Connect with us

Cannabis News

Washington May Raise the Minimum Age for High THC Cannabis Purchases

Published

on


Washington House Bill 2320

Washington State has often led the way in progressive cannabis policies. However, the introduction of House Bill 2320 by the Washington State legislature could mark a pivotal shift in this trajectory.

This bipartisan bill proposes to raise the minimum age to 25 years for purchasing and consuming products containing 35% or more THC, based on concerns over the potency of modern cannabis concentrates and their effects on young consumers. This legislation has sparked a heated debate among policymakers, health experts, cannabis industry stakeholders, and the general public. At the heart of this debate is the balance between public health safety and individual freedoms, the integrity of scientific research informing these policies, and the future of the cannabis industry in the state.

This post aims to dissect the implications of House Bill 2320, questioning the rationale behind its specific age restriction and potency limits, and arguing why this legislative approach may not only be misguided but potentially detrimental to the very goals it seeks to achieve.

House Bill 2320 and age limits for products of 35% THC or more

If signed into law, the bipartisan House Bill 2320 would prohibit the sale of any cannabis product that contains 35 percent or more to anyone under the age of 25.

This bill was introduced by Democratic Rep. Lauren Davis:

“Today, there’s no legal limit on the potency of the psychoactive element, THC, in cannabis concentrates,” Davis explained in a press release on her website. “Cannabis vape oils, dabs and shatter are regularly sold with a THC potency of nearly 100 percent, a tenfold increase in potency from when cannabis was legalized in 2012. These concentrated products are different. And dangerous.”

“The cannabis industry has changed considerably since cannabis was legalized,” Dent said. “This legislation is needed to address the ever changing market and put some measures in place to protect cannabis users and our youth.”

Dent and Davis primarily reference the November 2020 report from the Washington State Prevention Research Subcommittee in their research. This report, conducted jointly by Washington State University and the University of Washington, often conflates correlation with causation.

The underlying premise for this study was that there has been an increase in both cannabis potency and in the availability of high potency concentrates. Contrary to these claims, the potency of cannabis has not significantly increased. Rather, many growers have learned to manipulate the testing so their product shows high THC, which can get higher prices. One testing facility claimed a concentrate consisted of 103% THC!

Why I don’t like House Bill 2320

1. Scientific Evidence and Misinterpretation

The justification for House Bill 2320 heavily relies on a report that, critics argue, conflates correlation with causation regarding cannabis use and its effects. A more nuanced examination of scientific literature reveals that the relationship between cannabis potency and adverse health outcomes is complex and not as straightforward as the bill suggests. Moreover, the claim that cannabis potency has drastically increased ignores the variability and sophistication of cannabis cultivation methods that have been in practice for decades. Legislators should base regulations on a comprehensive review of scientific evidence rather than isolated reports that may not capture the full spectrum of research.

2. Inconsistencies with Age Restrictions for Other Substances and Responsibilities

The bill’s proposal to limit access to high-THC cannabis products to those 25 and older stands in stark contrast to regulations for other substances and adult responsibilities. At 18, individuals are deemed responsible enough to vote, enlist in the military, and make lifelong decisions about education and debt. This discrepancy raises fundamental questions about how society defines adulthood and the rights and responsibilities it entails. If young adults are trusted to make significant decisions in other aspects of their lives, restricting their access to cannabis based on an arbitrary age limit undermines this trust and contradicts existing legal precedents.

3. Impact on the Cannabis Industry and Consumer Behavior

By imposing strict limits on THC content for consumers under 25, House Bill 2320 risks stifling innovation and growth in the cannabis industry. Such restrictions may also drive consumers towards the black market in search of higher potency products, undermining the safety and regulatory gains achieved through legalization. The focus should instead be on promoting safe consumption practices, education, and quality control across all legal cannabis products, rather than imposing age-based restrictions that could have unintended economic and public health consequences.

4. A One-Size-Fits-All Approach to Drug Policy

The bill exemplifies a one-size-fits-all approach to drug policy that fails to consider individual differences in usage patterns, tolerance, and medical needs. Cannabis, like many substances, affects individuals differently, and policy should reflect a nuanced understanding of its use. Regulations must be flexible enough to accommodate the therapeutic use of high-THC products for young adults under 25 who may benefit from them, under proper medical guidance.

