Finding out the ageA product that uses “best”, “use” or “sell” dates can be confused, but at least they give consumers an idea. However, consumers often leave with cannabis completely in the dark, although it may change quickly.
Washington and Cannabis regulators, or LCB, are considering updating the cannabis packaging requirements.
The state stipulates that certain information should be reflected in all cannabis products sold in licensed dispensaries, although the date of harvest and processing date is considered additional information.
On September 24, the LCB issued a preliminary statement on investigation into the issue of the harvest and the cannabis packaging date. This action with the LCB begins the process of studying the changes of the rules, allowing the regulators to formally consider and open a public comment period.
The Council accepts this action in response to the petition issued by Olivier, a self -designed citizen from Seattle.
In his petition, Olivier said “Washington consumers of cannabis do not have enough information to determine the quality of the product they buy.”
Read the rest of this article about Inliner, Click here
In an antitrust lawsuit, Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost accuses nine cannabis operators in various states of engaging in anti-competitive behavior designed to reduce product choices and artificially keep prices high, harming both consumers and smaller Ohio cannabis businesses.
The lawsuit stems from an October 2024 tip submitted to Yost’s office by an Ohio cannabis industry official alleging widespread “shelf sharing” by large vertically integrated cannabis companies operating in Ohio and across the country.
According to information later confirmed by the investigation, cannabis operators in various states entered into reciprocal purchasing agreements — coordinated at the national level — to favor each other’s products at Ohio dispensaries while reducing or eliminating purchases from Ohio’s independent growers and processors.
“Our investigation uncovered allegations of an industry-wide scheme designed to drive Ohio’s small businesses out of business,” Yost said. “Ohio’s antitrust laws protect competition and consumers, not backroom deals that rig the system for a select few.”
According to information, senior representatives of major operators operating in different states met in late 2022 and agreed to reduce purchases from independent companies to save shelf space for each other during a period of increased supply and lower prices. The tip also alleged that some companies have established apparent internal quotas, reserving a significant percentage of pharmacy shelves for products obtained through reciprocal agreements with other multi-state operators.
The defendants in the lawsuit are:
Ascend Wellness
Air health
The Cannabist Company
Cresco Laboratories
Kuralist
Green Thumb Industries
Jushi
Trulieve
summer
The lawsuit alleges that each defendant violated Ohio’s Valentine Act:
Conclusion of mutual trade agreements with competitors.
Sharing competitive confidential information.
Engaged in discriminatory distribution practices that disadvantaged independent cannabis operators in Ohio.
According to the complaint, these actions reduced product choice and quality for Ohio consumers, stifled innovation and allowed the defendants to maintain or increase hypercompetitive prices in the state’s cannabis market.
Attorney General Jost is seeking an injunction to stop the alleged wrongful conduct.
New Cannabis Ventures offers readers this easy-to-read exclusive summary of BDSA’s 15-state monthly cannabis sales data.
In January, cannabis sales decreased sequentially by 3.1%. In this review, we break down the results by state, starting with the western markets and then ending with the eastern markets. Overall, the BDSA estimates sales in 15 markets totaled $2.07 billion in January, up 4.6 percent from a year earlier. BDSA updated its Illinois numbers after the state recently changed the way it counts sales.
Western markets
BDSA provides coverage for Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada and Oregon. In December, annual growth was negative in 4 states. Growth in each of these states fell in succession.
Eastern markets
BDSA provides coverage for Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, Ohio and Pennsylvania. Annual growth in December ranged from -3.1% in Missouri to +37.6% in New York. Ohio began using adults in August, spurring growth. Note that Florida and Pennsylvania are medical markets only. On a daily basis, sequential gains declined in eight markets. Annual growth was negative in both markets and sharp in both states. We warned of a potential slowdown in Florida despite strong dispensary and unit volume growth due to competitive pressure.
For readers interested in a deeper look hemp markets in these fifteen states and more, including segmentation by additional product categories, brand and product details, longer history and segmentation by product attributes, learn how BDSA Solutions can give you access to actionable data and analytics.
