Connect with us

business

Federal Judge Rules Against Firearms Ban for Cannabis Users

Published

on


Following a recent case in Oklahoma, a federal Judge has declared it unconstitutional to ban cannabis users from owning firearms, citing the 2nd amendment right to bear arms. Interestingly, neither one of these states offer residents the right to legal cannabis (medical is available in both states, but recreational is not), yet they’re making it a point to not infringe on the rights of gun owners, whether they smoke weed or not.  

What’s the news? 

Earlier this month, U.S. District Judge Patrick Wyrick declared the gun ownership ban for Oklahoma cannabis users “unconstitutional”, citing our 2nd amendment right to bear arms. This was following the arrest and indictment of Jared Michael Harrison, who received a federal firearms charge after being caught in possession of a cannabis along with a revolver.  

These items were discovered by Lawton Police officers during a routine traffic stop. Harrison informed police that he did not have a state-issued medical card, however, he worked at a dispensary, and was on his way there when he was pulled over.  

Harrison’s lawyers had argued that the “portion of federal firearms law focused on drug users or addicts was not consistent with the nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation”, echoing what the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled last year in a case known as New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen; as well as another case in Florida in which the state’s agriculture commissioner Nikki Fried, filed a lawsuit alongside a number of medical cannabis patients on the grounds that it is unconstitutional to prevent them from owning firearms. 

U.S. District Judge Patrick Wyrick in Oklahoma City agreed with Harrison and his legal team, ruling that “stripping him of his fundamental right to possess a firearm … is not a constitutionally permissible means of disarming Harrison.” He added that, “the mere use of marijuana carries none of the characteristics that the Nation’s history and tradition of firearms regulation supports.” 

The 2nd amendment 

The second amendment is one of the most fundamental yet polarizing of our constitutional rights as Americans. The verbatim text of the second amendment is as follows: “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” 

The bone of contention around this amendment stems from its various modern-day interpretations. What were our founding fathers referring to when they said, “a well-regulated militia”? Some believe that a “well-regulated militia” is a military group that is overseen by the government, but the definition of a militia is actually “any fighting organization of non-professional soldiers, citizens of a country, or subjects of a state.” As a matter of fact, militias are often formed in opposition to the government or ruling force of a nation.  

When looking at all these parts of the whole, “well-regulated militia” with “free state” and “right of the people”, it seems clear that the right to bear arms was established in order to give citizens a fighting chance to protect themselves against a tyrannical and out of control governing body. 

So, back to those modern-day interpretations of the second amendment. Many will argue that it’s no longer relevant, on the grounds that (A) it was written so long ago and during a much different period in our history, or (B) because the weapons we have today are far more technologically advanced and destructive than the weapons available when the constitution was written.  


Thank you for stopping in. Head over to the Cannadelics Weekly Newsletter for direct updates; and get access to awesome deals on cannabis buds, vapes, edibles, smoking devices and equipment, cannabinoid compounds, and some psychedelic products! Go get high responsibly!


The way I see it, neither one of those arguments hold any weight because when you get down to the core of it, the right to bear arms is less about the right to own any particular weapons, and more about the right for law-abiding citizens to protect themselves from immediate danger, whether that danger comes from criminals or corrupt government forces. And if we’re assuming that all the other amendments are still our innate rights, it’s safe to conclude that the right to bear arms will remain one as well.  

Final thoughts

As both, firearm rights and cannabis use continue to be national hot-button topics, we’ll be seeing more stories like this until the latter is federally legalized. What are your thoughts on cannabis users owning guns? We’d love to hear what you think, so drop us a line in the comment section below!

Thanks for making your way over! We appreciate you stopping in at Cannadelics.com; where we work to bring you the best in independent news coverage for the cannabis and psychedelics spaces. Visit us regularly for daily news injections, and sign up to the Cannadelics Weekly Newsletter, so you’re always on top of what’s going on.



Source link

Continue Reading

Aurora

Philip Morris International picks Aurora for ZYN nicotine pouch plant

Published

on

By



Philip Morris International has selected Aurora for a new manufacturing plant to make its popular ZYN nicotine pouches, a product marketed to people wanting to stop smoking or chewing tobacco.

PMI plans to invest $600 million in a new facility on empty land at 48th Avenue and Harvest Road. When it is up and running, the plant will employ 500 workers making an average annual wage of $90,000, according to the company.

“These 500 jobs are good jobs,” said Stacey Kennedy, CEO of PMI’s U.S. operations based in Stamford, Conn., at a news conference held Tuesday morning at the Colorado Freedom Memorial in Aurora.

Read the rest of this story on TheKnow.DenverPost.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

business

Castle Pines sued by landowner for stopping city’s first McDonald’s

Published

on

By



“No clown in our town!” residents chanted as they hoisted homemade protest signs that read, “No McDonald’s double drive-thru fast food dispensary on Castle Pines Parkway.”

It was May 28 in the bedroom community of Castle Pines, where the City Council was weighing whether to allow construction of the town’s first McDonald’s. About 100 people attended and two dozen testified. Most in the crowd and on the council were opposed.

“Garbage fast food that attracts low-income, high-yield traffic from a very busy highway isn’t what I want,” a woman testified. Another warned, “Your average McDonald’s transient customer — which means half are below average — isn’t the element we should be promoting.”

Read the rest of this story on TheKnow.DenverPost.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

business

Kroger-Albertsons merger could lead to sale of 91 stores across Colorado

Published

on

By



Kroger and Albertsons would unload 91 grocery stores in Colorado if the companies prevail over lawsuits and regulators’ opposition to a merger of the two large supermarket chains.

The stores on the list of ones that would be sold to C&S Wholesale Grocers are spread across the state, ranging from Alamosa and Cortez to Fraser and Frisco with several in metro Denver. Two Albertsons stores are on the list of those to be sold. The rest are Safeways. That’s the bulk of the 105 Albertsons and Safeways in the state.

A dairy plant, an entire distribution center and part of another one in Denver would also be part of the deal with C&S Wholesale grocers.

Read the rest of this story on TheKnow.DenverPost.com.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media