Vote No on Washington State House Bill 2320

As the debate around House Bill 2320 continues, it is crucial for lawmakers, stakeholders, and the public to critically assess the foundations and implications of this proposed legislation.

The discussion surrounding cannabis potency and age restrictions touches on broader themes of autonomy, public health, scientific integrity, and the role of government in regulating personal choices. While the protection of young consumers is a laudable goal, the approach taken by House Bill 2320 may not be the most effective or equitable way to achieve it.

Instead, we should strive for policies that are informed by comprehensive scientific research, respect individual freedoms, and promote the safe and responsible use of cannabis. Emphasizing education, harm reduction, and quality control can achieve the bill’s public health objectives without imposing arbitrary age restrictions that contradict existing legal standards for adulthood. As we navigate the complexities of cannabis regulation, let us ensure that our policies reflect a balanced consideration of evidence, ethics, and the diverse needs of our community.



Source link

Cannabis News

California Awards $12 Million In Local Cannabis Equity Grants To Repair Drug War Harms

Published

on

By


California’s path to cannabis social equity: from arrests to advocacy

Data from the California Department of Justice reveals that nearly half a million individuals were arrested on cannabis charges in the state between 2006 and 2015. Even after Governor Schwarzenegger authorized a statewide decriminalization program in 2010, thousands continued to face serious misdemeanor charges related to cannabis. Despite California’s pioneering legalization of cannabis through Proposition 215 in 1996, just two years after the 1994 Crime Bill, the state legislature’s approach to cannabis legal reform was not as progressive as one might expect. The impact of the War on Drugs during this period was profound, with marijuana possession arrest rates increasing by 124% in 2010, even as rates for other serious crimes decreased significantly.

Proposition 64, passed a few years later, lacked any discussion addressing the damage caused by past policies. However, with social equity becoming a prominent topic in the cannabis industry, California officials have started investing significantly in social equity policies. Initiatives like the California Cannabis Equity Act of 2018 and the Budget Act of 2019 reflected this shift, aiming to support the economic development of communities and individuals adversely affected by previous harsh cannabis policies in what is now a multi-billion dollar industry.

Investing in justice: California’s cannabis social equity journey

In November 2023, California officials finally announced the application process for aspiring social equity business owners via the Cannabis Equity Grants Program for Local Jurisdictions which itself is an extension of Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development. As the substantial costs of running a fully legal cannabis business in California can often get obscenely expensive, these large grants are meant to fund and lessen the financial burden of these exorbitant costs.

The overall purpose of this multi-million dollar initiative is “to advance economic justice for populations and communities impacted by cannabis prohibition and the War on Drugs by providing support to local jurisdictions as they promote equity in California and eliminate barriers to enter the newly regulated cannabis industry for equity program applicants and licensees,” according to the website. In February of 2023, the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development distributed approximately $15 million in social equity-focused funding to 16 different cities and counties throughout the Golden State.

Breaking barriers: California’s social equity initiatives in cannabis

At the end of last month, California officials finally awarded those patiently awaited funds. Funded by a $12 million portion of the billions in tax revenue raised by California cannabis sales, the grants will go to a total of 10 different cities and counties. While most awarded counties reside in Northern California, the city of Coachella also received $350,000 in funding. In particular, Oakland received $3 million and the city and county of San Francisco received over $2 million. “California’s cannabis industry is not just about business; it’s about righting past wrongs. Through initiatives like the Cannabis Equity Grants Program, the state is investing in communities once harmed by harsh drug policies, creating opportunities and economic justice for those affected,” said California Cannabis Attorney Karen Albence.

From prohibition to inclusion: California’s cannabis equity evolution

The possibilities with this funding are nearly endless. Funds will go towards local programs offering technical support, regulatory compliance and assistance. One notable grantee includes San Jose’s Cannabis Equity Business Academy. Social equity advocates have even more progress to celebrate, as the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development and Governor Gavin Newsom’s new budget proposal would invest $15 million further in similar programs by October of 2024.

