Connect with us

Cannabis News

Hemp Isn’t A Loophole—It’s A Legal Industry, And It’s Under Attack (Op-Ed)

Published

on

“What this will do is put consumers at risk, steal tax revenue from municipalities and states, and ultimately hurt farmers across the nation.”

By Adam Stettner, FundCanna

Congress did something terribly shorthanded. They crammed a massive policy change into a budget deal and mistakenly called it “public safety.”

If the changes stand, it will wipe out a more than $28 billion market, kill about 300,000 jobs, and eliminate one of the best national paths we have today to safe and sensible cannabis reform and regulation. A prime example is when the government burned down a house to kill the spider.

This is not politics. The 2018 Farm Bill is an example of evil politics being used to kill an industry without having the courage to reverse it and fight back.

The Straw Man: “Unregulated hemp is dangerous, so we need a blanket ban.”

Proponents of the change argued that hemp-derived intoxicants such as Delta-8 THC are a public health threat. That it is sold to children. They are untested. That they escaped a loophole in the 2018 Farm Bill.

Although there is some element of truth in their arguments, this is not indicative of the whole truth.

In short, that narrative is written to support blanket prohibition. Every industry has bad actors, companies and people who game the system. Instead of destroying an entire industry to get rid of bad actors, you analyze the problem, determine the underlying problem, and use logic and law to create, regulate, and enforce structure.

That is not what Congress has done.

Leading this charge is Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY), who appears to be trying to clean up what he sees as a legislative mess he authored. In 2018, he supported the Farm Bill that legalized hemp. Today, he says this law inadvertently unleashed an unregulated flood of what he calls “gas station cannabis” and that the only solution is to shut down the entire industry.

The correct solution? A framework that includes maximum potency, laboratory testing, package size, distribution guidelines, age conditions, and a structure to enforce the above. All of this would address concerns about “gas station hemp” and the risk to children.

In short, I’m all for regulation. This is not a regulation. It is eradication.

Reality: This is a legal, licensed, thriving and job-creating industry

The 2018 Farm Bill legalized hemp. That law was written, passed and signed by Congress and President Donald Trump, who has since endorsed the benefits of CBD and cannabinoids and asserted that cannabis policy should be left up to the states.

Since then, an entire market has grown up around hemp-derived cannabinoids. Manufacturers, retailers and financial partners have invested hundreds of millions in business compliance, taxation and job creation.

Cannabis entrepreneurs have built legitimate and highly regulated businesses that now employ hundreds of thousands of Americans. Their success does not depend on speculation, but on sustainable business models, sound financial management and sustainable access to capital;

The new provisions ban products containing more than 0.4 mg of THC per container. If passed, that would wipe out 95 percent of the hemp-derived market, according to industry estimates. And it would do so without holding a single hearing or public comment period, driving an industry underground to beg for regulation.

What this will do is put consumers at risk, steal tax revenue from municipalities and states, and ultimately hurt farmers nationwide. It will drive cultivation, production and manufacturing into the black market as it has done in the case of prohibition or unexpected legal structures.

One only has to look at the state’s legal cannabis market, which still operates under federal prohibition, to see a legal market that has grown to $35 billion but has simultaneously fueled an illegal market north of $100 billion.

The ban doesn’t work. Half-baked structures and scattered laws without a clear framework, understanding of basic economic principles and lack of regulation/enforcement do not work.

“This is just the beginning”? Let’s not invent ghosts

Some in the broader cannabis industry fear this is the horse behind future attacks on legal THC. This paranoia is understandable, but wrong.

This is not part of a coordinated federal crackdown. It’s a last-minute misguided attempt to solve a real consumer safety issue using the wrong tool. The maturity of the cannabis industry will be determined by its ability to distinguish between good policy and bad process. It is the latter.

Every part of the plant, regardless of label, requires logic, science-backed education, data, debate, and sensible, thoughtful regulation.

Do you want security? Regulate, not abolish

Intoxicating products must be tested, sales must be restricted to adults, packaging and potency must be clearly labeled. This is called regulation.

We regulate alcohol, tobacco and caffeine. We regulate thousands of other industries. What we don’t do is ban entire industries through the fine print in budget bills.

If Congress wants to fix the Farm Bill’s flaws, hold hearings. Invite scientists. Ask the Food and Drug Administration for guidance. Bring industry leaders to the table. What we don’t need is a hidden policy reversal tucked into a spending bill without public debate.

Over the decades, prohibition brought us figures like Al Capone and El Chapo, and created drug trafficking from all corners of the world. It involves crime, money laundering, loss of life, and it’s all pointless. What will the ban create in this case? Just imagine.

