of September, Agrolux has been independent again, and the group has big ambitions for the beginning of this new era. Although it may seem counterintuitive, they will not focus on selling as many devices as possible. Marc explained that it is much more to strengthen relations with the sector and customers. “Many producers have been working with Agrolux for years. These are the long-term partnerships we believe in and the ones we want to continue, because together we can achieve success.”

CEO Ad van der Vorst added that in recent years the company has not been properly organized to support this long-term market vision. “But we’re excited about the horticulture industry, we see it as having tremendous potential, and we’re excited to tackle it.”

In recent months, the team has grown and is investing heavily in product development and innovation. “New software and more modular and sustainable products,” said Ad. But more about that at Fruit Logistic in Berlin, because it was also possible to see it by bike, of course.

View of the track and the center area© Arlette Sijmonsma | MMJDaily.com

© AgroluxWith Sander Verbeek (SV.CO) and Bram Zwinkels (Gavita International BV). Sebastian Mora (left) and Robbe Ghys (right)

For more information:
Gavita International
(email protected)
www.agrolux.com










Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media