Although it has taken a while for these programs to be created and even longer to be implemented, we are hopeful for this new era. This $12 million in local, social equity grants is a drop in the bucket, considering the damage that was done. But a drop is better than an empty bucket. With substantial investments and ongoing support, California is starting to pave the way for a more equitable and inclusive cannabis industry– one where all individuals, regardless of background, have the chance to participate and succeed. As the state continues to allocate resources and expand such programs, the future holds promise for further progress in achieving social equity within the California cannabis landscape.



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

Patient Zero for Untreatable Depression Begins Groundbreaking Psychedelics Therapy

Published

on

By


psychedelics for depression

In a phase 2b clinical trial, Beckley Psytech has started treating the first subject for BPL-003, an intranasal synthetic formulation of the psychedelic chemical 5-MeO-DMT intended for patients with treatment-resistant depression.

 

With FDA clearance for investigational new medication status in February, this groundbreaking research represents the biggest controlled examination into the potential of 5-MeO-DMT, involving 40 locations throughout Australia, Europe, and the US.

 

The trial, employing a randomized, quadruple-masked design, seeks to identify optimal dosages of BPL-003, complemented by psychological support, in 225 individuals grappling with moderate to severe treatment-resistant depression, compared to a placebo group.

 

Efficacy will be gauged using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale at various intervals throughout the trial, with all participants receiving psychological support before, during, and after dosing. An open-label extension is slated for select sites eight weeks post-initial dosing to evaluate sustained effects following a second dose.

 

Anticipated findings from this phase 2b endeavor, projected by late 2024, will augment insights gleaned from the ongoing phase 2a exploration of BPL-003, as highlighted by the company.

 

Cosmo Feilding Mellen, CEO of Beckley Psytech, expressed confidence in the compound, citing promising safety and pharmacokinetic data. He emphasized its capacity to induce brief yet profound subjective experiences correlating with therapeutic benefits, underscoring the company’s eagerness to advance BPL-003 through the clinical development pipeline.

 

Unprecedented Research Scope

 

An important turning point in the field of psychedelic research, especially in the area of mental health therapy, was reached with the start of Beckley Psytech’s phase 2b clinical experiment. The large-scale nature of this experiment highlights an important development in our knowledge of the therapeutic potential of psychedelic substances, with a particular emphasis on 5-MeO-DMT for patients suffering from depression that does not respond to conventional therapy. This experiment, which spans 40 sites throughout Australia, Europe, and the US, is the biggest controlled investigation into the possible effectiveness of 5-MeO-DMT, in contrast to earlier research. This wide outreach guarantees a varied pool of participants and improves the trial’s outcomes dependability and generalizability.

 

A rising awareness among scientists of the need for novel strategies to tackle the widespread problems associated with treatment-resistant depression is reflected in the decision to launch such an extensive research project. Researchers want to increase the number of therapy choices available for those who have not reacted well to traditional medications by investigating the therapeutic benefits of 5-MeO-DMT in a rigorous clinical environment. The trial’s multi-site design also makes it easier for clinicians and researchers in various areas to collaborate, which promotes a group effort to further our understanding of psychedelic-assisted treatment.

 

The size of this phase 2b experiment not only emphasizes the significance of its findings, but also demonstrates Beckley Psytech’s dedication to pushing the limits of psychedelic research. Through strategic alliances and diligent preparation, the firm has proved its commitment to performing high-quality clinical studies that meet rigorous scientific criteria while investigating novel treatment approaches. This innovative method not only aids the area of mental health treatment, but also helps to de-stigmatize psychedelics by demonstrating their ability to treat significant psychiatric illnesses safely and responsibly.

 

The experiment is expected to yield valuable insights that might influence future research, clinical recommendations, and regulatory choices related to the use of psychedelic substances in mental health therapy. This is because the trial is expected to proceed and data will accrue. Psychedelic-assisted therapy is being promoted as a possible therapeutic option for the intricate problems associated with treatment-resistant depression, thanks to the combined efforts of researchers, physicians, and study participants.

