Connect with us

business

Federal Judge Rules Against Firearms Ban for Cannabis Users

Published

on


Following a recent case in Oklahoma, a federal Judge has declared it unconstitutional to ban cannabis users from owning firearms, citing the 2nd amendment right to bear arms. Interestingly, neither one of these states offer residents the right to legal cannabis (medical is available in both states, but recreational is not), yet they’re making it a point to not infringe on the rights of gun owners, whether they smoke weed or not.  

What’s the news? 

Earlier this month, U.S. District Judge Patrick Wyrick declared the gun ownership ban for Oklahoma cannabis users “unconstitutional”, citing our 2nd amendment right to bear arms. This was following the arrest and indictment of Jared Michael Harrison, who received a federal firearms charge after being caught in possession of a cannabis along with a revolver.  

These items were discovered by Lawton Police officers during a routine traffic stop. Harrison informed police that he did not have a state-issued medical card, however, he worked at a dispensary, and was on his way there when he was pulled over.  

Harrison’s lawyers had argued that the “portion of federal firearms law focused on drug users or addicts was not consistent with the nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation”, echoing what the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled last year in a case known as New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen; as well as another case in Florida in which the state’s agriculture commissioner Nikki Fried, filed a lawsuit alongside a number of medical cannabis patients on the grounds that it is unconstitutional to prevent them from owning firearms. 

U.S. District Judge Patrick Wyrick in Oklahoma City agreed with Harrison and his legal team, ruling that “stripping him of his fundamental right to possess a firearm … is not a constitutionally permissible means of disarming Harrison.” He added that, “the mere use of marijuana carries none of the characteristics that the Nation’s history and tradition of firearms regulation supports.” 

The 2nd amendment 

The second amendment is one of the most fundamental yet polarizing of our constitutional rights as Americans. The verbatim text of the second amendment is as follows: “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” 

The bone of contention around this amendment stems from its various modern-day interpretations. What were our founding fathers referring to when they said, “a well-regulated militia”? Some believe that a “well-regulated militia” is a military group that is overseen by the government, but the definition of a militia is actually “any fighting organization of non-professional soldiers, citizens of a country, or subjects of a state.” As a matter of fact, militias are often formed in opposition to the government or ruling force of a nation.  

When looking at all these parts of the whole, “well-regulated militia” with “free state” and “right of the people”, it seems clear that the right to bear arms was established in order to give citizens a fighting chance to protect themselves against a tyrannical and out of control governing body. 

So, back to those modern-day interpretations of the second amendment. Many will argue that it’s no longer relevant, on the grounds that (A) it was written so long ago and during a much different period in our history, or (B) because the weapons we have today are far more technologically advanced and destructive than the weapons available when the constitution was written.  


Thank you for stopping in. Head over to the Cannadelics Weekly Newsletter for direct updates; and get access to awesome deals on cannabis buds, vapes, edibles, smoking devices and equipment, cannabinoid compounds, and some psychedelic products! Go get high responsibly!


The way I see it, neither one of those arguments hold any weight because when you get down to the core of it, the right to bear arms is less about the right to own any particular weapons, and more about the right for law-abiding citizens to protect themselves from immediate danger, whether that danger comes from criminals or corrupt government forces. And if we’re assuming that all the other amendments are still our innate rights, it’s safe to conclude that the right to bear arms will remain one as well.  

Final thoughts

As both, firearm rights and cannabis use continue to be national hot-button topics, we’ll be seeing more stories like this until the latter is federally legalized. What are your thoughts on cannabis users owning guns? We’d love to hear what you think, so drop us a line in the comment section below!

Thanks for making your way over! We appreciate you stopping in at Cannadelics.com; where we work to bring you the best in independent news coverage for the cannabis and psychedelics spaces. Visit us regularly for daily news injections, and sign up to the Cannadelics Weekly Newsletter, so you’re always on top of what’s going on.



Source link

Continue Reading

BDS Movement

Moroccan hashish Dealers Boycott Israeli Traffickers

Published

on

By


In a significant move demonstrating solidarity with Gaza and with Islamic terrorism, amid ongoing conflict, Moroccan hashish dealers have decided to boycott Israeli drug smugglers, as reported by Israeli media. This decision has led to substantial financial losses for criminal organizations involved in the trade, with tens of millions of shekels already lost. Morocco, known for its high-quality hashish produced in the Rif Mountains, is the world’s largest hashish producer, with a significant portion of its product previously destined for the Israeli market. The boycott disrupts established smuggling routes and reflects the dealers’ support for Palestinians in Gaza, aligning with the broader Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel.

Moroccan hashish dealers, mostly muslims, are taking a stand in the ongoing war in Gaza by severing ties with Israeli drug smugglers, according to a report from Israeli media. This boycott has led to significant financial repercussions for criminal organizations involved in the hashish trade, with losses amounting to tens of millions of shekels. Moroccan hashish, highly prized for its quality and potency, has been a lucrative commodity in the Israeli market, with prices reaching up to NIS 300,000 ($84,000) per kilogram.