Although scientifically less dangerous than cannabis, the regulated alcohol and tobacco industries today employ millions, generate billions in sales and, above all, provide consumers with standardized and safer products through proper oversight. Yet we continue to vilify and ban rather than regulate.

The financial consequences are real

Ban hemp, and you haven’t gotten rid of “gas station” hemp.

You kill an entire industry, even the good parts. You eliminate hundreds of thousands of jobs. You eliminate tax revenue at the federal and state and municipal levels. You immediately take $30 billion out of the economy and push that money into illegal channels. You’re directly putting the product you’ve outlawed into the hands of children and those you claim to protect. Eliminating jobs and the possibility of regulation, oversight, safer products and age-status in the process.

Banning the industry does not protect consumers, it penalizes law-abiding and responsible business owners who are open to regulation and oversight.

The cannabis industry doesn’t want a free pass, but it deserves fair and responsible regulation. That starts with policy making that is deliberate, transparent and informed by the people doing the work on the ground.

Congress, your actions have created a much bigger problem than the problem you were trying to solve. If you want to keep our children safe and support our farmers and industries, do it the right way by regulating with logic. There is a way to have it all, this isn’t it.

Adam Stettner, CEO of FundCanna, has overseen more than $20 billion in loans in underserved markets.

Max Jackson’s photo.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Cannabis News

‘We didn’t cherry pick our submissions”

Published

on

By

Hollandse Hoogtes received seven awards at the 2026 Highlife Cup, five of them in first place, using batches it was already sending to cafes in Holland, rather than material saved for the competition. The works were presented together with coffeeshop Club69 and John&co.

© Hollandse Hoogtes

The difference between LP and equity income
The Highlife Cup is run in lots selected by cafes from months of sales, which leaves room for an entrant to submit their strongest lot. Rick Bakker, CEO of Hollandse Hoogtes, didn’t have much to choose from. “We built our facility to have a harvest every week, so the cycle goes on and on,” says Rick. The company’s production is allocated as quickly as it comes off the line, so what went into the mug was the final version, the same flower that a customer would buy that week. Wins include Crumbled Lime’s first sativa, Zizi’s first indica, Rainbow Zizi’s house favorite, Fruit Punch’s hash and Karma Stardawg third place at WPFF, along with two edible awards.

This is the first year that licensed producers can enter the cup, in their categories, after being excluded the previous year. The jury conducts terpene tests on the entries, and scores put the regulated category above the illegal cafe entries in three of the five flower categories, with both illegal entries scoring higher than the regulated entries. Basic growers had months to select their best material to send, while Hollandse Hoogtes produced a standard weekly production.

Rick spends time in the cafeteria telling the employees where the company is going. “Being number one is a standard, not a trophy,” he says. “What I’m proud of is our people, from farming to hand cutting to logistics, they keep that motivation to be the best and produce week after week.”

© Hollandse Hoogtes

Cafes sold cannabis for decades without lab testing or stable genetics. “Everything we produce has to be tested, and we can consistently deliver consistent quality,” says Rick. “We have mother plants, all the plants come from those selected mother plants. That was unthinkable in the illegal market.” Cultivating all harvests with selected mothers allows the company to put regular production into a glass without worrying about which batch it is.

Genetics and inheritance
Hollandse Hoogtes works with two genetic houses, Karma Genetics and Amsterdam Genetics, both of which have long histories in the Dutch scene, and all of Karma’s breed and selection top positions come from this relationship. “We are very pleased that Karma has supported the start of Hollandse Hoogtes and continues to consult and support us.”

At the start of the experiment, growers got a short window to import cuttings of the developed genetics, which Rick describes as a day or two, when the rules briefly allowed, after which the path was closed. “The selection process now works from seed,” says Rick. When the company sees a gap in the market it selects seeds and conducts a full pheno-hunt of approximately 2,000 plants to judge how ten to fifty expressions of a single genetic grow together with others and the capabilities of the facility. Some basic genetics never worked well indoors, so selection continues.

© Hollandse Hoogtes

Dutch experimental cannabis market
Edibles come out of a kitchen run by a chef, Nicolas Vanderslyen, who spent ten to fifteen years in Michelin-starred kitchens before fully delving into cooking with cannabis compounds. Hollandse Hoogtes combines the flavor of rosin with the flavor of chocolate or gummy, combines its tiramisu praline with Super Silver Sweets rosin for the look of the cake, and the chocolate comes from a luxury chocolate house. Tiramisu Pralines took the first place and Cherry Cola Gummies came third. “We see it as an important category that helps people who don’t want to smoke but want to get the experience,” says Rick.