 

Trial Design and Objectives

 

BPL-003’s phase 2b clinical trial has been carefully designed to assess the drug’s potential as a therapy for people with depression who are not responding to conventional treatments. The experiment uses a quadruple-masked, randomized design to reduce biases and guarantee the validity and dependability of the results. This methodological rigor bolsters the foundation for well-informed decision-making on developing BPL-003 and increases the legitimacy of the study’s findings.

 

Central to the trial’s objectives is the identification of optimal dosages of BPL-003 that can effectively alleviate symptoms of moderate to severe treatment-resistant depression. By employing a range of doses and comparing them against a placebo group, researchers seek to discern the therapeutic window within which BPL-003 demonstrates the greatest efficacy while minimizing adverse effects. This dose-finding aspect of the trial is crucial for informing subsequent clinical studies and eventual therapeutic use.

 

The experiment incorporates psychological support as an additional therapeutic component in addition to dose optimization. All patients get thorough psychological care before, during, and following medication since it is acknowledged that depression is a complex condition with psychosocial components that may influence treatment outcomes. To promote complete healing and recovery, this holistic approach emphasizes the need to address not only the biology but also the psychological and emotional elements of depression.

 

Furthermore, the trial’s design includes strong metrics for measuring effectiveness, particularly using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale at several points throughout the research. This validated method enables researchers to systematically assess changes in depression symptoms and track the therapeutic benefits of BPL-003 over time. The trial uses standardized evaluation techniques to improve the consistency and comparability of outcomes across multiple research sites, increasing the reliability and generalizability of the findings.

 

Evaluation Methods and Milestones

 

A wide range of evaluation techniques and milestones are included in the phase 2b clinical study to assess BPL-003’s effectiveness in treating depression that is resistant to therapy. The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, a reliable instrument for gauging depression symptoms and treatment response, is a key component of this evaluation. Researchers can systematically monitor changes in participants’ depressed symptoms and evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of BPL-003 in comparison to placebo by giving this scale to participants at different intervals during the experiment.

 

The study underlines the need to provide psychological support to all participants before, during, and after dosing. This integrated approach stresses the need to meet the holistic needs of patients receiving therapy while also recognizing the complex interplay between biological, psychological, and social factors in depression. The study’s purpose is to improve treatment outcomes and participants’ overall well-being by offering comprehensive psychological support, such as counseling and therapeutic sessions, during the experiment.

 

Furthermore, the trial includes an open-label extension phase at select sites, scheduled eight weeks post-initial dosing, to evaluate the sustained effects of BPL-003 following a second dose. This extension phase allows researchers to assess the durability of treatment response and investigate the potential for long-term therapeutic benefits. By extending the observation period beyond the initial dosing phase, the trial aims to provide insights into the maintenance of treatment effects over time and inform recommendations for the optimal dosing regimen of BPL-003 in clinical practice.

 

Bottom Line

 

Beckley Psytech’s phase 2b clinical trial of BPL-003 for treatment-resistant depression marks a significant milestone in psychedelic research. With its expansive scope, rigorous trial design, and emphasis on comprehensive evaluation methods, the study holds promise for advancing our understanding of psychedelic-assisted therapy. As the trial progresses and data accumulates, it is poised to provide valuable insights that could influence future treatment approaches and regulatory decisions in the field of mental health.

 

MUSHROOMS TO END DEPRESSION, READ ON…

MUSHROOMS FOR DEPRESSION

UK STUDY SAYS MUSHROOMS ARE BEST DRUG TO FIGHT DEPRESSION!



Source link

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

A Deep Dive into the Benefits of Medical Marijuana for Mental Health

Published

on

By


marijuana for mental health benefits

New Study Dives Deep Into The Benefits Of Medical Marijuana For Patients’ Mental Health

Cannabis Is A Healing Tool In More Ways Than One

 

As of today, 38 states plus the District of Columbia and three territories have legalized marijuana for medical purposes.

 

There’s a reason why the movement to legalize weed for therapeutic use only continues to grow: that’s because it simply works. Depending on the state, the most common conditions that cannabis has accepted medical uses for includes seizures, nausea, chronic pain, glaucoma, cancer, multiple sclerosis, muscle spasms, and others to name a few. But even without a medical marijuana card, thousands of people are already enjoying the powerful therapeutic properties that cannabis has for a number of ailments.