The boycott has disrupted the flow of Moroccan hash into Israel, which was previously facilitated through various channels, including orthodox Jewish students. Moroccan dealers have explicitly stated their solidarity with Gaza as the reason behind their decision, criticizing the disparity between the thriving Israeli hashish market and the conditions faced by Palestinians in Gaza. The move has forced Israeli smugglers to look for alternative sources, marking a significant shift in the regional drug trade dynamics.

The Moroccan hashish boycott is reflective of the Palestinian-led Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, which seeks to isolate and pressure Israel economically and culturally. The decision by Moroccan hashish dealers to halt sales to Israeli counterparts underscores the interconnectedness of political conflict and international trade, highlighting the broader implications of the Gaza war on global markets and communities.

Why It Matters: The boycott by Moroccan hashish dealers against Israeli traffickers is not just a significant economic blow to the drug trade but also a powerful statement of political solidarity with the Islamic terrorist ‘state of Gaza. It underscores the impact of geopolitical conflicts on international commerce and the role of civil society actions in influencing political discourse and outcomes.

Potential Implications: The Moroccan hashish boycott could lead to a reevaluation of drug trade routes and partnerships, potentially affecting the global cannabis market, at least in the middle east.

Source: Business Insider



Source link

Continue Reading

business

Brighton to allow marijuana stores for the first time

Published

on

By



The city of Brighton is about to get a little greener.

This week, the Brighton City Council voted 7-2 to allow recreational marijuana shops for the first time. The council-approved ordinance allows for the establishment of four stores, with two of the licenses reserved for social equity applicants. Applications open March 1.

This will be the first time Brighton, which is located primarily in Adams County, has ever allowed cannabis businesses within city limits, despite the fact that recreational weed has been legal in Colorado for a decade and medical marijuana has been legal since 2000. The city still prohibits cultivation and manufacturing businesses.

Read the rest of this story on DenverPost.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Botanical Products

Cannabis Rescheduling: A Potential Shift Back to the Black Market?

Published

on

By


Summary: A recent poll indicates that about one-third of marijuana consumers would revert to the illicit market if cannabis rescheduling led to its availability only as an FDA-approved prescription drug. This survey, conducted by Nugg MD, highlights concerns among consumers about potential government involvement in marijuana regulation following a hypothetical reclassification.

The Impact of Cannabis Rescheduling on Consumer Choices and the Black Market

The poll’s findings come amid ongoing administrative reviews into cannabis scheduling by federal agencies. While the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has recommended shifting cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), this wouldn’t automatically legalize it as a prescription drug. The FDA’s drug approval process, typically not approving botanicals as prescription medications, is separate from this scheduling.

Industry observers generally expect the federal government to continue allowing state cannabis markets to operate without interference post-rescheduling. However, some advocates and consumers worry that this change could disrupt state-licensed businesses by enabling a pharmaceutical takeover of the marijuana industry. The survey underscores these concerns, revealing that if the only legal option to purchase cannabis was through a pharmacy with a prescription, 32% of respondents would prefer buying from the illicit market, risking criminalization. In contrast, 55% would visit the pharmacy, 6% would cease using cannabis, and 7% would choose other alternatives.

Deb Tharp, head of legal and policy research at NuggMD.com, emphasizes that consumer preferences lean towards traditional botanical products over FDA-approved cannabis. The survey also indicates that a majority of respondents prefer state-run cannabis markets and have moderate to high trust in state controls. Tharp warns that pushing consumers into the unregulated market could have severe safety implications, as black market cannabis is not considered safe.

The survey also explored general consumer preferences, with 77% favoring traditional botanical products and 18% opting for FDA-approved cannabis. Regarding the potential impact of moving marijuana to Schedule III, opinions were divided: 47% felt it wouldn’t affect their access, 28% believed it would make access harder, and 25% thought it would become easier.

Why It Matters: This poll’s results are significant as they reflect the potential consequences of federal rescheduling of cannabis on consumer behavior and market dynamics. The preference for state-regulated markets and traditional botanical products over pharmaceutical alternatives highlights the importance of considering consumer needs and market structures in cannabis policy reform.

Potential Implications: If cannabis is rescheduled and access becomes restricted to pharmacies with prescriptions, a significant portion of consumers might turn to the illicit market. This shift could undermine the safety and regulatory achievements of legal cannabis markets, potentially reigniting issues related to unregulated cannabis products. Policymakers need to balance federal regulations with the preservation of state markets and consumer preferences to avoid unintended consequences.

Source: Marijuana Moment


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter:

We hope you enjoyed this news update. Check back with us daily to see what’s going on in the world of cannabis and psychedelics. And make sure to subscribe to our weekly newsletter, the Cannadelics Sunday Edition with a the best stories of the week.

.

AI Disclaimer: This news update was created using a AI tools. PsychePen is an AI author who is constantly improving. We appreciate your kindness and understanding as PsychePen continues to learn and develop. Please note that the provided information is derived from various sources and should not be considered as legal, financial, or medical advice.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media