Based in Houston, Alan leverages his experience as an online community founder 420 Investorthe first and still the largest due diligence platform focused on publicly traded stocks in the cannabis industry. With his extensive network in the cannabis community, Alan continues to find new ways to connect the industry and facilitate its sustainable growth. time New Cannabis Ventureshe is responsible for content development and strategic alliances. Before turning his attention to the cannabis industry in early 2013, Alan, who began his career on Wall Street in 1986, worked as an independent research analyst with more than two decades of research and portfolio management experience. A prolific writer, with over 650 articles published since 2007 Looking for Alphawhere he has 70,000 followers, Alan is a frequent speaker at industry conferences and frequent source Media including the NY Times, Wall Street Journal, Fox Business and Bloomberg TV. Contact Alan. Twitter: |: Facebook |: LinkedIn: |: El
Welcome to 10thousand Oregon’s annual State of the Marijuana publication. A lot of things have changed over the years and I plan to write another review post soon. But for now, let’s talk about everything that happened in 2025 — and that’s a lot.
Sales and market data
According to OLCC datatotal sales from January 1 to November 30 were $848 million. This is a 3.7% drop from the same period in 2024, when total sales were $881 million. Does this mean Oregon cannabis retailers are selling less product? No, not like that. Maybe they are selling more for the price of the discounted models.
Sad retail price trend line continued to decline through 2025. Within this trendline, the extracts/concentrates category hit a low of $15.00 per gram (average) in the extracts/concentrates category in April; it again shows $15.00 per gram for November. Edible marijuana also dropped to an awful $3.33 per gram (average) in April, and has been pretty much nonexistent since then. (Useful marijuana is essentially a flower in the OLCC environment.)
There is no foreseeable end to the price depression: it can only get worse. Croptober 2025 was Oregon’s largest METRC crop with 6,289,890 pounds recorded. This was a significant and unwelcome 8.9% increase in the crop compared to the October 2024 crop, which itself was a record. As I wrote last year:
“I’m sure the illegal market has had a great year as well; the weather is the same for everyone and the enforcement paradigm is static… Consumers may win, but it may not be great for pricing.”
Unfortunately, it came true in 2025 and it will happen again in 2026. As for what people actually buy at all these OLCC stores, I’ve compiled the following table:
2025 year
2024 year
Change +/-
Used marijuana
43.6%
46.2%
-2.6
Concentrate/extract
26%
25%
+1.0
Food / Tincture
14.2%
13.7%
+0.5
Inhalation with supplements without canna
10.7%
9.1%
+1.6
“Other”
4.9%
5.4%
-0.5
Industrial hemp
0% (?)
0.6%
-o.6 (?)
Check it out the fall in the eligible marijuana category. In both 2023 and 2024, I noted a “multi-year trend of declining per capita marijuana sales in favor of other categories.” We’re not just seeing these SKU changes in the data—we’ve had a series of farm customers complaining that retailers are withdrawing flower orders in response to consumer preference for vapes and cartridges.
Bottom line: People are buying more cannabis in Oregon than ever, at lower prices than ever. There is also more hemp than ever in the OLCC market. Looking at this wealth, customers do not burn flowers, as before, but choose packaged products. All of this creates a very challenging business environment, especially for small farms that continue to falter and fail.
Cannabis Licenses and Licensing in Oregon
A years-long moratorium on OLCC licensing in Oregon was ratified by the Legislature in 2024. We still have a one-in, one-out policy whereby outgoing license holders are allowed to surrender (sell) their licenses in favor of new entrants purchasing (buying) replacement licenses. Outside of this buy/sell paradigm, the OLCC is “prohibited from accepting new license applications almost forever due to restrictive formulas based on population-based ratios,” as I explained ago when HB 4121 passed.
In 2025, as predicted, the number of licenses in all areas decreased slightly. This was also the case in 2024 and 2023 due to a long-term moratorium due to business bankruptcy. Here’s a table showing current license numbers compared to this time last year:
2025 year
2024 year
Change +/-
Manufacturers
1,351
1375
-24
Processors
275
288
-13
Wholesalers
243
257
-14
Retailers
769
789
-20
Laboratories
10
13
-3
Studies
1
1
none
The numbers continue to fall on the slow decline we’ve seen for several years, and that’s a good thing. Most would agree that we have too many licenses in all categories except perhaps labs and research. Unfortunately, we lost a couple of labs this year, possibly due to the October 2024 dropout. suppression of THC inflation.
In terms of pricing, we’ve helped people buy and sell producer licenses for anywhere from $60,000 to $85,000 over the course of a year, with prices rising over the past month or two. Most of the deals are relocation and change-of-owner scenarios, and most of the buyers are Chinese. Wholesale licenses and CPU licenses are sold less frequently and at lower prices; retail pricing is a separate animal that depends heavily on store performance. However, we did help sell a couple of $100K retail licenses.