Hollandse Hoogtes prices in the premium segment. “If you look for the same quality products from coffee shops, you pay 25 to 35 euros per gram for a good type of Gelato, like our Rainbow Bacio (Karma’s favorite for roasting) and we sell that for 12 to 15 euros,” says Rick. In the middle of the market is an average of eight to eleven euros per gram of flower, and at the bottom are greenhouse crops that have not done well indoors, and stock that a grower needs to move, where Rick has seen similar offers for five grams of strain for €22.50.

Demand already exceeds what the company can grow. “Winning awards doesn’t help because the demand will grow,” laughs Rick. The facility opened with ten flowering cells and sixteen are under construction, an increase of close to fifty percent, with flowers from the new cells expected to be on the market in the second quarter of next year. Current cells run on Fluence VYPR LEDs, and in expansion the company plans to test HPS and under-lighting with its own nutrient recipes. In canopy size Rick ranks alongside Hollandse Hoogtes Village Farms after counting the new build, behind CanAdelaar (Cronos), which remains the largest among experimental growers in greenhouse production, while Hollandse Hoogtes is grown entirely indoors, a setup best suited to the Dutch climate.

For more information:
Dutch heights
(email protected)
www.hollandsehoogtes.nl

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

DEA Picks Participants For Marijuana Rescheduling Hearing This Month, And Only Opponents Are Invited

Published

on

By

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has selected participants Hear about the Trump administration’s cannabis reorganization process this will begin this month—and only those opposed to the reform have been invited to participate.

On Thursday, the DEA began notifying parties who expressed their intention to participate that they had been invited to participate, and sending rejection letters to those who were not invited.

The invited participants are:

  • Drug and Alcohol Screening Association (NDASA)
  • Tennessee Bureau of Investigation
  • Smart Approaches to Marijuana (SAM)
  • The states of Nebraska, Idaho, Indiana and Louisiana
  • Voice of the Victims
  • Kenneth Finn, MD
  • Phillip A. Drum, PharmD

All organizations, individuals and officials have come out against marijuana reform, and some have filed lawsuits specifically trying to block cannabis reform.

Supporters of the reform who have expressed their intention to participate have not been invited.

According to several rejection letters seen by Marijuana Moment from cannabis reform advocates, the DEA said they do not meet the definition of “interested person” to participate because they “would not be harmed or harmed by any rule or proposed rule that may be issued.”

In a letter to the Drug Policy Alliance (DPA), DEA Administrator Terrance Cole wrote that the agency has “concluded that you have not demonstrated that you are harmed or harmed by the promulgation of a proposed rule to transfer marijuana, 21 CFR 1308.11(d)(23) 21 CFR 1308.11(d)(23), marijuana as defined in abstracts, 21 CFR. 1308.11(d)(58), and naturally derived delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinols from Schedules I through III of the CSA as proposed in the “Notice of Proposed Rulemaking” (NPRM).

“In fact, you state that the DPA supports the removal of marijuana from Schedule I and ‘does not object’ to the transfer of marijuana to Schedule III. Furthermore, the DPA states that any harm it would suffer from the NPRM would be to schedule marijuana in Schedule III. Because the DPA has not sufficiently demonstrated that the proposed rule itself is harmed or harmed, the DEA concludes that the DPA is not an “interested person.”

“Accordingly, the DEA is denying your request to participate in the hearing,” Cole told DPA.

Cat Packer, DPA’s director of drug markets and law enforcement, told Marihuana Moment after receiving the opt-out notice that “the rescheduling would leave the federal criminalization of marijuana largely intact and falls far short of what the public has asked for.”

“More than 70 percent of this public comments submitted on the proposed rule supported decriminalizationHowever, many patients, consumers, families, small businesses and individuals who have suffered the consequences of the ban — including arrests, incarcerations, family separations, housing barriers, immigration consequences and lost economic opportunities — have been excluded from meaningful participation in these proceedings, he said. dialogue, helping to shape the policies that affect their lives, families and communities.”

Michael Bronstein, president of the American Trade Association for Cannabis and Hemp (ATACH), said his group is “very disappointed” that not a single supporter of cannabis rescheduling was elected.

“The upcoming redistricting hearings will strictly include prohibitionist parties who oppose President Trump’s stance on redistricting. Now it’s up to the Drug Enforcement Administration to defend its rule,” he said.

SAM president Kevin Sabet, meanwhile, said his prohibitionist group “appreciates the opportunity to make our case” at the hearing.

“Rescheduling marijuana would be the biggest drug policy mistake in a generation,” he argued in a statement. “SAM looks forward to presenting the science, data, and public health stakes that show why reprogramming should be rejected.”

The hearingwhich will be overseen by a DEA administrative law judge, will begin on June 29 and conclude no later than July 15.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche in April He issued an order that immediately reclassified the state’s licensed medical cannabisas well as marijuana products approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under Schedule I through Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).