 

That said, using cannabis for a physical ailment also has other positive effects – particularly on patients’ mental health.

 

There is a strong link, after all, between chronic illnesses and poor mental health. The diagnosis of a physical disease will directly impact and challenge your emotions or state of mind, which is why it’s so common to suffer from severe depression, anxiety, and bouts of anger or sadness. It’s only natural: it seems like you’re going into a downward spiral of emotions, having to figure out treatment, prognosis, and how to live the rest of your life.

 

But medicating with cannabis may not only help your physical ailment; it can greatly help you regain sanity, too.

 

According to a recent study out of Cambridge in the United Kingdom conducted by researchers from Switzerland’s University of Basel, patients with chronic health problems most especially chronic pain experience significant improvements in their mental health after medical marijuana has been legalized. The researchers assessed feedback from 7.9 million participants of an online survey conducted from 1993 through 2018.

The participants were grouped into various categories based on their cannabis consumption, including individuals who were “highly likely to abstain from using marijuana, to use marijuana as a recreational drug, or to use it for medical reasons” to identify the impact of medical marijuana legalization on mental health. The investigators also considered the use of marijuana for chronic pain. They measured the participants’ mental health by polling participants to grade their state based on the number of days they experienced mental health issues.

The findings, which were published in Health Economics, Policy, and Law, revealed: “Eased access to marijuana through medical marijuana laws reduce the reported number of days with poor mental health for individuals who consume marijuana for medical purposes and for those individuals who likely suffer from frequent pain.”

 

They also found that medical marijuana legalization didn’t impact the youth and recreational consumers. “Overall, our results show that medical cannabis legalization in the USA benefits the people it is intended for without harming other groups,” according to Professor Alois Stutzer. He also summarized that there a clear association between mental wellness and liberalization.

 

The findings of a similar study was released in 2023; it was conducted by researchers at the University of Sydney. They polled over 2,300 patients who were prescribed cannabis in the form of CBD and THC in a carrier oil from November 2020 through December 2021. The participants’ ages ranged from 18 to 97, and almost 2/3 of them were female.

The participants were asked to measure their quality of life relating to their overall health, pain, sleep, depression and anxiety before they began therapy with marijuana. They were polled again after 2 weeks of therapy, a routine that continued monthly for 3 months.

“Within the first three months of medicinal cannabis therapy, participants reported improvements in their health-related quality of life, fatigue, and health conditions associated with anxiety, depression, and pain,” explained Margaret-Ann Tait, a senior research officer to SWNS.

 

Additionally, the researchers reported that the patients experienced significant benefits when it came to their fatigue, pain, and quality of life.

 

The struggles with mental health are even more intense for cancer patients. However, medical marijuana use has been shown to help reduce depression, anxiety, and fatigue in patients diagnosed with cancer. A single-center, case-matched study conducted on 74 patients who were recently diagnosed with head and neck cancers found that cannabis users, compared to non users, reported less pain, better well-being, less fatigue, depression, and anxiety.

Head and neck cancers, in particular, can significantly impact one’s mental health given that it affects one’s swallowing mechanisms, facial structures, and speech. “These very much impact people’s social interactions and sense of self-worth,” said Dr. Zhang.

 

Conclusion

Medical marijuana has numerous therapeutic applications for patients suffering from a wide array of disease. Its anti-inflammatory, anti-emetic, anxiolytic, and anti-epileptic effects have been studied, and found to be extremely beneficial for those who are healing from disease. Cannabis makes life more bearable while helping to treat pain at its source, which is a major help for patients who simply want to make it, day by day.

 

At this day and age, we unfortunately still don’t have the standardized formulations of THC or CBD to help with conditions. However, doctors who are knowledgeable with medical marijuana can help. If you or a loved one are struggling with chronic disease and want to explore using marijuana as adjunct treatment, reach out to a medical professional who can help. There is hope on the other end of the line when cannabis is involved!

 

CANNABIS MENTAL HEALTH TIPS, READ ON…

CANNABIS HARM REDUCTION STRATEGIES

CANNABIS MENTAL HEALTH TIPS – HARM REDUCTION STRATEGIES!



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media