The OLCC highlighted the rapid movement of applications through the system, which is welcome news. Last week, I met with several OLCC officials who outlined their goal of a “zero wait” for change-of-ownership applications, their plans to comply with the new rules requiring polished submissions, and their demands for fast-track applicants.
Oregon’s New Cannabis Rules
Marijuana
The licensing protocol rules mentioned above will go online on January 1, 2026, along with rules that make some technical updates and implement Marijuana Act of 2025. I considered these rules in a recent postand I will not summarize them here.
Earlier this year, rules a ban on the sale of most CBN products also came into effect. i explained:
Beginning July 1, 2025, products containing artificially derived CBN can no longer be sold in Oregon under either the OLCC system or the general (hemp) market unless the manufacturer has determined to be Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) or submitted a New Dietary Ingredient Notification to the FDA and received a “no objection” response.
To my knowledge, no one has acquired GRAS status and submitted a corresponding notification to NDI. This is not unexpected, and it is also very bad.
Hemp
Complex hemp registry rules will take effect on January 1. These rules apply to hemp flower pre-rolls, as well as hemp beverages and tinctures that contain cannabinoids such as THC, CBD, and others. The regulations do not apply to hemp products that: a) are sold in stores licensed by the OLCC, b) do not contain cannabinoids, c) are intended for local use only, d) are industrial or commercial feed products, or e) simply pass through the state.
A slew of labeling requirements and “claims” for hemp products sold in Oregon will also go into effect next year. It remains to be seen whether any of these new rules will interact with the recent federal ban on intoxicating hemp products, although I don’t expect much friction. If the federal ban remains, we will likely have fewer out-of-state registrations and fewer products coming in, other than what is allocated to the CBD space.
For what it’s worth, the OLCC and other agencies made public earlier this year report details that most hemp products in Oregon are hot. It wasn’t a great look, but yes was not a surprise.
Oregon Cannabis Litigation
Oregon hemp cases go to court in 2025. Our office has handled a number of business and investor disputes, and there have also been some public skirmishes. Here is my short list:
A friend of the firm, Andrew DeWeese, filed a notable statement challenging the dormant commerce clause to the federal ban on the interstate sale of marijuana. We root for him.
Ballot 119 was defeated in the District Court of Oregon. The measure required most Oregon hemp businesses to enter into labor settlement agreements with approved unions in order to be reinstated or licensed. The unfortunate case is currently pending before the 9th US Circuit Court of Appealsthousand Scheme.
Oregon Court of Appeals ruled against retail applicants unwilling to pay taxes as a condition precedent to license renewal. No appeal was filed.
Cannabis continued to grow rapidly, with Tumalo Industries being the biggest. Market remained soft, buyers again Chasha insiders.
Federal developments
I should add a little bit about President Trump Disposition of December 18, which regulates the transportation of marijuana. We have illuminated him from all sides already, but Oregon cannabis businesses should be happy.
Depending on the path Pam Bondi chooses and the resistance, marijuana could end up on Schedule III in 2026. If that’s the case, many of our customers will get better margins right away. These businesses may also experience less competition from out-of-state hemp operators due to the federal ban mentioned earlier.
Odds and ends
The hemp industry continued to limp along. Finally we saw increase in cultivated areas, despite the declining number of farmers. Licensed “providers” continued to accumulate in the ODA program toward the 2024 enrollment requirement.
We continue to fight to fix and end the cannabis industry transactions structured by brokers. At least one prominent cannabis broker in Oregon has no license, and several others continue to run riot. Of course there are also competent brokers – our advice is never to use legal agreements offered by brokers.
The OLCC appeared to be less strict and returning to compliance training, especially for smaller operators (including laboratories). I would like to think we had something to do this approach and I hope it sticks, but who knows anyway.
The Hemp Alliance of Oregon (CIAO) played a leading role in the 2025 legislative negotiations. CIAO has successfully lobbied for producer transfer rights, expanded trading patterns and more realistic timelines for the CBN compliance regulations mentioned above.
Initiative Petition 39, which aims to legalize cannabis cafes, was filed in February, but withdrawn last month, due to logistical problems.
Emerge Law Group, the Measure 91 law firm and Oregon’s first boutique cannabis law firm, has announced its retirement after a stellar 10-year run. His remaining attorneys to join Denver-based Vicente LLP.