According to a separate order signed by the acting Attorney General, in the upcoming hearing, marijuana III.

In order to be considered for participation in the hearing, the parties had to submit requests, indicating their interest in the procedure, the claims or issues they want to hear and their position on these issues.

“The purpose of the hearing is to ‘receive factual evidence and expert opinion’ on whether marijuana should be transferred to Schedule III of the controlled substance list,” Blanche’s initial statement in April said.

The attorney general will also select an administrative law judge (ALJ) to oversee the proceeding.

“The ALJ’s authority includes the power to hold conferences to simplify or determine the issues at the hearing or to consider other matters that may assist in the expeditious resolution of the hearing; to require the parties to state their position in writing; to sign and issue subpoenas; to compel the production of documents and materials to the extent necessary to conduct the hearing; to examine witnesses; to direct, exclude, or testify; the Rule on Procedural Matters and the President’s DEA Hearing Procedures and Administrative Procedure Actions allowed under the law, Blanch wrote.

Preliminary hearing process on the marijuana redistricting process initiated by the Biden administration It was halted last year amid allegations of improper communications and witness selection.

the current The marijuana redistricting process is being challenged in several ways which have been upheld by a federal Court of Appeals. those pieces of State attorneys general have filed lawsuits against cannabis reform, Opponents of marijuana legalization and a a cannabis-based biopharmaceutical corporation.

Meanwhile, the reorganization of state-licensed medical cannabis is already having a major impact.

The Congressional Research Service published a report on the current rescheduling of cannabis Certified patients with medical marijuana from state licensed dispensaries are now eligible for Class III. “The order appears to allow end users to use marijuana medically without a CSA prescription,” he says.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has published a Draft update to a gun purchase form to recognize the legal status of medical marijuana in the reprogramming. The revised section of the question states that only the “recreational use or possession of marijuana” is federally prohibited, omitting the prior form’s mention of medical cannabis.

The US Treasury and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) said they plan to issued new tax guidelines for the marijuana industry after reprogramming. The reform will benefit state-licensed marijuana businesses by allowing them to take federal tax deductions that are currently prohibited under IRS Code Section III, known as Section 280E.

Even the DEA, which has long opposed cannabis legalization and accused the Biden administration of stalling the initiative in the reorganization process, has done so. It launched a registration process for legal marijuana businesses in the state to take advantage of the federal benefits that come with the reform.

The Department of Transport, on the other hand, issued guidelines stating this use Legal medical cannabis in the state is still no excuse for truck drivers to test positive for drugspilots and other safety-sensitive personnel.

A congressional committee recently Federal officials voted to block further steps to reschedule cannabis.

Read DEA Reorganization Denial the letter To the Drug Policy Alliance below:

Marijuana Moment is made possible with the help of readers. If you rely on our pro-cannabis journalism to stay informed, consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Continue Reading

Cannabis News

More flexibility to manage light, condensation and UV with extended Solarweave range

Published

on

By

For over 50 years, Solarweave has been a woven covering solution for greenhouse and polytunnel applications. First introduced in the 1970s, it was developed as a sustainable alternative to plastic films and is recognized for its long life, strength and consistent performance.

Designed and manufactured in Australia, Solarweave is designed to withstand demanding growing environments, including high temperatures and high winds. Today, it is used worldwide in many protected cropping systems.

Building on this heritage, GALE Pacific has expanded the Solarweave range with the new D40 and D60 variants, giving growers greater flexibility to manage light, condensation and UV exposure while maintaining the durability that Solarweave is known for.

© GALE Pacific

Light performance optimized for modern grow systems
The extended Solarweave range allows growers to select the right balance of light properties and anti-drip performance for different crops, climates and structures.

Solarweave D40 and D60 gradually increase fog, light diffusion and UV protection. This allows more light to penetrate through the crop canopy and helps reduce plant stress and disease risk in greenhouse environments.

Long life for stronger life value
Unlike plastic films that often need to be replaced every few seasons, Solarweave is used for 15 years or more in greenhouse and polytunnel applications.

This extended service life reduces replacement frequency, labor requirements and downtime during the life of the structure. When evaluated over time, many growers believe Solarweave provides a greater return on investment by avoiding the recurring costs and downtime associated with film replacement and disposal.

Built for real-world production
Solarweave is repairable, allowing localized damage to be repaired on site rather than replacing the entire coating. This is a practical advantage for continuous commercial growing operations.

With decades of proven performance, Australian manufacturing expertise and a wide range of options, Solarweave continues to evolve while remaining a reliable solution for long-lasting greenhouse covers.

For more information:
GALE Pacific
Email: (email protected)
galepacific.com/

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 The Art of MaryJane Media